Www.derby.ac.uk Supporting students, supporting staff.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Departmental/Divisional Administrator Briefing
Advertisements

External Examiners’ Conference Context Professor Mary Watkins.
UWE Bristol External Examiners day 29 th January 2014 Jenny Dye, UG Modular Scheme Leader, HLS Judith Ritchie, Director of PG Studies, FET.
Extenuating Circumstances 2013/14 Definition of ECs ‘Extenuating Circumstances are circumstances, normally exceptional and outside the control of the.
Specialist leaders of education Briefing session for potential applicants 2013.
Conservation District Supervisor Accreditation Module 6: Responsibilities and Duties of A Supervisor.
BSc (Honours) Computing and Information Systems Part-time Course Code: 2172 Don McFall – Course Director Room 16J08.
UoB monitoring expected contact and reporting to the UKBA PBS monitoring stakeholder group meeting 16 th March 2010.
Introduction to PhD Code of Practice Jo FerrieInterim Director Graduate Training September 2013.
Mitigation and Extenuating Circumstances
Brunel University Briefing for External Examiners February 2013
Freedom of Information Act 2000 Tony Mitcheson. 2 Freedom of Information Act 2000 The Act gives a general right of access to all types of recorded information.
BSc (Honours) Computing Systems Part-time Course Code: 6921 Don McFall – Course Director Room 16J08.
SQA School Co-ordinator Conference June 2014 Results Services.
The External Examiner at Anglia Ruskin Anglia Ruskin’s Organisational Structure 5 faculties 29 departments 50+ programmes numerous pathways and modules.
UEL Guidelines for External Examiners Philip Brimson Quality Manager (Validation & Review)
Annual Monitoring and Review & Mutual Review Quality Assurance Services.
Personal tutoring to support full and part time campus based students from September 2012 Sue Smith, Centre for Learning and Teaching Leeds Metropolitan.
STUDYLINK OVERVIEW FOR EDUCATION PROVIDERS Find the best way to finance your future August 2013.
Data Protection Recruitment Process
Meeting the Needs of the Customer: to ISO 9001 Standards Michael Donohoe, Operations and Systems Manager (CYQ)
Ofsted framework 2012 Feedback from inspections carried out under the new framework and implications for clerks and governing bodies Clerks briefings April.
Practical Placements & the QAA and ASET Guidelines By Ian Sunley & Lorna Uden Faculty of Computing, Engineering & Technology, Staffordshire University,
National Award for SEN Coordination Leadership and Management: Special and Inclusive Education September, 2012.
Our Academic and Quality Frameworks Phil Brimson Quality Manager (Validation and Review)
Centre of the University: Integrating services for students at Kingston Karen Belsham Umbrella Conference 2011.
PRIMARY SCIENCE Education Consultancy Primary Science Quality Mark Funded by the Wellcome Trust.
1 GRADUATE SCHOOL A Guide to the Academic Regulations What you need to know! Michael Frain, Graduate School Level Two, Foundation Building 15 November.
UEL Guidelines for External Examiners Philip Brimson Quality Manager (Validation & Review)
Marking the work of students with spld Chris Colcomb Learning Coordinator Student Development and Advisory Service.
Rhona Sharpe, Head of OCSLD Liz Turner, Head of APQO 11 th April 2013 CHAIRING VALIDATION PANELS.
Information for External Examiners involved in Academic Collaborative Provision - 12 Nov 2014.
External examiner induction Alison Coates QA Manager (Validation & Review)
The Role of Teaching Assistants. Session outline The Workshop includes four elements: (1)Roles and Responsibilities of Staff (2)Establishing a Professional.
Overview of Thesis Submission and Examination Helen Buckley, Research Student Administrator, Graduate Studies Office (GSO).
HCT ATTENDANCE POLICY - LP210 6 th March ACADEMIC AND STUDENT REGULATIONS THIRD: STUDENT CONDUCT AND DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES 1- Standards of Conduct.
Overview of Thesis Submission and Examination Helen Buckley, Research Student Administrator, Graduate Studies Office (GSO).
Governance and Commissioning Natalie White DCSF Consultant
HaSS PG Support Staff Annual Briefing Session WELCOME 29 th April 2009.
International Partnerships Conference 21 November 2013 CREATE THE DIFFERENCE1 Dr Noel Morrison Academic Registrar and Director of the Student Experience.
OPERATION OF ASSESSMENT BOARDS Academic year 2012/2013.
Access Grading Briefing Assessment requirements. Why these requirements? To ensure that: grades, credits and Access to HE Diplomas are awarded on an equivalent.
UNIT 5: NON EXAMINED ASSESSMENT PRESENTATION JANUARY 2016 This presentation has been amended following the publication of the revised JCQ regulations for.
Working in Partnership – What we expect of you 1) Working in partnership – We want to work with you in providing a rewarding learning experience. Our approach.
UCL Student Disability Services Venitia Stoby Student Disability Services Manager - Senior Disability Advisor.
Embedding Careers provision at Bournemouth University Jacqui Gush Head of Graduate Employment Service.
A Guide to the Academic Regulations
External Examining Induction Event for new Examiners February 2017
Expectations of Our External Examiners
Returning Year 2 Undergraduates
Coursework & Exam Guidance
Teaching Centre Open Mon – Fri 09:00 – 17:00 Staffed by:
UEL Guidelines for External Examiners
Accounting: Graded Unit 2 F8KF 35
External Examiners day
O-Week for Academics Policies, Procedures, Practice
Winchester School of Art
Late hand-in of assignments
Postgraduate Research Student Supervision
Managed Learning and Assessment Environments A strategic approach for the provision of Transnational Education Dr Ray Stoneham Professor Mayur Patel Faculty.
External Examiners Conference
Important information about your assessment in 2017/18
Compliance with the Freedom of Information Act 2000
Academic Advising Assessment Session
External Examiners Briefing Session Friday 14th December 2018
UWE Bristol External Examiners day 27th January 2016
The to Grand Central Mitigation
UEL Guidelines for External Examiners at The University of East London
Brunel University Briefing for External Examiners March 2014
What happens if I don’t pass first time
Presentation transcript:

Supporting students, supporting staff

Our context: On campus: c12,000 students full team restructure for ‘Enquiry Services’: re-named as Information, Advice & Guidance team, with change in role from Administrator to Advisor combining 2 teams (Information, Advice & Guidance and Programme Advisory Service) under one manager to create Student Centre team 4 Student Centres (9 desks, 13 advisors, equiv to 9 FTE 5 administrators on back office work, including student attendance monitoring across university and full range of administration and student support for Joint Honours (1200 students) Move from physical submission of coursework (50,000+ a year handled by team) to majority e-submission Expectation for information, advice and guidance across a broader range of queries Closer connection with supporting Student Wellbeing Service activity Continual development and support for student attendance monitoring and Joint Honours administration

How we look now: Kedleston Road, Main Campus site, majority of on-campus students Term-time pm Britannia Mill – covering 2 teaching sites Buxton – covering HE & FE students Atrium (central social space) Student Wellbeing Centre (shared with GP practice reception)

More stuff happening … University restructure in 2014: from 4 Faculties to 7 Colleges (plus Joint Honours, plus University of Derby On-line, plus University of Derby Corporate, plus Buxton & Leek College) Creation of ‘Academic Centres’ for administrative support for academic staff and programmes New sites being acquired: new building in Derby for Law & Criminology department, new site in Chesterfield, new STEM building in Derby for 2016/17

Familiar? Tier 3 highly specialist Tier 2 Specialist Tier 1 Generalist

Generalist? assignments explaining regs ID cards loan queries car park permits council tax exemption confirmation letters records amendments timetable queries Joint honours signposting extenuating circumstances late submission complaints triage appointment booking wellbeing triage results queries

Tier 1 / Generalist : 80% of queries?! (we don’t have CRM) These queries aren’t superficial, but they can be recurring regular queries, where it’s our day job or we can access guidance information quickly and easily From Tier 1 queries, we should and could be building up a knowledge base to anticipate trends for future, provide virtual advice, or can train staff to be absolutely confident with them Tier 1 queries can usually be resolved without high levels of systems or security access, in-depth knowledge of a particular area of the University or specialist/practitioner training. The interaction should leave the ‘client’ confident that their query has been resolved, or with sufficient information provided which gives them a clear understanding of how the resolution will take place or what their next steps should be.

Highly specialist Specialist SFE links Student records AdmissionsGraduation Student Liaison Officers Finance Halls Timetabling Academic Centres debt IT Wellbeing practitioners Complaints

Tier 2 / Specialist: a higher level of system access or security? an in-depth knowledge of a particular area of the University business and the needs of a client which comes from dealing with that type of business on a day to day basis or specialist/practitioner training. Tier 3 / Highly Specialist: Tier 3 queries will require high level access or privileged system access and/or specialist or practitioner training. A query or task doesn’t have to go through all 3 tiers: student crisis situation - straight from tier 1 to 3 And tier 1 may be the specialist e.g student car parking

T1 T2 T3 Over to you Your own one stop shops: Do you have a similar model? Do you have similar tasks/functions/activities to Derby? What’s different?

Exceptional Extenuating Circumstances and Late Submission Requests

EEC & LSR Historically: Students ‘applied’ through carbon copy form for an extension to coursework or to take exam at a different point approved by module leader for up to 7 days, new deadline set by module leader approved by programme leader for longer extension, new deadline set by programme leader one copy of form held by Enquiry Services team Advantages: student relationship with module and programme leader module and programme leader have better understanding of work involved and realistic new deadline Disadvantages: copy of form didn’t get to Enquiry Services substantiation of reasons for extension not provided assessment boards didn’t know what had been agreed soft versus hard line module and programme leaders lack of consistency (how many module leaders agreeing, how many different deadlines funding arrangements expected students to attempt all assessments – loss of income

review of EEC and LSR regulations move to EEC panels for each Faculty (College) students have to submit ‘something’ by deadline (essay plan, notes, part completed or almost completed coursework) students have to submit evidence, from an impartial, professional source standardised new deadlines based on assessment periods in the academic calendar students made aware of mark for partially completed assignment students then accept or reject offer of deferral of deadline from EEC panel students must undertake a fresh assessment (some exceptions for placement, portfolio, independent study) late submission of up to 7 days to be approved by Deputy Head of Department (late decision in 2014 changed this from programme leader) students have to submit ‘something’ by deadline students have to supply evidence approval equals 7 extra days to complete – but same piece of work, not fresh assessment

Our system: Moved from carbon paper To scanned pdfs collated by College with an overview report, stored with restricted access on the intranet To using the student record system from application to approvalstudent record system

students Student Wellbeing Academic staff Student Liaison Officers Quality and Regs Panel Officers Academic Centres Panel Chairs Student Experience Training othersSystem development Regs Review Auditing Statistics

Boundaries?

Your own one stop shops … Are there defined boundaries? What are they and why? How do you negotiate them? Do they become blurred?