What is a Z Score?. The State’s Waiver from NCLB All schools will achieve 85% proficiency for all students in all subjects (as measured on a statewide.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding How the Ranking is Calculated 2011 TOP TO BOTTOM RANKING.
Advertisements

Top-to-Bottom (TTB) Ranking
Top-to-Bottom Ranking & Priority/Focus/Reward Designations Understanding the.
A quick review of z-scores and how to understand them August 26, 2011
Rules and Legislation Regarding A-F Report Cards June 2013 Jennifer Stegman, Program Manager CTB.
Presented to the State Board of Education August 22, 2012 Jonathan Wiens, PhD Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.
1 The Ewing Public Schools Overview of NCLB Results presented by Dr. Danita Ishibashi Assistant Superintendent.
Alexander Schwarz Office of Psychometrics, Accountability, Research and Evaluation Michigan Department of Education.
Maryland School Assessment (MSA) 2012 Science Results Carolyn M. Wood, Ph.D. Assistant Superintendent, Accountability, Assessment, and Data Systems August.
A-F School Grading Presentation October 2, History of A to F School Grading System Preliminary grades based on data from SY08-09 through SY10-11.
Introduction to GREAT for ELs Office of Student Assessment Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction (608)
September 25, :30 a.m.- 3:30 p.m.. “If you do what you’ve always done, you’ll get what you’ve always gotten.” -Tony Robbins.
Introduction to Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Psychometrics, Accountability, Research, & Evaluation Summer.
Venessa A. Keesler, Ph.D. Bureau of Assessment and Accountability Michigan Department of Education Presentation to MASFPS Fall Directors’ Institute October.
Top-to-Bottom Ranking & Priority/Focus/Reward Designations Understanding the.
Understanding How the Ranking is Calculated
UNDERSTANDING HOW THE RANKING IS CALCULATED Top-to-Bottom (TTB) Ranking
Top-to-Bottom Ranking & Priority/Focus/Reward Designations Understanding the.
Michigan’s Accountability Scorecards A Brief Introduction.
Information on Focus Schools Released/Retained Fall 2015.
MARSHALL PUBLIC SCHOOLS STATE ACCOUNTABILITY RESULTS Multiple Measurement Rating (MMR) – Initial Designation.
Department of Research and Evaluation Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST API and AYP Elementary Presentation Version: Elementary.
1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.
ASSESSMENT & ACCOUNTABILITY Updates to Student Testing and School Accountability for the school year.
Understanding How the Ranking is Calculated 2011 TOP TO BOTTOM RANKING.
A Closer Look at Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability Paul Bielawski Conference.
School Performance Framework Sponsored by The Colorado Department of Education Summer 2010 Version 1.3.
Introduction to GREAT for ELs Office of Student Assessment Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction (608)
Department of Research and Planning November 14, 2011.
MI-SAAS: Michigan School Accreditation and Accountability System Overview of Key Features School Year.
1 Michigan School Accreditation and Accountability System pending legislative approval Venessa A. Keesler, Ph.D. March 16, 2011.
Mark DeCandia Kentucky NAEP State Coordinator
2011 Top to Bottom and Persistently Lowest Achieving Schools List Overview Briefing: MDE August 23, 2011.
Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST Enter School Name Version: Intermediate.
The Nation’s Report Card: Geography National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)
Public School Accountability System. Background One year ago One year ago –100 percent proficiency required in –AMOs set to increase 7-12 points.
Accountability SY Divisions of Assessment, Accountability and School Improvement.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
1 Getting Up to Speed on Value-Added - An Accountability Perspective Presentation by the Ohio Department of Education.
Understanding Your Top from Your Bottom: A Guide to Michigan’s Accountability System September 2013 Mitch Fowler
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
Accountability Scorecards Top to Bottom Ranking February 2016.
703 KAR 5:225 Next-Generation Learners Accountability System Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Support & Research KDE:OAA:DSR:cw,ko.
Top to Bottom and Persistently Lowest Achieving Schools Lists Federally Approved Requirements for Identifying Persistently Lowest Achieving Schools August.
Public School Accountability System. Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall performance Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall.
Minnesota’s Proposed Accountability System “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
MDE Accountability Update MSTC Conference, February 2016.
MCAS Progress and Performance Index Report 2013 Cohasset Public Schools.
Academic Year – Dawson Springs Independent.
Policy Matters: News from the Capitol Back to School | September 24, 2013 Brad Wever | Director of Public Policy The Governor John Engler Center for Charter.
Assessment and Accountability Update Longbranch Elementary School September 27,
1. 2 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Survey of academic achievement for the nation and the states Assesses various subjects at grades.
Assessment & Accountability Session 3: Content and School Scores.
1 Testing Various Models in Support of Improving API Scores.
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) Accountability
February 2012 State Board Ruling: School Grade Calculations
Teacher SLTs
Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools
Why Measure Performance with Scale Scores
What is API? The Academic Performance Index (API) is the cornerstone of California's Public Schools Accountability Act of 1999 (PSAA). It is required.
Growth Models Oklahoma
A Parents’ Guide to the FL Standards Assessment
Prepared for Quincy Schools – November 2013
Prepared for DD Key Contacts – September 2013
Teacher SLTs
ESSA for AFESC Schools 2018 Under the reauthorization of ESEA, the federal government required each state to design an accountability system that met.
Focus Schools and Special Education Centers
Presented by Joseph P. Stern
Understanding How the Ranking is Calculated
Michigan School Accountability Scorecards
Presentation transcript:

What is a Z Score?

The State’s Waiver from NCLB All schools will achieve 85% proficiency for all students in all subjects (as measured on a statewide assessment) by Reward Schools ◦Highest Performing ◦Beating the Odds ◦Exceeding 85% ◦Highest Progress Focus Schools ◦The ten percent of schools with the largest gaps in student results (as identified by statewide assessments) between high and low-achieving students within a school. (Approximately 356 schools) Priority Schools ◦Schools in the bottom five percent on the state’s Top-to- Bottom list. These schools are placed under the jurisdiction of the School Reform Office and are required to rapidly turnaround, transform, restart or close. (Approximately 150 schools)

Ranking Schools Understanding the Use of Z-Scores in the Top to Bottom Ranking Selected Slides from Michigan Department of Education Materials provided by MDE

Thoughts on Ranking Schools To rank schools: – Have to compare them on a similar metric Example: MEAP Scale Score for 3 rd grade: 315 MME Scale Score for 11 th grade: 1100 How do you compare a school of 3 rd graders to a school of 11 th graders?

Example: Can’t add up all scale scores and divide by number of students, because the scores have different meanings Need to put all assessment scores on the same metric so that you can combine: ◦Across grades ◦Across test types ◦Across subjects

The answer: Z-scores! We can use z-scores to: ◦Level the playing field across grade levels and subjects ◦Talk about a student’s score in terms of distance from the statewide average for all similar students ◦Talk about a school value (such as average achievement or improvement) in terms of that school’s distance from the statewide average for all similar schools

Z-Score “Cheat Sheet” Z-scores are centered around zero Positive numbers mean the student or school is above the state average Negative numbers mean the student or school is below the state average State Average Better than state average….…Worse than state average

Z-Score Examples Your school has a z-score of 1.5. You are better than the state average State Average Better than state average….…Worse than state average Z-score of 1.5

Z-Score Examples Your school has a z-score of.2. You are better than the state average, but not by a lot State Average Better than state average….…Worse than state average Z-score of 1.5 Z-score of 0.2

Z-Score Examples Your school has a z-score of You are very far below state average State Average Better than state average….…Worse than state average Z-score of 1.5 Z-score of 0.2Z-score of -2.0

How do we use Z-Scores in the TTB? Understanding Z-Scores

Two main ways 1) To compare student test scores to other student test scores, and to combine all those test scores into school-level values 2) To compare school-level values (like school achievement, improvement, and gaps) to other schools

