Georgia Modification Research Study Spring 2006 Sharron Hunt Melissa Fincher.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
District Test Coordinators Training February 2013, Anchorage, Alaska Grace Gray Alternative Assessment Program Manager.
Advertisements

Participation in Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills.
JANUARY 30, 2014 TETN EVENT #31593 SpEd Assessment Updates: Assessment Options for Students with Disabilities.
2015 SpEd Assessment Updates TETN Event # Presented June 5, 2013 TEA’s Student Assessment Division.
Accommodations Manual Manual available online on the Testing Students with Disabilities Accommodations page at
Accommodations and Modifications Making classroom instruction work for all students.
A Guide for IEP Teams Including Students with Disabilities in State and District- wide Assessment.
Special Test Accommodations Virginia Association of Test Directors 2008 Assessment Conference October 2008.
A CCOMMODATIONS (R EQUIRED FOR DTC S, STC S, AND TA S )
ARD Training Education Service Center and School District Training TEA Student Assessment Division.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
Smarter Balanced Accessibility and Accommodations Policies and Guidelines Chief Instructional Officers Update March 12, 2013.
Assessment Updates CD PST Meeting March 10, 2015.
Spring Assessment Update Grades 3 to 8.
NC Final Exam Implementation Plan 2015 NHCS. Rationale  The schedule is designed to parallel the secure and controlled manner in which end-of-grade assessments.
NC Final Exams High School Spring 2015 NHCS. Rationale  The schedule is designed to parallel the secure and controlled manner in which end-of-grade assessments.
New Hampshire Enhanced Assessment Initiative: Technical Documentation for Alternate Assessments Alignment Inclusive Assessment Seminar Brian Gong Claudia.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
Monitoring Accommodations in South Dakota Linda Turner Special Education Programs.
Content Mastery Center- Opening the Doors of Success
Conducting a Job Analysis to Establish the Examination Content Domain Patricia M. Muenzen Associate Director of Research Programs Professional Examination.
State Testing Accommodations For Students with Disabilities August, 2009 By Mitzi Delker EXED Supervisor Secondary Education.
By Clare Paronich.  The research problem being investigated is whether students with learning disabilities will score higher on mathematics assessments.
ASSESSMENT ACCOMMODATIONS How to Select, Administer, and Evaluate Use of Accommodations for Instruction and Assessment of Students with Disabilities Ohio.
Proof of Concept Study: Grade 5 Mathematics Training Tammy Howard, PhD Director, Accountability Services NC Department of Public Instruction August 4,
D E C E M B E R  S T U D E N T A S S E S S M E N T D I V I S I O N  T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Training on the LPAC Decision-Making.
Identifying the gaps in state assessment systems CCSSO Large-Scale Assessment Conference Nashville June 19, 2007 Sue Bechard Office of Inclusive Educational.
Smarter Balanced Accommodations – Knowing and Using Allowed Resources Presenters: Donna Gearns Alicia Skelly 8/20/2014.
Challenges of Administering MI-Access To Students with Visual and Hearing Impairments Presenters: COLLETTE BAUMAN Supervisor, Michigan Department of Education-Low.
By Raani Agrawal 1 PARCC Assessment: ELA/Literacy and Math Grades 6-8.
MAP Examiner Training Homebound Teachers March, 2008.
Demystifying Statewide Assessment for Students with Disabilities September 19, 2007 Central Elementary School.
Accommodations for High- Stakes Testing Ben Ditkowsky, Ph.D. Waukegan Unit School District 60.
STAR Information Meeting. Agenda Changes Security Before testing During testing After testing Testing Calendar.
Michigan Educational Assessment Program MEAP. Fall Purpose The Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) is Michigan’s general assessment.
Fall 2010 Mathematics Standards of Learning Assessment Update - 1 -
1 TCAP Accommodations Training October, 2013 PACESetters!
In the State-Required Assessment and Accountability Programs 703 KAR 5:070 1.
Accommodations Required Content for STC and TA Training.
Elementary Literacy Assessment October 9 -12, 2007 Sub Code: 968.
State Efforts to Improve Instruction and Assessment of Students who May be Candidates to Take the Alternate Assessment Based on Modified Academic Achievement.
2014 CRCT Proctor In-Service Mt. Zion Elementary.
Test Accommodations Students with Disabilities 2012 Presented by Janice Koblick, Curriculum Supervisor Exceptional Student Education 1.
Accommodations Required Content for STC and TA Training Last updated: 08/20/09.
Chapter 6 Curriculum-Based Classroom Assessment Techniques.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training January 2010.
Accessibility and Accommodations Alabama Student Assessment Program Nannette Pence Education Specialist Student Assessment Alabama State Department of.
Tammy Burks and Catherine Prescher. Accommodations: What are they?* Provisions made in how a student receives information or demonstrates learning Allows.
1 NCEXTEND1 Alternate Assessment with Alternate Achievement Standards Conference on Exceptional Children November 17-18, 2008 NCDPI Division of Accountability.
Proof of Concept Study: Grade 5 Mathematics Grade 6 ELA/Reading Nancy Carolan, Hope Lung NC Department of Public Instruction August 18, 2015.
So What is Going to be Happening with State Assessment for Students with Disabilities for 2007/2008? Peggy Dutcher Fall 2007 Assessment and Accountability.
Accommodations and Modification in Grades Do NOT fundamentally alter or lower expectations or standards in instructional level, content, or performance.
February 2010 Copyright © 2009 Mississippi Department of Education 1 School Test Coordinator Training February 15, 2010 Special Populations.
Summer Institutes 2013 Changing Teacher Practice Changing Student Outcomes.
NC Final Exam Implementation Plan NHCS.
GA Milestones. Testing Schedule April 13 – May 4, 2016 Georgia Milestones End of Grade (EOG) Spring Administration End of Grade (EOG) in language arts,
State Testing for SPED Students: (Georgia Alternative Assessment vs. Regular State Testing with Accommodations)
STAAR Alternate is the state assessment for students with significant cognitive disabilities.
Accessibility Features and Accommodations
M-Step Overview, Practice and Instructional Implications
Michigan’s Lessons and Uses of the CTEAG
NCDPI/Division of Accountability Services
Kathy Cox State Superintendent of Schools GPS Day 3 Training
Accessibility Supports Training
Accommodations Required Content for STC and TA Training
Accommodations Required Content for STC and TA Training
Accommodations Required Content for STC and TA Training
Presentation transcript:

Georgia Modification Research Study Spring 2006 Sharron Hunt Melissa Fincher

Georgia’s Student Assessment Program Includes an array of criterion-referenced tests (including an alternate) and a norm-referenced test Built from the ground up to be inclusive – GA includes teachers of special populations in all phases of test development – GA includes all students in pilots and field tests

Georgia’s Student Assessment Program GA provides a menu of traditional accommodation options – Presentation – Response – Setting – Scheduling Accommodations are provided during pilots and field tests

Georgia’s Student Assessment Program Although Georgia is inclusive, some students still struggle to access the tests – Schools sought additional avenues for students who were caught between assessments – neither the general or the alternate were completely appropriate for these students

Georgia’s Student Assessment Program Georgia looked for avenues to investigate how to make assessments more accessible Questions to answer – Who are the students struggling to access the general assessments? – What additional accommodations/modifications might assist in making the test more accessible? About the same time…. – Enhanced Assessment Instruments Grant announced (ultimately pulled back) – Announcement of the 2% flexibility

Georgia’s Student Assessment Program Georgia moved forward with an empirical research study designed to answer those questions The Testing Division worked with the – Division for Exceptional Students – Curriculum and Instructional Services Division

Study Purpose To investigate the effects of certain modifications on the reliability and validity of the state testing programs – Criterion-Referenced Competency Tests (CRCT) – Georgia High School Graduation Tests (GHSGT) Focus on reading and math

Study Purpose This study will help Georgia determine – What works – Who benefits The goal of the study is to help Georgia operationalize additional options for the school year

