New F&A Waiver Strategy. Current F&A Challenges Large amounts of foregone F&A restrict institutional capabilities Institutional risk exists due to inconsistent.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Types of Cost Sharing Mandatory: When the sponsor stipulates that cost sharing or matching funds are required as a condition of receiving an award. Specifically.
Advertisements

JULY12, 2011 SESSION 7 OF AAPLS – BUDGETING FOR PROPOSALS WITH SUBCONTRACTS: ESTABLISHING RELATIONSHIPS APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES.
Subrecipient Monitoring OFFICE OF RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION 2010.
ORS Quarterly Grants Managers Meeting August 21, 2014.
Prepared by the Office of Grants and Contracts1 COST SHARING.
Indirect Cost & Waiver Update Senior Contract & Grant Officers Chris Rigney and Lauren Ryan.
The Revised Infrastructure Policy Effective 9/01/05 and Sponsored Projects Office of Research Administration Jesse Charlton May 13, 2009.
Presented by: OSP January MRAM 2012 Policy publication: January 16, 2012.
External Funding Fiscal Issues CEHD CPI January 2014.
ADVANCE SPENDING REQUESTS – DEVELOPING REVISED PROGRAM Lynelle A. Gehrke, Associate Director Office of Contract & Grant Administration Campus Cost Transfer.
Effort Reporting and PARs What You Need to Know Before You Sign Your PAR January 24, 2013 Maja Marjanovic Director, Sponsored Programs.
AU SCHOLARSHIP INCENTIVE POLICY Faculty Research Committee Presented by Bruce Smith, Chair.
Grant Financial Management Post Award Sponsored Projects Training Program1.
Supporting Research in Colleges of Education: Some Preliminary Data Ralph E. Reynolds
UHH Research Functions, Challenges and Organization.
Financial Policies Training: Effort Reporting on Sponsored Projects (2.1.21) Effective Date: July 1, 2009.
Page 1 CRAD F&A Waiver Process Change November 15, 2007.
The University of Texas at Arlington Office of Research and Office of Accounting and Business Services Brown Bag Training Session Three: The 1,2,3’s of.
Overview of the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the Major Research Instrumentation (MRI) Program Office of Integrative Activities National Science.
Facilities & Administrative Costs and Sponsored Programs at Chico State March 27, 2012.
1 COST SHARING CReATE ver. 04/13 © 2013 Florida State University. All rights reserved Objective: To understand the requirements related to cost sharing.
Washington University Washington University School of Medicine Research Administrator’s Forum February 2002.
Research Administrator’s Forum School of Medicine November 2006 Presented by: Sponsored Projects Accounting.
Financial Management How Can I Spend Award Dollars.
EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY OFFICE OF GRANTS AND CONTRACTS Effort Reporting System Departmental Coordinator Training Updated 01/11/2012.
CSBS Fourth Friday Faculty Workshop 1: Grant Management CSBS: Frances Solano ORSP: Stefanie Friesen TUC: Stacey Lord / Maryann Camarillo 1/23/
Role of the Sponsored Programs Office Michelle D. Christy March 23, 2010.
MANAGING SPONSORED PROJECTS FINANCIAL COMPLIANCE May 1, 2008 Office of Grants &Contracts Accounting.
1 Sponsored Programs AdditionalReviewSteps. 2 Sponsored Program Section Content How to Identify a Sponsored Program Types of Costs Review Budget to Actual.
CONTRACTS & GRANTS PROCESS AT A RESEARCH UNIVERSITY FSU ALUMNI CENTER MAY 7, 2015 Post Award Processes Angie Rowe Associate Director – Sponsored Research.
