CALIFORNIA’S JUVENILE JUSTICE CRIME PREVENTION ACT. By Janine Niccoli. POLS 680. April 14, 2008.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Walter A. McNeil, Secretary Florida Department of Corrections Public Safety and Domestic Security Policy Committee Policy Committee October 6, 2009.

Advertisements

Public Safety Performance Project October 2, 2012 Less Crime at Lower Costs Special Council on Criminal Justice Reform for Georgians.

Issues Faced by Juveniles Leaving Custody: Breaking Down the Barriers University of Oregon April 6, 2007 Pat Arthur, National Center for Youth Law.

Ojjdp.gov T L O A Tribal Law and Order Act Overview of the Law’s Impact on Tribal Youth and Discussion on Juvenile Detention Centers with Laura Ansera,

Reversing the Legacy of Incarceration for American Indian Youth Stephanie Autumn Education Development Center Technical Assistant Specialist Safe Schools.

1 17-Year-Old Offenders in the Adult Criminal Justice System Legislative Audit Bureau April 2008.

UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA-OMAHA JUVENILE JUSTICE INSTITUTE Building a Comprehensive Juvenile Diversion Program January 20, 2012.

Montana Delinquency Jurisdiction Lower Age: (None specified) Upper Age: 17 Extended Age : 24.

Poli 103A California Politics Crime and Punishment II: Race and Crime.

THE IMPACT OF AB 109 ON LAPD. Overview AB 109 impact on the LAPD Statistical information AB 109 impact on LAPD jail facilities Securing the safety of.

Presentation to the Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission April 13, 2015 Judy Clarke, Executive Director, Virginia Center For Restorative Justice Mark.

Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Michael Thompson, Director Council of State Governments Justice Center July 28, 2014 Washington, D.C. Measuring.

National Forum on Youth Violence Prevention April 2 & 3, Square miles 1,000,000 + people 10 th largest U.S. city 4 th Safest U.S. city.

State Advisory Committee on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention March Board Update 2014.

Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Michael Thompson, Director June 22,

Unequal Justice Race, Class and the Criminal Justice System Tim Ready Director Walker Institute for the Study of Race and Ethnic Relations Western Michigan.

MacArthur Foundation Juvenile Justice Grantmaking  Background and History  The MacArthur Research Network on Adolescent Development and Juvenile Justice.

Front End Juvenile Justice System Reform Population of Focus Offenders ages 7 through 15 who come into contact with the juvenile justice system through.

11 Beyond the Bench 2013 “Juvenile Justice Reform– where are we now?” CALIFORNIA JUVENILE JUSTICE TRENDS UPDATE December 2, 2013 – Anaheim, CA Presented.

Ohio Justice Alliance for Community Corrections October 13, 2011.

Corrections Growth: A Long-Term Analysis of Growth in Michigan’s Department of Corrections Balancing Our Priorities: Can We Safely Spend Less on Corrections?

Criminal Justice Reform in California Challenges and Opportunities Mia Bird Northern California Grantmakers Annual Conference – From Ideas to Action May.

Juvenile Crime Prevention Evaluation Phase 2 Interim Report Findings in Brief Juvenile Crime Prevention Evaluation Phase 2 Interim Report Findings in Brief.

May 18, 2009 Montebello Unified School District Presentation By: Debbie Nelson, Director.

North Carolina TASC NC TASC Bridging Systems for Effective Offender Care Management.

Public Safety Improvement Act. Criminal Justice Initiative Work Group Process 35+ stakeholder meetings 6 meetings from July through October 2012 – Analyzed.

Click Here to Add Text This could be a call out area. Bullet Points to emphasize Association for Criminal Justice Research (California) 76th Semi-Annual.

OFFENDER REENTRY: A PUBLIC SAFETY STRATEGY Court Support Services Division.

1 Evaluating the Orange County School Mobile Assessment and Response Team (SMART) Association for Criminal Justice Research, California 63rd Semi-Annual.

Facts to Consider: Presentation to the Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Howard N. Snyder National Center for Juvenile.

Skills for Success Program Savenia Falquist Youth Development Coordinator Jefferson County Juvenile Officer July 14, 2005.

Evidenced Based Practices In Probation Challenges and Considerations Scott MacDonald Chief Probation Officer Santa Cruz County.

Public Safety and Offender Rehabilitation Services Act of 2007 (AB 900) Implementation and Impact on County Mental Health Robin Dezember Chief Deputy Secretary.

LAO Overview of Inmate Education Legislative Analyst’s Office Presented to: Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Subcommittee No. 5 on Corrections,

California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Office of Research 1.

Community Corrections Chapter Eight. Community Corrections Comprehensive community supervision comprises a multitude of human resources, programs, automation.

Muskie School of Public Service 2008 Maine Crime and Justice Data Book March, 2009.

POLI 103A CALIFORNIA POLITICS CRIME AND PUNISHMENT II: RACE AND CRIME.

