The following lecture has been approved for University Undergraduate Students This lecture may contain information, ideas, concepts and discursive anecdotes.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beyond Null Hypothesis Testing Supplementary Statistical Techniques.
Advertisements

MSS 905 Methods of Missiological Research
Azra Rafique Khalid Mahmood. Introduction “To learn each and everything in a limited time frame of degree course is not possible for students”. (Mahmood,
Health-related quality of life in diabetic patients and controls without diabetes in refugee camps in Gaza strip: a cross-sectional study By: Ashraf Eljedi:
The following lecture has been approved for University Undergraduate Students This lecture may contain information, ideas, concepts and discursive anecdotes.
Simple Short Reports #2 Junk Food Monkeys Dr. Craig Jackson Senior Lecturer in Health Psychology School of Health and Policy Studies Faculty of Health.
Today’s Agenda Review Homework #1 [not posted]
C82MCP Diploma Statistics School of Psychology University of Nottingham 1 Overview of Lecture Independent and Dependent Variables Between and Within Designs.
Research Protocols Dr. Craig Jackson Senior Lecturer in Health Psychology School of Health and Policy Studies Faculty of Health & Community Care University.
The following lecture has been approved for University Undergraduate Students This lecture may contain information, ideas, concepts and discursive anecdotes.
Quantitative Business Methods for Decision Making Estimation and Testing of Hypotheses.
Clinical Leadership Skills Acquisition in Nurse Residents
Understanding Research Results
The following lecture has been approved for University Undergraduate Students This lecture may contain information, ideas, concepts and discursive anecdotes.
Collecting, Presenting, and Analyzing Research Data By: Zainal A. Hasibuan Research methodology and Scientific Writing W# 9 Faculty.
RESEARCH A systematic quest for undiscovered truth A way of thinking
Calvary Centre for Palliative Care Research The use of an emergency medication kit (EMK) in palliative care community practice.– The EMK Study Dr Tracey.
The paired sample experiment The paired t test. Frequently one is interested in comparing the effects of two treatments (drugs, etc…) on a response variable.
Analyzing Reliability and Validity in Outcomes Assessment (Part 1) Robert W. Lingard and Deborah K. van Alphen California State University, Northridge.
Review – Using Standard Deviation Here are eight test scores from a previous Stats 201 class: 35, 59, 70, 73, 75, 81, 84, 86. The mean and standard deviation.
Evidence-Based Medicine 3 More Knowledge and Skills for Critical Reading Karen E. Schetzina, MD, MPH.
What do Centurions think about our school spirit? Diana Tapia Period
POSTER TEMPLATES BY: Research Objective(s) Results Discussion References Introduction/Significance Study Procedures Specify.
“The Effect of Patient Complexity on Treatment Outcomes for Patients Enrolled in an Integrated Depression Treatment Program- a Pilot Study” Ryan Miller,
Estimating a Population Proportion
© New Zealand Ministry of Education copying restricted to use by New Zealand education sector. Page 1 Consider the Evidence Evidence-driven.
Chapter 12 A Primer for Inferential Statistics What Does Statistically Significant Mean? It’s the probability that an observed difference or association.
 In Chapter 10 we tested a parameter from a population represented by a sample against a known population ( ).  In chapter 11 we will test a parameter.
Depression Screening of Children and Adolescents With Diabetes Lizzy Shaw
Kano Model & Multivariate Statistics Dr. Surej P John.
The Normal Curve Theoretical Symmetrical Known Areas For Each Standard Deviation or Z-score FOR EACH SIDE:  34.13% of scores in distribution are b/t the.
Sampling Error.  When we take a sample, our results will not exactly equal the correct results for the whole population. That is, our results will be.
Does Clinical Training Facilitate Feigning Schizophrenia on the MMPI-2? Bagby, R.M., Rogers, R., Nicholson, R., Buis,T, Seeman, M.V., Rector N. (1997).
Reasoning in Psychology Using Statistics Psychology
Appendix B: Statistical Methods. Statistical Methods: Graphing Data Frequency distribution Histogram Frequency polygon.
The following lecture has been approved for University Undergraduate Students This lecture may contain information, ideas, concepts and discursive anecdotes.
Chapters 6 & 7 Overview Created by Erin Hodgess, Houston, Texas.
Chronic pelvic pain Journal Club 17 th June 2011 Dr Claire Hoxley (GPST1) Dr Harpreet Rayar (GPST2)
HYPOTHESIS TESTING FOR DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MEANS AND BETWEEN PROPORTIONS.
1 Collecting and Interpreting Quantitative Data Deborah K. van Alphen and Robert W. Lingard California State University, Northridge.
King Faisal University جامعة الملك فيصل Deanship of E-Learning and Distance Education عمادة التعلم الإلكتروني والتعليم عن بعد [ ] 1 جامعة الملك فيصل عمادة.
1 Machismo as a determinant for HIV/STD risk behavior among Latino MSM Jacqueline L. Sears, MPH.
METHODOLOGY Target population All students from 2 nd year to 4 th year in Audiology and Speech Sciences Department in National University Malaysia (UKM).
A2 unit 4 Clinical Psychology 4) Content Reliability of the diagnosis of mental disorders Validity of the diagnosis of mental disorders Cultural issues.
CHAPTER 15: THE NUTS AND BOLTS OF USING STATISTICS.
Practice As part of a program to reducing smoking, a national organization ran an advertising campaign to convince people to quit or reduce their smoking.
1. Data Processing Sci Info Skills.
Statistical Analysis Urmia University
ERFCON th International Conference of the Faculty of Education and Rehabilitation Sciences University of Zagreb 17 – 19 May 2017, Zagreb SOCIAL COMPETENCE.
Hypothesis testing March 20, 2000.
Hypothesis Testing and Confidence Intervals (Part 1): Using the Standard Normal Lecture 8 Justin Kern October 10 and 12, 2017.
AXIS critical Appraisal of cross sectional Studies
A2 unit 4 Clinical Psychology
Inferential statistics,
Issues in Inferential Statistics
Analyzing Reliability and Validity in Outcomes Assessment Part 1
Lights! Camera! Graphs! Photos!
Wednesday, September 23 Descriptive v. Inferential statistics.
Charles D. Gerson, Mary-Joan Gerson 
Reasoning in Psychology Using Statistics
Work Schedule Methodological Issues Variables Constant
Statistics for the Social Sciences
Consider the Evidence Evidence-driven decision making
Introduction: Statistics meets corpus linguistics
Reasoning in Psychology Using Statistics
Analyzing Reliability and Validity in Outcomes Assessment
Xbar Chart By Farrokh Alemi Ph.D
Reasoning in Psychology Using Statistics
Sampling Techniques Assist. Prof. Maha A. AL-Nuaimi Ph.D/ Comm. Med
Collecting and Interpreting Quantitative Data
Presentation transcript:

The following lecture has been approved for University Undergraduate Students This lecture may contain information, ideas, concepts and discursive anecdotes that may be thought provoking and challenging It is not intended for the content or delivery to cause offence Any issues raised in the lecture may require the viewer to engage in further thought, insight, reflection or critical evaluation

Hypothetical Research Project IBS study Analysis Dr. Craig Jackson Senior Lecturer in Health Psychology School of Health and Policy Studies Faculty of Health & Community Care University of Central

Hypothetical Research Project - Checklist Identify a research question Identify a population Identify a sample and capture it Select a methodology Research tools Subject deployment Statistics and analysis Interpretation Write up

Some research has suggested that IBS is more prevalent in some occupational groups than others eg. night workers Some research has suggested that IBS is more prevalent in females than males Some research has suggested that IBS is more prevalent in some personality types than others What questions are raised here ? Hypothetical Research Project – Checklist Irritable Bowel Syndrome

ARE WE INTERESTED IN LOOKING AT DIFFERENT WORKING GROUPS? Shift workers v’s Flexi workers Factory workers v’s Office workers Sedentary workers v’s Mobile workers Exposed workers v’s Non / Low Exposed workers Salaried workers v’s Waged workers Temporary workers v’s Permanent workers

Irritable Bowel Syndrome ARE WE INTERESTED IN LOOKING AT DIFFERENT GENDERS? Male v’s Female Parent v’s Non – Parent Gay v’s Straight Single ’s Married

Irritable Bowel Syndrome ARE WE INTERESTED IN LOOKING AT DIFFERENT PATIENT GROUPS? Personality type A v’s Type B Neurotic v’s Normals Depressed v’s Normals Former psychiatric patient v’s Normals

Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Workers WHAT QUESTIONS SHOULD BE ASKED? 1. Do night workers suffer IBS more than day workers ? 2. Do females suffer IBS more than males ? 3. Do manual workers suffer IBS more than skilled workers ?

