Andrea Giammanco CMS Tracker Week April 20031 DS ROD Prototype: “final” optohybrids “final” CCUM integrated in the rod with new FEC_to_CCUM adapter (Guido.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TEC X5 Setup (1) 1 Front + 1 Back petal, fully equipped (28 modules F.P modules B.P. + AOH + DOHM) Petal assembly IPN-Lyon (F.P.), RWTH-Aachen I.
Advertisements

Kondo GNANVO Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne FL.
Test Setup for PHOBOS Hybrid/Module Testing at MIT Pradeep Sarin 31 July 98.
Micromegas studies using cosmic rays Franck Sabatié May 7th 2009 Saclay cosmic ray bench Data acquisition system and analysis tools MIP detection Position.
X5 TEST BEAM preliminary studies Outline  Voltage scan  PLL scan + Neighbour Strips  Sensor Uniformity  Comments  Special Trigger (Friday)
Study of Photon Sensors using the Laser System 05/7/12 Niigata University, Japan Sayaka Iba, Editha P. Jacosalem, Hiroaki Ono, Noriko.
FNAL TB09 Plots Alessandra Borgia Syracuse Unviersity Marina Artuso, Jianchun Wang, Ray Mountain January 20, 2010.
Update on Analysis of FNAL TB09 Jianchun Wang for the group Syracuse Univesity Jan 29 th,2010.
1 Scintillating Fibre Cosmic Ray Test Results Malcolm Ellis Imperial College London Monday 29 th March 2004.
Juan Valls 1 TOB System Test Status Report  DS ROD System Test Setup  DAQ Software  DS ROD Characterization PLL, FED Timing Scans OPTO Scans  Noise.
The first testing of the CERC and PCB Version II with cosmic rays Catherine Fry Imperial College London CALICE Meeting, CERN 28 th – 29 th June 2004 Prototype.
LHCC referees meeting, 10 October 2005Børge Svane Nielsen, NBI1 Status of the FMD LHCC referees meeting, 10 October 2005 Børge Svane Nielsen Niels Bohr.
1 US Testing Status-Anthony AffolderModule Testing Meeting, Dec. 11, 2003 Update of US Testing Status Anthony Affolder On behalf of the US testing group.
The Transverse detector is made of an array of 256 scintillating fibers coupled to Avalanche PhotoDiodes (APD). The small size of the fibers (5X5mm) results.
1 November 18, 2014 DOE SC-OPA Review of 12 GeV ENC vs. preamp load FSSR2 by FNAL Single chip on a PCB Load from capacitors SVT module testing.
System Test Status Report R. D’Alessandro 1 TIB System Test Report Where were we ….., Mechanics (layer 3 prototype) Mother Cable & Interconnect Board System.
Updates on GEMs characterization with APV electronics K. Gnanvo, N. Liyanage, K. Saenboonruang.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 EC / PCAL ENERGY CALIBRATION Cole Smith UVA PCAL EC Outline Why 2 calorimeters? Requirements Using.
Status of the NO ν A Near Detector Prototype Timothy Kutnink Iowa State University For the NOvA Collaboration.
Waclaw Karpinski General meeting CMS TRACKER SYSTEM TEST Outer Barrel –TOB Inner Barrel –TIB End cap –TEC TIB TOB TEC Different Geometries One.
“End station A setup” data analysis Josef Uher. Outline Introduction to setup and analysis Quartz bar start counter MA and MCP PMT in the prototype.
Guido_Tonelli / CMS_TSC / 5 February Time stability of ST sensors The problem The sensors re-measuring campaign Failure analysis Conclusions.
Commissioning and Operation of the CMS Tracker analogue optical link system at TIF with CMSSW: R.Bainbridge, A.Dos Santos Assis Jesus, K.A.Gill, V. Radicci.
July 19, 2006VLCW-06 Vancouver1 Scint/MAPMT Muon Prototype Operation Robert Abrams Indiana University.
Operation of the CMS Tracker at the Large Hadron Collider
Design and development of micro-strip stacked module prototypes for tracking at S-LHC Motivations Tracking detectors at future hadron colliders will operate.
October, 2001CMS Tracker Electronics1 Module studies at IC OUTLINE laboratory setup description, APV I2C settings pulse shape studies (dependence on ISHA,
Swadhin Taneja Stony Brook University On behalf of Vertex detector team at PHENIX Collaboration 112/2/2015S. Taneja -- DNP Conference, Santa Fe Nov 1-6.
Update on the Triple GEM Detectors for Muon Tomography K. Gnanvo, M. Hohlmann, L. Grasso, A. Quintero Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL.
Status of photon sensor study at Niigata University -- SiPM and MPPC -- Photon sensor mini workshop 05/9/16 University Niigata University.