What is a modification? an alteration in the administration of an assessment that results in a possible change in the content or construct being assessed – typically either through the addition or removal of content

What is an accommodation? an alteration in the administration of an assessment that allows students to participate – how the test is administered or presented – how the student responds Construct (what the test measures) remains the same

Georgia Modification Study Focused on selected grades and content areas – Students in grades 4 and 7 took the Reading and Math CRCT (March 2006) – Students in grade 12 took the ELA and Math GHSGT (April 2006)

Georgia Modification Study For security reasons, off-level testing was used – Grade 4 students took the 3 rd grade Spring 2005 CRCT – Grade 7 students took the 6 th grade Spring 2005 CRCT – Grade 12 students took the Spring 2005 GHSGT

Georgia Modification Study Study included both special education students and regular education students – The number of special education students who took the test last year at each school was identified Tested the number of students identified, if possible – Schools randomly selected an equal number of general education students to participate

Georgia Modification Study Included all special education students, with the following exceptions: – GAA students – Students who require Braille or large print Set a broad net to help determine the characteristics of students assisted by modifications

Georgia Modification Study Each school assigned a condition for this study – All students within the school took the test under the same condition Both special and regular education students

Georgia Modification Study CRCT (grades 4 and 7) – Three conditions – Condition 1: Resource Guides – Condition 2: Read Aloud/Calculator – Condition 3: Traditional Administration

Georgia Modification Study GHSGT (grade 12) – Two conditions – Condition 1: Resource Guide – Condition 2: Traditional Administration

Condition 1 – CRCT & GHSGT Resource Guide – A single sheet (one for each content area) that provides key definitions, examples, multiplication tables etc. – A short practice test was provided to help introduce the resource guides to students; each item related to something on the resource guide Recommended introducing sample tests and guides a couple of days before the administration

Condition 1 – CRCT & GHSGT Resource Guide Development – Committee comprised of Testing, Special Education, and Curriculum specialists reviewed the tests identified concepts students might struggle with and discussed appropriate information for inclusion on the guide

Condition 2 - CRCT Read Aloud (Reading CRCT) – Teacher read the reading passages and questions to students Teacher reads test verbatim Calculator (Math CRCT) – Basic function calculators provided to schools assigned this condition

Condition 3 - CRCT Traditional Administration – Students took tests as they have always done Special education students received the standard accommodations they normally receive Regular education students did not receive accommodations

Condition 2 - GHSGT Traditional Administration – Students took tests as they have always done Special education students received the standard accommodations they normally receive Regular education students did not receive accommodations

Georgia Modification Study A survey was be provided for each special education student – The person most knowledgeable about the student completed the survey – This information will be critical in determining who benefits from the modifications

Georgia Modification Study Survey collected important information about each special education student – Student’s disability/ies – Severity of disability/ies – IEP objectives for reading and math – Time in mainstream/general ed classroom – Area/s served – Instructional services – Type of accommodation, if any

Georgia Modification Study Administration Procedures – Follow all administration protocols as outlined in the Examiner’s Manual – Complete all student demographics on answer documents, including State-Required Codes

Georgia Modification Study Administration Procedures – Followed all administration protocols as outlined in the Examiner’s Manual – Completed all student demographics on answer documents, including State-Required Codes – Complete survey for each special education student

Georgia Modification Study Key Research Questions Are there performance differences for students with disabilities on the CRCT and GHSGT when these assessments are administered under modified conditions? Are there performance differences for regular education students on the CRCT and GHSGT when these assessments are administered under modified conditions?

Georgia Modification Study Key Research Questions How, if at all, do performance differences on the traditional versus modified version of the CRCT or GHSGT differ for students with disabilities compared to regular education students? Are the CRCT and GHSGT reliable and valid assessments when administered under modified conditions?

Georgia Modification Study Currently analyzing data to answer the research questions – Analysis at the item level Are certain items more likely to function differently? – Analysis at the form level How does the test form function under each condition (modified vs traditional) for each group of students?

Georgia Modification Study Sharron Hunt, Director of Testing / Melissa Fincher, Assistant Director of Testing /