PSWG March 20081 Adaptive Optics Systems Engineering on GMT Peter McGregor.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Geminis Future AO Program A Decade of AO Evolution at Gemini Recent AO Program Highlights Doug Simons Gemini Observatory.
Advertisements

Subaru AO in future. Outline Overview of AO systems at Mauna Kea and in the world. Ongoing plan of AOS at Subaru and Mauna Kea. What’s in future.
GLAO Workshop, Leiden; April 26 th 2005 Ground Layer Adaptive Optics, N. Hubin Ground Layer Adaptive Optics Status and strategy at ESO Norbert Hubin European.
1 Keck LGS AO Planning Workshop: Overview, Requirements & Schedule December 5, 2004.
RASC, Victoria, 1/08/06 The Future of Adaptive Optics Instrumentation David Andersen HIA.
The Project Office Perspective Antonin Bouchez 1GMT AO Workshop, Canberra Nov
Laser guide star adaptive optics at the Keck Observatory Adam R. Contos, Peter L. Wizinowich, Scott K. Hartman, David Le Mignant, Christopher R. Neyman,
FLAO Alignment Procedures G. Brusa, S. Esposito FLAO system external review, Florence, 30/31 March 2009.
Trade Study Report: Fixed vs. Variable LGS Asterism V. Velur Caltech Optical Observatories Pasadena, CA V. Velur Caltech Optical Observatories Pasadena,
GMT Phasing GLAO – not needed LTAO – Phase stabilization done at ~1kHz with edge sensing at M1 and M2 – Phase reference set at ~.01Hz using off-axis star.
Aug-Nov, 2008 IAG/USP (Keith Taylor) ‏ Instrumentation Concepts Ground-based Optical Telescopes Keith Taylor (IAG/USP) Aug-Nov, 2008 Aug-Sep, 2008 IAG-USP.
System-wide issues Before we get to the telescope System integration and verification at the telescope Operations Maintenance and support.
PALM-3000 PALM-3000 Instrument Requirements Antonin Bouchez PALM-3000 Requirements Review November 12, 2007.
NIR LOWFS for Keck and TMT Roger Smith & David Hale.
NGAO 1-tier Draft Optical Relay Design P. Wizinowich 12/7/07.
Low order wavefront sensor trade study Richard Clare NGAO meeting #4 January
1 Laser Guide Star Wavefront Sensor Mini-Review 6/15/2015Richard Dekany 12/07/2009.
Keck Next Generation Adaptive Optics Team Meeting 6 1 Optical Relay and Field Rotation (WBS , ) Brian Bauman April 26, 2007.
PALM-3000 PALM-3000 Instrument Architecture Antonin Bouchez PALM-3000 Requirements Review November 12, 2007.
LO WFS Summit 6/19/2015Richard Dekany A Joint Meeting of the NGAO, IRIS, and K1 LO WFS Teams 12/15/2009.
WFS Preliminary design phase report I V. Velur, J. Bell, A. Moore, C. Neyman Design Meeting (Team meeting #10) Sept 17 th, 2007.
NGAO Alignment Plan See KAON 719 P. Wizinowich. 2 Introduction KAON 719 is intended to define & describe the alignments that will need to be performed.
Demonstration of Science Observing Modes AOWG meeting Dec. 5, 2003 D. Le Mignant, A. Bouchez for the Keck AO team.
Palomar Laser Guide Star Adaptive Optics Antonin Bouchez & Mitchell Troy John Angione, Rick Burruss, John Cromer, Richard Dekany, Steve Guiwits, John Henning,
LGS-AO Performance Characterization Plan AOWG meeting Dec. 5, 2003 A. Bouchez, D. Le Mignant, M. van Dam for the Keck AO team.
NGAO Status R. Dekany January 31, Next Generation AO at Keck Nearing completion of 18 months System Design phase –Science requirements and initial.
Keck Laser Guide Star Adaptive Optics System: 1 st & 2 nd Milestones AOWG Telecon Oct. 17, 2003 A. Bouchez, J. Chin, A. Contos, S. Hartman, E. Johansson,
5 th February 2010 FP7 Prep WP9000 Progress Meeting 1 Update Tim Morris Durham University FP7 Prep WP 9340.
NGAO Controls Team Kickoff Meeting August 5, 2008 Erik Johansson.
TMT.AOS.PRE REL01 Ellerbroek, AO4ELT, Paris, June Brent Ellerbroek Thirty Meter Telescope Observatory Corporation Adaptive Optics for.
Big Bear Solar Observatory NST Main Features  All reflecting, off-axis Gregory optical configuration  PM: 1.6 m clear aperture with f/2.4  Figuring.
1 On-sky validation of LIFT on GeMS C. Plantet 1, S. Meimon 1, J.-M. Conan 1, B. Neichel 2, T. Fusco 1 1: ONERA, the French Aerospace Lab, Chatillon, France.
Adaptive Optics Nicholas Devaney GTC project, Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias 1. Principles 2. Multi-conjugate 3. Performance & challenges.
MCAO Adaptive Optics Module Mechanical Design Eric James.
MCAO Adaptive Optics Module Subsystem Optical Designs R.A.Buchroeder.