- Performance Studies & Production of the LHCb Silicon Tracker Stefan Koestner (University Zurich) on behalf of the Silicon Tracker Collaboration IT -
Test beam preliminary results D. Di Filippo, P. Massarotti, T. Spadaro.
Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL
E.Guschin (INR,Moscow) 3 May 2006Calorimeter commissioning meeting Status of PRS/SPD detector Cosmic test results Installation/tuning of monitoring system.
P. Colas on behalf of LCTPC. Strategy for Micromegas The Micromegas option is studied within the same (EUDET) facility as the other options (see R. Diener’s.
Wenxin Wang On behalf of LCTPC 01/11/2012W.Wang_ IEEE Conference Nuclear Science Symposium, Medical Imaging Conference & workshop on Room-Temperature.
1 Calorimeters LED control LHCb CALO meeting Anatoli Konoplyannikov /ITEP/ Status of the calorimeters LV power supply and ECS control Status of.
5-9 June 2006Erika Garutti - CALOR CALICE scintillator HCAL commissioning experience and test beam program Erika Garutti On behalf of the CALICE.
9/17/2008TWEPP 2008, R. Stringer - UC Riverside 1 CMS Tracker Services: present status and potential for upgrade Robert Stringer University of California,
Abstract Beam Test of a Large-area GEM Detector Prototype for the Upgrade of the CMS Muon Endcap System V. Bhopatkar, M. Hohlmann, M. Phipps, J. Twigger,
CHIPP meeting Appenberg, 24 Aug 2009 Preparation for LHC beam, Jeroen van Tilburg 1/15 Jeroen van Tilburg (Universität Zürich) LHCb: Preparation for LHC.
F Don Lincoln, Fermilab f Fermilab/Boeing Test Results for HiSTE-VI Don Lincoln Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory.
Beam Test of a Large-Area GEM Detector Prototype for the Upgrade of the CMS Muon Endcap System Vallary Bhopatkar M. Hohlmann, M. Phipps, J. Twigger, A.
Construction and beam test analysis of GE1/1 prototype III gaseous electron multiplier (GEM) detector V. BHOPATKAR, E. HANSEN, M. HOHLMANN, M. PHIPPS,
Six modules Micromegas TPC beam test & Test bench 12/4/2012W.Wang_RD51 mini week1 D. Attié, P. Colas, M. Dixit, P. Hayman, W. Wang.
The CMS Silicon Strip Tracker Carlo Civinini INFN-Firenze On behalf of the CMS Tracker Collaboration Sixth International "Hiroshima" Symposium on the Development.
Irradiated 3D sensor testbeam results Alex Krzywda On behalf of CMS 3D collaboration Purdue University March 15, 2012.
Juan Valls - LECC03 Amsterdam 1 Recent System Test Results from the CMS TOB Detector  Introduction  ROD System Test Setup  ROD Electrical and Optical.
J. Valls, CMS L2-L3 Meeting, Sept ROD Production at CERN  ROD Flow During Production  ROD Flow at CERN  ROD Testing Areas  Infrastructure  Equipment.
Summer Student 2003Ferro Livia1. Summer Student 2003Ferro Livia2 Contents Experimental setup Thermal behaviour and cooling performance of the TOB structures.
Upgrade with Silicon Vertex Tracker Rachid Nouicer Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) For the PHENIX Collaboration Stripixel VTX Review October 1, 2008.
CdTe prototype detector testing Anja Schubert The University of Melbourne 9 May 2011 Updates.
Electrical Tests of Modules and Ladders Markus Friedl (HEPHY Vienna) 2 October 2014.
3/06/06 CALOR 06Alexandre Zabi - Imperial College1 CMS ECAL Performance: Test Beam Results Alexandre Zabi on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group CMS ECAL.
1 Methods of PSD energy calibration. 2 Dependence of energy resolution on many factors Constant term is essential only for energy measurement of single.
Panja Luukka. Silicon Beam Telescope (SiBT) Group Since 2007 a collaboration of several CMS institutes has been operating a silicon micro-strip beam telescope.
Resolution Studies of the CMS ECAL in the 2003 Test Beam
The Beam Test at Fermilab:
Panagiotis Kokkas Univ. of Ioannina
Detection of muons at 150 GeV/c with a CMS Preshower Prototype
Roberto Chierici - CERN
X5 quasi offline Analysis
PCAL Cosmic Ray Tests Progress Report C. Smith μ U V W MODULE 2
Igor Mandić1, Vladimir Cindro1, Gregor Kramberger1 and Marko Mikuž1,2
TIB module performance at X5 Test beam – preliminary studies
5% The CMS all silicon tracker simulation
Update of US Testing Status
Vertex Detector Overview Prototypes R&D Plans Summary.
Beam Test Results for the CMS Forward Pixel Detector
Imperial laser system and analysis
Presentation transcript:

Andrea Giammanco CMS Tracker Week April DS ROD Prototype: “final” optohybrids “final” CCUM integrated in the rod with new FEC_to_CCUM adapter (Guido and Farooq) Noise (briefly) Noise (briefly) Physics signals Physics signals CCUM 5 XDAQ latest release (to be used in forthcoming beam test)  New FEC supervisor  Substantially higher speed Commissioned by Paolo & Laurent Problems of PMC very low trigger frequency cured in the XDAQ software (Laurent) for cosmic runs

Andrea Giammanco CMS Tracker Week April The ROD test setup See previous talks at the last tracker and cms weeks ! Alu box, gas tight, with patch panel for pipes ( C 6 F 14 cooling and dry air) and other services (it can house 2 rods) Modules, optohybrids, CCUM, high voltage Daq PC with 1 TSC, 1 FEC and 3 FED cards, DAQ Software

Andrea Giammanco CMS Tracker Week April Basic tuning procedure of DAQ settings well established in XDAQ discussed in previous system test presentations (Paolo) Standard APV settings Time alignment in the FED PLL scan Optimization of laser bias and gain [N.B. I sha =80 V psp =30 inverting mode] (24 and 2, with non individual tuning) Detailed study of noise & correlated noise as for SS rod repeated for all modules Excellent behaviour low common mode flat noise distribution

Andrea Giammanco CMS Tracker Week April Noise studied in all modules… CCUM ped i = ev  tot  tot : RMS of ADC i -ped i  d  d : RMS of 0.5(ADC i -ADC i+1 )  nrm  nrm : RMS of ADC i -ped i -CMN 0  lin  lin : RMS of ADC i -ped i -CMN i CMN 0 = strip CMN i = b+a i a = CM Slope FNAL modules old ceramic hybrid - DCU2

Andrea Giammanco CMS Tracker Week April Study of physics signals 106 Ru 61 (Q=3.5 MeV) Cosmics Analysis: tools developed by Roberto, Paolo, Andrea Trigger rate ~500 Hz Trigger rate ~0.5 Hz TSC gate = 6 ns Low voltage Hamamatsu PM Well assessed delay scan to find signal (Laurent)

Andrea Giammanco CMS Tracker Week April Cluster finding 1.S/N > 2 for every strip in a cluster 2.S/N > 5 for the highest signal strip Signal: sum of the signals of the strips Noise: noise of the seed Very simple cluster definition: 5 2 S/N strips cluster not a cluster (“seed”) No special treatment for bad strips

Andrea Giammanco CMS Tracker Week April Physics signals - source Source on the center of a sensor Deconvolution mode / inverter ON S/N=21.2 Det #1

Andrea Giammanco CMS Tracker Week April Physics signals - source peak mode inverter ON S/N=33.3 Det #1

Andrea Giammanco CMS Tracker Week April Det #7  tot  tot : RMS of ADC i -ped i  d  d : RMS of 0.5(ADC i -ADC i+1 )  lin  lin : RMS of ADC i -ped i -CMN i CMN 0 = strip CMN i = b+a i a = CM Slope  nrm  nrm : RMS of ADC i -ped i -CMN 0 Group of missing and shorted bonds missing bond (PA) missing bond (S1-S2) Partial signal recovery from neighbours:

Andrea Giammanco CMS Tracker Week April Physics signals - Cosmics ~20% higher than  rays Deconvolution mode / inverter ON S/N=25.6 Det #1

Andrea Giammanco CMS Tracker Week April Time delay scan N clusters /N triggers vs delay N clusters /N triggers t=0 Not the detector efficiency!  upper =N upper&lower /N lower =99.9%  lower =N upper&lower /N upper =99.8% noise of scintillator spurious triggers (not ideal collimator) Use only events seen by the other detector: Det #7

Andrea Giammanco CMS Tracker Week April Source on the bonding N clusters /N triggers t=0 subtracting Source on the center Source on the bonding Det #7 Evidence for region with lower charge collection efficiency near the edge normalized to same area

Andrea Giammanco CMS Tracker Week April Source on the overlap CCUM x axis

Andrea Giammanco CMS Tracker Week April Alignment 7-1: strips 7-8: strips CCUM Rod alignment pins were not integrated! x axis 2-8: strips (  m) (  m)(  m)

Andrea Giammanco CMS Tracker Week April “Tracking” with 2 hits CCUM Deviations from linearity due to the finite size of the source 3 mm 7 1  m=tg  Slope of the line passing through the hits in 7 & 1 vs Position on 7 x position of the source

Andrea Giammanco CMS Tracker Week April “Tracking” with 4 hits CCUM Slope of the best fit line for the hits in 7 & 1 & 2 & 8 vs Position on 7 3 mm 8 mm x axis  m=tg  x position of the source

Andrea Giammanco CMS Tracker Week April Conclusions  Fully equipped DS rod thoroughly tested also with physics signals: no problem found.  Analysis of physics signals provides a complementary view of detector defects.  Simple method to qualify rod geometry commissioned.  Calibration of 106 Ru 61 vs high energy cosmic muons performed 106 Ru 61 : Cosmics: deco: peak: S/N=21 S/N=33 S/N=25 If muons 500  m) = electrons noise deco) = 1600 electrons identical to predictions.

Andrea Giammanco CMS Tracker Week April Electrons vs capacitance

Andrea Giammanco CMS Tracker Week April Noise: module #7 FNAL module - old ceramic hybrid - DCU2 To be compared with performance on physics signals (deconvolution) ped i = ev  tot  tot : RMS of ADC i -ped i  d  d : RMS of 0.5(ADC i -ADC i+1 )  nrm  nrm : RMS of ADC i -ped i -CMN 0  lin  lin : RMS of ADC i -ped i -CMN i CMN 0 = strip CMN i = b+a i a = CM Slope

Andrea Giammanco CMS Tracker Week April Noise: module #1 FNAL module - old ceramic hybrid - DCU2 To be compared with performance on physics signals (deconvolution) ped i = ev  tot  tot : RMS of ADC i -ped i  d  d : RMS of 0.5(ADC i -ADC i+1 )  nrm  nrm : RMS of ADC i -ped i -CMN 0  lin  lin : RMS of ADC i -ped i -CMN i CMN 0 = strip CMN i = b+a i a = CM Slope

Andrea Giammanco CMS Tracker Week April Noise: module #8 FNAL module - old ceramic hybrid - DCU2 To be compared with performance on physics signals (deconvolution) ped i = ev  tot  tot : RMS of ADC i -ped i  d  d : RMS of 0.5(ADC i -ADC i+1 )  nrm  nrm : RMS of ADC i -ped i -CMN 0  lin  lin : RMS of ADC i -ped i -CMN i CMN 0 = strip CMN i = b+a i a = CM Slope

Andrea Giammanco CMS Tracker Week April Noise: module #2 FNAL module - old ceramic hybrid - DCU2 To be compared with performance on physics signals (deconvolution) ped i = ev  tot  tot : RMS of ADC i -ped i  d  d : RMS of 0.5(ADC i -ADC i+1 )  nrm  nrm : RMS of ADC i -ped i -CMN 0  lin  lin : RMS of ADC i -ped i -CMN i CMN 0 = strip CMN i = b+a i a = CM Slope

Andrea Giammanco CMS Tracker Week April Det #7 ADC i -ped i -CMN i CMN 0 = strip CMN i = b+a i a = CM Slope Non gaussian noise! ADC i -ped i -CMN 0 kurtosis