1 Public Opinion and Issues in Anne Arundel County: A Leadership Anne Arundel Presentation November 15, 2006 by Dan Nataf, Ph.D Director, Center for the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CSLI Fall 2013 Survey Almost 7:30 Democratic Club Nov. 1, 2013 Presentation by Dan Nataf, Ph.D. Director, Center for the Study of Local Issues www2.aacc.edu/csli.
Advertisements

Local Government Services and revenue.
The Center for the Study of Local Issues: Overview Review CSLI History/Mission Opportunities for Student Learning and Civic Awareness Your Help Dan Nataf,
Survey Conducted May 6-8, Project Objectives & Results  A recently commissioned project of The Lew Edwards Group--with survey research.
What is an Area Development District? The Area Development Districts comprise a statewide network of multi-county planning and development organizations.
Presentation of the 20 th Idaho Public Policy Survey - Statewide Results 1 Boise State University College of Social Sciences & Public Affairs Public Policy.
1 Public Perceptions of Terrorism and Government Preparedness National and Local Trends and Findings November 16, 2005 Presented by Dan Nataf, Ph.D Director,
Presentation of the 20 th Idaho Public Policy Survey - Statewide Results 1 Boise State University College of Social Sciences & Public Affairs Public Policy.
2015 Municipal Budget Overview Borough of Montvale April 14, 2015.
1 Public ne Arundel County: Greater Severna Park Council – Presentation of CSLI Survey Findings for Spring 2009 April 14, 2009 Dan Nataf, PhD Director,
Transportation, Growth and Sustainability Economic Growth with Equity Open Classroom Stephanie Pollack April 1, 2009.
1 Public Opinion and Issues in Anne Arundel County: Leadership Anne Arundel Presentation January 20, 2011 Dan Nataf, PhD Director, Center for the Study.
Overview of Recent Public Opinion in Anne Arundel County By Dan Nataf, Ph.D. Director, Center for the Study of Local Issues Anne Arundel Community College.
Contra Costa County Survey of Likely November 2014 Voters Presentation to Board of Supervisors June 24, 2014.
The Urban Infrastructure Challenge in Canada: Focusing on Housing Affordability and Choice Presentation by CHBA – [Name] to The Municipal Council of [Name]
Summary of Survey Results Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin & Associates Opinion Research & Public Policy Analysis Santa Monica, CA – Oakland, CA – Madison,
2012 Elections and Public Opinion Dan Nataf Director, Center for the Study of Local Issues Anne Arundel Community College www2.aacc.edu/csli.
The Public’s Perceptions and Experiences with the Economy in Anne Arundel County By Dan Nataf, Ph.D. Director, Center for the Study of Local Issues Anne.
1 Public Opinion and Issues in Anne Arundel County: Leadership Anne Arundel Presentation January 7, 2010 Dan Nataf, PhD Director, Center for the Study.
Based on Recent Surveys of Anne Arundel County Residents By Dan Nataf Director, Center for the Study of Local Issues Anne Arundel Community College www2.aacc.edu/csli.
1 Colorado Transportation Issues July 10, These unique polling results are based on 1,001 live telephone surveys among likely 2014 voters statewide.
Review the process Review the findings Analyze - Hypotheses.
2004 Budget Presentation City Commission Budget Study Session July 2, 2003.
Executive Summary July SURVEY OVERVIEW Methodology Penn Schoen Berland conducted 1,650 telephone interviews between March 27, 2015 and May 4, 2015.
1 Public Opinion and Issues in Anne Arundel County: Leadership Anne Arundel Presentation – NLA Feb. 28, 2009 Dan Nataf, PhD Director, Center for the Study.
GREATER SEVERNA PARK COUNCIL PRESENTATION Results of Oct , 2012 Survey of Anne Arundel County Residents By Dan Nataf Director, Center for the Study.
Learning with the Center for the Study of Local Issues Dan Nataf, PhD, Director Center for the Study of Local Issues Careers 132 Anne Arundel Community.
 The Federal government  collects money (revenue) and  spends money (expenditures)  The government is important in our economy.
How do local governments get their money and what is it used for?
Presentation of CSLI Fall 2009 Survey Findings + Annapolis Election Musings Dan Nataf Ph.D. Director Center for the Study of Local Issues Anne Arundel.
1 Public Opinion in Anne Arundel County: CSLI Campus Presentation November 7, 2005 Presented by Dan Nataf, Ph.D Director, Center for the Study of Local.
1 Public Opinion in Anne Arundel County: Recent Trends and Findings February 21, 2006 Presented by Dan Nataf, Ph.D Director, Center for the Study of Local.
The Public’s Perceptions and Experiences with the Economy in Anne Arundel County By Dan Nataf, Ph.D. Director, Center for the Study of Local Issues Anne.
