NIH Mentored Career Development Awards (K Series) Part 4

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Computer English For Computer Major Master Candidates
Advertisements

ing%20for%20Success.pdf Information from NIH: Louis V. De Paolo NICHD Roger G. Sorensen.
Yiu-fai Cheung, MD Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine LKS Faculty of Medicine The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong, China Sharing in GRF.
Writing NIH Career Development (K) Awards
B IOMEDICAL E NGINEERING Significance & Innovation Dawn M Elliott, PhD.
NIH Mentored Career Development Awards (K Series) Part 2 Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco.
Website: where you can find all necessary forms! NIH Grant Writing 101 ASCEND March 2015.
Significance and Innovation Significance- The positive effect something is likely to have on other things Innovation- A new and substantially different.
NIH Mentored Career Development Awards (K Series) Part 1 Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco.
Research Design (how you will accomplish your goals) Building the story: Approach (not materials and methods)
NIH Mentored Career Development Awards (K Series) Part 3 Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco.
Preparing Grant Applications
Helping Your Mentees Develop a Competitive K Award Application (K01, K07, K08, K23, K25, K99) Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics.
Research Proposal Development of research question
Overall Impact versus Significance
Creating a Research Plan for a Career Development Award Jill Harkavy-Friedman, Ph.D.
Getting Funded: How to write a good grant
How to Improve your Grant Proposal Assessment, revisions, etc. Thomas S. Buchanan.
Formulating an important research question Susan Furth, MD, PhD Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research
UAMS Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Policy WG NIH policy proposal. Goal: Incorporating global access licensing as one of the additional review criteria Question 1: Should we propose this.
NIH Mentored Career Development Awards (K Series) Part 1 Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco.
Literature Review and Parts of Proposal
Navigating the Changes to the NIH Application Instructions Navigating the Changes to the NIH Application Instructions EFFECTIVE JANUARY 25, 2010.
1 Introduction to Grant Writing Beth Virnig, PhD Haitao Chu, MD, PhD University of Minnesota, School of Public Health December 11, 2013.
COMPONENTS OF A GOOD GRANT PROPOSAL Philip T. LoVerde.
Research Project Grant (RPG) Retreat K-Series March 2012 Bioengineering Classroom.
NIH Mentored Career Development Awards (K Series) Part 1 Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco.
Elizabeth A. Martinez, MD, MHS Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions September 10, 2008 Organization of Care and Outcomes in Cardiac Surgery AHRQ grant 1K08HS A1.
R01 NIH Grants John E. Lochman, PhD, ABPP Center for Prevention of Youth Behavior Problems Department of Psychology Psychosocial Development, Risk and.
NIH Mentored Career Development Awards (K Series) Part 4 Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco.
Helping Your Mentees Develop a Competitive K Award Application (K01, K07, K08, K23, K25, K99) Thomas Mitchell, MPH Dept. of Epidemiology and Biostatistics.
NIH Mentored Career Development Awards (K Series) Part 5 Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco.
AHRQ 2011 Annual Conference: Insights from the AHRQ Peer Review Process Training Grant Review Perspective Denise G. Tate Ph.D., Professor, Chair HCRT Study.
NIH Mentored Career Development Awards (K Series) Part 1 Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco.
NIH Mentored Career Development Awards (K Series) Part 1 Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco.
Research Design – Where to Begin…. Purpose of EDD 9300 Provide guidance and help you to: Select a topic Conduct a Preliminary Literature Review Design.
The Proposal AEE 804 Spring 2002 Revised Spring 2003 Reese & Woods.
G RANTSMANSHIP $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
Career Development Awards (K series) and Research Project Grants (R series) Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University.
Ronald Margolis, Ph.D. National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases Amanda Boyce, Ph.D. National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal.
GRANT & PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT OFFICE OF THE VICE DEAN, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION CIHR Project Scheme st Live Pilot Workshop Translating the Open Operating.
ENHANCING PEER REVIEW: GUIDE FOR REVIEW OF RESTRUCTURED GRANT APPLICATIONS.
Pilot Grant Program EGAD Study OCCUPATIONAL & ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH.
How to write a Research Proposal Dr. Areefa Albahri.
California Department of Public Health / 1 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH Standards and Guidelines for Healthcare Surge during Emergencies How.
Short and Sweet: Selling Your Science in 12 Pages ASBMR Grant Writing Workshop Friday, 15 October 2010 Toronto, ON Jane E. Aubin, Ph.D. Dept of Molecular.
R01? R03? R21? How to choose the right funding mechanism Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco.
Research Strategy: Approach Frank Sellke, MD Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery Brown Medical School Providence RI AATS Grant Course 2011.
NIH R03 Program Review Ning Jackie Zhang, MD, PhD, MPH College of Health and Public Affairs 04/17/2013.
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2016
NIH Fellowships Overview
Thomas Mitchell, MA, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics
Connecting the Sections and Incorporating Feedback
Research and Grant Writing
Grant Writing Information Session
Grant Title PI Name Intended Institute List of Proposed Key Personnel
Research Project Grant (RPG) Retreat R-series
Writing that First Research Grant
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2018
Preparing Research Proposals for NSF and NIH April 20, 2018
Dr. Lani (Chi Chi) Zimmerman, UNMC Dr. Bill Mahoney, IS&T
Approach Section: The “Meat” of the Proposal
BU Career Development Grant Writing Course- Session 3, Approach
How to Succeed with NIH: September 28, 2018
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2017
K R Investigator Research Question
Bandit Thinkhamrop, PhD
UAMS Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Thomas Mitchell, MA, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics
Presentation transcript:

NIH Mentored Career Development Awards (K Series) Part 4 Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco

Writing a competitive mentored K award grant application Main sections of the grant application: The Candidate Statements by Mentors, Co-Mentors, and Collaborators Description of Institutional Environment Institutional Commitment to Candidate’s Research Career Development Research Plan Specific Aims Research Strategy Significance Innovation Approach

Research Strategy Significance: The positive effect that successful completion of your research project is likely to have by solving an important, NIH-relevant problem. Innovation: A new and substantially different way of addressing an important, NIH-relevant problem, which enables departure from the status quo. The purpose of the Significance and Innovation subsections is to help justify the need for what is proposed. In writing these subsections, keep in mind that you are writing for a general audience that is “uninformed (about your topic) but intelligent,” so you should write this section in non-technical language. Suggested length: Ideally, both subsections combined should not be longer than 1 page.

Significance The Significance subsection is where you begin to increase the level of detail that will extend and validate what was written in the Specific Aims section. Provide a critical analysis of the primary literature that describes the existence of a critical gap in knowledge. This is where you include some of the material that used to be in the “Background” section, which substantiates and validates that there is an important problem. Explain why its continued existence represents an important problem that must be resolved.

Significance (cont’d) Describe the contribution you expect to make. Example: “The proposed research will contribute to our knowledge of the effects of mail order pharmacy by assessing whether mail order use is associated with improved patient safety, appropriate services utilization, and clinical outcomes in diabetes patients.” Write a simple, direct statement regarding why the expected contribution is important. Example: “This contribution will be significant because understanding the effects of mail order pharmacy use on patient safety and clinical outcomes will help health systems design safe and efficient medication delivery systems with the potential to improve CVD-related outcomes in diabetes patients.”

Significance (cont’d) Describe the positive impact your contribution will have. How will your contribution enable subsequent thinking and research? If applicable, call attention to decreased mortality/morbidity, improvements in the quality of life or medical outcomes, reduction in cost of medical care, etc. Example: “Improved medication adherence through mail order pharmacy use has the potential to decrease CVD-related hospitalizations and deaths in diabetes patients. Through a full assessment of the risks and benefits of mail order pharmacy use, we can gain important knowledge on how to potentially improve and expand the use of mail order pharmacy services.”

Innovation Innovation: A new and substantially different way of addressing an important, NIH-relevant problem, which enables departure from the status quo. Examples: Challenging existing paradigms, testing novel hypotheses, using newly developed state-of-the-art measurements. Provide the context (with citations from the literature) so reviewers will be able to understand how your project is innovative. For example, if you plan to assert that innovation stems from a new approach that you will take, you need to support that claim with discussion of previous approaches and why they were unsatisfactory. This is another place where you include material that was previously in the “Background” section.

Innovation (cont’d) Write a statement that begins with the phrase, “The proposed research is innovative because…..” Complete this sentence by stating what objectively sets your project apart, such as a different approach you are taking or a different technology you have created, compared to past investigators. Example: “The proposed research is innovative because it addresses the potential of a healthcare system-level factor – in this case, the provision of mail order pharmacy service – rather than patient-level or provider-level factors to improve patient adherence to medications. “

Innovation (cont’d) Describe the positive impact that will result from your innovative approach. Positive impact under Significance stems from concrete benefit that is relevant to NIH’s mission. Positive impact under Innovation stems from advancement that would have been unlikely without substantive – not incremental – departure from the status quo. Example: “Many researchers and policy makers have lamented that the field of medication adherence research is “stuck” with few good options for moving forward. 3-5 Research that comprehensively assesses the impact of system-level interventions such as mail order pharmacies can significantly advance the field of structural interventions to improve patient health.”

Approach NIH guidelines for this section Describe the overall strategy, methodology, and analyses to be used to accomplish the specific aims of the project. Discuss potential problems, alternative approaches, and benchmarks for success anticipated to achieve the aims. If the project is in the early stages of development, describe any strategy to establish feasibility and address the management of any high-risk aspects of the proposed work. For new applications, include information on Preliminary Studies as part of the Approach section.

Approach (cont’d) Organization of this section: 2 approaches “Modular” approach Each Aim: Introduction Background Preliminary Studies Research Design Expected Outcomes Potential Problems & Alternative Approaches Timeline Future Directions

Approach (cont’d) “Unitary” approach Introduction Background Preliminary Studies Research Design Study design Study population Study procedures Study measurements Data quality and management Data analysis Expected Outcomes Potential Problems & Alternative Approaches Timeline Future Directions