Tracy Unified School District Leadership Institute – “Leading the Transformation” Breakout Session Authentic Data Driven Decision Making July/August 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DATA TEAMS AT STANTON NETWORK SCHOOL IN THE CONTEXT OF THE SEED TEACHER EVAL PROGRAM PRESENTED BY BILLIE SHEA & JANE COOK ADAPTED FROM MATERIALS DEVELOPED.
Advertisements

Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Cedar Rapids Pioneer Group February 8, 2005 Dr. Susan Leddick.
Beginning Action Research Learning Cedar Rapids Community Schools October, 2004 Dr. Susan Leddick.
Reading ARDT Teams September 10 & 11, Agenda Your Role Your Role Big Picture Big Picture PLC for ARDT PLC for ARDT CI support CI support Plan on.
Pre Planning: Identification of Need 1. Develop/Review Student Learning Expectations 2. Examine alignment of learning expectations with assessments 3.
Analyzing Student Work
Implementation of the PA Core Standards. Effective Communication Guiding Principle 1 Design and establish systems of effective communication among stakeholders.
Semonti Basu PBS Technical Assistance Facilitator Grace Martino-Brewster PBS Specialist Austin Independent School District Connecting Data Dots Using data-based.
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals STEP 1 1 Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES)
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
Learning Walk High Levels of Learning for All Students Quality Instruction in Every Classroom Skillful Leadership Throughout the School and District.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
Professional Learning Communities in Schools Online Workshop.
1. What is it we want our students to learn?
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
Theories of Action: What are they, why are they important, and how are they created? January 2015 Office of Student and School Success, OSPI Travis Campbell,
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
Data Teams New logo- lead and learn-leadership and learning center.
PDC Procedures – Individual Growth Action Plan The Individual Growth Action Plan (IGAP) is a plan each individual completes describing professional.
Discourse. Student Discourse How would you define student discourse? “IS considered student discourse” “IS NOT considered student discourse”
Our Leadership Journey Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckman Connie Laughlin.
Student Growth 2.0 Fall,  Face-to-Face Sessions  Student Growth 2.0  Rater Agreement Practices  TPEP/ Washington State Learning Standards.
Examining Monitoring Data
5-Step Process Clarification The 5-Step Process is for a unit, topic, or “chunk” of information. One form should be used for the unit, topic, etc. The.
Glendale Elementary School District Professional Development August 15, 2012.
Program Evaluation Tool Overview Library Media Leadership Council / Instructional Technology Leaders October 2, 2014.
Preparing to Use This Video with Staff: Materials/Resources:  Print copies for each person of the following resources found on any OIP Stage 0 Module.
“Current systems support current practices, which yield current outcomes. Revised systems are needed to support new practices to generate improved outcomes.”
Timberlane Regional School District
Provoking Action to Make Gains Student achievment Equity Public confidence.
Hastings and Prince Edward District School Board— AiM, Achievement in Motion for Student Success Hastings and Prince Edward District School Board Assessment.
TAP TAP Basics (Preparing for Success in a TAP School) [PSTS]
Educator Growth and Professional Development. Objectives for this session The SLT will…  Have a thorough understanding of High Quality Standard 5: Educator.
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 4: Reflecting and Adjusting December 2013.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Why must we do Data Teams? We know the implementation of DT benefit STUDENTS -helps teachers identify exceeding/proficient students and plan for targeted.
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals STEP 1 1 Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES) Facilitators: Effectiveness coaches.
After lunch - Mix it up! Arrange your tables so that everyone else seated at your table represents another district. 1.
Tier I: Implementing Learning Walks & Instructional Rounds OrRTI Conference Tara M. Black, M.Ed. May 9,
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
OIP The Ohio Improvement Process and the role of the BLT.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Data Analysis Processes: Cause and Effect Linking Data Analysis Processes to Teacher Evaluation Name of School.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 4: Professional Growth Plan Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
Gathering Evidence to Achieve Results.  ALL CSD students and educators are part of ONE proactive educational system.  Evidence-based instruction and.
FASA Middle School Principal ’ s Leadership Academy Don Griesheimer Laura Hassler Lang July 22, 2007.
PLMLC Leadership Series Thunder Bay Region Day 1 Brian Harrison, YRDSB Connie Quadrini, YCDSB Thursday February 3 rd, 2011.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Connecticut Accountability for Learning Initiative District and School Capacity Building Leadership No Child Left Behind Partnerships & Professional Learning.
Teacher Data Teams FOR RTI MODULE 5 ..
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Using Data to Improve Student Achievement December 1, 2010.
Office of Service Quality
Office of Service Quality
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
AVID Leading College & Career Readiness Districtwide - Transforming Student Outcomes AVID's mission is to close the achievement gap by preparing all students.
Developing Structures for Teacher- Lead Learning Communities Jill Cabrera, Ph.D. Western Kentucky University.
Indicator 5.4 Create and implement a documented continuous improvement process that describes the gathering, analysis, and use of student achievement.
DECISION-MAKING FOR RESULTS HSES- Data Team Training.
Welcome TDEC Professional Learning December 22,
Creating Student Success through the Data Team Process Mason City Community School District Kathryn Schladweiler TJ.
DO PRINCIPAL SUPERVISORS MATTER? BUILDING THE CAPACITY OF AREA SUPERINTENDENTS National Principal Supervisor Summit May 2016.
Student Growth 2.0 NCESD Fellows November 17 th,
Building a Framework to Support the Culture Required for Student Centered Learning Jeff McCoy | Executive Director of Academic Innovation & Technology.
Quality Comprehensive Improvement System
Preparing to Use This Video with Staff:
An Introduction to Evaluating Federal Title Funding
Presentation transcript:

Tracy Unified School District Leadership Institute – “Leading the Transformation” Breakout Session Authentic Data Driven Decision Making July/August 2014 Dr. Paul F. Ezen Consultant

Leadership’s Role in Data-Driven Decision Making

Data-Driven Leadership Standardizing expectations Standardizing tools and protocols Facilitating fast and accurate communication Enabling evaluation and accountability PG page 23

Data Strategies Analyze forces of change. Identify student learning needs.

