Improving an Air Quality Decision Support System through the Integration of Satellite Data with Ground-based, Modeled, and Emissions Data NASA ROSES 2007:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An Integrated Systems Solution to Air Quality Data and Decision Support on the Web GEO Architecture Implementation Pilot – Phase 2 (AIP-2) Kickoff Workshop.
Advertisements

Attribution of Haze Workgroup & Technical Support System Report Fire Emissions Joint Forum Meeting July
Attribution of Haze Phase 2 and Technical Support System Project Update AoH Meeting – San Francisco, CA September 14/15, 2005 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource.
Web-Based Decision Support Systems: Supporting Air Quality Monitoring Networks, Science, and Regulations Bret A. Schichtel, National Park Service Rudolf.
Satellite and Above-Boundary Layer Observations for Air Quality Management Workshop Series – 2 nd Workshop Satellite and Above-Boundary Layer Observations.
Integrated Decision Support: A Tale of Two Systems “It was the best of times, it was the worst of times…” Charles Dickens, A Tale of Two Cities, 1859 “Actually,
Technical Support System Review / / RPO Monitoring/Data Analysis Workgroup Conference.
2 nd Quarter 2009 Status Update The Visibility Information Exchange Web System (VIEWS) Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere.
 Provides integrated online access to:  Monitoring data: from over 3 dozen networks  Modeling data: from a variety of modeling scenarios  Emissions.
WRAP Technical Support System for Air Quality Planning, Tracking, & Decision Support Tom Moore, Western Regional Air Partnership, Western Governor’s Association.
The Visibility Information Exchange Web System (VIEWS): An Approach to Air Quality Data Management and Presentation In a broader sense, VIEWS facilitates.
Technical Support System Review Board Meeting March 8, 2007.
WRAP Regional Haze Analysis & Technical Support System IMPROVE Steering Committee Meeting September 27, 2006.
Dissemination of Haze Data, Data Products and Information Bret Schichtel, Rodger Ames, Shawn McClure and Doug Fox.
Issues on Ozone Planning in the Western United States Prepared by the WESTAR Planning Committee for the Fall Business Meeting, Tempe, AZ October 31, 2011.
DSS Performance Metrics Improving an Air Quality Decision Support System through the Integration of Satellite Data with Ground-Based, Modeled, and Emissions.
WRAP Decision and Data Support Systems Tom Moore | Western Governors’ Association Shawn McClure | Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere.
CORDEX Scope, or What is CORDEX?  Provide a set of regional climate scenarios (including uncertainties) covering the period , for the majority.
The Western Regional Air Partnership (WRAP) WRAP formed in 1997 as the successor organization to Grand Canyon Visibility Transport Commission (GCVTC) –
Oil and Gas Workgroup Summary October 21-23, 2009 Denver.
” Particulates „ Characterisation of Exhaust Particulate Emissions from Road Vehicles Key Action KA2:Sustainable Mobility and Intermodality Task 2.2:Infrastructures.
2004 Workplan WRAP Regional Modeling Center Prepared by: Gail Tonnesen, University of California Riverside Ralph Morris, ENVIRON Corporation Zac Adelman,
PM2.5 Model Performance Evaluation- Purpose and Goals PM Model Evaluation Workshop February 10, 2004 Chapel Hill, NC Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS.
November 7, 2013 WRAP Membership Meeting Denver, CO Tom Moore WRAP Air Quality Program Manager WESTAR Council.
WRAP Committee and Forum Updates WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City, UT October 15, 2003.
Air Quality Focus Group Discussion Summary ESIP Winter Meeting January 2005 Air Quality is one of 12 Applications of National Priority as defined by NASA.
WRAP CAMx-PSAT Source Apportionment Modeling Results Implementation Workgroup Meeting August 29, 2006.
Next Steps in Regional Haze Planning in the Western U.S. Prepared by the WESTAR Planning Committee for the Fall Business Meeting, Tempe, AZ October 31,
RPO Monitoring Issues by Marc Pitchford, Ph.D. WRAP Ambient Monitoring & Reporting Forum Co-chair.