Hypothetical Research Project - Checklist Identify a research question Identify a population Identify a sample and capture it Select a methodology Research tools Subject deployment Statistics and analysis Interpretation Write up

Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Workers Do nocturnal workers suffer IBS more than diurnal workers ? Do females suffer IBS more than males ? Do manual workers suffer IBS more than skilled workers ? Different shiftsDifferent sexesDifferent skills A population

Hypothetical Research Project - Checklist Identify a research question Identify a population Identify a sample and capture it Select a methodology Research tools Subject deployment Statistics and analysis Interpretation Write up

Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Workers Sampling from the population Need Exclusion & Inclusion Criteria 1.Subjects must have IBS (Is this a good criteria? There is an argument for and against it) (Is this a good criteria? There is an argument for and against it) 2. Subjects must be between certain age limits: Subjects must not have any other organic condition 4. Subjects must not be currently receiving psychiatric treatment 5. Subjects must speak English as a first language 6.Subjects must work full time

Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Workers Convenient Sample Frame would be: 1. Patients attending a local gastroenterology clinic Fit into the exclusion criteria Could be recruited into the study Problem with this method ? 2. People working locally Could be recruited into the study Problem with this method ?

Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Workers Methodology? “Patients diagnosed with IBS showing no known physical cause for their symptoms, with no other illness (the Rome Criteria)…..who work in an occupational setting that passes the exclusion criteria.” Knowing who the sample is and how they can best be accessed determines and shapes the methodology...

Legion of IBS patients Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Workers Methodology Over 12 months, we recruit patients on their initial visit to the gastro unit (prior to treatment) into the project Use questionnaire method to collect data Each patient will receive a score, based on their responses to questions about their: SYMPTOMS SEX SHIFT and TYPE OF WORK What type of subject design might this be?

Hypothetical Research Project - Checklist Identify a research question Identify a population Identify a sample and capture it Select a methodology Research tools Subject deployment Statistics and analysis Interpretation Write up

Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Workers Research Tools What is being measured? IBS symptoms -Develop a symptom scale Sex-Ask Shift- Ask Work-Ask Develop the scale required to get the data Remember to pilot any questionnaire / scale developed It must be valid i.e. measures what it is supposed to measure Otherwise CONSTANT ERRORS will encroach into data

Hypothetical Research Project - Checklist Identify a research question Identify a population Identify a sample and capture it Select a methodology Research tools Subject deployment Statistics and analysis Interpretation Write up

GroupNIBS Score Shift - Day Night Sex -Female Male WorkManual Non manual Night shift report greater IBS symptoms Females report greater IBS symptoms Skilled report greater IBS symptoms Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Workers Preliminary Results After 12 months 200 Patients agreed to take part 150 returned completed questionnaire packs

Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Workers Preliminary Figures

Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Workers Preliminary Results Three findings already from simply looking at some DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS about the data A fourth finding from the DESCRIPTIVE STATS is the distribution / frequency of responses to the IBS scale But it is not enough just to present the 4 graphs. INFERENTIAL STATISTICS are required

Hypothetical Research Project Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Workers INFERENTIAL STATISTICS - The T test IBS score as dependent variable, with SHIFT as the independent variable, operating on 2 levels (day & night) DayNightT P IBS score as dependent variable, with SEX as the independent variable, operating on 2 levels (female & male) FemaleMaleT P IBS score as dependent variable, with WORK TYPE as the independent variable, operating on 2 levels (manual & non-manual) ManualNon-ManualT P

Further Investigation of IBS Data Obtain IBS and Shift data from Use the dataset to proved the descriptive data about the IBS sample for each of the groups of interest - SHIFT, SEX, WORKTYPE Mean IBS scores Standard deviations Minimum IBS scores Maximum IBS scores Confidence Intervals

Further Investigation of IBS Data Obtain “IBS and Shift” data from Using “IBS score” as the dependent & “SHIFT” as the independent / factor Mean IBS scores Standard deviations Minimum IBS scores Maximum IBS scores Confidence Intervals

Hypothetical Research Project - Checklist Identify a research question Identify a population Identify a sample and capture it Select a methodology Research tools Subject deployment Statistics and analysis Interpretation Write up

Hypothetical Research Project INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS Now aware of: A significant difference between shifts of workers and IBS score Non - significant differences between the sexes & type of work and IBS score Shift work was associated with a difference in how subjects rate their IBS symptoms, with night shift workers reporting significantly greater symptoms (5.56) than day workers (4.52, p=0.002) Sex differences between workers (irrespective of shift) was found to have no effect upon the differences in IBS symptoms reported by these two groups (females 5.12, males 4.98), p=0.67 Skill required for the work was also found to have no effect upon subjects’ reporting of symptoms (manual workers =4.7, non-manual =5.29, p=0.085)

Hypothetical Research Project - Checklist Identify a research question Identify a population Identify a sample and capture it Select a methodology Research tools Subject deployment Statistics and analysis Interpretation Write up