Unit 1 Focusing on the Major Work of the Levels Produced under U.S. Department of Education Contract No. ED-VAE-13-C-0066, with StandardsWork, Inc. and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LOOKING AHEAD TO THE NEW CURRICULUM MATH COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS AND CREC.
Advertisements

2008 May 31Standards PD: Day 1 afternoon: slide 1 Goal for the Afternoon Identify content specific to each grade band and each grade level.
Professional Development on the Instructional Shift of Focus Lets Focus on Focus.
Professional Development Module Common Core Math Shift: Focus Grade 6.
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Focus at Grade 5 Professional Development Module.
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Coherence Grade 7 Overview.
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Coherence
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Coherence Grade 8 Overview.
Kindergarten Instructional Shifts-Focus. Why Common Core? Initiated by the National Governors Association (NGA) and Council of Chief State School Officers.
CCSS Mathematics Instructional Shifts 2 nd Grade Overview.
K The Common Core State Standards in Mathematics © Copyright 2011 Institute for Mathematics and Education Welcome to a clickable.
Mathematics Grade Level Considerations for High School.
Transition to CCSS Math What it means and what are the expectations for learning? Middle School Parent Meeting March 26, 2014.
The Common Core State Standards for Mathematics
November 15, :00 PM – 8:30 Auditorium
Common Core State Standards Wolcott Elementary School West Hartford Public Schools.
The Instructional Advances in ELA/Literacy CCR Standards for Adult Education Unit 1 Connecting the College and Career Readiness Standards to the Key Advances.
C OMMON C ORE /PARCC I NFORMATIONAL S ESSION AGENDA Introductions Common Core Standards Overview of CCS in Math & ELA Implementation of Standards PARCC.
Unit 4 Creating High-Quality Writing Prompts Produced under U.S. Department of Education Contract No. ED-VAE-13-C-0066, with StandardsWork, Inc. and Subcontractor,
Arkansas Department of Education-CCSS
WELCOME Day 3 EEA Summer Outcomes for Day 3 The participants will: synthesize their knowledge of the CCSS and available resources. share projects.
CCSS within the Teaching Framework: Mathematics 3-6 Rochester City School District August 9, 2012 August 10, 2012 August 20, 2012 August 27, 2012.
Rigorous Curriculum Design Showcase
Unit 3 Engaging the Three Components of Rigor Produced under U.S. Department of Education Contract No. ED-VAE-13-C-0066, with StandardsWork, Inc. and Subcontractor,
KENNEDY MIDDLE SCHOOL MATHEMATICS PLACEMENT INFORMATION NIGHT June 8, 2012.
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: The Key Shifts.
2010 New Math Standards. Mathematical Practices 1. Attend to precision 2. Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others 3. Make sense.
Mathematics Grade Level Considerations for Grades 6-8.
Welcome to your child’s 6 th Grade Math Class On Team (6B) Welcome to your child’s 6 th Grade Math Class On Team (6B) Where we try to make sense of numbers.
Introduction to the Math Shifts of the Common Core State Standards.
Instructional Shifts for Mathematics. achievethecore.org 2 Instructional Shifts in Mathematics 1.Focus: Focus strongly where the Standards focus. 2.Coherence:
Middle School Liaison Meeting
COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS OVERVIEW The Shifts: What they are and why they are important.
Exploration of Key Instructional Advances in Mathematics Mimi Alkire of StandardsWork, Inc. U.S. Department of Education Office of Career, Technical, and.
Understanding the Shifts in the Common Core State Standards A Focus on Mathematics Wednesday, October 19 th, :00 pm – 3:30 pm Doug Sovde, Senior.
Three Shifts of the Alaska Mathematics Standards.