Dan Nataf Ph.D. Director Center for the Study of Local Issues Anne Arundel Community College 101 College Parkway Arnold, MD
Service Learning at the Center for the Study of Local Issues Review CSLI History/Mission The Semi-Annual Survey: An Opportunity for Student Learning and.
1 Public Opinion in Anne Arundel County: Recent Trends and Findings November 18, 2005 Presented by Dan Nataf, Ph.D Director, Center for the Study of Local.
CSLI Advisory Board Feb. 11, 2010 Agenda Call to order Committee reports Review of ongoing activities Review/discuss Fall 2009 survey Review/discuss proposed.
Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin & Associates Opinion Research & Public Policy Analysis Santa Monica, CA – Oakland, CA – Madison, WI - Mexico City City of Palo.
CSLI Advisory Board Sept Agenda Call to order Committee reports Review of ongoing activities Review/discuss Spring 2009 survey Review/discuss.
1 CSLI Advisory Board – Fall 2006 Presentation Review of Spring 2006 Survey Findings September 14, 2006 Presented by Dan Nataf, Ph.D Director, Center for.
State and Local Government Budgets Chapter 14 Section 3 and Chapter 25 Section 2.
1 Overview of the Center for the Study of Local Issues March 30, 2006 Presented by Dan Nataf, Ph.D Director, Center for the Study of Local Issues Anne.
CSLI Service Learning – Final Meeting, Fall 2012 Review the process Review the findings Analyze - Hypotheses.
1 Public ne Arundel County: Coordinators of Volunteers of Anne Arundel County– Reflections about Trends affecting Nonprofits in AA County June 5, 2009.
1 Public Opinion in Anne Arundel County: Recent Trends and Findings March 29, 2006 Presented by Dan Nataf, Ph.D Director, Center for the Study of Local.
Results of March 4-7, 2013 Survey of Anne Arundel County Residents By Dan Nataf, Ph.D. Director, Center for the Study of Local Issues Anne Arundel Community.
Overview of Recent Public Opinion in Anne Arundel County By Dan Nataf, Ph.D. Director, Center for the Study of Local Issues Anne Arundel Community College.
Recap of Recent CSLI Survey Findings from Fall 2008 Dan Nataf, Ph.D. Director, Center for the Study of Local Issues Part of the Sarbanes Center for Public.
1 Public Opinion in Anne Arundel County: Recent Trends and Findings June 14, 2006 Presented by Dan Nataf, Ph.D Director, Center for the Study of Local.
1 Public Opinion in Anne Arundel County: Recent Trends and Findings December 13, 2005 Presented by Dan Nataf, Ph.D Director, Center for the Study of Local.
1 Public Opinion in Anne Arundel County: Recent Trends and Findings March 14, 2006 Presented by Dan Nataf, Ph.D Director, Center for the Study of Local.
ECON chapter 9 1. __________ affect the factors of production & therefore, resource allocation.
By Dan Nataf, PhD Director, Center for the Study of Local Issues Anne Arundel Community College August 4, 2010.
CSLI Service Learning – Final Meeting, Fall 2012 Review the process Review the findings Analyze - Hypotheses.
1 Public Opinion and Issues in Anne Arundel County: A Leadership Anne Arundel Presentation May 12, 2006 by Dan Nataf, Ph.D Director, Center for the Study.
Greater Severna Park Council Presentation of Fall 2015 Survey Findings – Anne Arundel County Dan Nataf, Ph.D. Director, Center for the Study of Local Issues.
Dan Nataf Ph.D. Director Center for the Study of Local Issues Anne Arundel Community College 101 College Parkway Arnold, MD
District 32 Republican Club Presentation of Fall 2015 Survey Findings – Anne Arundel County Dan Nataf, Ph.D. Director, Center for the Study of Local Issues.
Dan Nataf Ph.D. Director Center for the Study of Local Issues Anne Arundel Community College 101 College Parkway Arnold, MD
NC State and Local Government Budgets Chapter 14 Section 3 and Chapter 25 Section 2.
Local Government Services and Revenue Chapter 12 Section 2.
City of Indio Community Survey SUMMARY PRESENTATION TO CITY COUNCIL June 16, 2010 Presented by: Rick Sklarz, Senior Researcher.
National Citizen Survey 2010 Results. City of Decatur Citizen Survey Results Contracted with the National Research Center, Inc. for third time Survey.
1 Public Opinion in Anne Arundel County: Recent Trends and Findings November 2, 2005 Presented by Dan Nataf, Ph.D Director, Center for the Study of Local.
TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS Statewide Transportation Survey Arizona Transportation Summit May 29, 2008.
CITY AND COUNTY OF BROOMFIELD 2015 CITIZEN SURVEY PRESENTATION OF RESULTS.
City of Decatur Citizen Survey Results  Contracted with the National Research Center, Inc. for second time  Survey conducted by mail  1200 randomly.
Priority Based Budgeting Update Board of County Commissioners Workshop December 10, 2012.
City Revenues and Expenditures
Business, The Economy and Government
Presentation transcript:

1 Public Opinion and Issues in Anne Arundel County: A Leadership Anne Arundel Presentation November 15, 2006 by Dan Nataf, Ph.D Director, Center for the Study of Local Issues Anne Arundel Community College 101 College Parkway Arnold, MD (410) (410) fax www2.aacc.edu/csli

2 The Center for the Study of Local Issues: Overview CSLI conducts public interest and private surveys each semester (since 1978) Respondents randomly chosen from universe of listed telephone numbers combined with computer generated numbers Typical sample size: respondents; students used as interviewers – Fall, 2006 – 382 respondents Each survey includes demographic and attitude/behavior questions, including such themes as: –Growth/Development –Transportation –Economic conditions –Education –Tax and spending preferences –Policy preferences Visit CSLI’s web site for previous surveys (www2.aacc.edu/csli)

3 The Center for the Study of Local Issues: Web Site - Homepage www2.aacc.edu/csli

4 Most Important Issues Facing AA County Residents – Trends for Major Issue Areas

5 Economic optimism – “ Thinking about our county's economy, how would you rate economic conditions in Anne Arundel County today -- excellent, good, only fair, or poor?” Focus on the Economy: Opportunities with Inflation and Growth Management Anxieties National County

6 Economic Optimism - Perception of Issues in 2010 Negative expectations for all major issue areas except economy

7 Economic Anxiety - Concerns about the cost of living Cost factor Very serious Somewhat serious Not very serious No answer The cost of housing The cost of utilities such as electricity or natural gas The cost of gasoline The cost of health care Not having enough money for retirement The cost of education The cost of property taxes

8 Anxiety unevenly spread: Income and % saying “very serious” Housing Cost0- $50,000 $50,001 to $100,000 $100,001 and over Overall Health Care Money for Retirement Gasoline Education Housing Property taxes Utilities

9 Age and % saying “very serious” Overall Utilities Cost Property Taxes Gasoline Housing Health Care Money for Retirement Education

10 Gender and % saying “very serious” Item WomenMen Overall Gasoline Money for Retirement Utilities Cost Housing Education Health Care Property Taxes

11 Race and % saying “very serious” African- Americans Whites Overall Gasoline Health Care Money for Retirement Housing Education Utilities Cost 6764 Property Taxes

12 Attribute citedPercentage Purchase price Median: $ ,000 39% A type that is lacking in AA County 20% Housing type – apartments, townhouses, section 8 19% User type – low income, poor9% Other12% Total100% What is “affordable housing?” Fall 2002 Is the lack of affordable housing in Anne Arundel County a problem? Yes 54% No 34% Don’t know 12%

13 Main Economic Challenge for the Next Decade (Fall 2005) Challenge% Citing Managing growth/development31 Providing affordable housing19 Providing proper skills/education for workers 19 Infrastructure, roads10 Providing enough jobs9 Govt. budget problems/services3 Gas prices2 Taxes2 Other5

14 Effectiveness of County Growth Policies (Fall 2004) How effective have County policies been regarding growth and planning?

