AQATICS AQATICS TEAM Sharon Cipicchio Bill Pieper Norm Littlefair Theresa Liakopoulos Brad Rybicki Donna Dewar.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Strategies for Success NYSOMH Quality Improvement Initiative.
Advertisements

Orientation for New Regional Directors Official presentation of the Student National Medical Association Board-approved April 2006.
Presentation on the Agreement on Import Licensing Procedures By Shashank Priya, Director, Department of Commerce.
An Outline for: A User-Based Systems Approach to the Evaluation, Selection, and Institutionalization of Safer Medical Devices.
The Coaches Role in the Student Eligibility Process.
Operation of Subject Examination Boards Sarah Lane Senior School Manager, School of Law.
Build a Better Mousetrap: Quality Assurance and Call Specialist Performance Evaluation.
1. Set expectations and measure performance ◦ What employees are expected to do for their organization in return for pay and benefits ◦ Allows employees.
Accounting Information Systems: Definitions and Characteristics.
KEYS TO SUCCESS NCURA Region IV Spring Meeting April 27 – 30, 2014 © 2014 National Council of University Research Administrators Effort Certification and.
House Education Committee Summit November 11, 2014 Update on 2014 Legislation Regarding the A-F School Grading System Shelley Loving-Ryder Assistant Superintendent.
September D.I.S.H Director Information Share Hub Verification 2014 Katie Embree-Cleveland September 11, 2014.
Conducting Collaborative Projects Part 4 OSP Awareness Feb 16, 2011 osp.syr.edu
Corrective & Preventive Action Programme l Corrective and preventive action managed by one programme l Closely linked to the internal audit programme l.
2012 Trends in Inventory Auditing WIS Customer Forum Oct 2012 KPMG LLP.
Special Education Accountability Reviews Let’s put the pieces together March 25, 2015.
Prepared by. As stewards of a chapter’s money the chapter officers are responsible for the careful handling and dissemination of funds.
Technology Use Plan Mary Anderson 7/29/08 EDTECH 571 click to go to each slide.
Understanding your child’s IEP.  The Individualized Education Plan (IEP) is intended to help students with disabilities interact with the same content.
Perception between Regular and Sped teachers in Handling Children with Intellectual Disability: Basis for a Specialized Training Program for Teachers by.
Lecture Note 8 Using Data Flow Diagrams
PTA Treasurer Training Pam Grigorian August 20, 2015.
Corporate governance: Asia Pacific. JAPAN  The Japan corporate governance committee published its revised code in The Code had six chapters, which.
Data Quality: Treasure in/Treasure Out Victoria Essenmacher, SPEC Associates Melanie Hwalek, SPEC Associates Portions of this presentation were created.
Verification. What is Verification? Verification is confirmation of eligibility for free and reduced price meals under NSLP and SBP. -Verification is.
Staff Assessment Studies Problems faced in examination of Hospital Studies
Performance Improvement. 2 Steps to Performance Improvement 1. Define the Problem 2. Define Duties or Behaviors to be Improved 3. Establish Priorities.
© 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
PUBLIC PROCUREMENT OPERATIONS Dr. Fred Mugambi Mwirigi JKUAT 1.
Slide 1 Long-Term Care (LTC) Collaborative PIP: Medication Review Tuesday, October 29, 2013 Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate Director, PIP.
PRESENTATION OF IRP BALLOTS 2008 IFTA / IRP Audit Workshop.
Ratepayer and Customer Rights Energy Regulatory Partnership Program Abuja, Nigeria July 14-18, 2008 Presented by Robert W. Kehres.
Public participation of EIA in R.O.C. Hsiao-Tien Wu, Wei-Chein Sun & Tung-Wang Chang Environmental Protection Administration Executive Yuan R.O.C.
Strategic Problem Solving Committee Report Progress during the School Year SPECIAL EDUCATION.
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. This edition is intended for use outside of the U.S. only, with content that may be different from the U.S.
1 Department of Medical Assistance Services Provider Training for Patient Pay Claims Processing Changes eff. October 1, 2015 September.
Rebecca Ramirez, J.D., M.H.A. Associate Director for Operations SPCAA Head Start and Early Head Start October 2, 2010.
1 Your Skills and Experience Are a Valuable Resource to Your Department and to the City of Houston. We Wish You an Expedited Recovery and Safe Return to.
Improvement Planning Mischele McManus Infant/Toddler and Family Services Office of Early Childhood Education and Family Services July 20, 2007
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Managing Coding Operations Section B 1.
RESEARCH METHODS Lecture 29. DATA ANALYSIS Data Analysis Data processing and analysis is part of research design – decisions already made. During analysis.
Kansas Educator Evaluation Bill Bagshaw Asst. Director Kansas State Department of Education February 25, 2015.
Division of Risk Management State of Florida Loss Prevention Program.
Developing Monitoring and Pre-Scoring Plans for Alternate/Alternative Assessments Virginia Department of Education Division of Student Assessment and School.
Presented By WVDE Title I Staff June 10, Fiscal Issues Maintain an updated inventory list, including the following information: description of.
The Implementation of BPR Pertemuan 9 Matakuliah: M0734-Business Process Reenginering Tahun: 2010.
Title I, Part A Preparing for Federal Program Monitoring Lynn Sodat Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability.
AMENDMENTS TO THE PROGRAM COMPLIANCE REVIEW GUIDE July 2006 IFTA Annual Business Meeting.
Onsite Quarterly Meeting SIPP PIPs June 13, 2012 Presenter: Christy Hormann, LMSW, CPHQ Project Leader-PIP Team.
Optimal Database Marketing Drozdenko & Drake, ©
By Mario Carrizo. Definition Instructional design is define basically as the person who teaches, designs or develops instructions. Instructional designers.
Best practice of EU countries in implementation of international standards of accounting and financial reporting in the public sector A French example.
STAMP ACCOUNTABILITY MANAGEMENT Pacific Area Finance Training February 2008.
Presented by: Sharon Pender Louisiana State PTA Treasurer.
6/18/2016 DES / AzEIP 2011 Cycle Two Self Report Overview & Training Cycle Two Self Report Overview & Training.
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
December 13,  Current policy  Required employees to complete Individual Development Plans (IDPs) for Milestone and Exemplary Merit increases.
Case Management Updates.  During the of week April 11, 2011, the ETO system experienced technical difficulties.  As of April 13, 2011, the errors have.
Teacher-Parent Communication in Alternative Assessment Oksana Mosheev, Anna Kofman.
AQATICS.
Surviving a Program Review
Inventories and the Cost of Goods Sold
Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ
Client Onboarding QBExpress Cloud August 2015
i&r quality assurance on a shoestring budget
Inventories and the Cost of Goods Sold
Sales Process March 2017.
RIT BUSINESS IMPACT ANALYSIS VERSION 1.0.
Presenter: Kate Bell, MA PIP Reviewer
New Enrollment and Transfer Students
Presentation transcript:

AQATICS

AQATICS TEAM Sharon Cipicchio Bill Pieper Norm Littlefair Theresa Liakopoulos Brad Rybicki Donna Dewar

I. WHAT IS AQATICS? Allied Quality Awareness Team Improving Customer Service

II.WHAT ARE THE OBJECTIVES OF THE PROGRAM? Provide better service to participants by handling correspondence more accurately, consistently, and timely. Develop, clarify or modify departmental procedures through feedback from reviews.

Eliminate procedural inconsistencies between analysts and between departments. Determine if any quality deficiencies exist among staff and develop assistance for them through retraining. II. WHAT ARE THE OBJECTIVES OF THE PROGRAM? (cont.)

III. WHAT CAN BE GAINED BY AN EFFECTIVE AQATICS PROGRAM?  Less hardship on the members because their inquiries are processed accurately and timely.  A decrease in phone calls to Toll-Free as well as the number of TKPR referrals sent to the Research Department.  A decrease in inventory backlogs.  Increased satisfaction amongst local unions, providers, and PPO networks.

IV. WHO WILL BE REVIEWED?  Analysts doing non-committee batch work (RSA, RR4, RPB)  Analysts doing committee appeal work (RFC, RAC, RBT)  Teamleaders

V. HOW WILL REVIEWS BE CONDUCTED?  Random and retrospective from weekly TKPR production reports  Batch Work  Done by Norm and Theresa on alternating basis  Based on random selection, items to be pulled by Workflow Clerk and replaced with “out card” for easy identification  A special bin for re-files will be set up for analysts and reviewers to return work after review is completed  To assist process, analysts must file all their closed-out work in the proper batch by the end of the week

V. HOW WILL REVIEWS BE CONDUCTED? (cont.)  Committee Appeal Work  Done as they are currently oRFC write-ups and letters by Norm oRAC and RBT write-ups and letters by Theresa and Bill  Since all Committee write-ups and letters are currently reviewed upfront, any errors identified will be recorded and kept in a holding file. If at a later time, the random selection calls up one of these files, the error will be assessed at that time.