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Review Focus and Coherence A Closer look at Rigor.
Mathematics Shift 1: Focus What the Student Does…What the Teacher Does…What the Principal Does… Spend more time thinking and working on.
Standards for Mathematics Standards for Mathematical Practice Apply across all grade levels Describe habits of mind of a mathematically proficient student.
ALGEBRA WORKSHOP SESSION 3 Tricia Profic, Erie 1 BOCES.
 Declining US competitiveness with other developed countries  Largely flat performance on NAEP over the past 40 years  High rates of college remediation.
 Common Core State Standards Or College and Career State Standards CCSS.
How to read the grade level standards Standards Clusters Domains define what students should understand and be able to do. are groups of related standards.
EALR 2: Problem Solving EALR 3: Reasoning EALR 4: Communication EALR 5: Connections Component 5.3: Relate mathematical concepts and procedures to real-world.
Adapted from Engageny.org. What the Student Does… What the Teacher Does… What the Principal Does… Spend more time thinking and working on fewer concepts.
Teachers today must prepare students for a world of possibilities that may not currently exist. The workforce of tomorrow must be flexible, motivated,
Unit 2 Thinking Across Levels to Connect Learning Produced under U.S. Department of Education Contract No. ED-VAE-13-C-0066, with StandardsWork, Inc. and.
1 Grade-Level Standards  K-8 grade-by-grade standards organized by domain  9-12 high school standards organized by conceptual categories Common Core.
A CLOSER LOOK AT THE CCSS FOR MATHEMATICS COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS PRESENTED BY: BEATRIZ ALDAY.
Lunch and Learn: A Collaborative Time for North Carolina Teachers Your Presenter Information.
Chapter 1 Algebraic Reasoning Chapter 2 Integers and Rational Numbers Chapter 3 Applying Rational Numbers Chapter 4 Patterns and Functions Chapter 5 Proportional.
Unit 4 Connecting Standards for Mathematical Practice to Content Produced under U.S. Department of Education Contract No. ED-VAE-13-C-0066, with StandardsWork,
Language Objective: Students will be able to practice agreeing and disagreeing with partner or small group, interpret and discuss illustrations, identify.
Understanding the Common Core State Standards March 2012 These slides were taken from: and I have deleted.
Mathematics Shifts and Integration of Initiatives Common Core State Standards Session 2 K-5 Mathematics.
Section 1 Systems of Professional Learning Module 1 Grades 6–12: Focus on Practice Standards.
2010 Arizona Mathematics Standards (Common Core).
INSTRUCTIONAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners, Inc. May 30, 2012.
Welcome to Curriculum Night I am so glad you are here. Feel free to ask questions. Remember our time is short. Welcome to Curriculum Night for Ms. Figurelli’s.
Key Advances, Math Practices, and Translating Math Standards Into College and Career Readiness-Aligned Curriculum and Instruction.
Mathematics in the Common Core 6 instructional shifts cassandra sponseller director of teaching and learning.
Modeling K The Common Core State Standards in Mathematics Geometry Measurement and Data The Number System Number and Operations.
Math Course & Placement Information Night Avon Grove Intermediate School May 9, 2016.
Navigating the Instructional Shifts of the Common Core Learning Standards: Shifting Perspectives – Changing Actions.
EnVisionMATH Common Core K-8 Publisher’s Criteria for the Common Core State Standards.
Key Advances, Math Practices, and Translating Math Standards Into College and Career Readiness-Aligned Curriculum and Instruction.
LITCHFIELD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT MATH CURRICULUM
Math Shifts Focus Coherence Rigor
Common Core Vs Kansas Standards
Problem Solving and data Analysis
Presentation transcript:

Unit 1 Focusing on the Major Work of the Levels Produced under U.S. Department of Education Contract No. ED-VAE-13-C-0066, with StandardsWork, Inc. and Subcontractor, Reingold, Inc. December 2014 The Instructional Advances in Mathematics CCR Standards for Adult Education

Three Key Advances Prompted by the CCR Standards 1.Focus: Focus strongly where the CCR Standards focus. 2.Coherence: Design learning around coherent progressions from level to level. 3.Rigor: Pursue conceptual understanding, procedural skill and fluency, and application—all with equal intensity. 2

Unit 1 Objectives Focusing on the Major Work of the Levels  Understand the research base that explains the importance of focusing each level of the CCR Standards on concepts and skills that are critical for preparing students for college and careers.  Delve into the CCR Standards and build an understanding of the critical areas for each level as a foundation for developing a coherent and rigorous mathematics curriculum. 3

Rationale for Focus Relevance and Importance Based on the Research  High-performing nations significantly narrow the scope of content so that students can focus their time and energy. Focusing on too many topics has a negative impact on student performance (TIMSS research).  Focusing on what is emphasized in the standards gives students a strong foundation and uses instructional time productively (ACT survey of college faculty).  Identifying concepts that support the major work of each level creates a coherent flow of knowledge and skills within the level. 4

Implications of Focus on Instruction  Focus means that some content is more important than other content and receives more time and attention.  Other content supports the more important content.  The Standards for Mathematical Practice become a critical focus in the CCR Standards and the mathematics curriculum. 5

Major Areas of Focus  Level A: Whole numbers—addition and subtraction concepts, skills, and problem-solving to 20; place value and whole number relationships to 100; and reasoning about geometric shapes and linear measures  Level B: Whole numbers and fractions—place value, comparison, and addition and subtraction to 1000; fluency to 100; multiplication and division to 100; fractions concepts, skills, and problem-solving; 2-dimensional shape concepts; standard units for measuring time, liquid, and mass; and area measurements 6

Major Areas of Focus  Level C: Positive whole numbers, fractions, and decimals—fluency with multi-digit whole number and decimal operations; decimal place value concepts and skills to thousandths; comparing, ordering, and operating with fractions; fluency with sums and differences of fractions; understanding rates and ratios; early expressions and equations; area, surface area, and volume; classification of 2- dimensional shapes; and developing understanding of data distributions, including creating dot plots in the coordinate plane 7

8 Major Areas of Focus  Level D: Rational numbers—fluent arithmetic of positive and negative rational numbers; applying rates, ratios, and proportions; applying linear expressions, equations, and functions; systems of linear equations; classification and analysis of 2- and 3-dimensional figures; developing similarity and congruence concepts, including problems of scale; solving right triangles using the Pythagorean theorem; random sampling of populations to summarize, describe, display, interpret, and draw inferences; bivariate data and a line of good fit; and development of probability concepts

 Level E: Real numbers—extending number system to include all real numbers; equivalent expressions involving radicals and rational exponents; reasoning about units and levels of precision; linear, quadratic, and exponential expressions, equations, and functions; linear inequalities; algebraic and graphic models of functions; applying similarity and congruence to 2-dimensional figures; and analyzing 1- and 2-variable data sets, including using frequency tables 9 Major Areas of Focus

10 Now let’s do some hands-on work with focusing on the major work of the levels …

Materials  Directions for Participants  Worksheet: Focusing on the Major Work of the Levels  Resource: Major Work of the Levels  Resource: CCR Standards for Adult Education 11

Directions 1.Circle the topics on the worksheet for each level that are part of the major focus for that level. 2.Use the Major Work of the Levels resource to help you make your decisions. You also may use a copy of the CCR Standards, if needed. 3.Discuss your selections and rationales at your table. On the following slide, there are some questions to guide your discussion. 12

 What are some rationales for why you did or did not circle a particular topic as critical to the level?  Did anyone have a hard time deciding to which critical area a topic belongs? Tell us where and why.  Are any of the lesson objectives that you did not select for the given level critical to a different level?  Do you think that any of the topics you did not select are important to teach? If so, how might you relate them to one of the critical areas for the level? Discussion Questions 13

Reflections  Why focus?  There’s so much mathematics that students could be learning, why limit what students are taught? 14

Next Steps  How has participating in this activity changed your thinking about the CCR Standards?  How will you use the information and understanding you have acquired to improve your teaching practice and student learning?  What additional training and tools would strengthen your ability to do so? 15