15 Approaches for Managing Growth/Transportation (Fall 1998) Approach to growth and transportationYesNo Build or upgrade highly congested roads and intersections in the county 7713 Create a local jitney bus service7121 Increase bus availability to major cities (Balt/DC)6922 Make it easier to get o MARC trains6720 Make it easier to find other people with whom to carpool6326 Severely limit new residential development – higher impact fees 5433 Put moratorium on new residential development in your area5335 Reduce fares on public transportation5228 Allow more intense development of areas well served by public transportation 4345

16 Confidence in/perceived preparedness of local authorities – meet challenges or terrorist strike/natural disasters (Fall 2005) Preparedness/ Confidence Econ.Environ.TerrorDisaster Very8711 Somewhat Not very No answer7634

17 Public Opinion in Anne Arundel County: Recent Trends How prepared are local authorities in event of terrorist strike – Katrina

18 Crime Problem

19 Crime: Safety and Security in County and Neighborhood (2005)

20 Crime: Been a Victim of Crime? ( )

21 Crime: Improve Safety (Average ) One Thing to Most Improve Safety

22 Education – Perceived Value to Taxpayers? Spend more, same or less on public service? (Spring 2004) ServiceMore % Same % Less % Don’t% know Public schools Police Fire Community college Seniors’ services Roads Average percentage Environmental programs Social services Health department Libraries Parks and recreation Planning and zoning

23 Would proposals help, hurt or have no effect on the quality of public schools (Spring 1996) HelpHurtNo effect HelpHurtNo effect Add Teaching Aides in Classrooms 9117 Increase Local Community Control over Schools Reduce Class Size8929 Provide More Elective Courses in Higher Grades Give Teachers More Power when Dealing with Disruptive Students 8687 Allow more variety in the curriculum Emphasize a "Return to Basics" Approach to Education 8659Change the School Board selection process Provide More Assistance to Special Education 85410Provide More Financial Assistance to Schools doing Poorly on Standardized Tests Encourage Flexibility in Teaching Methods 8398Add some Specialized Programs Increase Teacher Salaries82315Introduce School Prayers Start some Countywide "Magnet" Schools 79714Place Some Schools on a Year Round Schedule Create a Special High School for Disruptive Students Redistrict schools more frequently

24 How to pay for all the public wants government to do? If the County ends the year with a surplus, which of the following would you prefer to see happen? (Fall 2005) Proposal% The County spends it on high priority areas28 The County keeps it for a ‘rainy day’ when it might be needed, such as an emergency 19 The County sends it back to taxpayers as a tax refund15 The County uses it to lower taxes next year30 Other answer5 No answer, unsure2

25 General orientation – cut programs or cut spending? (Spring 2003, Fall 2003) ProposalSpring 2003Fall 2003 Cut programs4034 Increase taxes3634 Other--18 Don’t know2414 Total100

26 Revenue enhancement – Income taxes (Spring 2003, Fall 2003) ApproachFavorOppose Unsure Increase income taxes for everyone An increase in state income taxes Increasing the County’s local income tax rate Increase income taxes on business and the “rich” Increasing the corporate income tax rate by 1 percent Placing a 3 percent surcharge on the income tax of people who make $500,000 or more annually

27 Revenue enhancement – Sales/gasoline taxes (Spring 2003, Fall 2003) FavorOpposeUnsure Increase the state sales tax by 1 percent, from 5 to 6 percent An increase in the general sales tax46532 An increase in the state gasoline tax29692 Higher taxes on gasoline to encourage use of more fuel efficient vehicles (Fall 2005) 20764

28 Revenue enhancement – User/Specific Fees (Fall 2003) ApproachFavorOpposeUnsure Creating specific taxes to fund County public safety such as fire & police County Increasing impact fees on new housing development in AA Creating a $2.50 surcharge on monthly sewage fees to help upgrade waste water treatment plants Legalizing slot machines in Maryland62336

29 Expenditure reduction (Spring 2003) ApproachFavorOpposeUnsure Postponing fully funding the Thornton Plan for public education Layoffs of state and County employees Reducing salaries of state employees Cutting back on state services Reducing financial support for higher education 18784

30 Expenditure reduction – Identify ways to cut govt. spending (open-ended) (Spring 2003) Approach (N=85)FavorCases Reduce government salaries1513 Reduce politicians salaries1210 Reduce government perks76 Cut waste, administration119 Cut back on specific programs3933 Other miscellaneous1614 Total10085

31 Politics of Taxes and Expenditures) (Support for County Executive Candidates’ on Certain Issues (Fall, 2006)