Improving the Passenger Experience Pennsylvania Public Transportation Association (PPTA) April 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tysons Tysons Corner Circulator Study Board Transportation Committee June 12, 2012.
Advertisements

1 The Role of Bus Transit in the Regional Transportation, Present and Future Howard Benn, Chair, TPB Regional Bus Subcommittee TPB Regional Priority Bus.
West Michigan Transit Linkages Study Wednesday, June 4 th, :00 a.m. Grand Valley State University Kirkhof Center Conference Room 2266.
FY 2014 NTD Reporting Federal Register Notices Explanation of Proposed Changes 28 August 2014.
TBITE 05/15/ Heather Sobush, Senior Planner Christopher Cochran, Senior Planner
SR 50/UCF Connector Alternatives Analysis Orange County Board of County Commissioners January 13, 2015.
Markham Centre TDM and Land Development Case Study ACT Canada – TDM Summit October 21, 2008.
Community Transit Solutions for the Suburbs APTA Annual Meeting September 30, 2013.
Regional Transportation Commission, Washoe County Lee Gibson, Executive Director Roger Hanson, Senior Planner.
TRANSPORTATION POLICY COMMITTEE FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS PROFESSIONAL AND TECHNICAL STAFF COUNCIL ALUMNI CENTER APRIL 2, 2003.
1 Status Report on the Bus Systems in the National Capital Region Report of the Regional Bus Subcommittee to the Access for All Advisory Committee April.
Short Range Transit Improvement Plan CITY OF HIGHPOINT Sounding Board Meeting Service Recommendations September 9, 2014.
Paul Roberts – TIF Technical Manager Presentation to the TPS – 3 June 2009.
White House Conference on Aging Transportation Policy Committee Testimony January 8, 2005 Looking Forward… Growing Older Public Transportation: Providing.
Bus Rapid Transit: Chicago’s New Route to Opportunity Josh Ellis, BRT Project Manager Metropolitan Planning Council.
Presented on January 20, ◦ Services 2 3 fixed routes, 1 bus 23 vans, 19 daily vehicle runs.
South/West Corridor Improvements Service and Facility Alternatives September 9, 2014 Planning & Project Development Committee March 3, 2015.
06/20/2007 Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation (DRPT) Update on FTA New Initiatives on Transportation Services.
TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Houston, Texas May 2009 Ann Arbor Transportation Plan Update-- Connecting the Land Use & Transportation.
HSTP PLAN DEVELOPMENT Skagit-Island Human Services Transportation Plan July 10, 2014.
SKAGIT-ISLAND HSTP Skagit-Island HSTP Committee Meeting #4 October 1, 2014.
Human Services Coordinated Transportation Plan Thursday July 20, 2006 GF City Hall Rm A102.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December 14, 2010 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Destination 2035.
Greater Mankato Transit Redesign Study Study Overview and Initial Existing Conditions September 2011 In association with: LSA Design and Public Solutions.
Mark Phillips BSDA/Metro Long-Range Planner. The Foundation: Moving Transit Forward.
Welcome to the TSIP Project Webinar Planning Technical Working Group 28 July – 3:30 pm.
TRB/APTA 2004 Bus Rapid Transit Conference When is BRT the Best Option? the Best Option? 1:30 – 2:40 p.m. Paul Larrousse Director, National Transit Institute.
South/West Corridor Transit Improvements PRIMO & ENHANCED AMENITIES PLANNING PHASE September 9, 2014 Planning & Project Development Committee August 11,
Click to edit Master subtitle style 4/8/11 Select Committee on Appropriations Presentation on proposed amendments to public transport grants (PTISG and.
Portland North Small Starts Alternatives Analysis Coordination Meeting June 16, 2009.
AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 – 8:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback on purpose, needs, and alternatives  Sign up for list  Fill.
OPEN HOUSE #4 JUNE AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback  Sign up for list  Fill out comment.
February 24, “Moving Transit Forward”  A fiscally responsible, community-driven vision for restoring, enhancing, and expanding the Metro Transit.
00 Metropolitan Transit System Transit Serving Point Loma September 23, 2008.
Regional Transit Study Project Update. Four open houses held between November , 2009 Informed and engaged the public in the study process Provided.
DC Circulator Transit Development Plan TPB Access for All Advisory Committee October 28, 2010.
1 Presented to the Transportation Planning Board October 15, 2008 Item 9 Metrobus Priority Corridor Network.
Kickoff Meeting for Imperial Valley College/San Diego State University Transit Shuttle Analysis September 14 th, 2015 c.
1 Mountain Metropolitan Transit Sustainability Committee March 20, 2009 Presented By: Sherre Ritenour & Tim McKinney.
Line 22 BRT: Summary Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority May 2003.
What is a TSP? Provides City with guidance for operating and improving a multimodal transportation system Focuses on priority projects, policies, and programs.
1 Status Report on the Bus Systems in the National Capital Region Report of the Regional Bus Subcommittee to the National Capital Region Transportation.
Valley Metro Regional Paratransit Plan Public Meeting January 27, 2016.
South/West Corridor Transit Improvements ZARZAMORA AND MILITARY PRIMO BRT PROJECTS ENVIRONMENTAL AND PRELIMINARY DESIGN PHASE September 9, 2014 VIA Community.
Gastonia Transit Expansion Study City Council/Planning Commission Joint Transportation Workshop September 13, 2007.
Placer County Rural Transit Study Expanding Public Transit Service for Rural Placer County.
GRTC Bus Rapid Transit Project July 17, Agenda 1.BRT Concept 2.Project Goals 3.Project Benefits 4.Project Corridor 5.Proposed Multimodal Access.
Service Guidelines and Standards Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority Board of Directors Meeting September 2015 capmetro.org |1.
Transportation Fee FY2016 January 16, Services Provided by Transportation Stinger Buses - Three routes with 10 buses operating weekdays and two.
FARE STUDY ECOPASS Board of Directors Study Session August 25, 2015.
Indianapolis Public Public Hearing – Proposed 2014 Budget Thursday, August 15, 2013 Transportation Corporation.
A presentation by Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Broward Boulevard Presentation to the Broward MPO TCC and CIR March 2012 Agenda Item NA-1, Attachment.
E XPANDING M OBILITY O PTIONS IN M ARIN Marin Transit’s Paratransit and Mobility Management Programs 1.
TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY RECOMMENDATIONS AND SERVICE OPTIONS JUNE 14, 2016.
Finance Committee & City Council October 10, 2016
Comprehensive Route Network Analysis
Gunnison Valley Transportation Authority (RTA) 2016 Transit Planning Process Funded through a Section 5304 Planning Grant 5/23/2018.
Flagler County Fixed Route Transit Operation Plan
Votran Transit Development Plan (TDP)
San Mateo Countywide Transportation Plan update
Comprehensive Operational Analysis (COA)
Transportation Management Plan Modernization Project
USDOT ADA Service Requirements
Bus Rapid Transit Study
Status Report on Rochester’s DMC Transportation Plan
Transit Integration and Efficiency Study Transit Advisory Committee
GMT NextGen Update CVRPC TAC
Transportation Management Plan Modernization Project
1. Where should buses run and with what frequency?
HRT Workshop: Transit Strategic Plan and Aug-Dec working items
Presentation transcript:

Improving the Passenger Experience Pennsylvania Public Transportation Association (PPTA) April 2015

2 Two Unique Projects LANta’s Enhanced Bus Service (EBS) Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) achieved through Phased Implementation LANtaFlex Demand Responsive shared-ride service open to the general public

3 EBS Project Review Study conducted by team led by AECOM Technical Services with HDR and Taggart Associates Study commenced in summer 2012 Numerous Advisory Committee meetings throughout process Two series of public meetings Revised Draft Final Report and Executive Summary submitted 2/28/14

4 Summary of Recommendations Two route system

5 Summary of Recommendations Two route system

6 Phased Implementation Approach Phase I – Implement EBS 1 as local Phase II – Add limited stop service to EBS 1 Phase III – Implement EBS 2 between West Allentown and South Bethlehem Phase IV – Increase frequency on EBS 1 and EBS 2 Phase V – Add limited stop in Easton Phase VI – Add limited stop along entire EBS 2 TSM option identified

7 Recommended Plan Impacts Net Rev Hours Net Riders to Corridor Net Operating Subsidy ($) Net Riders per Net Rev Hr (Productivity) Net Op Subsidy per Net Rider ($) Phase I9,191504,198241, Phase II15,176515,792756, Phase III29,245594,7301,908, Phase IV47,548629,7443,483, Phase V48,983637,1303,601, Phase VI58,496679,1374,393, TSM13,676514,225625, Current LANtaBus systemwide is $2.80 Op Subsidy/Rider; Current systemwide productivity is 23.8 riders/hour Target is 24.0 riders/ hour