WORKING WITH SPO AND IAO Lynne HollyerNoam Pines Associate Director Research Administrator Industry Alliances OfficeSponsored Projects Office
Time with Office of Sponsored Programs April 4, 2011 Topic: Cost Share.
Washington University Washington University Hilltop Campus Research Administrator’s Forum March 2002 Presented by The Research Office and Sponsored Projects.
Open Campus Meetings January 14-16, 2015 RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION SYSTEM (RAS) Internal Approval Process & Budget Development.
ORIENTATION Grants Development Office. ″The Grants Development Office assists faculty, staff, and external collaborators, when relevant, with conceptualizing,
Cost Sharing for Sponsored Programs College of Agriculture, Food, and Natural Resources March 19, 2010.
Cost Sharing James Trotter Quality Standards Manager Sponsored Projects Administration.
Quality Research Administration Meeting May, 2012.
DGA Community Meeting February 14, DGA Community Meeting: Agenda February 14, 2012 Agenda ItemDiscussion Leader Welcome and IntroductionsMoira.
COST SHARE Neta Fernandez Director, Grants and Contracts.
Cost Sharing The Double Edge Sword 1 Dennis J. Paffrath – University of Maryland, Baltimore Executive Director, Sponsored Programs Administration
Submitting Subaward Proposals ORA Third Tuesday January 15, 2007.
Carilion Clinic, Office of Sponsored Projects Frequently Asked Questions Pre-Award Procedures For Principal Investigators.
Daily Management of Awards Jennifer Crockett Jennifer Crockett, Director, Sponsored Projects Finance, Columbia University Tamara Hill Tamara Hill, Manager,
Cost Sharing. Objectives Review roles and responsibilities Facilitate pro-active, continuous monitoring of cost share commitments Review Cost Share Summary.
Limited Submissions NCURA Region III Spring Meeting.
1 February 23, 2015 Teresa A. Costantinidis Budget and Resource Management UCSF Facilities & Administration Presentation.
Research Activity Administered in support of San Diego State University Fiscal Year
Quarterly SPAAS Meeting Sponsored Programs Administration & Accounting Services.
Indirect Cost Calculations: Beyond the Basics Jim Carter Huron Consulting Tuesday March 12, :45 – 3:30 PM 1.
Cost Analysis Guidance for Information Requested from Financial Officer.
Washington University Hilltop Campus Research Administrators Forum August 23, 2002.
SUBMITTING PROPOSALS AFTER LEGAL CLOSE If you plan to collaborate with VUMC investigators, you will need to include a VUMC proposal for an outgoing billing.
Reinventing the Award Review and Set-Up Process NCURA Annual Meeting November 2012 Marcia Smith, Associate Vice Chancellor, Research Administration, UCLA.
How to Discuss Indirect Costs with Upper Administration Anne Feuerborn – MAXIMUS Steve Cofield – OHSU Leading Excellence in Research Costing Practices.
Center for Excellence in Applied Computational Science and Engineering
Grant and Contract Accounting Brown Bag January 24, 2017
New Faculty Research Services Office of Research (OOR)
Collaborative Research Initiative for Sponsored Programs
Office of Sponsored Programs
Proposal Routing Overview
UCR PRO Reviewer Placemat
Sponsored Programs at Penn
PROCESSING SPONSORED PROPOSALS AT THE JOHN F
Calculation of Research F&A Rate
Sponsored Programs at Penn
Faculty Grant Writing FLC (Faculty Learning Community)
SPONSORED PROGRAM SERVICES OVERVIEW
Information Session October 13, 2016
Office of Sponsored Programs
Presentation transcript:

New F&A Waiver Strategy

Current F&A Challenges Large amounts of foregone F&A restrict institutional capabilities Institutional risk exists due to inconsistent treatment F&A Waiver process needs to be streamlined $1.87M waived in first four months of FY08 –76 requests ~50% for projects under $50K direct costs/yr –Spread across all fund sources

Peer Positions F&A Waivers not granted to for-profits (UC all campuses, Stanford, Michigan, Washington, MIT, Michigan State, Purdue) F&A Waivers not granted to foreign entities (UC all campuses, Stanford, Penn State, MIT, Michigan State, Purdue)

Minnesota F&A Rates are Competitive U of Washington56.0% UC San Diego54.5% UC San Francisco54.0% UC Los Angeles54.0% UC Berkeley53.5% U of Illinois53.0% (UIC at 57%) U of Michigan52.0% U of Minnesota51.0% Ohio State50.0% Wisconsin48.5% North Carolina46.0% (FY08 under negotiation)

SPA PI Transfers Non-profits with published policy Special governmental programs Projects which move from off-campus to on-campus. Proposed New Strategy F&A Waiver Requests Administrative Waivers Strategic Waivers Regular Waivers Deans Small Project Waiver (<$50K direct cost/yr) Other Reductions above minimums VPR Waivers or reductions below minimums Tracked

Proposed F&A Rate Minimums (awards over $50K direct costs/year) Federal ……………………………… Federally negotiated rate* Foreign government ………………... Federally negotiated rate* For-profit …………………………… 34% State of Minnesota ………………….. 0% (for now) Non-profit/foundations ……...…….. Published policy or 10% TDC** Corporate affiliate programs ……….. 10% TDC Industry-funded clinical trials …… 26% TDC * or as approved by SPA ** Use published policy if it exists, otherwise, 10% TDC

Waivers No Longer Available for: Projects that did not receive institutional endorsement prior to submission to Sponsor F&A waivers or reductions of rates negotiated by PIs with Sponsors If reduced F&A is needed in these instances, the Unit must set up a cost-sharing account to pay the difference between the Sponsor- approved rate and the federally negotiated rate or approved minimum for this type of project.

Potential Reasons to Approve Waivers Seed grants which may attract larger awards Hardship for new PI Awards which include equipment or building funds Community relations or library projects Student services projects (or increase funding to pay for students) Capped awards Department committed to undertake the research regardless of external funding (e.g., any dollar gained is better than nothing) Small cost Junior faculty or incoming faculty member Enhance cultural/artistic activities (small projects only) Only available source of funds in an area Strategic partnerships

Potential Reasons to Disapprove Waivers Precedent setting Grounds on which the waiver might be justified to other faculty whose projects carry full overhead Consistency with similar sponsors or programs Large total cost to the University Any IP rights granted to the sponsor Past history of PI requesting waivers Profit-making entities Foreign entities

F&A Waiver Process Improvements 1.Eliminate formal waiver process for projects less than $50K/year – dean’s signature on PRF will signify approval 2.SPA has created a list of agencies with pre-approved rates (based on policy); proof of agency policy is no longer required to accompany PRFs when submitting to these entities 3.SPA has new “Foregone F&A calculator” to help Deans and SPA better understand and track foregone amountsForegone F&A calculator 4.Waiver requests must be submitted in advance (4 business days for regular waivers, 7 business days for strategic waivers)  Can’t make the deadline? Submit with full F&A!

Approval Timelines Regular Waivers Day 1: Info to Dean(s) Day 2: PI notified by Dean of approval/disapproval Day 3: PI/Dept adjusts proposal if needed & submit to SPA Day 4: SPA proposal review Strategic Waivers Day 1: Info to Dean(s) Day 2-4: Dean(s), VPR, Chair, PI, SPA confer Day 5: PI notified of approval/disapproval Day 6: PI/Dept adjusts proposal if needed & submit to SPA Day 7: SPA proposal review Timeline Still under Consideration!

Proposal for New Waiver Strategy Rollout Proposed for April 1, 2008 Streamlined waiver approval process implemented Dean’s approval for small waivers implemented SPA endorsement for administrative waivers implemented No waivers granted for proposals submitted without endorsement Reductions for for-profits and foreign governments beyond pre- set minimum level requires VPR approval Other F&A minimums considered “targets” PIs informed that they may not negotiate F&A rates Proposed for January 1, 2009 F&A minimum levels for all categories implemented

Questions?