Development of a Standardized Acoustic Shock Tube

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Respiratory Protection and the Role of NIOSH
Advertisements

HPD Labeling: EPA Rulemaking and an Updated ANSI S12.42 NHCA Conference, Orlando, 2/27/10 Elliott H. Berger, Senior Scientist.
Sandra Rodiño Palacios – Statoil ASA
Universal Waste Management Training. Introduction DEC and EPA have established standards for the handling of “Universal Wastes”. “Universal Wastes”, in.
Comparison of Damage Risk Criteria Using the Albuquerque Blast Overpressure Walkup Study Data William J. Murphy Amir Khan Peter B. Shaw Hearing Loss Prevention.
HEARING CONSERVATION Protecting Employees From Noise Hazards.
Budget Shortfall Options Ian Wyatt - Atkins JIP on Bursting Disks for Shell & Tube Exchangers – 2 nd Stakeholders Meeting.
HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM. REFERENCES 29 CFR
Hearing Conservation and Noise Control. WHY?????? It’s the LAW Quality of Life Gradual / Painless.
Ohio BWC Division of Safety and Hygiene John Canning Cleveland Service Office Lausche Office Building (office) (cell)
[Federal Register: June 17, 2003 (Volume 68, Number 116)] [Rules and Regulations] [Page ]
Impulsive Noise Control Strategies. A noise that occurs at intervals of greater than one per second; for example, the noise made by a metal shear, jackhammer,
Siemens Building Technologies, Inc. ED&G 100 Design Project Fume Hood Face Velocity Control Spring 2004.
AIA Iowa Complying with the 2014 FGI Acoustical Guidelines #A203 Jon W. Mooney PE September 26, 2014.
Student Book © 2004 Propane Education & Research CouncilPage Performing Pressure Tests on Gas Distribution Lines Gas personnel must understand.
Hydraulics.
Introduction to Hydraulics ClassAct SRS enabled. In this presentation you will: identify the fundamental parts of a hydraulic system and safety issues.
Disclaimer: The findings and conclusions in this presentation are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the National Institute.
ISO EMS CONTRACTOR OVERVIEW May /26/10ISO EMS CONTRACTOR OVERVIEW TRAINING ISO EMS OVERVIEW TRAINING Contents What is ISO
Sound Power Testing Techniques for Powered Hand Tools Brian Kim Edward Zechmann, M.S. Chuck Hayden, M.S., P.E. Dept of Health and Human Services US Public.
Lock-Out/Tag-out.  What is lock-out/tag-out (LOTO)?  The proper procedure for installing locks and tags.  The proper procedure for removing locks and.
 Review Alpena Biorefinery Hearing Conservation Program  Types of Hearing Protection Devices Employee Safety Training
a look at noise on the farm
Environmental Considerations Confined Space Rescue is inherently dangerous and requires performance of rigorous activities under adverse conditions. Regional.
Independent Laboratory Testing PART 6 Regulations Mechanical & Engineering Safety Division Robert Setren Mechanical Engineer.
OVERVIEW 1 HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM 28 Jan 2013.
Mrs. Brandi Robinson Office of New Animal Drug Evaluation Center for Veterinary Medicine Regulating Animal Drugs.
Safety and Loss Control
Fire Fighter Fatality/Injury SCBA Evaluation Overview Thomas Pouchot General Engineer National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health National Personal.
Keep Fort Rucker “Above The Best.”
CHAPTER 6 Moving Heat: Heating and Air Conditioning Principles
Occupational Health Management Programme. Chemical Hazard Control Hearing Conservation Industrial Ventilation Industrial Hygiene Monitoring Medical Surveillance.