8 Recommended Program of Treatments Improved Stop Amenities Bus Bulbs Queue Jumps Bus Lanes TSP

9 Projected Capital Expenses Queue Jumps Curb LanesBus BulbsTVM'sSheltersVehiclesTotal Phase I Phase II50, ,850866,400480,0001,200,000 2,985,250 Phase III016,670222,200433,200144,0001,800,000 2,616,070 Phase IV000006,000,000 Phase V00222,200048,0001,200,000 1,470,200 Phase VI0108, ,0001,200,000 1,524,355 Total50,000125,025833,2501,299,600888,00011,400,00014,595,875 TSM1,200,000

10 Initial Approach – Service Enhancements Implement service elements of Phase I of EBS1 for 3 years 60 minute frequency for all stops local service Phase I will be designated LANtaBus Route 100 until EBS branding Additional phases would be pursued as deemed necessary Demand based As element of Long Range Transportation Plan Continued advocacy for transit supportive land use along corridors Development/densification of corridor could improve ridership/revenue projections Introduction of brand with Phase II Need to finalize brand and extent of brand Prioritization for brand program

11 Timeline – EBS1 Phase I Implementation of Phase I beginning in September 2016 Three year operational service Recommend implementation of Phase II based on: Performance and demand patterns of Phase I local Regional transportation strategy Specific developments Physical improvements to be pursued separately

12 Timeline – EBS1 Phase II Phase II can be implemented in parts Limited stop express service on top of local service Peak Service only, then implemented during midday period Provides 30 minute route frequency between EBS1 express and local Introduction of Route Branding

13 Initial Approach - Treatments Treatments to be pursued independently and as opportunities arise Most cost effective treatments will be pursued Coordination with PennDOT, LVPC and municipalities to incorporate recommendations into other planned work Grant funding to be used to fund conceptual engineering of queue jumps and 6 th Street bus lane Some treatments addressed planned through LANta’s capital program Transit hub improvements Shelters program

14 Financing Financed through LANta Operating Budget for the first three years Potential for growth in Operating Funding to account for increased costs Seek New/Small Starts for future phases on the Capital Program Pursue and continue detailed planning of service and physical elements of plan to ensure optimal positioning for financing opportunities

15 Rationale for Recommended Approach Consistent with Moving LANta Forward by creating high frequency corridors Responds to riders priorities for higher frequencies of service and longer spans of service Consistent with LANtaBus Service and Performance Targets Grows with and can respond to changes in development Is financially feasible in current environment Uncertainty/Inapplicability of FTA Small Starts funding program or CDP’s Potential for funding through PennDOT demonstration project program Potentially sustainable given growth in operating funding

16

17 Flex provided in Macungie/Alburtis area of Lehigh Valley Previously served by two fixed routes Eliminated due to poorer ridership performance in 2011 Provides service coverage to area characterized by: Rapid Development Numerous Employment Sites Pockets of low-income populations

18 Reservation based Curb-to-curb Shared-ride service Open to general public – no eligibility requirements Hours of operation: 6:00am – 6:00pm Monday through Friday Reservations required at least one day prior to travel, and no more than 14 days in advance. Standing appointments allowed

19 Allows for curb-to-curb service between any origin & desintation point within the Flex Zone Trips with an origin or destination outside of the Flex Zone are transferred to a LANtaBus fixed route to complete trip Managed through contract with Easton Coach Company (ECC) LANtaFlex has same passenger cost as fixed route. All LANtaBus fare instruments accepted on LANtaFlex Cash accepted Day passes sold on-board

20 Nature of Service Small transit vehicles used – 16 passenger No driver assistance for passengers except wheelchair lifts “No-show” policy similar to paratransit Sanctions for repeat violators of the no-show policy No bike racks

21 Service Characteristics Passenger trips cost approximately the same versus former fixed route: $13.89 cost per passenger trip on fixed route previously provided $14.00 cost per passenger trip on LANtaFlex Expanded service coverage Fixed route operated on a small number of main arterials Limited pedestrian infrastructure High vehicle speeds Twelve (12) hour span of service on Flex compared to a small number of peak period and one midday round trip on fixed route

22 Contact Information Brendan Cotter – Director of Planning and Development