How do we get Standardized Scale Scores for Each Student? Step #1: Take each student’s score on the test they took and compare that score to the statewide average for students who took that same test in the same grade and year This creates a student-level z-score for each student in each content area – Compare MEAP to MEAP MEAP-Access to MEAP-Access MME to MME MI-Access – Participation to Participation – Supported Independence to Supported Independence – Functional Independence to Functional Independence

What do we do with those standardized scores? Step #2: Once each student has a z-score for each content area (based on the test they took), we take all of the students in a each school, and rank order the students within the school. – Z-scores will have come from different tests, and compare students to statewide average for that grade, test, and subject – But they can now be combined for the school Step #3: Add up all z-scores and take the average. This is now the average standardized student scale score. Step #4: Define the top and bottom 30% subgroups, based on that rank ordering.

StudentTest TakenZ-score TommyMi-Access, Participation 2.5 SallyMEAP2.0 MauraMI-Access, SI1.9 FredMEAP1.5 IchabodMEAP-Access1.0 FreudMEAP0.8 MaybelleMI-Access, FI0.7 DestinyMEAP0.5 HaroldMEAP-0.2 BickfordMI-Access, FI-0.5 TalledagaMEAP-Access-0.7 FrancineMEAP-1.2 JoeyMEAP-1.9 WilliamMEAP-2.2

StudentTest TakenZ-score TommyMi-Access, Participation 2.5 SallyMEAP2.0 MauraMI-Access, SI1.9 FredMEAP1.5 IchabodMEAP-Access1.0 FreudMEAP0.8 MaybelleMI-Access, FI0.7 DestinyMEAP0.5 HaroldMEAP-0.2 BickfordMI-Access, FI-0.5 TalledagaMEAP-Access-0.7 FrancineMEAP-1.2 JoeyMEAP-1.9 WilliamMEAP-2.2 Average Z-score (average standardized student scale score): 0.28 (sum all z-scores, divide by 15)

StudentTest TakenZ-score TommyMi-Access, Participation2.5 SallyMEAP2.0 MauraMI-Access, SI1.9 FredMEAP1.5 IchabodMEAP-Access1.0 FreudMEAP0.8 MaybelleMI-Access, FI0.7 DestinyMEAP0.5 HaroldMEAP-0.2 BickfordMI-Access, FI-0.5 TalledagaMEAP-Access-0.7 FrancineMEAP-1.2 JoeyMEAP-1.9 WilliamMEAP-2.2 Top 30% Bottom 30%

How do we compare school z- scores? We calculate school-level values for the following components in every subject: – Achievement – Improvement – Achievement gap Then we calculate overall values for each subject that combine those three components The school z-scores compare each school’s value to the average value for other similar schools

How is the TTB ranking calculated? Each subject area test is 20% If a building awards a diploma, the graduation rate is 10% and each of the five content areas are weighted at 18%. If a building doesn’t have a content area, the weight of the other content areas are modified equally to reach 100%. End of MDE Material

Z Scores and TTB Ranking: 2014 How does it look in a real Focus school?

Pleasantview Middle School Year Publicized Overall School Index TTB Percentile Rank Focus Year

Mathematics E/MS Math Yr Ave % Proficient: Achievement: Z: Improvement (PLC): Z: Index: Z: Achievement Gap: Z:

Reading E/MS Reading Yr Ave % Proficient: Achievement: Z: Improvement (PLC): Z: Index: Z: Achievement Gap: Z:

Science E/MS Science Yr Ave % Proficient: Achievement: Z: Improvement: Z: Index: Z: Achievement Gap: Z:

Social Studies E/MS Social Studies Yr Ave % Proficient: Achievement: Z: Improvement: Z: Index: Z: Achievement Gap: Z:

Writing E/MS Writing Yr Ave % Proficient: Achievement: Z: Improvement: Z: Index: Z: Achievement Gap: Z:

Trend Data TTB Rankings

Pleasantview Middle School School Z Score Analysis: ContentYearAchievementImprovementGap Mathematics Reading Science Social Studies Writing

Table Talk How would you explain your school’s TTB ranking to building administrators? Teachers? How might you assist your school in explaining these data to parents? School board? What further assistance or questions do you have around the Z score and the Top to Bottom Ranking?