STAR J/  Simulations for RUN III Manuel Calderon for the Heavy-Flavor Group Analysis Meeting at BNL October 23, 2002.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
STAR Status of J/  Trigger Simulations for d+Au Running Trigger Board Meeting Dec5, 2002 MC & TU.
Advertisements

 Trigger for Run 8 Rates, Yields, Backgrounds… Debasish Das Pibero Djawotho Manuel Calderon de la Barca Analysis Meeting BNL October 16, 2007.
Measurement of charmonia at mid-rapidity at RHIC-PHENIX  c  J/   e + e -  in p+p collisions at √s=200GeV Susumu Oda CNS, University of Tokyo For.
Direct virtual photon production in Au+Au collision at 200 GeV at STAR Bingchu Huang for the STAR collaboration Brookhaven National Laboratory Aug
1 N. Davidson E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias events Jet Note 8 Meeting 15 th May 2007.
Quarkonium progress in STAR Manuel Calderón de la Barca Sánchez UC Davis Heavy Flavor Working Group, STAR; XXII Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics La.
Invariant Mass Calculation J/ψ Rosi Reed 10/31/07.
Top Turns Ten March 2 nd, Measurement of the Top Quark Mass The Low Bias Template Method using Lepton + jets events Kevin Black, Meenakshi Narain.
MC Study on B°  S (Status Report) Jianchun Wang Syracuse University BTeV meeting 05/25/01.
Topological D-meson Reconstruction with STAR Using the Silicon Vertex Tracker (SVT) Sarah LaPointe Wayne State University SVT review, BNL, July 7 th /8.
 production in p+p collisions in Manuel Calderón de la Barca Sánchez UC Davis STAR Collaboration 23 d Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics Big Sky, Montana.
 (  ->ee) production in d+Au collisions at STAR Haidong Liu For the Collaboration.
Upsilon production in STAR Pibero Djawotho Indiana University Cyclotron Facility October 12, 2007 DNP 2007.
MC Study on B°  J/  ° With J/      °     Jianchun Wang Syracuse University BTeV meeting 03/04/01.
 production in d+Au collisions at STAR Haidong Liu University of California, Davis For the STAR Collaboration.
Non-photonic electron production in STAR A. G. Knospe Yale University 9 April 2008.
Cynthia HadjidakisTerzo Convegno sulla Fisica di ALICE Detection of photons and electrons in EMCAL Photons, Electrons and  0 at large p T Identification.
HBD Meeting 2010 / 11/ 24 Katsuro 1. confirmation plan for HBD simulation performances 2 HBD charge distribution Red: merged cluster Blue: separated cluster.
1 NCC Task Force Richard Seto NCC Task Force Meeting Dec 14, 2007 BNL.
 Improve lepton-photon-hadron separation in the FMS to do  Some examples  J/Ψ physics in pAu and pp at forward rapidities  current status from chris.
Resonances in decay for 400fb -1 DC Meeting April 10th, 2006 J.Brodzicka, H.Palka INP Kraków J.Brodzicka, H.Palka INP Kraków B +  D 0 D 0 K + B +  D.
Sevil Salur for STAR Collaboration, Yale University WHAT IS A PENTAQUARK? STAR at RHIC, BNL measures charged particles via Time Projection Chamber. Due.
HFT + TOF: Heavy Flavor Physics Yifei Zhang University of Science & Technology of China Lawrence Berkeley National Lab TOF Workshop, Hangzhou, April,
Measurements of  Production and Nuclear Modification Factor at STAR Anthony Kesich University of California, Davis STAR Collaboration.
H->ZZ->4l Update Trying to re-do CSC note: MC Sample Trigger Eff. Electron Selection Eff. Muon Selection Eff.
SQM2004, Cape Town, Sept. 16, 2004 STAR 1 Cronin Effect for the identified particles from 200 GeV d+Au collisions Xiangzhou Cai Shanghai INstitute of Applied.
 production in p+p and Au+Au collisions in STAR Debasish Das UC Davis (For the STAR Collaboration)‏
 Production at forward Rapidity in d+Au Collisions at 200 GeV The STAR Forward TPCs Lambda Reconstruction Lambda Spectra & Yields Centrality Dependence.
Studies of the jet fragmentation in p+p collisions in STAR Elena Bruna Yale University STAR Collaboration meeting, June
Victor Ryabov (PNPI) for the PHENIX Collaboration QM2005 Budapest Aug,06, First measurement of the  - meson production with PHENIX experiment at.