WRAP Update WESTAR Meeting San Francisco April 25, 2011.
TSS Project Update and Demo of Selected Tools WRAP IWG Meeting Santa Fe, NM December 7, 2006.
Regional Haze SIP Development Overview AQCC Presentation July 2005.
An Integrated Systems Solution to Air Quality Data and Decision Support on the Web GEO Architecture Implementation Pilot – Phase 2 (AIP-2) Kickoff Workshop.
1 Brian Finneran, Oregon DEQ WRAP IWG Meeting, Santa Fe December 2006 Update on Regional Haze 308 SIP Template.
WRAP Workshop July 29-30, 2008 Potential Future Regional Modeling Center Cumulative Analysis Ralph Morris ENVIRON International Corporation Novato, California.
2005 WRAP Work Plan WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City, UT November 10, 2004.
Technical Projects Update WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City, UT November 10, 2004.
TSS Database Inventory. CIRA has… Received and imported the 2002 and 2018 modeling data Decided to initially store only IMPROVE site-specific data Decided.
1 Brian Finneran, Oregon DEQ WRAP IWG Meeting, Portland August 2006 Suggested Changes to IWG Section 308 SIP Template.
Overview of WRAP FEJF Work Products WRAP Workshop on Fire, Carbon, and Dust May 23-24, 2006 Sacramento, CA Darla Potter (WDEQ) & Mark Fitch (USFS)
Air Quality Data User Agencies Draft ESIP Federation Air Quality Cluster February, 2005.
Adaptive Integrated Framework (AIF): a new methodology for managing impacts of multiple stressors in coastal ecosystems A bit more on AIF, project components.
TSS Project Update WRAP Technical Analysis Forum Boise, ID May 22, 2007.
An Integrated Fire, Smoke and Air Quality Data & Tools Network Stefan Falke and Rudolf Husar Center for Air Pollution Impact and Trend Analysis Washington.
WRAP Activities Overview §308 Technical Work Outline June 3, 2003.
TSS Workshop WRAP-up June 20, June 19 th - PRP18 report Major findings - Emissions results detailed in Lee’s talk –Fixed errors in assumptions.
Application of NASA ESE Data and Tools to Particulate Air Quality Management A proposal to NASA Earth Science REASoN Solicitation CAN-02-OES-01 REASoN:
Technical Support System Review Board Meeting March 8, 2007.
Attribution of Haze Phase 2 and Technical Support System Project Update Combined Session – Emissions and Fire Emissions Joint Forums – Missoula, MT September.
Concepts on Aerosol Characterization R.B. Husar Washington University in St. Louis Presented at EPA – OAQPS Seminar Research Triangle Park, NC, April 4,
Key Findings from May & July 2008 WRAP Technical Workshops September 30, 2008 Steve Arnold, Colorado DPHE & Bob Kotchenruther, EPA R10 (Co-Chairs, WRAP.
Federal Land Manager Environmental Database (FED) Overview and Update June 6, 2011 Shawn McClure.
Fire, Smoke & Air Quality: Tools for Data Exploration & Analysis : Data Sharing/Processing Infrastructure This project integrates.
Shawn McClure, Rodger Ames and Doug Fox - CIRA
Western Regional Technical Projects 2011 through 2013
Aerosol & Atmospheric Optics: Visual Air Quality and Radiation
Improving an Air Quality Decision Support System through the Integration of Satellite Data with Ground-Based, Modeled, and Emissions Data Demonstration.
Current and Future State of the IMPROVE Website
Improving an Air Quality Decision Support System through the Integration of Satellite Data with Ground-Based, Modeled, and Emissions Data DSS Performance.
Dissemination of Haze Data, Data Products and Information
Federal Land Manager Environmental Database (FED)
NASA ROSES 2007: Decision Support through Earth Science Research Results Improving an Air Quality Decision Support System through the Integration of Satellite.
AoH Phase 2 Update AoH Meeting – San Diego, CA January 25, 2006
Tom Moore (WESTAR and WRAP) and Pat Brewer (NPS ARD)
Issues on Ozone Planning in the Western United States
Western Regional Haze Planning and
Improving an Air Quality Decision Support System through the Integration of Satellite Data with Ground-Based, Modeled, and Emissions Data Demonstration.
Air Resource Specialists, Inc. July 23, 2004
EPA’s Roadmap for the Second Planning Period
Presentation transcript:

Improving an Air Quality Decision Support System through the Integration of Satellite Data with Ground-based, Modeled, and Emissions Data NASA ROSES 2007: Decision Support through Earth Science Research Results Design Workshop, May 12 – 13: Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere

Workshop Objectives Introduce end users to project team, objectives, and high-level details Solicit end user feedback regarding each project task to help plan and design effective DSS enhancements Brainstorm ideas for tasks and schedule, information exchange, and the creation of a “road map” document Identify relevant databases and key contacts at NASA centers and in the broader user community Synthesize the ideas generated during the workshop into a practical and successful project plan

Overall Project Goal To enhance and add value to a currently operational air quality decision support system (VIEWS/TSS) by integrating and utilizing satellite data from NASA satellites Aura, Terra, Aqua, and CALIPSO. Specific Project Goals Improve methods for identifying pollutant sources and their respective contributions to visibility impairment in Federal Class I Areas Improve fire emissions data used for current and future-year air quality assessments through calibration of a stochastic fire prediction model Facilitate interpretative analyses of ground-based, modeled, and emissions data by providing requirements for advanced analysis tools integrated in the DSS. Demonstrate the augmented system capabilities to end users via observations, emissions data, and outputs from the Community Multiscale Air Quality model from historic and future-year applications.

VIEWS The Visibility Information Exchange Web System  Developed by the five Regional Planning Organizations (RPOs) in 2002  For RPOs, States, Tribes, Federal Land Managers, and local agencies  Used by researchers, analysts, planners, regulators, stakeholders, and students  Provides online access to data from over fifty monitoring networks and studies  The primary source for IMPROVE Regional Haze Rule data  Offers tools for exploring, downloading, visualizing, and analyzing data  Has over 1200 registered users  Serves over 300 organizations, institutions, and companies  New version being launched in the summer of 2008

TSS WRAP Technical Support System  Developed by the WRAP for Western States, Tribes, and air quality agencies  Serves as an access point for regional technical data, guidance, and results  Provides tools and support for the development of SIPs and TIPs  Describes the technical methods used in implementation plans  Helps assess the impact of other areas on local Class I Areas  Provides ongoing tracking and assessment of emissions control strategies  Will adapt to and serve the future regional technical needs of WRAP members  Built upon the database and software infrastructure of VIEWS

VIEWS/TSS Decisions: End Users & Benefits Federal Land Managers: Better air quality evaluation More accurate source apportionment More meaningful impact assessment Informed permitting and regulation Improved air quality in ecosystems EPA and RPOs: Effective emissions control evaluation Practical and equitable standards Leveraging of existing efforts Improved synergy with States and Tribes Valuable case studies and precedents More effective application of resources States, Tribes, and Local Agencies: Effective Implementation Plans Defensible and achievable control strategies Uniform and reasonable progress Better air quality in Class I Areas Researchers, Students, & Stakeholders: Better insight into the decision process Real life evidence of successes & failures Incorporation of feedback into next generation products Increasing expertise in developing decision support tools

VIEWS/TSS Data Value Chain

Dynamic Contour Maps

Dynamic Data Maps

Network Inter-comparison Parameter: Nitrate Ion Concentrations Location: Bondville, IL Networks: IMPROVE, STN, and CASTNet Graphs: Time Series and Scatter Plot

Model Performance Evaluation CMAQ Model Performance vs. Monitored Worst 20% Days in 2002

Source Apportionment  Mass source apportionment by source category and region  From regional photochemical model with comprehensive emissions inputs  Species mass for various time periods – directly comparable to monitoring data

Glide Slope and Uniform Rate of Progress

Multidimensional Analysis  Multiple NAAQS indicators, multiple time periods, multiple locations  Displayed with consistent, comparable graphics in the same tool

Emissions Review Tool Available Parameters: –Sulfur Dioxide –Sulfur Oxides (gas and particulate) –Nitrogen Oxides (gas) –Nitrogen Oxides (gas and particulate) –Other species from SMOKE Multiple dimensions: –Parameters –Emissions Scenarios –Source Categories –Regions of Interest Future plans: –Display regional summaries as well as state-level emissions

Raw Data

VIEWS/TSS Objectives: Analyze current and historic air quality conditions Aerosol composition for best & worst visibility days Estimates of natural background visibility conditions Modeled projections of visibility in future years Identify pollutant sources among biogenic, federal/international, and controllable anthropogenic categories, as well as their relative contributions to visibility impairment Determine Reasonable Progress goals for reducing emissions Develop long term control strategies for achieving natural visibility conditions in protected ecosystems by 2064

Overall Project Premise…

Project Tasks Task 1: Integrate Satellite Data into the TSS Database Task 2: Enhance Existing TSS Tools for Satellite Data Access Task 3: Add Additional Satellite-Data Enhanced Analysis Tools Task 4: Calibrate the Fire Scenario Builder with MODIS Fire Data Products Task 5: Demonstrate Key Applications of the Enhanced TSS Task 6: Engage End Users, Transfer Technology, and Provide Training

Project Schedule: Year One Organize design workshop to solicit system end user requirements Create “road map” document including performance metrics for enhanced DSS Acquire/QA Level 2 or gridded OMI and CALIPSO data from UMBC Enhance TSS database to import satellite data Attend NASA Science Team meeting and other project-relevant meetings for communication with end users and satellite data experts Examine MODIS fire data for 2006 or later from RRS to import into DSS Begin modifying pyPA to include particulate species modeled in CMAQ Prepare fire model inputs for Western U.S. ecoprovinces for ’06-’07 timeframe Run FSB simulations and calibrate against MODIS fire data Enhance AMET for comparison with CALIPSO aerosol data

Project Schedule: Year Two Complete data import of CALIPSO and OMI into DSS and begin beta tests Complete data import of MODIS fire data products into DSS Attend NASA Science Team meetings and other project-relevant meetings for communication with end users and satellite data experts Complete AMET and pyPA installation in DSS Produce emissions of ’06 or ’07 fires for Western U.S. and compare with NEI 2005 fire inventory Produce base and future-year emissions for CMAQ including predicted fires Test pyPA with archived CMAQ outputs from RPO simulations Test AMET analysis tools with archived CMAQ Send links to beta version of DSS to end users Incorporate feedback from beta testing

Project Schedule: Year Three Prepare CMAQ lateral and vertically varying boundary conditions for ’06 or ’07 from satellite data for Continental US and Western domain Performance-test nested simulations with satellite-data enhanced emissions (fire sources) and QA Attend NASA Science Team meetings and other project-relevant meetings for communication with end users and satellite data experts Perform base- and future-year simulations for 2 nested domains for 2 representative seasons Analyze results / evaluate against 3D measurements Send links to end users for beta testing, and incorporate feedback Archive results in DSS database and QA Convene Final Demonstration Workshop and update DSS database as needed Attend all-investigator meeting at NASA HQ to present project results

Thanks!