May 22, 2008 TJRMICE Beamline Collimation and Correction 1 Tom Roberts Carol Johnstone Muons, Inc.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 MICE Beamline: Plans for initial commissioning. Kevin Tilley, 16 th November. - 75days until commissioning Target, detectors, particle production Upstream.
Advertisements

January 14, 2004 TJR - - UPDATED 1/25/04 1 MICE Beamline Analysis Using g4beamline Including Jan 25 Updates for Kevin’s JAN04 Beamline Design Tom Roberts.
Akihisa TOYODA, KEK. Outline g-2/EDM beamline Final Focus(FF) optimization Requirements Option 1: 1-Solenoid case Option 2: 3-Quads case Option 3: 1-Solenoid.
ILC Accelerator School Kyungpook National University
Summary of the discussion for the commissioning session 2 nd ATF2 Project Meeting KEK, Tsukuba, Japan 6/ 1/ 2006 T.Okugi (KEK)
Paul drumm, mutac jan MICE Beamline Optics Design Kevin Tilley, RAL, 12th June MICE Needs Generic Solution Pion Injection & Decay Section (a) Inputs.
Emittance–momentum matrix1 Demonstrating the emittance-momentum matrix Mark Rayner, MICE Video Conference, 21 January Initial 4D.
SLIDE Beam measurements using the MICE TOF counters Analysis meeting, 23 September 2008 Mark Rayner.
March 30, 2004 TJR1 MICE Upstream Particle Identification Tom Roberts Illinois Institute of Technology March 30, 2004.
Slide 1 MICE Beamline Design and Commissioning Review 16 th Nov 2007 Simulation comparison / tools / issues Henry Nebrensky Brunel University There are.
Beam line summary paul drumm for beam line group.
K.Walaron Fermilab, Batavia, Chicago 12/6/ Simulation and performance of beamline K.Walaron T.J. Roberts.
3/31/2005 KEK, Japan 1 G4Beamline for KEK test K. Yonehara Illinois Institute of Tech.
Beam line characterization with the TOFs1 Demonstrating the emittance-momentum matrix Mark Rayner, CM26 California, 24 March Initial.
Diffuser in G4MICE Victoria Blackmore 09/03/10 Analysis Meeting 1/8.
TJR August 2, 2004MICE Beamline Analysis1 MICE Beamline Analysis JUNE04 Including a proposal for a JUNE04A Configuration Tom Roberts Illinois Institute.
MICE analysis meeting Alain Blondel 5 August MICE -- what running strategy? disclaimer: of course we will evolve the running strategy as problems.
TJR 9/24/031 Update: Geant4 Simulations of the MICE Beamline – Absolute Normalization Tom Roberts Illinois Institute of Technology 9/24/03 (With thanks.
TJR 7/30/031 Geant4 Simulations of the MICE Beamline Tom Roberts Illinois Institute of Technology 7/30/03.
Mark Rayner, Analysis workshop 4 September ‘08: Use of TOFs for Beam measurement & RF phasing, slide 1 Use of TOFs for Beam measurement & RF phasing Analysis.
July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.
MICE Alignment and Support Structure Tony Jones and Yury Ivanyushenkov Engineering Department RAL.
1 MICE Beamline Design: General principles & expected capabilities Kevin Tilley, 16 th November Charge to beamline & desirable beam General principles.
Linac4 Beam Commissioning Committee PSB Beam Optics and Painting Schemes 9 th December 2010 Beam Optics and Painting Schemes C. Bracco, C. Carli, B. Goddard,
MICE Video meeting Alain Blondel 7 December MICE -- what running strategy? reflections on steps I and II.
(+) session, PAC09 Vancouver – TH6PFP056 Introduction The Muon Ionisation Cooling Experiment (MICE, fig. 1c) at RAL[1]
Particle Production in the MICE Beam Line Particle Accelerator Conference, May 2009, Vancouver, Canada Particle Production in the MICE Beam Line Jean-Sebastien.
Results from Step I of MICE D Adey 2013 International Workshop on Neutrino Factories, Super-beams and Beta- beams Working Group 3 – Accelerator Topics.
Beam line commissioning Preparations for Phase1 Kevin Tilley For Paul Drumm & the beam line group.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
1 EPIC SIMULATIONS V.S. Morozov, Y.S. Derbenev Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility A. Afanasev Hampton University R.P. Johnson Muons, Inc. Operated.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  In our previous discussion, we implicitly assumed that the distribution of particles in phase space followed the ellipse defined.