Feb. 7, 2007First GLAST symposium1 Measuring the PSF and the energy resolution with the GLAST-LAT Calibration Unit Ph. Bruel on behalf of the beam test.
Detection of electromagnetic showers along muon tracks Salvatore Mangano (IFIC)
HFT-prototype BUR considerations for Run-13 The main goal of the HFT engineering run will be system verification and correction; this includes the study.
Quarkonium Physics with STAR Mauro Cosentino (University of Sao Paulo/BNL)
Measurement of J/  -> e + e - and  C -> J/  +   in dAu collisions at PHENIX/RHIC A. Lebedev, ISU 1 Fall 2003 DNP Meeting Alexandre Lebedev, Iowa State.
HFT-prototype BUR considerations (Quantitative) What physics is possible in Run-13 assuming some (prototype) sectors are there? Relates to how long would.
Measurement of photons via conversion pairs with PHENIX at RHIC - Torsten Dahms - Stony Brook University HotQuarks 2006 – May 18, 2006.
On quasi-two-body components of (for 250fb -1 ) (for 250fb -1 ) J.Brodzicka, H.Palka INP Krakow DC Meeting May 16, 2005 B +  D 0 D 0 K + B +  D 0 D 0.
1 Nuclear modification and elliptic flow measurements for  mesons at  s NN = 200 GeV d+Au and Au+Au collisions by PHENIX Dipali Pal for the PHENIX collaboration.
5/9/111 Update on TMVA J. Bouchet. 5/9/112 What changed background and signal have increased statistic to recall, signal are (Kpi) pairs taken from single.
STAR J/  Trigger in dA Manuel Calderon for the Heavy-Flavor Group Trigger Workshop at BNL October 21, 2002.
STAR Collaboration Meeting, BNL – march 2003 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC Update Update on EMC –Hardware installed and current.
STAR Analysis Meeting, BNL – oct 2002 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC update Status of EMC analysis –Calibration –Transverse.
STAR Collaboration meeting, Nantes Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC analysis update Just to remember … What we have done.
D 0 reconstruction: 15 AGeV – 25 AGeV – 35 AGeV M.Deveaux, C.Dritsa, F.Rami IPHC Strasbourg / GSI Darmstadt Outline Motivation Simulation Tools Results.
 Production and Suppression in Heavy Ion Collisions at STAR Anthony Kesich University of California, Davis STAR Collaboration February 5, 2013.
1 More on the omega – some better rates/trigger counts Richard Seto UCR Light/Heavy PWG Aug 28, 2003.
NCC simulation update DC meeting Oct 3, 2007 BNL.
1 NCC Task Force Richard Seto NCC Task Force Meeting Jan 8, 2007 BNL.
Outline Motivation The STAR/EMC detector Analysis procedure Results Final remarks.
EEMC Photons Pibero Djawotho (IUCF) Wednesday, October 17, 2007 STAR Analysis Meeting (BNL)
Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.
 -jet measurements Table of Contents:  Motivation  Preliminary QA of  -trigger Data  Shower Shape Analysis  Experimental Challenges  Summary  
Feb. 3, 2007IFC meeting1 Beam test report Ph. Bruel on behalf of the beam test working group Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
PHENIX J/  Measurements at  s = 200A GeV Wei Xie UC. RiverSide For PHENIX Collaboration.
Status of the measurement of K L lifetime - Data sample (old): ~ 440 pb -1 ( ) - MC sample: ~125 pb -1 ( mk0 stream ) Selection: standard tag (|
Photon Selection Algorithm Ming Yang , Mingshui Chen BESIII Meeting
A 2 nd proposal for a Low mass electron pair trigger. Richard Seto University of CA, Riverside Trigger Working Group Meeting 6/7/2001.
Analysis Meeting, November 9-11, 2003 Manuel Calderón de la Barca Sánchez Heavy Flavor Working Group Heavy Flavor in ‘04: Prospects for J/ . Heavy.
Direct Photon v 2 Study in 200 GeV AuAu Collisions at RHIC Guoji Lin (Yale) For STAR Collaboration RHIC & AGS Users’ Meeting, BNL, June 5-9.
Charles F. Maguire Vanderbilt University
STAR Geometry and Detectors
PrimEx II 0 analysis status
° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.
STAR Analysis Meeting - BNL
->K+K- Production at 62.4GeV Au+Au Collisions
J/Y Simulations for Trigger
Understanding the decay background for measuring fragmentation photons
° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.
Presentation transcript:

STAR J/  Simulations for RUN III Manuel Calderon for the Heavy-Flavor Group Analysis Meeting at BNL October 23, 2002

STAR Simulations so far … Rejection/Efficiency: Working on AuAu low multiplicity simulations only up to now. Need dAu simulations, can probably get higher rejection with lower multiplicity events. Use S eff = S/(2B/S + 1) Background: Minbias Au+Au (only last weekend did d+Au begin running…) Select most peripheral 50% x-section: dN/d  = 11 (5.6 at 40%) to approx. d+Au multiplicity Signal: J/Psi simulated flat in pt and h to see efficiency vs pt Will use more realistic pt distribution to see where most signal sits. Throw one J/Psi in an empty event Need to also mix them into a background event. Using 3 cuts: Tower Energy (L0), Mass, Cos  L2)

STAR Algorithm 1) Approximate the electron daughters with towers (or clusters) Energy, Position 2) Obtain vertex from BBC timing 3) Need at least 2 towers to make a pair (could require this at L0?) 4) Take all selected towers and make all possible pairs M inv  2E 1 E 2 (1-cos(   )) 5) Do cuts in M and cos(  )… Still exploring possibilities Towers, clusters, cluster size?

STAR Algorithm : Need to explore various ideas What are the best energy thresholds to use? 1, 1.5, 2 GeV? Want acceptable resolution and not to kill the signal. First tested with Tower Energy only: resolution not good! Now testing various cluster approaches: 2 towers, or patches of various sizes (3x3, 5x5, 7x7, 9x9) Single Tower 2-Tower Cluster

STAR Acceptance and Trigger Efficiency J/  1) Done at mid-rapidity with full EMC 2) Trigger efficiency using Tower Energy (no clustering), and both towers with same threshold (1 GeV)

STAR Half EMC acceptance (pT -  ) Raw Accepted electrons with E>1 GeV, 0.1 <  < 0.9

STAR Acceptance and Trigger Efficiency (Half Emc, Cluster) Half Emc, 0.2 <  < 1

STAR J/  Mass at Level 2 Thrown mass L2 Mass, real E, real cos(  ) L2 Mass, cluster E, real cos(  ) L2 Mass, real E, cluster cos(  ) L2 Mass, cluser E and cos(  ) J/  flat in pt-  Background To do: simulate with some pT slope

STAR J/  Mass at Level 2 (from today!) Thrown mass L2 Mass, real E, real cos(  ) L2 Mass, cluster E, real cos(  ) L2 Mass, real E, cluster cos(  ) L2 Mass, cluser E and cos(  ) J/  with slope 600 MeV Background (w/ dAu) Rejection Factor at L2 for loose cuts: 35 Goal: ~48 KHz/1KHz not too far = 2.93, 2.68 GeV  M = 300, 668 MeV

STAR Decay Topology: large opening angle for most J/  Accepted J/  (flat in pt-  Background

STAR Isolation cuts… Compare tower (or “cluster”) energy to surrounding energy in patch For 3x3 patch Electrons

STAR To Do: Still many simulations and tests to do to arrive at a good L2 Algorithm: + Low multiplicity in d+Au will reduce the backgrounds - Signal is faint ~ “one in a million” - Half EMC drastically reduces acceptance  Need to try out l various patches, 3x3, 5x5 l Energy Thresholds l Mass Thresholds l Opening Angles l Isolation cuts