Subsurface Utility Engineering Director / Senior Project Manager

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project Description and Needs Lincoln Way Widening Addition of a center-turn lane and safety improvements to the grade and horizontal alignment. Needs.
Advertisements

Drawings of Sufficient Detail
Bangor Water Districts Experience With Gas. Bangor Water Districts Experience With Natural Gas.
Utility As-Built Information Value Awareness
Bill Dexheimer Field Manager PMissouri One Call System, Inc. 824 Weathered Rock Rd. Jefferson City, MO 65101
Call Before you dig Safe digging is no accident. Alberta Damage Prevention Council.
December 10, 2014 Highway Maintenance and Preservation Needs WSDOT Can Provide Reliable Long-Term Pavement Estimates, but Accuracy of Bridge Estimates.
“A driver initiated program” Lance Morgan Dave Conklin.
EA204 Environmental Technology Pavement Drainage Stormwater Sewer Design.
2-1 Utility Conflict Concepts Lesson Course Overview 8:30 AM – 9:00 AMIntroductions and Course Overview 9:00 AM – 10:15 AMUtility Conflict Concepts.
2-1 Utility Conflict Concepts and SHRP 2 R15(B) Research Findings Lesson 2.
3-1 Utility Conflict Identification and Management Lesson 3.
A Comprehensive Study on Pavement Edge Line Implementation Presented by: Mark J. Morvant, P.E. Associate Director, Research Louisiana Transportation Research.
Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE) Kenneth Slaninka Director / Senior Project Manager Cardno TBE Utility Coordination Training.
FDOT R/W Guidelines Use of License Agreements
US Highway 17 (Center Street) Sidewalk Feasibility Study Town of Pierson, Florida.
1 Automated Machine Guidance: Electronic Files and Design Data AASHTO Subcommittee on Construction Meeting August 18, 2010 – Burlington, VT Mark Taylor.
Chapter 13 Site Plan Layout.
ENGINEERING SURVEYS DEFINITION Surveying has to do with the determination of location of points on or near the surface of the earth. It is the art/science.
Introduction Transportation System Objectives : Military; Knit together the inhabitants of a territory by providing mutual access and communication; Economic.
Project Manager: Tim Brown Project Editor: Tabatha Doughty Project Engineer: Drew Furry Project Engineer: Jim Walter.
Safety Audit Components Safety assessment for risk Management.
Prof. J.J Lew, P.E. Principal Investigator – Purdue Univ. James H. Anspach, P.G. Technical Advisor – So-Deep, Inc. C. Paul Scott, P.E. FHWA Advisor Kevin.
Detours – Selection and Design Highways & Engineering Conference March 2, 2006.
2014 CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATES Estimates Estimates 3 Point of the illustration? Document your assumptions.
 Life in communities has changed over the years.  One of those changes is in transportation. Transportation is a way of moving people or things from.
A New Paradigm for Utility Coordination Kenny Franklin INDOT Director of Utilities and Railroads.
Excavation Instructional Goal: through class participation and discussion, the participant will identify the issues and hazards related to trenching and.
Prepared for: NEW YORK STATE PLANNING FEDERATION April 14, 2015 Prepared by: BME ASSOCIATES Peter G. Vars, P.E. Essential Skills: Reading and Interpreting.
Borough of Madison Woodland Avenue Reconstruction Engineering CY2009 Existing Conditions Underground Infrastructure Municipal Aid Application Reconstruction.
Alameda Creek Bridge Replacement Scoping Meeting March 4, 2014.
Location Surveys I. Traditional Highway Location: 1. field-oriented work 2. *Procedures 1) The first step: Reconnaissance of the area using available topographic.