Personal Protective Equipment
Incident Energy Study Christian Brothers University MAESC CONFERENCE Jermichael Beaver, Bruce Luong, David Temple, and John Ventura.
VALIDATION METHODOLOGY
FHM TRAINING TOOLS This training presentation is part of FHM’s commitment to creating and keeping safe workplaces. Be sure to check out all the training.
Safety Meeting MSDS Sheets EDM Services, Inc, August 31, 2010.
Jackie Friedman Period 4. Congress passed the Occupational Safety and Health Act to ensure worker and workplace safety. The act makes sure employers provide.
Pro-Science 4 th International Conference of Hydrogen Safety, September 12-14, 2011, SAN FRANCISCO, USA EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF IGNITED UNSTEADY HYDROGEN.
Level 2 Unit 4 Producing Engineering Solutions Engineering Diploma Level 2 Unit 4 Producing Engineering Solutions An Approach to Unit Delivery and Assessment.
Chucri A. Kardous, M.S., P.E. William J. Murphy, Ph.D. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National.
Introduction to Workplace Safety
Product Development Chapter 6. Definitions needed: Verification: The process of evaluating compliance to regulations, standards, or specifications.
Medical Research and Materiel Command U.S. Army Aeromedical Research Laboratory Fort Rucker, Alabama.
Hearing Conservation Personnel Department Occupational Safety and Health Division.
Noise Control In Highway Construction Kwangseog Ahn, MS and Susan Moir, MS Department of Work Environment University of Massachusetts Lowell
Chapter 20 Measurement Systems. Objectives Define and describe measurement methods for both continuous and discrete data. Use various analytical methods.
Introduction to a Safe Workplace
Noise Reduction Rating (NRR) Theresa Y. Schulz, PhD, LtCol, USAF (ret.)
NIOSH AND OSHA REGULATIONS AND CONTACT LENS USE BY: DR. MARK W. BURCHAM.
Informations and comments on ECE-TRANS-WP.29-GRB e 1 Louis-Ferdinand PARDO (France) Transmitted by the expert from France Informal document GRB
Confined Space Rescue Level I Technical References: Mod 3.
JLAB Pressure Systems Considerations Ed Daly. Outline Introduction Federal Law - 10CFR851 Compliance JLAB Pressure Systems Program –Complies with 10CFR851,
Noise Survey and Database Training Cathy Pate Megan Karie (248) Cathy Pate
Laboratory Decommissioning : Essential Tools and Lessons Learned Jim Carscadden Division of Environmental Protection Office of Research Facilities.
Performance of Sound Restoration Hearing Protectors in Impulsive Noise William J. Murphy, Ph.D. Commander, U.S. Public Health Service National Institute.
Management of Surgical Smoke Tool Kit Part III: An Overview of the Health Care Regulations, Standards, and Guidelines Related to Surgical Smoke.
Chucri (Chuck) A. Kardous, M.S., P.E. Peter B. Shaw, Ph.D. William J. Murphy, Ph.D. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control.
SAFE 101 NSC Chapter 14.
We’ve upped our Safety standards,
Noise By Dr. Ali Saleh.
MOSH Noise Team Presentation to CM&EE August
3E Plus Program Software Insulation Thickness Calculator
Presented by Harry C. Elinsky, Jr. Filtech, Inc.
Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)
MOSH Noise Team Presentation to JS August
Safety and Regulatory Guidelines In the Medical Laboratory
Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)
Parker domnick hunter. Safety of Electrical and
Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)
Presentation transcript:

Development of a Standardized Acoustic Shock Tube Amir Khan, Edward Zechmann and William J. Murphy Hearing Loss Prevention Team Engineering and Physical Hazards Branch National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health May 22, 2009 The findings and conclusions in this presentation have not been formally disseminated by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health and should not be construed to represent any agency determination or policy.

Acoustic Shock Tube High amplitude wavefront Rapid expansion of a compressed gas. Pressurizing a chamber sealed by a membrane Punctured or ruptured spontaneously. Impulse peak levels range is 130-180 dB peak sound pressure level.

Proposed EPA Regulation EPA is proposing new labeling requirements for all Hearing Protection Devices. The current labels for the hearing protection devices only require the Noise Reduction Rating (NRR) for continuous noises. The EPA is expected to propose new methods for passive, active noise reduction and impulsive hearing protection devices.

Current EPA Label for HPD

Proposed EPA Labeling Requirements According to the new EPA regulation the NRR for HPD will have to be evaluated at three exposure levels using A-duration peak height: 130-134 dB 0r 132+2 dB 148-152 dB 0r 150+2 dB 166-170 dB 0r 168+2 dB In order for a standardized shock tube design to be acceptable it must be capable of generating impulses within the three exposure range levels. impulses can also be generated using explosive charges, but then the concerns about the safety at the testing lab can become an issue. The acoustic shock tube is a much more safe and less hazardous method than working with explosives.

Methodology Recommended by EPA for Computing NRR for HPD

Proposed EPA label for HPD ABC Protective Equipment 123 Main Street Anywhere, USA MODEL ABC1 www.ABCProtectors.com Federal law prohibits removal of this label prior to purchase LABEL REQUIRED BY U . S E P A REGULATIONS 40 CFR Part 211 , Subpart B EPA Noise Reduction Rating 0 10 20 30 40 50 PASSIVE IMPULSIVE 22 38 33 40 This product is intended to protect against impulse noise exposures (such as firearms, impact tools, and machinery). The NRR’s are comprised of two numbers. When this product is used as directed, the user may expect to receive a level of protection between the lesser and the greater NRR. See supporting information for details.

Why Do We Need To Develop A Standardized Shock Tube Design? To ensure reproducibility of NRR from laboratory to laboratory and from manufacturer to manufacturer. This will be achieved by: Developing guidelines for designing standardized shock tube capable of complying with the proposed new EPA labeling requirements. Standardizing the methodology for computing the NRR for HPD to impulsive noise exposure.

Evaluate the Performances of Three Different Design Shock Tubes. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) shock tube located at the Robert Taft Laboratories in Cincinnati, Ohio. US Army Aeromedical Research Laboratories (USAARL) shock tube located at Fort Rucker, Alabama. US Army Research Laboratories (ARL) shock tube located at Aberdeen Proving Grounds, Maryland.

Criteria To Be Used In Rating The Performances Of Shock Tubes Precision and reproducibility of the shock tube in generating the three exposure levels. The repeatability and reproducibility of the NRR measurements for a wide range of HPD using all three shock tubes. The day-to-day variations in the acoustic environment of each of the facilities.

Experimental Protocol For The Evaluation Of The Performances Of The Shock Tubes The protocol will specify: Type and size of the microphones to be used Standard operating procedure to be used in the calibration of the Microphones Types and number of the HPD to be evaluated Locations of the microphones relative to the mannequin Location and orientation of the mannequin relative to the shock tube Study duration Room conditions Data collection and analysis

NIOSH Shock Tube Flat Gasket and Puncture Knife Pressure Chamber Flat Gasket and Puncture Knife Flat Gasket and Puncture Knife Pneumatic Solenoid for Puncture Knife

Air Pressure Meter with Reset Button Air Pressure Release Valve Air Pressure Meter with Reset Button Pressure Reducer and Gauge Pneumatic Solenoid Trigger

USAARL Shock Tube Square Horn 6 inch diameter Shock Wave Guide Hydraulic Ram membrane clamp Hydraulic Ram -- membrane clamp

Mannequin and Square Horn Support for Control Panel and Ram O-ring Gasket and puncturing knife Control Panel Mannequin and Square Horn

ARL Shock Tube

Evaluate The Effects Of The Atmospheric Conditions On The Performance Of The Shock Tubes Relative humidity Room temperature Atmospheric pressure

Selection Of The Shock Tube As A Prototype For The Design Of The Standardized Shock Tube The shock tube with the best compliance to the EPA regulation will be used as a prototype for the development and design of a standardized shock tube. The design of the selected shock tube will be improved to enhance the reproducibility and precision of the NRR for HPD by generating stable and reproducible impulses at the required exposure levels per EPA regulation. The performance of the new improved shock tube will then be optimized.

Optimization Of The Critical Components Of The Selected Shock Tube The explosion mechanism. The size and design of the chamber downstream of the explosion. The size and design of the chamber upstream of the explosion.

Other things to consider Development of a speaker driven shock tube Use of explosives Choice of transducers for measurement PCB Blast Probe 1/8” microphone