The Nation’s Report Card Mathematics 2000. National Assessment of Educational Progress 1.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics May 10, 2012.

Advertisements

Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics June 27, 2013 #NAEP.

Stuart Kerachsky Deputy Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics March 24, 2010.

Dianne Chadwick Iowa NAEP Coordinator Iowa Department of Education November 8, 2011.

Inside America’s Math Courses The Release of the Algebra I and Geometry Curricula: Results from the 2005 High School Transcript Mathematics Curriculum.

1 NAEP th Grade Economics Assessment. 2 ► First NAEP assessment of economics ► Content areas: market economy, national economy, and international.

NAEP 2008 Trends in Academic Progress in Reading and Mathematics.

Reliability and Linking of Assessments. Figure 1 Differences Between Percentages Proficient or Above on State Assessments and on NAEP: Grade 8 Mathematics,

Office of Assessment October 22, PSAT/SAT/NAEP  PSAT – Pre-Scholastic Aptitude Test  SAT – Scholastic Aptitude Test  NAEP – National Assessment.

Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.

Mark DeCandia Kentucky NAEP State Coordinator

Grade 3-8 English Language Arts and Mathematics Results August 8, 2011.

2013 NACME Data Book Deck 2: Pre-College Educational Challenges.

NAEP 1998 Civics Assessment National Center for Education Statistics Gary W. Phillips Acting Commissioner 18 November 1999.

Shannon Kewin EFD The Basics a. Terra Nova (TN) Test Score Results b. Wilson School Annual Report Card 2. Breakdown of scores (Reading) 3. Breakdown.

1 Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics June 2011.

1 NCES and NIEA Web Session July Today’s Native American Student American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) students make up about 1 percent of 4th-

Identifying the gaps in state assessment systems CCSSO Large-Scale Assessment Conference Nashville June 19, 2007 Sue Bechard Office of Inclusive Educational.

Results of the 2009 NAEP High School Transcript Study America’s High School Graduates Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics.

The data-driven conclusion: High-stakes testing has failed.

Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics January 25, 2011.

1 The Nation’s Report Card: 2007 Writing. 2 Overview of the 2007 Writing Assessment Given January – March 2007 – 139,900 eighth-graders – 27,900 twelfth-graders.

New York State Scores 2011—2012 School Year. Growth Ratings and Score Ranges Growth RatingDescriptionGrowth Score Range (2011–12) Highly EffectiveWell.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Results of the 2005 National Assessment of Educational Progress.

0 Michele Sonnenfeld NAEP State Coordinator Florida Department of Education October 2006 Florida Association of Science Supervisors.

Integrating Success The Transition of All Students From High School to College November 2007 Iowa Educational Research & Evaluation Association Annual.

LIVE INTERACTIVE YOUR DESKTOP June 20, 2012 Science in Action: Understanding what students know and can do in the classroom, in the lab, and.

Mark DeCandia Kentucky NAEP State Coordinator

NAEP 2011 Mathematics and Reading Results Challis Breithaupt November 1, 2011.

2005 NAEP Results Mathematics San Diego City Schools Board of Education Workshop January 17, 2006 S D CS.

NAEP 2011 Mathematics and Reading Results NAEP State Coordinator Mark DeCandia.

2009 National Assessment of Educational Progress: National and State-Level Science Results JANUARY 25, 2011.

The Nation’s Report Card: U.S. History National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

The Nation’s Report Card Science National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

United to Make a Difference: Improving the Achievement of Young Men of Color Council of the Great City Schools Fall 2014.

35th Annual National Conference on Large-Scale Assessment June 18, 2005 How to compare NAEP and State Assessment Results NAEP State Analysis Project Don.

THE 2005 NAEP HIGH SCHOOL TRANSCRIPT STUDY. THE 2005 HIGH SCHOOL TRANSCRIPT STUDY Today ’ s Presentations.

Uri Treisman Professor of Mathematics Director, Charles A. Dana Center The University of Texas at Austin URBAN MATH LEADERSHIP.

Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics February 21, 2013.

United to Make a Difference: Improving the Achievement of Young Men of Color Council of the Great City Schools Fall 2014.

1. 2 Overview of the 2006 NAEP Assessments Administered in January–March 2006 National results for grades 4, 8, and 12 Results by scale scores and achievement.

The Nation’s Report Card: Geography National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

Future Ready Schools National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) in North Carolina Wednesday, February 13, 2008 Auditorium III 8:30 – 9:30 a.m.

The Nation’s Report Card 4th-Grade Reading SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP),

Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics May 4, 2011.

Understanding AzMERIT Results and Score Reporting An Overview.

The Nation’s Report Card: Trial Urban District Assessment: Science 2005.

The Nation’s Report Card: 2005 Reading and Mathematics Trial Urban District Assessments.

2015 State PARCC Results Presented to the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education Robert Lee MCAS Chief Analyst and Acting PARCC Coordinator October.

Kentucky’s New Assessment and Accountability System What to Expect for the First Release of Data.

NAEP 2005 Reading and Mathematics Results. Overview of the 2005 Reading and Mathematics Assessment 1.

2009 Grade 3-8 Math Additional Slides 1. Math Percentage of Students Statewide Scoring at Levels 3 and 4, Grades The percentage of students.

NAEP 2007: Reading and Mathematics, Grades 4 and 8 New Jersey State Board of Education Work Session Assistant Commissioner Jay Doolan Assessment Director.

A Closer Look at CRCT Data Comparing LaBelle, Cobb County School District, and State Data LaBelle Elementary (544 students enrolled) Intended use for.

