Cancer Research in Australia: an overview of funding to cancer research projects and research programs in Australia 2006 to 2011 Evidence to inform research.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Appraising Evidence About Diagnostic Tests
Advertisements

ANZDATA Registry Annual Report 2013 STOCK AND FLOW CHAPTER 1.
Australia BY ALEX MARCHESE. The capital city of Australia is ACT.
SONNIE Senior Officers National Network of Indigenous Education.
Nancy Briggs Kylie Hurst Stephen McDonald CHAPTER 4 METHOD AND LOCATION OF DIALYSIS 2012 Annual Report—35th Edition ANZDATA Registry Annual Report 2012.
PC4: developing cancer research in primary care Jon Emery Professor of General Practice, University of Western Australia. Director of PC4.
How much are libraries worth? An independent assessment of the return on investment of Australian public libraries by SGS Economics.
Figure 14.1 Economic Growth in the ADE/ASR model.
Ambulance Services in Australasia 2013
Federal Parliamentary Democracy of Australia
Comparison of the American and Australian Health Care Systems By Emma Dougall, Emily Josef, Christie Felber and Hamed Al - Yahmedy.
© ANZDATA Registry ORGAN PROCUREMENT CHAPTER 9. © ANZDATA Registry Figure 9.1 Number of Donors** by Retrieval State (X) ( ) Donors Per Million.
The National Flag of AUSTRALIA
Background: In response to the supportive care needs of cancer patients Northern Health initiated a two day a week psychology clinic for cancer patients.
Ben, Nikki and Martin INDIGENOUS PEOPLE IN AUSTRALIA.
Cancer Research in Australia: an overview of funding initiatives to support cancer research capacity in Australia 2006 to 2011 Evidence to inform strategic.
Improving the safety, productivity and sustainability of our road networks through research and collaboration.
Sections & Council Formation Dates In Australia SectionsGeo CodeFormation Date 1 Australia CouncilR May-86 2 Australian Capital TerritoryR Nov-88.
Western Australia Northern Territory South Australia Queensland New South Wales Tasmania Victoria Australian Capital Territory.
© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing Prentice Hall. Note 9 The Product Life Cycle.
STOCK AND FLOW CHAPTER 1. © ANZDATA Registry Figure 1.1 Prevalent Patients (Number Per Million Population at 31st December)
Parties of Australia By Dinithi Perera. Party ideology is called Liberalism. The Liberal Party of Australia is one of the two major Australian political.
Blair Grace Kylie Hurst Stephen McDonald CHAPTER 1 STOCK AND FLOW 2012 Annual Report—35th Edition ANZDATA Registry Annual Report 2012.
A Tour of Melbourne Continue with tour Link to the next page.
Health status of Australians compared with other developed countries Comparing: Sweden United States of America United Kingdom Japan.
The Cancer Registry of Norway Jan F Nygård Head of the IT-department.
The Map of AUSTRALIA. Western Australia Northern Territory South Australia Queensland Adelaide Melbourne Sydney Victoria Perth Darwin Brisbane Canberra.
Cancer in Ontario: Overview A Statistical Report.
Developed from information included in the AIHW report Cancer in Australia: in brief 2014 Highlights.
Midland Cancer Network 2012 Clinical Performance Conference.
Where can I find data on cancer? Victoria H Coupland London Knowledge and Intelligence Team 20 February 2014.
Date of download: 6/21/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: The Prevalence of Weekly Angina Among Patients With.
Delivering effective tobacco education in schools Bianca Crosling, Quit Victoria Fiona Edwards, Smarter than Smoking Project, WA.
ANZBA Role ANZBA was formed following a MOU signed between State Governments (i.e. New South Wales, Northern Territory, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania,
What does the data tell us? Colorectal CANCER IN NEVADA
Bloodborne viral and sexually transmissible infections in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people: Annual Surveillance Report 2016.
The National Flag of AUSTRALIA
Cancer in Ontario 1 An Overview
From: Use of Decision Models in the Development of Evidence-Based Clinical Preventive Services Recommendations: Methods of the U.S. Preventive Services.
Age-standardized incidence and mortality rates across 20 years, and incidence, death and prevalence estimates for the year 2000, Canada. (Top) Age-standardized.
PowerPoint Presentations
Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc
INCOSE Systems Engineering Professional (SEP) Program
5 Prevalence Ontario Cancer Statistics 2016 Chapter 5: Prevalence.
South Australia and Queensland changes their western borders.
METHOD AND LOCATION OF DIALYSIS CHAPTER 4.
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages (September 2015)
myIS.neu.edu – presentation screen shots accompany:
INCOSE Systems Engineering Professional (SEP) Program
Geo Units Formation Dates In Australia
Comparison of Scores for Candidate Ideology Generated from Different Data Sources. Adam Bonica rsf 2016;2:11-32 Copyright © 2016 by Russell Sage Foundation.
INCOSE Systems Engineering Professional (SEP) Program
Copyright © 2012, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved.
Figure 11-1.
Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc
INCOSE Systems Engineering Professional (SEP) Program
Figure Overview.
CHAPTER 6 SKELETAL SYSTEM
Figure Overview.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Does PSA Testing Influence the Natural History of Prostate Cancer?
Overview of cancer genetics in the SMP1 cohort: lung cancer (A), breast cancer (B), colorectal adenocarcinoma (except mucinous subtype) (C), prostate cancer.
Chapter 78 Vaccination and Screening in Cervical Cancer
STRATEGIC PLAN.
My Health record-Information and thoughts
Chapter 77 Cervical Cancer: Burden of Disease
Chapter 20 Assisted Reproductive Technologies
Prevalent Dialysis and Transplants Australia (at 31st December) Number of Patients
Australia and New Zealand
Australia and New Zealand
Presentation transcript:

Cancer Research in Australia: an overview of funding to cancer research projects and research programs in Australia 2006 to 2011 Evidence to inform research investment Tables and Figures from the Report

Copyright Conditions © Cancer Australia 2013 This work is copyright. You may reproduce the whole or part of this work in unaltered form for your own personal use or, if you are part of an organisation, for internal use within your organisation, but only if you or your organisation do not use the reproduction for any commercial purpose and retain this copyright notice and all disclaimer notices as part of that reproduction. Apart from rights to use as permitted by the Copyright Act 1968 or allowed by this copyright notice, all other rights are reserved and you are not allowed to reproduce the whole or any part of this work in any way (electronic or otherwise) without first being given the specific written permission from Cancer Australia to do so. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights are to be sent to the Publications and Copyright contact officer, Cancer Australia, Locked Bag 3, Strawberry Hills NSW 2012.

Table 3.1 Direct funding to and number of cancer research projects and research programs in Australia in 2003−2005, 2006−2008 and 2009−2011

Figure 3.1 Annual direct funding to cancer research projects and research programs in Australia, 2006 to 2011

Figure 3.2 Distribution to states and territories of direct funding to cancer research projects and research programs in Australia, 2006 to 2011

Table 3.2 Distribution to states and territories of direct funding to cancer research projects and research programs from NHMRC and non-NHMRC funding sources in the period 2006 to 2011

Table 3.3 Distribution to states and territories of direct funding to cancer research projects and research programs in 2003–2005, 2006– 2008 and 2009–2011

Figure 4.1 Proportion of funding to cancer research projects and research programs by funding source in the period 2006 to 2011

Table 4.1 Major sources of funding – total direct funding, percentage of total direct funding and number of cancer research projects and research programs funded in 2003−2005, 2006−2008 and 2009−2011

Figure 5.1 The pattern of funding to each CSO category and percentage of total direct funding to each CSO category in the period 2006 to 2011

Figure 5.2 The pattern of funding to each CSO category and the percentage of proportional funding in 2003–2005, 2006–2008 and 2009–2011

Table 5.2 Direct funding to and number of cancer research projects and research programs in each CSO category in 2003−2005, 2006−2008 and 2009− 2011

Figure 5.3 The pattern of funding to each CSO category and the percentage of proportional funding from the NHMRC in 2003−2005, 2006−2008 and 2009−2011

Table 5.3 Direct funding to and number of research projects and research programs funded by the NHMRC in 2003−2005, 2006−2008 and 2009−2011