Data Strategies Analyze forces of change. Identify student learning needs. Set student learning goals. Set school goals.

Data Strategies Analyze forces of change. Identify student learning needs. Set student learning goals. Set school goals. Analyze school practices. Test hypotheses. Quantify perceptions.

Successful Leadership Strategies What are some strategies you have put in place in your building or district to use data and get results? With your table group, create a graphic organizer to describe effective strategies. PG page 23

Gallery Walk Take a packet of sticky notes. Record strategies that you would like to use. Leave positive notes or comments. PG page 23

Strategies for Data-Driven Instruction Ask for and post public displays of data in schools. Ask data-driven questions of leadership teams. Ask students to quantify their learning progress. Ask teachers to cite data indicating how they gauge student learning. Use charts and graphs to reduce data to useful information by focusing on simple numbers, gap comparisons, and trends. Ask frequent questions to ensure data accuracy.

Transformational Leadership Framework KNOWLEDGE APPLICATION A B D C High Low Grades based on multiple kinds of assessments Peer review of student work Individual progress monitoring Observations by instructional coaches Grades based on multiple kinds of assessments Peer review of student work Individual progress monitoring Observations by instructional coaches PG page 24

Setting SMART Goals Goal: S pecific Who, what, when, where, why? M easurable How much? How often? A ttainable Is it realistic? Why? R elevant Is it important? Why? T ime-based How long will it take? PG page 25

Developing a Productive Data Team

Data Pyramid adapted from The Data Coach’s Guide to Improving Learning for All Students, p. 129 Less often More often PG page 26

Purposes and Functions of the Building Data Team (from Leaders Make It Happen! pp. 97–98) To access and monitor student success, the quality of instruction, and the effectiveness of the team in order to improve instructional practice and performance PG page 27

BDT Processes 1. Uses building data to develop a school improvement plan that focuses on a limited number of strategies aligned with the district’s goals and strategies 2. Determines specific shared instructional strategies to implement schoolwide 3. Actively monitors the implementation and effectiveness of the shared instructional strategies (adult indicators) and their impact on student learning PG page 27

BDT Processes 4. Actively monitors the teacher-based Instructional Data Teams (IDTs) and their follow-through 5. Provides for and participates in professional development and provides additional learning supports to staff 6. Makes adjustments based on the data PG page 27

Data Team Players PG page 27

The Successful Data Coach Demonstrates leadership Is committed to equity Is a skilled collaborator Knows how to run a meeting Is willing to learn and take risks Has a basic knowledge of data and assessments Is comfortable with computers PG page 27

Data Team Configurations

Describing Results-Focused Teams from Teacher Teams That Get Results, Kuzmich and Gregory (2007) PG page 28

Data Team Agenda Date: September 19 DT Members Present: John Stacy, Bill, Dave, Melissa, Juan, Jake, Kathy A. Review progress of implementation of action items from previous meetings. B. Review student data and/or data related to action plan to determine if plan and initiatives are working. C. Discuss new plans and/or adjustments to current plans based on data review. D. Review student intervention efforts and effects on student performance. E. Review action decisions from this meeting and assign actions to report on for next meeting. F. Review any additional items related to student achievement and progress. Actions: PG page 29

Questions for Data Teams 1. Do we have the data we need? What are we trying to measure? Did we measure what we need to monitor? Is the assessment a reasonable length? Should we revise any questions for a post- assessment? PG page 30

2. What do the data mean? Do any responses stand out? What does a proficient response look like? Which questions had a high/low number of correct responses? Do the questions accurately test the targeted knowledge? What learning needs are evident? Questions for Data Teams PG page 30

3. What should our goals be? What do the data say about gaps in achievement? (Do we have an equity problem in our school?) Are our goals specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and timely (SMART)? What obstacles stand in the way of our reaching those student learning goals? Questions for Data Teams PG page 30

Questions for Data Teams 4. What instructional strategies will we emphasize? Do we need to model or teach these strategies? Does the classroom environment need to change in some way? Do teachers have access to the resources and materials that they need? PG page 31

Questions for Data Teams 5. How will we recognize success? How can we tell that students are learning? What kind of formative assessment might teachers use to reveal on-target learning? How can we confirm that everyone is using the strategies as intended and described? How can we link learning to specific strategies? PG page 31

Making Data Public What goal were we trying to meet with this change? What data established the need for this change? What data will prove that we succeeded? Does this change match the values in our mission?

Presenting Information

Minute Paper 1. What does your data team currently look like? 2. How does your team focus on teaching and learning? 3. What results is your team getting?

Action Item Next steps at your school? Determine GAP’s Process to fill those GAP’s Collaborative Process Communication