THE IMPACT OF STATE LEVEL BUILDING CODES ON RESIDENTIAL ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION Anin Aroonruengsawat UC Berkeley, ARE Maximilian Auffhammer UC Berkeley,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quick, But Not Risky Ken Nickolai. START HERE Much of your discussion will be about money. Think both about money that will be spent… And money that.
Advertisements

BUILDING ENERGY CODES UNIVERSITYwww.energycodes.gov/BECU 1 BUILDING ENERGY CODES UNIVERSITY ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard Scope and Application April.
Helping Massachusetts Municipalities Create a Greener Energy Future Code Informational Session November 13, 2013.
Energy Savings Impacts of the Advanced Energy Design Guide: Small Office Buildings Bing Liu, P.E. Research Engineer Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
Evaluating the Slow Adoption of Energy Efficient Investments: Are Renters Less Likely to Have Energy Efficient Appliances? December 2009 Lucas W. Davis.
A tax on the energy utility for excessive residential electricity use.
By: R.M. Chitranshi. ECBC With the background of high energy saving potential and its benefits bridging the gap between demand and supply, reducing environmental.
Energy Square 1111 “O” Street, Suite 223 Lincoln, Nebraska Website: Phone:
Overview of Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) Program San Antonio Office of Environmental Policy December 16, 2009.
Energy Efficiency Initiative of the RFF Center for Climate and Electricity Policy RFF NY Breakfast Series November 9, 2010.
Energy Rating Index Performance Path Speaker Name Speaker Affiliation.
MENG 547 LECTURE 3 By Dr. O Phillips Agboola. C OMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL BUILDING ENERGY AUDIT Why do we audit Commercial/Industrial buildings Important.
Heating energy calculation methods Anti Hamburg Lecture TTK-UAS.
Energy Rating Index Performance Path Speaker Name Speaker Affiliation.
Presented by: Energy Systems Laboratory (ESL) Texas A&M University Funded by: State Energy Conservation Office (SECO) US Department of Energy (DOE) The.
Energy Efficiency and Arizona’s Energy Future Jeff Schlegel Southwest Energy Efficiency Project (SWEEP) April
Connecticut’s Energy Future Removing Barriers to Promote Energy Sustainability: Public Policy and Financing December 2, 2004 Legislative Office Building.
State Incentives for Energy Efficiency Commercial and Industrial New Jersey Board of Public Utilities Office of Clean Energy Mona L. Mosser Bureau of Energy.
Input-Output Analysis of Climate Change: Case Study of Efficiency Driven Policy Choice of Indian Response Strategy Joyashree Roy Jadavpur University, Kolkata,
Free Software for Energy Code Compliance Free Software for Energy Code Compliance Presented By: Mustafa Abdul Geleel Hussien By: Evan H. Shu, FAIA Web.
Have residential building energy codes and standards reduced household energy consumption- and if so, by how much? Meredith Fowlie discussant Conference.
Promoting Energy Efficiency In Buildings in Developing countries.
BUILDING ENERGY CODES UNIVERSITYwww.energycodes.gov/training 1 Building Energy Codes An Introduction Department of Energy Energy Efficiency & Renewable.
The Greening of the Rooftop Module 5 Why Roof Green?
Massachusetts “Stretch” Energy Code Marc Breslow Executive Office of Energy & Environmental Affairs.
Impact of Incentives: Driving Demand for Efficient Products Steven Nadel ACEEE.
MECHANICAL ASPECTS OF MICHIGAN UNIFORM ENERGY CODE MIAM DOHERTY INN CLAIRE, MICHIGAN MARK RILEY.
Compiled to help residents cost-effectively reduce residential energy use, save money and increase home comfort. Reducing Energy Use in the Built Environment.
SEEA Presentation to SEES March 2006 SEEA Presentation to SEES February 2006 SOUTHEAST ENERGY EFFICIENCY ALLIANCE.
© OECD/IEA 2011 Improving Energy Efficiency in Buildings International Best Practices Yamina SAHEB International Energy Agency Efficient.
C A L I F O R N I A E N E R G Y C O M M I S S I O N California Energy Policy: Zero Net Energy Homes in 2020 Martha Brook, P.E. High Performance Buildings.
Energy Conservation. What is energy conservation?  Energy conservation is the practice of decreasing the quantity of energy used while achieving a similar.