Peggy G. Carr Associate Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics June 2010 Peggy G. Carr Associate Commissioner National Center for Education.

KHS PARCC/SCIENCE RESULTS Using the results to improve achievement Families can use the results to engage their child in conversations about.

1 Main achievement outcomes continued.... Performance on mathematics and reading (minor domains) in PISA 2006, including performance by gender Performance.

1. 2 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Survey of academic achievement for the nation and the states Assesses various subjects at grades.

Assessment & Accountability Session 3: Content and School Scores.

NAEP Grade 12 Results.

Examining Achievement Gaps

Gloria Ladson-Billings University of Wisconsin

Using NAEP Results to Examine State Trends in Mathematics Achievement

Update on Data Collection and Reporting

Focus on the Learner: Who are the students states serve?

2016 READY ACCOUNTABILITY DISTRICT RESULTS

2017 TUDA NAEP Results for Miami-Dade

2019 Report Card Update Marianne Mottley Report Card Project Director

Presentation transcript:

The Nation’s Report Card Mathematics 2000

National Assessment of Educational Progress 1

National Assessment of Educational Progress 2

National Assessment of Educational Progress 3

Features of the 2000 Mathematics Assessment

Content of the 2000 Mathematics Assessment

National Scale Score Results Across Years Significantly different from SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1990, 1992, 1996, and 2000 Mathematics Assessments.

National Scale Score Percentiles Across Years Significantly different from SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1990, 1992, 1996, and 2000 Mathematics Assessments.

National Achievement Level Results Across Years:Grade 4 Significantly different from NOTE: Percentages within each mathematics achievement level range may not add to 100, or to the exact percentages at or above achievement levels, due to rounding. SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1990, 1992, 1996, and 2000 Mathematics Assessments.

National Achievement Level Results Across Years: Grade 8 Significantly different from NOTE: Percentages within each mathematics achievement level range may not add to 100, or to the exact percentages at or above achievement levels, due to rounding. SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1990, 1992, 1996, and 2000 Mathematics Assessments.

National Achievement Level Results Across Years: Grade 12 Significantly different from NOTE: Percentages within each mathematics achievement level range may not add to 100, or to the exact percentages at or above achievement levels, due to rounding. SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1990, 1992, 1996, and 2000 Mathematics Assessments.

Gender Gaps in Average Scale Scores Across Years SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1990, 1992, 1996, and 2000 Mathematics Assessments.

Average Scale Scores Across Years by Race/Ethnicity: White Significantly different from SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1990, 1992, 1996, and 2000 Mathematics Assessments.

Average Scale Scores Across Years by Race/Ethnicity: BlackAverage Scale Scores Across Years by Race/Ethnicity: White Significantly different from SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1990, 1992, 1996, and 2000 Mathematics Assessments.

Average Scale Scores Across Years by Race/Ethnicity: HispanicAverage Scale Scores Across Years by Race/Ethnicity: White Significantly different from SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1990, 1992, 1996, and 2000 Mathematics Assessments.

Average Scale Scores Across Years by Race/Ethnicity: Asian/Pacific IslanderAverage Scale Scores Across Years by Race/Ethnicity: White Special analyses raised concerns about the accuracy and precision of national grade 8 Asian/Pacific Islander results in 1996, and grade 4 Asian/Pacific Islander results in As a result, they are omitted from this chart. SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1990, 1992, 1996, and 2000 Mathematics Assessments.

Average Scale Scores Across Years by Race/Ethnicity : American IndianAverage Scale Scores Across Years by Race/Ethnicity: White NOTE: Sample size was insufficient to permit a reliable estimate for American Indian students in 1990 and SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1990, 1992, 1996, and 2000 Mathematics Assessments.

Racial/Ethnic Gaps in Average Scale Scores Across Years SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1990, 1992, 1996, and 2000 Mathematics Assessments.

Average Scale Scores Across Years by Type of School Significantly different from SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1990, 1992, 1996, and 2000 Mathematics Assessments.

State Results 2000 vs. 1992: Grade 4 SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1992 and 2000 Mathematics Assessments.

State Results 2000 vs. 1996: Grade 4 SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1996 and 2000 Mathematics Assessments.

State Results 2000 vs. 1990: Grade 8 SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1990 and 2000 Mathematics Assessments.

State Results 2000 vs. 1996: Grade 8 SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1996 and 2000 Mathematics Assessments.

Average Score by Type of Current Mathematics Course, Grade 8: 2000 Statistically significant difference between average scores. SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2000 Mathematics Assessment.

Average Scores by Teachers’ Report of Undergraduate Major, Grade 8: 2000 Statistically significant difference between average scores. SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2000 Mathematics Assessment.

Average Scores by Teachers’ Report of Total Years Taught, Grades 4 and 8: 2000 Statistically significant difference between average scores. SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2000 Mathematics Assessment.

Average Scores by Students’ Report of Frequency of Calculator Use for Classwork: 2000 Statistically significant difference between average scores. SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2000 Mathematics Assessment.

Profiles of High- and Low-Scoring Students, Grade 8: 2000 High-scoring students = top 10% of students. Low-scoring students = bottom 10% of students. SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2000 Mathematics Assessment.

Becoming a More Inclusive National Assessment

Accommodations Permitted in the 2000 Mathematics Assessment

Comparison of Overall National Results in Two NAEP Samples Statistically significant difference between average scores. SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1996 and 2000 Mathematics Assessments.

End Slide