ADULT REDEPLOY ILLINOIS Mary Ann Dyar, Program Administrator National Association of Sentencing Commissions August 7, 2012.

Salinas, California Addressing the Roots of Violence Through a Collective Impact Approach.

Racial Disparities in Criminal Justice in Wisconsin Pamela Oliver.

1 This project was supported by Grant No DG-BX-K021 awarded by the Bureau of Justice Assistance. The Bureau of Justice Assistance is a component.

Oregon Youth Authority Meeting the Challenge through Collaboration and Partnerships Oregon´s juvenile justice system is composed of a network of local.

Improving Outcomes for Young Adults in the Justice System Challenges and Opportunities.

Presentation to the California State Association of Counties (CSAC) February 24, 2016.

Comprehensive Youth Services Assessment and Plan February 21, 2014.

Youth First Initiative National Survey Results and Analysis.

Breaking the Cycle of Criminal Justice Involvement and Homelessness May 10, 2016 Presented by Joe N. Savage, Jr., PhD Regional Coordinator (USICH)

CRIME MAPPING A DATA-DRIVEN PROCESS FOR MORE EFFECTIVE OUTCOMES Target Focused Comprehensive Strategies Baseline Data Baseline Data that is Measurable.

Juvenile Reentry Programs Palm Beach County

Challenges in Determining Whether Treatment Programs are Effective

A Look at Statistics and Trends Based on public information available

Santa Barbara County Re-Alignment Strategy Study

Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice

Broward County Sheriff’s Office Civil Citation Program Evaluation

TEXAS STUDY USED MORE THAN 1

2018 Budget Presentation – DOCCR

California State Association of Counties

National Forum on Youth Violence Prevention

Maryland Juvenile Services Long Term Trends FY 2007 – FY December 2016

Metro Region Juvenile Services Long Term Trends: Counties of Montgomery and Prince George’s DJS Office of Research and Evaluation, January 2017.

Baltimore City Juvenile Services Long Term Trends

Senate Health and Human Services Committee

Comprehensive Youth Services

Eastern Region Juvenile Services Long Term Trends: Counties of Caroline, Cecil, Dorchester, Kent, Queen Anne’s, Somerset, Talbot, Wicomico, and Worcester.

Central Region Juvenile Services Long Term Trends: Counties of Baltimore, Carroll, Harford, and Howard DJS Office of Research and Evaluation, January 2017.

Mental Health in the Correctional System

Southern Region Juvenile Services Long Term Trends: Counties of Anne Arundel, Calvert, Charles, and St. Mary’s DJS Office of Research and Evaluation, January.

Western Region Juvenile Services Long Term Trends: Counties of Allegany, Frederick, Garrett and Washington DJS Office of Research and Evaluation, January.

Prince George’s County Juvenile Services Long Term Trends

Presentation transcript:

CALIFORNIA’S JUVENILE JUSTICE CRIME PREVENTION ACT. By Janine Niccoli. POLS 680. April 14,

INTRODUCTION. Increase in violent juvenile crime. Schiff-Cardenas Crime Prevention Act. Balanced solution to juvenile crime. Stable annual funding source to counties.

JUVENILE JUSTICE CRIME PREVENTION ACT. Juvenile Justice Coordinating Council. Assess the local juvenile justice system. Comprehensive Multi-agency Juvenile Justice Plan.

PROBLEMS AND ISSUES. Rising cost of juvenile crime. Increase in violent juvenile crime. Juvenile Recidivism.

GOALS AND OBJECTIVES. Improve public safety. – Reduce juvenile crime and delinquency. – Reduce juvenile recidivism. – Reduce the cost of juvenile crime.

OUTCOME MEASURES. Arrest. Incarceration. Probation violation. Restitution. Community Service. Probation.

POLICY RESPONSE: CRIME AND DELINQUENCY. JJCPA outcome measures. Juvenile arrest rates.

ARREST AND INCARCERATION. Figure 1: Arrest and Incarceration Rate Averages Arrest RateIncarceration Rate Outcome Measures Percentage JJCPA Participants Non JJCPA Participants Source: Data taken from California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Corrections Standards Authority. Annual JJCPA reports2003 through (Accessed April 29, 2007).

JUVENILE ARREST RATE.

POLICY RESPONSE: JUVENILE RECIDIVISM. Risk assessment instruments. Measures of recidivism.

POLICY RESPONSE: REDUCING COSTS OF JUVENILE CRIME. Decrease in population of juvenile wards. Contributing factors.

JUVENILE INMATE POPULATION

PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS. 105,421 youth served each year. 6,325 less arrests. 4,217 less incarcerations. 5,271 more successful probations.

BARRIERS TO MEASURING SUCCESS. Data quality. Incomplete Data. Evaluating the cost of juvenile crime.

CONCLUSION. Is the JJCPA a successful policy? – Impact on juvenile crime. – Impact on recidivism. – Impact on costs of juvenile crime.

CONCLUSION CONTINUED. Positive impact on participants. Insufficient evidence.

THE END! Questions?