By Igor Tchoulba Programme Officer UNDP Belarus. Duration - 5 years Budget – USD 4.9 mln Donors: GEF, UNDP National agencies: Department on Energy Efficiency.
Experiences in carbon accounting for thermal performance improvements in low-income dwelling structures Steve Thorne founder and director SouthSouthNorth.
Energy efficiency in buildings Monga Mehlwana Tuesday, 05 October 2010.
1 Cap and Trade for Regulating Greenhouse Gases Presented by Scott Murtishaw Advisor to President Peevey, CPUC NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting San Francisco June.
1 Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy THE IMPACT OF A CARBON CONTROL PROGRAM ON LOW-INCOME CONSUMERS Joel Eisenberg ORNL
Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California.
GREEN FIEND ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT Energy Conservation.
Ben Larson 28 September th Avenue NE, Seattle, WA (206) Fax: (206)
WBCSD EEB PROJECT Challenges Towards Achieving a Zero Net Energy Building Sector William Sisson, UTC, WBCSD EEB Co-chair Lafarge Briefing November, 2008.
Wales Building Regulations 2013 Part L Existing non-domestic buildings September 2012.
HVACR416 - Design Heat Loss / Heat Gain Part 1. Why? The primary function of Air Conditioning is to maintain conditions that are… o Conductive to human.
Arthur Rosenfeld, California Energy Commission Gregory Rosenquist, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory C. Keith Rice, Oak Ridge National Laboratory ARI.
11/23/ Residential Sector Load Forecast Impacts of Codes, Standards and Market Changes Preliminary Estimates June 19, 2002.
SPSC Low Carbon Tool: Interim Status Report CREPC/SPSC meeting San Diego, CA October 5, 2012 Arne Olson.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council A Look At The Council’s Conservation Planning Methodology and Assumptions A Look At The Council’s Conservation.
QUIZQUIZ Check your knowledge before starting your practical tasks Energy Efficient Renovation of Old & Historic Buildings START YOUR TEST.
Week 6 The Energy Walk Through. Possible elements of a walk through Understand on-site information collection and listing of essential data for collection.
Sixth Power Plan A Public Utility Point of View Bill Gaines, Director, Tacoma Public Utilities Craig Smith, Assistant General Manager, Snohomish PUD Northwest.
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Page 1 Energy Policy Report Proceeding Docket 02-IEP-01 Staff Workshop Paper Publication F Sylvia Bender Demand.
Energy Efficiency, Conservation & Low-Income Households Mike Villanueva Strategic Marketing Coordinator MLGW March 31, 2016 Knoxville, TN.
Stretch Code Informational Session March 16, 2011.
PRELIMINARY DRAFT EXCERPT RECOMMENDATIONS ON MEASUREMENT AND VERIFICATION METHODS IN THE FRAMEWORK OF DIRECTIVE 2006/32/EC ON ENERGY END-USE EFFICIENCY.
Sustainable Architecture in Korea The Present Situation and Policy ACGSA REPORT 31 October, 2012 Korea Institute of Registered Architects (KIRA)
Heat Plan Denmark Low Carbon Urban Heating Anders Dyrelund, market manager Rambøll Denmark.
EFFICIENCY FIRST FOR MISSOURI’S ENERGY FUTURE Becky Stanfield, NRDC October 21, 2014 MPSC Statewide Collaborative Meeting.
California Energy Efficiency Policy and Goals Beena Morar Southern California Edison June 14, 2016.
Support for low emission development in SEE: decarbonisation of the residential sector in Albania Tirana, 26 October 2015 Modelling: Aleksandra Novikova,
Interest Free Energy Efficiency Loan Program Proposal for Improvements August 15, 2016.
Stretch Code Informational Session February 16, 2011.
Fort Stanwix National Monument Energy Audit Contract
Truss Heel Heights and Energy Code Requirements
Home Energy Savings Program Wyoming
CLIMATE CHANGE POLICY SCENARIOS - BULGARIA
CONSERVATION OPTIONS Global energy intensity — the amount of energy needed to generate each unit of GDP—has fallen steadily over the last several decades.
Measuring Progress Towards GHG Reductions Presented by: Stefan Unnasch
Thermal Impact of Different Interior Finishing Materials on Energy Consumption YOGESH JATAV
BUREAU OF STANDARDS JAMAICA
Global Status Report for COP
Presentation transcript:

THE IMPACT OF STATE LEVEL BUILDING CODES ON RESIDENTIAL ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION Anin Aroonruengsawat UC Berkeley, ARE Maximilian Auffhammer UC Berkeley, ARE/IAS Alan H. Sanstad LBNL

National Per Capita Consumption of Total Energy Has Been Flat since 1970

Residential Per Capita Consumption of Total Energy Flat since 1970

Growth of Residential Per Capita Consumption of Electricity has Slowed

…In States With and Without Significant Regulation

Policies are thought to matter

Technology-focused Efficiency and CO 2 Potential Studies “Bottom-up” engineering economics methodology – First appeared 1970s – Studies recently emerging at an accelerated rate, and gaining increasing attention – e.g., McKinsey study Traditional point-of-contention is the claim of sizable zero or negative cost energy and/or carbon reduction

McKinsey: Negative Marginal Costs for CO 2 Abatement from New Buildings

Are potential studies overly optimistic? Varying degrees of enforcement on site. Ex-Post Modifications by end-users If these improvements are free or have a positive return, why don’t households build the “correct” house?  Building codes are technical or performance standards, which may not achieve savings at least cost.

“Official” Savings from California Utilities

Ex-Post Evaluation of Energy Efficiency Programs Aggregate (national scale) studies are few, but do exist – Gillingham et al. (2006) estimated about 5% reduction in national primary consumption as of 2000 due to cumulative effects of all policies and programs, local, state, and federal – Geller (1995, ACEEE) – Jones, Norland and Prindle (1990, ASE) Econometric Studies: – Jaffe and Stavins (1995, JEEM) – Everyone speaking today.

Research Question How effective were state-level building codes at reducing residential electricity consumption?

History of Residential Building Codes Fuel-oil, gas and electricity shortages in the winter 1972/73. Closing of schools, industry and government offices created demand for regulation. NCSBCS asked NBS to develop set of standards states could use. August 1975 ASHRAE (American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air Conditioning Engineers) Code Revisions until 1995 known as the Model Energy Code (MEC) Current: International Energy Conservation Codes (IECC) California: Title 24 of 1978

What types of buildings are included? IECC 2009 covers: – construction, additions, remodeling, window replacement, and repairs of specified buildings. – The Residential portion of the Code applies to buildings that are detached one- and two-family dwellings and buildings that contain three or more dwelling units and is three stories or less in height above grade. – Commercial buildings are covered as well. A building is considered to be commercial when it is over three stories in height above grade or when it is below three stories and is not a residential building.

IECC 2009 Ensures the design of energy efficient building envelopes. Addresses the energy efficiency of elements that do not affect the building envelope, such as mechanical, water heating, electrical, and lighting equipment. The envelope requirements focus on insulation requirements for ceilings, walls, and floors and on thermal conductance of windows and doors.

IECC 2009 Varies by Climate Zone

California

Texas

MANDATORY STATE BUILDING CODES

Unconditional Event Graph: Per Capita Consumption Building Code Adoption

Residential New Construction und Building Code by State

Econometric Model Per capita residential electricity consumption, state i, year t Average residential electricity price, state i, year t Average natural gas price, state i, year t Per capita real personal income, state i, year t Heating & Cooling Degree Days, state i, year t Share of construction since 1970 permitted under building code ACEEE stringency and enforcement index

Econometric Model Per capita residential electricity consumption, state i, year t Average residential electricity price, state i, year t Average natural gas price, state i, year t Per capita real personal income, state i, year t Heating & Cooling Degree Days, state i, year t Share of construction since 1970 permitted under building code ACEEE stringency and enforcement index

Econometric Model Per capita residential electricity consumption, state i, year t Average residential electricity price, state i, year t Average natural gas price, state i, year t Per capita real personal income, state i, year t Heating & Cooling Degree Days, state i, year t Share of construction since 1970 permitted under building code ACEEE stringency and enforcement index

Econometric Model Per capita residential electricity consumption, state i, year t Average residential electricity price, state i, year t Average natural gas price, state i, year t Per capita real personal income, state i, year t Heating & Cooling Degree Days, state i, year t Share of construction since 1970 permitted under building code ACEEE stringency and enforcement index

Econometric Model Per capita residential electricity consumption, state i, year t Average residential electricity price, state i, year t Average natural gas price, state i, year t Per capita real personal income, state i, year t Heating & Cooling Degree Days, state i, year t Share of construction since 1970 permitted under building code ACEEE stringency and enforcement index

Econometric Model Per capita residential electricity consumption, state i, year t Average residential electricity price, state i, year t Average natural gas price, state i, year t Per capita real personal income, state i, year t Heating & Cooling Degree Days, state i, year t Share of construction since 1970 permitted under building code ACEEE stringency and enforcement index

Econometric Model Per capita residential electricity consumption, state i, year t Average residential electricity price, state i, year t Average natural gas price, state i, year t Per capita real personal income, state i, year t Heating & Cooling Degree Days, state i, year t Share of construction since 1970 permitted under building code ACEEE stringency and enforcement index

Estimation Results

Estimated Building Code Impacts

Total New Residential Construction since 1970 by State

Waxman Markey (ACESA, 2009) Combines Cap and Trade Program (Title III) with aggressive energy efficiency efforts (Title II). Title II, Subtitle A, Section 201 sets energy efficiency targets for residential and commercial buildings After enactment, compliant buildings will meet a 30 percent reduction in energy use relative to a baseline code (ASHRAE Standard for commercial and 2006 IECC for Residential) By 2014 (residential) and 2015 (commercial), buildings will be required to meet a 50% reduction. The reduction requirements are tightened by 5% at three year intervals thereafter until 2029 and 2030 respectively. Option to raise state-specific standards to match or exceed new standards.