SunRayce Front Suspension Analysis Jonathan Walker Lars Moravy Ian Harrison Alexander Ellis ME 224 December 12, 2001.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AERx Pulmonary Drug Delivery System, Remmele Engineering, Inc. Steering Bracket Design Validation.
Advertisements

Suspension Systems - 1 Topics covered in this presentation:
Formula 1 Group Members: Quinn Collett Steve Godlewski Tobiah Halter Jeff Swanson Academic Advisor: Dr. Chien Wern June 4, 2003.
Intake & Exhaust Team James Hogge Rebekah McNally Alisa Phillips Henos Woldegiorgis Upright Team Lloyd Outten Joseph Perry Josh Carroll Taylor Watkins.
CREEP  It can be defined as the slow & progressive (increasingly continuing) deformation of a material with time under a constant stress.  It is both.
Team UDFSAE: Suspension Group
Design of Machine Elements
Chris McHugh Randy Fulcher
Rolling Chassis Team Todd Anderson Matt Blackwood David Hovater Josh Smith Jessica Yoho.
Moonbuggy Rear Suspension Analysis ME450: Computer-Aided Engineering Analysis Department of Mechanical Engineering, IUPUI Instructor: Dr. Koshrow Nematollahi.
PACE Emerging Market Vehicle Suspension Design University of Cincinnati.
Introduction to strain gauges and beam bending. Labs and work You need to let us know (while working, not after the fact) if labs are taking too long.
Case Study Continued. Steering Consideration To design the steering system we must consider the 3-Dimensional geometry of the system.
Suspension Design Case Study
Project #3: Design of a MEMS Vertical Actuator Jianwei Heng Alvin Tai ME128 Spring 2005.
Over the Next Several Days
Cantilevers Trey Talley C’13 Department of Physics and Astronomy Sewanee: The University of the South, Sewanee, TN Introduction Cantilevers can be found.
Design of an Aerospace Component
FORCE-STRAIN-STRESS measurements.
Enhancement of a Vintage Muscle Car’s Suspension Jonathan Hoffman Advisor: Professor Bucinell
15-Jun-15Joe Eastman Load Cells. 15-Jun-15Joe Eastman Background Devices that translate force or weight into an electrical signal Constructed from high.
ENGR 220 Section
Fatigue Failure Through Bending David Burnette ME 498.
Wheatstone Bridge Discussion D2.6. Wheatstone Bridge Measuring Resistance Strain Gauges.
Chapter 5 – Design for Different Types of Loading
Home Work #4 Due Date: 18 Mar, 2010 (Turn in your assignment at the mail box of S581 outside the ME general office) The solutions must be written on A4.
Dune Buggy Suspension and Steering Design
Ashley Wyatt Xavier Thompson Matt Galles Bobby Costen Chris McHugh Randy Fulcher ODU FSAE Car.
Robert Golmon Advisor: Dr. Lee Instructor: Cris Koutsougeras Et Senior Design Fall 2012.
 2005 Pearson Education South Asia Pte Ltd TUTORIAL-1 : UNIAXIAL LOAD 1 PROBLEM-1 1 m P A composite A-36 steel bar shown in the figure has 2 segments,
Body Mechanics and Range of Motion
Finite Element Method Final Project “ Rear Suspension- Double A- Arms” Jaime Taha T.April 29 th 2003.
F13-60-BAJA PROPOSAL SAE SALUKI FRAME DESIGN Team Members Austin Lewandowski (ME) (PM) Thang Tran (ME) Preston Mathis (ME) Keegan Lohman (ME) Kyle Koester.
TEAM MEMBERS: Chad Chandler Joe Cofer Nathan Eramian Francis Hauris Jeff Wong.
Solar Car Design “Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite.
With strain gauge sensors, a Wheatstone bridge may not bridge the gap This presentation is partially animated. Only use the control panel at the bottom.
Engineering 309: Machine Design I Instructor: Dr. Min Lu Presented by: Mike Kraft Thanh Nguyen.
Power and Power Measurement ENGR 10 – Intro to Engineering College of Engineering San Jose State University (Ping Hsu and Ken Youssefi) 1 Introduction.
Old dominion university formula sae
Mechanics of Materials, 5e Chapter 1 Tension, Compression, and Shear.
Solar Electric Boat Drive train System Design Review
2011 Human Powered Vehicle Challenge 'Mjolnir' Team Members: Tad Bamford Ben Higgins Chris Schultz Aaron Stanton Neal Pang.
Design Stress & Fatigue
DESIGN FOR FATIGUE STRENGTH
Welding Design 1998/MJ1/MatJoin2/1 Design. Lesson Objectives When you finish this lesson you will understand: Mechanical and Physical Properties (structure.
1 Design for Different Type of Loading Lecture Notes Dr. Rakhmad Arief Siregar Kolej Universiti Kejuruteraan Utara Malaysia Machine Element in Mechanical.
Suspension Peter Morabito Michael Paliga Brian Ross Drivetrain Kenny Elliot Patrick Mooney Dylan Quinn Frame Dan D’Amico Curtis May Greg Schafran.
Abdelmageed Elmustafa
Front Suspension Systems
Stress Concentrations
Engineering/Failure Analysis
Redesign of Lotus Europa Front Suspension ME 450: Finite Element Analysis Spring 2007 Presented by: Bart Sudhoff, Zachary Lightner, Jim Milligan, Brian.
Front Suspension Design Final Report Solomon Metcalf Kevin Beckford Jumaane Palmer Daniel Atsyor.
Introduction to strain gauges and beam bending. Beam bending Galileo, 1638 (though he wasn’t right)
By : Rohini H M USN : 2VX11LVS19.  This system includes sensors for measuring vehicle speed; steering input; relative displacement of the wheel assembly.
Bicycle Wrench Analysis
Strain Sensing at High Altitude Annual Arizona Space Grant Consortium ASCEND! Andy Gee Pima Community College Mentor: Mike Sampogna Pima Community.
Mechanics of Solids (M2H321546)
Let ‘R Buck Racing Steering Team
Modern Control Systems EKT 308
Mechanical Measurement Lab, EDMS no
SAE Baja Senior Design Project
SAE Baja Senior Design Project
SAE Baja Senior Design Project
Wheatstone Bridge Discussion D2.6.
4.7 STRESS CONCENTRATIONS
Suspension System and its application in Racing Cars
SAE Mini Baja: Powertrain
Bicycle Wrench Analysis
Shipping Support Post Review
Presentation transcript:

SunRayce Front Suspension Analysis Jonathan Walker Lars Moravy Ian Harrison Alexander Ellis ME 224 December 12, 2001

Introduction SunRayce is a nation wide competition that allows college teams to design, build and race solar cars. The Northwestern Solar Car Team built a car that competed during the summer of Currently the team is preparing to build the second-generation car, improving on previous efforts. After benchmarking other teams, Northwestern determined that the key strategy to producing a more successful car is to significantly reduce the car’s weight. The team asked our group to assist them by collecting data on the forces on the suspension. With this information, a future design can be optimized for lighter weight. Ian

Purpose The purpose of this experiment is to determine the magnitude and frequency of the forces acting on the front suspension of the solar car. To carry out the experiment, we utilized every tool learned in ME 224, from signal conditioning to LabVIEW programming. Our experiment will provide information necessary to improve the SunRayce vehicle, hopefully contributing to a strong Northwestern finish at next year's competition.

Background F tangent —A-arms F normal —Push-rod F tangent, max =  * F normal

Experimental Setup STRAIN GAUGES: – Mounted on Axial Strut Push Rod – Axial and Transverse Orientation – Wheatstone Bridge Setup – Wired to DAQ and Laptop – Input to LabVIEW Program

Experimental Setup POTENTIOMETER: – Mounted on Pivot Point of Suspension – 5 K  Range – Wired to DAQ and Laptop – Inputs to LabVIEW Program

Theory STRAIN GAUGES: – Wheatstone Bridge –  v o /(v s* S g ) – Op-Amp (100 X Signal Amplification) POTENTIOMETER: – Variable resistance circuit – Angular-linear displacement ratio: 1 inch = Ohms R 2 = (R 1 * V 2 ) / (V - V 2 )

Testing Accelerating Cornering Bumps

Results and Data Smooth Road – Strain Range to –0.076 – Steady State  m = -0.08

Results and Data Over a Pipe Strain Spike Displacement – Back Tire Spike Bar impact

Design Limit Calculations FATIGUE ANALYSIS: Endurance limit –S e ’ = 0.45 S u –S e ’ = 363 Mpa FATIGUE ANALYSIS: Modified endurance limit: S e = k f * k s * k r * k t * k m * S e ’ k f = k s = k t = k m =1 k r = 0.9 {for 90% survivability} S e = 0.9 S e ’ = 327 MPa [S e = 327 Mpa] > [  max = 1.01E7] Infinite life without fatigue failure !!

Design Limit Calculations FATIGUE SAFETY FACTOR:  a = max. expected amplitude of stress on the push-rod  m = mean expected stress on the push-rod k f *  a / S e +  m / S ut = 1 / n s 7.83   -3 = 1 / n s = 1 / n s n s = 58 <= too high!

Design Limit Calculations IMPACT LOADING: Impact Factor, I m = P max / P avg = 1.69 E3 N / 5.07 E2 N = Impact stress,  i = P max / Area = 1.69 E3 N / E-4 m 2 = 1.07 E8 Pa IMPACT LOAD SAFETY FACTOR: Yield Stress, Sy = 8.07 E8 Pa n s = Sy /  i = 8.07 E8 Pa / 1.07 E8 Pa ~ 8

Design Limit Calculations YIELD ANALYSIS:  max = 1.01  7 Pa  y = 600  6 = 6  8 Pa {for 4140 steel} [  y = 6  8 Pa] > [  max = 1.01  7 Pa]  will not yield YIELD SAFTEY FACTOR: n s = 6  8 / 1.01  7 = 60 too high !!!!!

Conclusions Present situation – Too robust, too heavy Redesign options – Change materials: aluminum alloy (whole frame?) Further Testing Needed and Allowable – Varying Car Speed, Turning Radii