 Do you have an Interest in Math and Science?  Do you have good problem solving skills?  Do you approach problems in an analytical manner?  Can.
Jeff Shelley, P.E. Project Delivery Team Leader FHWA, Alabama Division 9500 Wynlakes Place Montgomery, AL (334) Fax: (334) Mail.
In this Presentation…. Project Overview Key Issues Elements of Design Funding and Schedule.
Mike Baumann Statewide Utility Engineer January 22, 2015.
MnDOT-ACEC/MN Annual Consultant Conference March 5, 2012 Leveraging SUE Data for Utilities on Projects Tom Swafford- Utility Mapping Services, Inc.
A New Paradigm for Utility Coordination Kenny Franklin INDOT Director of Utilities and Railroads.
HIGHWAY/UTILITY PROGRAM OVERVIEW ROADWAY CONFERENCE APRIL 20, 2009.
Getting on the Map: Underground Utility Location And Municipalities By: Michael L. Gill, PE, RLS.
Risk Assignment in The Delivery of a Project  RISK! –Construction projects have lot of it –Contractors manage it –Owners pay for it.
5-1 Hands-on Utility Conflict Management Exercise Lesson 5.
DR O.S ABIOLA DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE, ABEOKUTA. CVE 505 HIGHWAY & TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING I.
Introduction Session 01 Matakuliah: S0753 – Teknik Jalan Raya Tahun: 2009.
Data Palooza Workshop May 9, 2013 Rabinder Bains, FHWA – Office of Policy and Government Affairs.
Mass Highway Department (MHD) Design Process Anticipate possible use of MHD funds Anticipate possible use of MHD funds New Design Guide for Project Development.
IRWA Educational Mini Conference IRWA Educational Mini Conference Chapter 26 Presenter: Richard Diaz, Jr. P.E. September 16-17, 2010  Reading Right-of-Way.
Chapter 16 Site Preparation. Objectives After reading the chapter and reviewing the materials presented the students will be able to: Identify tasks required.
Design Criteria CTC 440. Objectives Know what “design criteria” means Determine design criteria for various types of facilities.
Plan Scales (see DOT 1B-3) 22”x34” paper for final designs (preliminary usually ½ size, 11”x17”) 1. Plan view: a) Rural a) 1:1000 plan scale (or 1”=100’)
HIGHWAY DESIGN PROCESS & ROUTE LOCATION Spring 2016.
Geometric Design: General Concept CE331 Transportation Engineering.
CEE 578 Senior Capstone Design Types of Construction Drawings
Horizontal Directional Drilling (HDD) Arvid Veidmark, III EVP, Senior Estimator Specialized Services Company
PRE-PLANNING FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS. OVERVIEW ASSESSING OWNER CAPABILITIES ANALYSIS OF RESOURCES REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEWING.
Civil Engineering Surveying Roy Frank. Basic Route Survey and Design 1.Concept for Route 2.Reconnaissance Study 1.Small scale mapping of region (1”-500’
FHWA: Revision of Thirteen Controlling Criteria for Design; Notice for Request and Comment. Comments Due: December 7, 2015 Jeremy Fletcher, P.E., P.S.M.
Iron Range Tourism Bureau April 25, 2013 Hwy 53 Update.
Contractor Utility Coordination WisDOT Projects February 18 th, 2016.
A New Paradigm for Utility Coordination Kenny Franklin VP of SUE Development Blood Hound.
Interdisciplinary teams Existing or new roadway
Common Surveys Used For Commercial Real Estate Transactions
Utility Permitting Overview
Safety Audit Components
Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE)
A Paradigm for Utility Coordination
Walker Street Reconstruction Project 25% Design Public Hearing
Construction Considerations
Drawing of Sufficient Detail (DOSD)
Appalachian Underground Corrosion Short Course
Presentation transcript:

Subsurface Utility Engineering Director / Senior Project Manager (SUE) Kenneth Slaninka Director / Senior Project Manager Cardno, Inc. Utility Coordination Training

Outline What is Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE)? Overview of SUE - Definitions When to Use SUE How to Use SUE Why Use SUE

What is Subsurface Utility Engineering?

What is Subsurface Utility Engineering? A branch of ENGINEERING PRACTICE that involves managing certain risks associated with: Utility Mapping at appropriate ASCE Quality Levels Utility Coordination Utility relocation and adjustment through conflict matrix resolution Utility relocation design and cost estimates Communication of utility data to concerned parties Implementation of Utility Accommodation Policies and utility design

CI/ASCE Standard 38-02 The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) has developed a National Consensus Standard, CI/ASCE 38-02, titled “Standard Guideline for the Collection and Depiction of Existing Subsurface Utility Data”. This National Consensus Standard (NCS) is used by courts and lawyers, along with contractual instruments, to assist in both defining a professional’s standard of care and level of responsibility.

ASCE UTILITY QUALITY LEVELS ASCE Standard – Quality Levels ASCE UTILITY QUALITY LEVELS QL-A QL-B QL-C QL-D

ASCE Quality Level D (QL-D) Existing Utility Records Involves the use of existing utility records, permits, plans to depict the ‘approximate’ horizontal position of underground utilities.

ASCE Quality Level C (QL-C) Survey of Visible Features Involves surveying visible above ground utility facilities to assist with determining ‘approximate’ horizontal position of underground utilities. Used with QL-D. Manholes Power poles Hydrants / valves Phone Pedestals

ASCE Quality Level B (QL-B) Utility Designating Involves the use of geophysical prospecting equipment to determine the existence and horizontal position of underground utilities. Paint markings Flags Field Sketch

Designating Equipment Electromagnetic (metallic) Acoustical – Pulse (non-metallic with fluid) Sonic / Sonde (open access) Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) Non-destructive probing

Designating Equipment Radiodetection 8000 Multi-Frequency 512Hz 8KHz 33Khz 65KHz Low Medium Metrotech 810/ Vivax 810 Single Frequency 83KHz High Subsite 950 512Hz 1Khz 8KHz 29Khz 80KHz Low Medium High Metrotech 9890xt 982Hz 9.8KHz 82KHz Low High Metrotech 530 Single Frequenc 332KHz Rycom 8876 Dual Frequency 815Hz 82KHz Low High Pipehorn 800 Hz 480 KHz Very High Low 3M Dynatel 2250 5772Hz 8Khz 33KHz 133Khz Low Medium High

Comments/ Notes/ Location Designating Approach: QA/QC All data is checked and cross-checked for accuracy – Records research vs. designating file Field sketch Designating data point & numbering system Utility # of points Comments/ Notes/ Location W1 20 East side of road W2 4 West side of road W3 12 NB lane

One-Call is NOT Quality Level B

Why One-Call is NOT Quality Level B One-Call is a risk based system used for excavation One-Call Utility locator uses one piece of equipment No traffic control allowing necessary geophysical methods, or opening/investigating of utility structures The information received has no guarantee of reliability One-Call Utility locator has a narrow focus and limited by time Utility data records research, interpretation, and designation not performed under the responsible charge of a registered professional, no QA/QC performed

Quality Level B is.. Using Appropriate Methods (Inductive vs Conductive) Inductive – inducing current along utility Conductive – directly connecting to utility Using Appropriate Equipment Single or multi-frequency electromagnetic units GPR Magnetics Sonde or sonic methods Supported by QL-D and QL-C Sealed by a Professional Engineer GPR

ASCE Quality Level A (QL-A) Utility Locating Involves the use of non-destructive digging equipment at critical points to determine the precise horizontal and vertical position of underground utilities, as well as the type, size, material, and other characteristics.

Locating Approach Permitting Minimal disturbance Saw cut in pavement Air vacuum excavation Centerline of facility Permanent reference points Proper restoration Compaction in 6” lifts Perma-Patch

Locating Approach: QA/QC Test Hole Data Collection – 2 photographs of every test hole for permanent record Final QA/QC of all Subsurface Utility Engineering work is done by registered Professional Engineer

When to Use SUE?