VI.WHAT IS ACTUALLY BEING REVIEWED?  Batch Work Analysts  100% of one day’s work per month based on the daily average attained by the analyst the previous quarter.  The review will be conducted on the research of the file and the resulting final action. This would include letters, payment referrals, and the content of any fact sheets, such as medical exclusions or 10% penalties presented to supervisors or manager for review. Technical errors on fact sheets will be informational only.

VI. WHAT IS ACTUALLY BEING REVIEWED? (cont.)  Batch Work Analysts (continued)  When analysts work on multiple categories of work during a review quarter, at least 50% of the review will be in the analyst’s specific assigned category of work, if available.

VI. WHAT IS ACTUALLY BEING REVIEWED? (cont.)  Appeals Committee and Staff Final Review Committee Analysts  100% of their write-ups and letters will be reviewed as they are now.  Errors will be recorded and kept in a folder for potential future random selection and assessment.

VI. WHAT IS ACTUALLY BEING REVIEWED? (cont.)  Appeals Committee and Staff Final Review Committee Analysts (cont.)  Committee write-ups are reviewed for content and presentation of facts. Technical errors on write-ups are informational only.  When analysts work on multiple categories of work during a review quarter, at least 50% of the review will be in the analyst’s specific assigned category of work available.

VI. WHAT IS ACTUALLY BEING REVIEWED? (cont.)  Trustee Appellate Review Committee Analysts  100% review of work based on exposure, and low number of completed files due to the nature of the work performed.

VI. WHAT IS ACTUALLY BEING REVIEWED? (cont.)  Teamleaders  Sample size will equal the group incentive average attained during the previous quarter.  A random selection of all work categories will be selected.  Letters for Manager or Director signature will be reviewed as they are presently and errors will be recorded and kept in a holding file. If at a later time, the random selection calls up the file, the error will be assessed at that time.

 Two types of errors – weighted separately:  Significant  Technical  Error Index (separate listing attached):separate  Correspondence Procedural Handling Errors  Final Action Errors  These are broad categories at this point. The AQATICS Team will continue to look at refining the listings as we begin the program and get feedback from the reviews. VII. WHAT CONSTITUTES AN ERROR?

VII. WHAT CONSTITUTES AN ERROR? (cont.)  Acceptable Error Percentages  To be developed as we are able to get review data over the first several quarters of the program.

VIII.HOW WILL YOUR PROGRESS BE REPORTED TO YOU?  Results of each review will be reported to you.  If an error needs to be corrected, since you have already received credit for this file, no additional credit will be given.

VIII. HOW WILL YOUR PROGRESS BE REPORTED TO YOU? (cont.)  Two Step Appeal Process available:  First appeal to reviewer  Second appeal to Review Committee consisting of the other two management team reviewers, not part of the original review  If Review Committee is deadlocked, final ruling made by Director

VIII. HOW WILL YOUR PROGRESS BE REPORTED TO YOU? (cont.)  Quality Profile Distributed Each Quarter  Will incorporate summary of all reviews from the quarter along with any additional performance feedback such as file aging or referral errors from other departments

IX. WHEN WILL THE PROGRAM BEGIN?  The program will begin the first full week after the AQATICS informational meeting.  For the first quarter, to get our feet wet, we will review one day’s average of work for the quarter (not for each month) for each analyst not subject to 100% review.

X. IMPORTANT THINGS TO REMEMBER  The program is not designed to be punitive and would only become so if an individual distinguishes himself or herself with a problem.  The first and second quarters will be strictly informational and a way to gather information, develop, and refine the program.

X. IMPORTANT THINGS TO REMEMBER (cont.)  Once the program is finalized and we can determine what are acceptable error percentages, analysts will begin in the non- disciplinary category. The results of their quarterly review could move them into different categories of review such as retraining or if necessary, a disciplinary category.

X. IMPORTANT THINGS TO REMEMBER (cont.)  The AQATICS Team will continue to meet regularly to discuss error categories, procedures, retraining and ideas which can improve the program.

X. IMPORTANT THINGS TO REMEMBER (cont.)  And most importantly… …there can be no AQATICS without “U” !