R. Assmann - LHCCWG Two Beam Operation R.W. Aßmann LHCCWG Acknowledgements to W. Herr, V. Previtali, A. Butterworth, P. Baudrenghien, J. Uythoven,
Overview: Primary Sensitivities Nov S. Childress Page 1 NuMI Overview: NuMI Primary Beamline Sensitivities NuMI requirements are for a very large.
Mark Rayner 14/8/08Analysis Meeting: Emittance measurement using the TOFs 1 Emittance measurement using the TOFs The question: can we use position measurements.
MANX at MTA Andreas Jansson Fermilab. 2/14/2007LEMC Workshop, February 12-16, 2007A. Jansson 2 Foreseen MCTF Experimental R&D Low energy proton beam to.
TJR August 2, 2004MICE Beamline Analysis1 MICE Beamline Analysis JUNE04 Including a proposal for a JUNE04A Configuration Update – August 03, 2004 (new.
Low emittance tuning in ATF Damping Ring - Experience and plan Sendai GDE Meeting Kiyoshi Kubo.
March 18, 2008 TJRMICE Beamline Status1 MICE Beamline Status (March 18, 2008) Tom Roberts Muons, Inc. Illinois Institute of Technology.
1 Question to the 50GeV group 3GeV からの 54π と 81π 、 6.1π の関係 fast extraction 部の acceptance (81π?) Comments on neutrino beamline optics?
1 EMMA Tracking Studies Shinji Machida ASTeC/CCLRC/RAL 4 January, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
LER Workshop, October 11, 2006LER & Transfer Line Lattice Design - J.A. Johnstone1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac Introduction The.
Dave Johnson July 12, 2010 NOvA/ANU Recycler Upgrades Review Optics, Apertures, and Operations Nova-doc 4930.
By Verena Kain CERN BE-OP. In the next three lectures we will have a look at the different components of a synchrotron. Today: Controlling particle trajectories.
Proton Driver – Target Station Interfaces Keith Gollwitzer Fermilab Wednesday May 28, 2014 MAP 2014 Spring Meeting.
Beam-beam compensation at RHIC LARP Proposal Tanaji Sen, Wolfram Fischer Thanks to Jean-Pierre Koutchouk, Frank Zimmermann.
Status of the AP2 Optics Keith Gollwitzer Antiproton Source Department November 19, 2004.
MEIC Detector and IR Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
Tuning Techniques And Operator Diagnostics for FACET at SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Chris Melton SLAC Accelerator Operations.
SL/BI 16/05/1999DIPAC’99 -- JJ Gras -- CERN SL/BI -- Adaptive Optics for the LEP 2 SR Monitors G. Burtin, R.J. Colchester, G. Ferioli, J.J. Gras, R. Jung,
Present MEIC IR Design Status Vasiliy Morozov, Yaroslav Derbenev MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
Monte Carlo simulation of the particle identification (PID) system of the Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment (MICE) Mice is mainly an accelerator physics.
FFAG 4-Bend Injection Line into EMMA C. Johnstone, Fermilab EMMA phone conference July 24, 2007.
J-Parc Neutrino Facility Primary Proton Beam Design A. K. Ichikawa(KEK), Y.Iwamoto(KEK) and K.Tanabe(Tokyo) et.al. 7 th Nov. 2003,
Stopped K beam at J-PARC Designed by J.Doornbos 1)Optics design of a K0.8 branch 2)Performance 3)Pion contamination 4)Comments on K1.1 Nov. 4, 2005 Korea.
G4beamline Spin Tracking Tom Roberts, Muons, Inc. In G4beamline 2.12, the tracking of muon and electron spins is introduced: – decay of pions into polarized.
y x Vincenzo Monaco, University of Torino HERA-LHC workshop 18/1/2005
Expected hardware status and Priority of the commissioning task
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Coupling Correction at the Australian Synchrotron
The COMET Experiment Ajit Kurup, Imperial College London, on behalf of the COMET Collaboration. ABSTRACT The COherent Muon to Electron Transition (COMET)
Pretzel scheme of CEPC H. Geng, G. Xu, Y. Zhang, Q. Qin, J. Gao, W. Chou, Y. Guo, N. Wang, Y. Peng, X. Cui, T. Yue, Z. Duan, Y. Wang, D. Wang, S. Bai,
AD & I : BDS Lattice Design Changes
Pure  exposure for e/ separation
Jeffrey Eldred, Sasha Valishev
Multiturn extraction for PS2
CNGS Proton beam line: news since NBI2002 OUTLINE 1. Overview
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
Multi-Turn Extraction for PS2 Preliminary considerations
K. Tilley, ISIS, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK Introduction
Presentation transcript:

May 22, 2008 TJRMICE Beamline Collimation and Correction 1 Tom Roberts Carol Johnstone Muons, Inc.

May 22, 2008 TJRMICE Beamline Collimation and Correction 2 Pion Segment Before D1, the beam contains all momenta and is purely aperture limited. There is little or nothing to be gained by putting either collimators or trim magnets in the pion segment. –The whole point is to maximize muon production, and basic geometry will do that –While collimators could be used to reduce intensity when necessary, it is much better to do that by adjusting the target. If they were installed, there’s no way to tune them – monitors are not useful until collimators or apertures define the momentum and transverse emittance.

May 22, 2008 TJRMICE Beamline Collimation and Correction 3 Muon Segment Collimators Collimation to limit momentum spread –Should be at a momentum-dispersed focus –Only possibility is midway between Q6 and Q7 Collimation to limit transverse emittance –Ideal: two pairs of H and V collimators separated by an odd-integer of π/2 phase advance Should be at low dispersion –Possible: Vertical collimator should be ahead of Q4 (avoid quad apertures giving a beta-dependent collimation) Horizontal collimator must be ahead of D2 (low dispersion) Only possibility is inside D2 The horizontal dispersion after D2 precludes any transverse- emittance collimation A vertical collimator midway between Q6 and Q7 is appropriate

May 22, 2008 TJRMICE Beamline Collimation and Correction 4 Muon Segment Trims Ideal: –Trims come in pairs separated by some distance, so both position and angle of the beam can be controlled –Trims are placed just after collimators Horizontal Trims –Useless before momentum collimation (just mimics D2) –Between momentum collimator and Q7 –Possibly another between Q9 and Tracker1 Vertical Trims –After each vertical collimator The one between D2 and Q4 may be difficult (access path) Possibly another between Q9 and Tracker1

May 22, 2008 TJRMICE Beamline Collimation and Correction 5 Current thinking, based on optics H and V Collimators (inside D2) V Trim (if possible) H and V Collimators H and V Trims H and V Trims (if possible)

May 22, 2008 TJRMICE Beamline Collimation and Correction 6 Next Steps Pair of collimators inside D2 –Determine detailed requirements –Mechanical design Pair of collimators between Q6 and Q7 –Consider interaction with beam stop, shielding, and quads –Look for existing units Pair of trims between collimators and Q7 –Consider interaction with beam stop, shielding, and quads –Look for existing magnets Other suggested components: –Check MICE drawings to consider possibilities Put these new elements into G4beamline and investigate their performance.