When to Use SUE? Type of Project Location of Project Piping and Facility Design (storm, sanitary, water) Site and Plant Design Roadway / Bridge const. Widening / Intersection Improvements Signal Replacement Location of Project Urban / Suburban Rural

When to Use SUE? Utilities involved Conflicts with utilities Major or Minor Conflicts with utilities Compensable interest Limited Access R/W Accuracy required ASCE Quality Level? Level of Risk

What are the Risks? ? ?? ???

What are the Risks? Project delays Damage to utilities Safety of workers Safety of public Redesign costs Higher bids Change orders Extra work orders Construction claims Higher insurance / financing / construction costs Detours for travelling public Negative publicity

TOTAL ENGINEERING RISK POOL Risk Management TOTAL ENGINEERING RISK POOL ALLOCATION OF RISK WITHIN ENGINEERING POOL With no SUE your level of risk is great. As you provide additional quality levels, or an increased level of accuracy of your utility information, your risk is minimized and potentially eliminated.

How Do We Use SUE? Commitment to avoid unnecessary utility relocations Communicate with Utilities early & often Records Research – QLD Utility Designating – QLB Topographic Survey – QLC Review of QLB, QLC & QLD Preliminary Design Utility Conflict Analysis Utility Locating – QLA Design Alternatives

Design Alternatives Geometric Alignment Change grade Shift alignment Widen on one side of the road Shift ramps or driveways

Design Alternatives Structure Design Alter footing / piling designs Provide alternative foundations Modify bridge layout Shift or modify retaining walls Add retaining walls Add guardrail

Design Alternatives Drainage Design Dual trunk line in lieu of single trunk Shift ditches Shift structure locations (inlets, pipes, manholes) Open vs. closed system Modify side slopes or ditch slopes

How Do We Use SUE? Utilities in Plan View

How Do We Use SUE? Utilities in Profile View

How Do We Use SUE? Utilities in Cross Section View

How Do We Use SUE? Utility Matrix

Why Use Subsurface Utility Engineering?

Why Use Subsurface Utility Engineering? One worker was killed and seven others injured when an underground gas pipeline exploded in rural Texas, sending a massive fireball into the air. The pipeline exploded after it was accidentally ruptured by utility workers digging to build a new power line. The worker had been driving a truck and drilling holes for utility poles when the line suddenly exploded, and other workers lost sight of him in the intense smoke, according to Roger Harmon, Johnson County's top elected official. Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1284880/Texas-gas-pipeline-explosion-kills-worker-injures-seven.html#ixzz2uQvjcPrf Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Why Use SUE? Make Informed Design Decisions Designers require accurate utility information, including constructability of multi-phase projects. Avoid Using Unreliable Underground Utility Information Avoid uncertainty and second guessing where a utility may be located.

Why Use SUE? Avoid Costly Conflicts / Utility Relocations By knowing the exact horizontal and vertical locations of underground utilities, costly conflicts and utility relocations may be avoided, along with not having to depend upon the utilities to relocate before construction can occur. Savings and Safety Inaccurate information can result in costly conflicts, utility damage, construction delays, service disruptions, redesign, claims, and even injuries and loss of life.

Relative Cost Savings & Benefits Purdue Study Commissioned by FHWA 71 projects studied in 4 states (VA, NC, OH, TX) Projects valued at >$1B SUE was < 0.5% of construction costs Both QLB & QLA performed

Relative Cost Savings & Benefits Purdue Study Cost savings of $4.62 per $1.00 spent on Subsurface Utility Engineering Largest return on investment was $208/$1 1.9% savings on construction costs Quantitative costs only (Qualitative costs not included) SUE is a viable practice that reduces project costs related to the risks associated with underground utilities If used properly it could result in a minimum savings of $1 billion per year

SUE Current Practice Owner and Engineer Responsibility In an increasing number of states, lawyers and courts are using guidelines, agency policies, and contractual instruments to define and hold professionals accountable for their standards of care. It is an Engineer’s responsibility, on behalf of an Owner, to utilize all available resources and methods to gather and provide the most accurate information possible.

Question and Answer Session There are more difficult things to deal with on the job than utilities!