Figure 5.4 The pattern of funding to each CSO category and the percentage of proportional funding from other (non-NHMRC) funding sources in 2003− 2005, 2006−2008 and 2009−2011

Table 5.4 Direct funding to and number of research projects and research programs in each CSO category funded by other (non-NHMRC) sources in 2003−2005, 2006−2008 and 2009−2011

Figure 5.5 Pattern of direct funding to CSO sub-categories in 2003−2005, 2006−2008 and 2009−2011

Figure 6.1 Proportional distribution of direct funding to Not tumour stream- specific, Single stream, or Multiple stream research categories in 2003−2005, 2006−2008 and 2009−2011

Table 6.1 Direct funding to and number of research projects and research programs in Not tumour stream-specific, Single stream or Multiple streams research in 2003–2005, 2006−2008 and 2009–2011

Figure 6.2A The pattern of funding to each CSO category for research that was not tumour stream-specific in 2003−2005, 2006−2008 and 2009−2011

Figure 6.2B The pattern of funding to each CSO category for research that was not tumour stream-specific in 2003−2005, 2006−2008 and 2009−2011

Table 6.2 Direct funding to and number of research projects and research programs in each CSO category for research that was not tumour stream-specific in 2003–2005, 2006–2008 and 2009–2011

Figure 6.3A The pattern of funding to each CSO category for cancer research that was specific to a tumour stream(s) in 2003−2005, 2006−2008 and 2009−2011

Figure 6.3B The pattern of funding to each CSO category for cancer research that was specific to a tumour stream(s) in 2003−2005, 2006−2008 and 2009−2011

Table 6.3 Direct funding to and number of research projects and research programs in each CSO category for research that was specific to single or multiple tumour stream(s) in 2003−2005, 2006−2008 and 2009−2011

Figure 7.1 Proportional funding to single tumour stream cancer research projects and research programs in 2003–2005, 2006–2008 and 2009–2011

Table 7.1 Proportional funding to single tumour stream cancer research projects and research programs in 2003–2005, 2006–2008 and 2009–2011

Figure 7.2 Tumour stream combinations in multiple tumour stream research projects and research programs in the period 2006 to 2011

Figure 8.1 Proportional funding to single tumour type cancer research projects and research programs in 2003–2005, 2006–2008 and 2009–2011

Table 8.1 Direct funding to and number of single tumour type research projects and research programs in 2003−2005, 2006−2008 and 2009−2011

Figure 8.2 Direct and proportional funding contribution by tumour type-specific funders and non tumour type-specific funders to direct funding to tumour type-specific cancer research projects and research programs in the period 2006 to 2011

Figure 8.3 Direct funding to tumour type-specific cancer research projects and research programs in Australia 2006 to 2011, compared with the top 20 cancers by incidence in Australia, 2009

Figure 8.4 Direct funding to tumour type-specific cancer research projects and research programs in Australia 2006 to 2011, compared with the top 20 cancers by mortality in Australia, 2010

Figure 8.5 Direct funding to single tumour type-specific cancer research projects and research programs in Australia 2006 to 2011, compared with the top 20 cancers by DALYs in Australia, 2012

Figure 8.6 Direct funding to single tumour type-specific cancer research projects and research programs in Australia (2006–2011), compared with the improvement in 5-year relative survival since and the overall 5-year relative survival (2006−2010) for selected cancers

Figure 9.1 Breast cancer research projects and research programs: pattern of proportional funding to each CSO category in 2003−2005, 2006−2008 and 2009−2011

Figure 9.2 Colon and rectum cancer research projects and research programs: pattern of proportional funding to each CSO category in 2003−2005, 2006−2008 and 2009−2011

Figure 9.3 Prostate cancer research projects and research programs: pattern of proportional funding to each CSO category in 2003−2005, 2006−2008 and 2009−2011

Figure 9.4 Leukaemia research projects and research programs: pattern of proportional funding to each CSO category in 2003−2005, 2006−2008 and 2009−2011

Figure 9.5 Melanoma research projects and research programs: pattern of proportional funding to each CSO category in 2003−2005, 2006−2008 and 2009−2011

Figure 9.6 Lung cancer and mesothelioma research projects and research programs: pattern of proportional funding to each CSO category in 2003−2005, 2006− 2008 and 2009−2011

Figure 9.7 Gynaecological cancer research projects and research programs: pattern of proportional funding to each CSO category in 2003−2005, 2006−2008 and 2009−2011

Figure 9.8 Ovarian cancer research projects and research programs: pattern of proportional funding to each CSO category in 2003−2005, 2006−2008 and 2009−2011

Figure 9.9 Cervical cancer research projects and research programs: pattern of proportional funding to each CSO category in 2003−2005, 2006−2008 and 2009−2011

Figure 9.10 Endometrial cancer research projects and research programs: pattern of proportional funding to each CSO category in 2003−2005, 2006−2008 and 2009−2011

Figure 10.1 Direct funding to and number of cancer clinical trial research projects and research programs in 2003−2005, 2006−2008 and 2009−2011

Table 10.1 Direct funding to and number of cancer clinical trial research projects and research programs in 2003−2005, 2006−2008 and 2009−2011

Figure 10.2 The number of cancer clinical trials with a specific tumour type focus in the period 2006 to 2011

Figure 10.3 The number of cancer clinical trials with a health discipline focus in the period 2006 to 2011

Figure 11.1 The proportion of cancer research projects and research programs in each collaboration category in 2003−2005, 2006−2008 and 2009−2011

Table 11.1 Direct funding to and number of cancer research projects and research programs, and average funding per project/program, in each collaboration category in 2003−2005, 2006−2008 and 2009−2011

Figure 11.2 The proportional split of direct funding to cancer research projects and research programs in each collaboration category in the period 2006 to 2011

Figure 11.3 The proportion of cancer research projects and research programs in each collaboration location category in the period 2006 to 2011

Figure 11.4 Interstate and international collaborations: number of cancer research projects and research programs and location of collaborator(s) in the period 2006 to 2011

Figure 12.1 Cancer research projects and research programs in NSW: pattern of proportional funding to each CSO category in 2003−2005, 2006−2008 and 2009−2011

Figure 12.2 Cancer research projects and research programs in Victoria: pattern of proportional funding to each CSO category in 2003−2005, 2006−2008 and 2009−2011

Figure 12.3 Cancer research projects and research programs in Queensland: pattern of proportional funding to each CSO category in 2003−2005, 2006−2008 and 2009−2011

Figure 12.4 Cancer research projects and research programs in South Australia: pattern of proportional funding to each CSO category in 2003−2005, 2006−2008 and 2009−2011

Figure 12.5 Cancer research projects and research programs in Western Australia: pattern of proportional funding to each CSO category in 2003−2005, 2006−2008 and 2009−2011

Figure 12.6 ACT Cancer research projects and research programs in Australian Capital Territory: pattern of proportional funding to each CSO category in 2003− 2005, 2006−2008 and 2009−2011

Figure 12.6 NT Cancer research projects and research programs in Northern Territory: pattern of proportional funding to each CSO category in 2003−2005, 2006−2008 and 2009−2011

Figure 12.6 Tasmania Cancer research projects and research programs in Tasmania: pattern of proportional funding to each CSO category in 2003−2005, 2006−2008 and 2009−2011

Figure 12.7 Comparison of the pattern of funding to cancer research in Australia with Canada and the United Kingdom (2006–2011)

Figure 12.7 Australia Pattern of funding to cancer research in Australia (2006–2011)

Figure 12.7 Canada Pattern of funding to cancer research in Canada (2006–2011)

Figure 12.7 United Kingdom Pattern of funding to cancer research in United Kingdom (2006–2011)

Figure 12.8 Pattern of funding in international cancer research (2008)

Figure 12.9 Australia International comparisons of the changes in the patterns of funding to cancer research

Figure 12.9 United Kingdom International comparisons of the changes in the patterns of funding to cancer research

Figure 12.9 Canada International comparisons of the changes in the patterns of funding to cancer research

Figure 12.9 ICRP (inc. NIH) International comparisons of the changes in the patterns of funding to cancer research

Figure 12.9 ICRP (NIH only) International comparisons of the changes in the patterns of funding to cancer research

Figure 12.9 ICRP (members not including NIH) International comparisons of the changes in the patterns of funding to cancer research