A visible-light AO system for the 4.2 m SOAR telescope A. Tokovinin, B. Gregory, H. E. Schwarz, V. Terebizh, S. Thomas.
1 FRIDA Engineering Status 17/05/07 Engineering Status May 17, 2007 F.J. Fuentes InFraRed Imager and Dissector for Adaptive Optics.
AO4ELT - Paris Giant Magellan Telescope Project Science Drivers & AO Requirements Patrick McCarthy - GMT Director Phil Hinz & Michael Hart - GMT.
Telescopes & recent observational techniques ASTR 3010 Lecture 4 Chapters 3 & 6.
GMTIFS – An AO-Corrected Integral-Field Spectrograph and Imager for GMT Peter McGregor The Australian National University 1 IFUs in the Era of JWST - October.
Low order modes sensing for LGS MCAO with a single NGS S. Esposito, P. M. Gori, G. Brusa Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri Italy Conf. AO4ELT June.
AO review meeting, Florence, November FLAO operating Modes Presented by: S. Esposito Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri / INAF.
Science large collection of science cases for seeing improved imaging and spectroscopy also demand on diffraction limited imaging and spectroscopy (Italians)
FLAO system test plan in solar tower S. Esposito, G. Brusa, L. Busoni FLAO system external review, Florence, 30/31 March 2009.
Future Plan of Subaru Adaptive Optics
MCAO System Modeling Brent Ellerbroek. MCAO May 24-25, 2001MCAO Preliminary Design Review2 Presentation Outline Modeling objectives and approach Updated.
ATLAS The LTAO module for the E-ELT Thierry Fusco ONERA / DOTA On behalf of the ATLAS consortium Advanced Tomography with Laser for AO systems.
Conference “Feeding the Giants: ELTs in the era of Surveys” -- Ischia 31/08/2011 Large field of view and ELTs: an impossible marriage? Paolo Ciliegi (INAF.
AO188/LGS Status and Schedule 1 Yutaka Hayano January 31, 2008.
Status report of AO188+LGS (+future AO) Yutaka Hayano (Subaru Telescope, NAOJ) S. Oya, M. Hattori, Y. Saito, Y. Minowa, M. Ito, H. Terada, T.S. Pyo, H.
K. G. Strassmeier, Polarimetry with ELTs, Utrecht, Nov./Dec Smart Focal Plane Spectropolarimetry with the E-ELT Klaus G. Strassmeier, Leibniz-Institute.
Ground Layer AO at ESO’s VLT Claire Max Interim Director UC Observatories September 14, 2014.
A global approach to ELT instrument developments J.-G. Cuby for the French ELT WG.
Introduction of RAVEN Internal meeting on future instrument projects at Subaru Shin Oya ( Subaru Telescope/NAOJ) ‏ Hilo.
Experimental results of tomographic reconstruction on ONERA laboratory WFAO bench A. Costille*, C. Petit*, J.-M. Conan*, T. Fusco*, C. Kulcsár**, H.-F.
Gemini AO Program SPIE Opto-Southwest September 17, 2001 Ellerbroek/Rigaut [SW01-114] AO … for ELT’s 1 Adaptive Optics Requirements, Concepts, and Performance.
March 31, 2000SPIE CONFERENCE 4007, MUNICH1 Principles, Performance and Limitations of Multi-conjugate Adaptive Optics F.Rigaut 1, B.Ellerbroek 1 and R.Flicker.
Na Laser Guide Stars for CELT CfAO Workshop on Laser Guide Stars 99/12/07 Rich Dekany.
Some Thoughts on Ground Layer Adaptive Optics & Adaptive Secondary Mirrors for Keck P. Wizinowich 9/15/14 1.
Science with Giant Telescopes - Jun 15-18, Instrument Concepts InstrumentFunction range (microns) ResolutionFOV GMACSOptical Multi-Object Spectrometer.
Wide field telescope using spherical mirrors Jim Burge and Roger Angel University of Arizona Tucson, AZ Jim
Overview Science drivers AO Infrastructure at WHT GLAS technicalities Current status of development GLAS: Ground-layer Laser Adaptive optics System.
Subaru GLAO Simulation
AO4ELT, Paris A Split LGS/NGS Atmospheric Tomography for MCAO and MOAO on ELTs Luc Gilles and Brent Ellerbroek Thirty Meter Telescope Observatory.
Keck Precision Adaptive Optics Authors: Christopher Neyman 1, Richard Dekany 2, Mitchell Troy 3 and Peter Wizinowich 1. 1 W.M. Keck Observatory, 2 California.
Telescope Phasing Slides Antonin Bouchez 1GMT AO Workshop, Canberra Nov
Introduction of RAVEN Subaru Future Instrument Workshop Shin Oya (Subaru Telescope) Mitaka Adaptive Optics Lab Subaru Telescope Astronomical.
Gemini AO Program March 31, 2000Ellerbroek/Rigaut [ ]1 Scaling Multi-Conjugate Adaptive Optics Performance Estimates to Extremely Large Telescopes.
Page 1 Adaptive Optics in the VLT and ELT era Beyond Basic AO François Wildi Observatoire de Genève.
Pyramid sensors for AO and co-phasing
Presentation transcript:

PSWG March Adaptive Optics Systems Engineering on GMT Peter McGregor

PSWG March Top-Level Questions:  Will GMT queue schedule instruments? What instrument configuration time is acceptable?  Will GMT have general-purpose ports? What field of view?  Will the upper IP support non-AO instruments? What field of view? What acquisition/calibration support?  Will M1/M2 be phased “intrinsically”? If extrinsic, what FoV/magnitude star is required?  What are the advantages of using an ASM?  What is optimal AO instrument performance?  How can maximum AO sky coverage be achieved? What TTWFS patrol field?  Yes 5 min  Yes 5 arcmin  Yes 5 arcmin Full  Yes ?  TBD TBD

PSWG March Proposed Solution:  5 arcmin folded Gregorian focus on upper IP +/- 75 arcsec AO engineering field +/- 30 arcsec AO science field  Integrated acquisition and calibration facilities  Multiple (4-6) non-AO & AO instrument ports  Rapid reconfiguration between instruments  Maximum cryogenic AO system and instruments  Maximum AO tip-tilt WFS patrol field  Minimum interference in science path

PSWG March New ASM AO Paradigm Instrument AcqCam NGS WFS LGS WFS Phasing Cam T-T-F WFS Truth WFS PWFS Active Opt. WFS

PSWG March Outstanding Issues:  Does M1 phasing require a 10 arcmin patrol field? Does this invalidate the concept? Or does it demand an intrinsic telescope solution?  How should field/pupil rotation be compensated? Large diameter ferro-fluidic hermetic seals? Implications for servicability?  How to calibrate LGS AO system with ASM?  Are non-common path phase errors acceptable?  Where to locate the IR instrument cold stop?  Should GMACS/NIRMOS have exclusive access? Do they restrict on AO designs?

PSWG March Non-AO Support Requirements  Multiple (6?) instrument ports 5 arcmin diameter FOV  2 Peripheral Wave Front Sensors Maintain independent tip-tilt-focus of 7 M1 segments Active optics monitoring Instrument rotator monitoring  Acquisition camera  Instrument (& WFS) calibration unit

PSWG March Wave Front Sensor Drum

PSWG March Acquisition Camera

PSWG March AO WFS Requirements  > 3 NGS tip-tilt/focus near-infrared WFS (> 60” rad.)  6 LGS high-order WFS (35” radius)  1 high-order optical NGS WFS (on-axis)  1 high-order optical(?) truth WFS  M1 segment phasing WFS

PSWG March Full AO WFS System Phasing Camera NGS WFS LGS WFS

PSWG March GLAO LGS WFS

PSWG March Complete Instr. Support Unit Phasing Camera NGS WFS LGS WFS Calibration Unit 3.5 m

PSWG March Complete Instr. Support Unit

PSWG March At Second Focus…  Tip-tilt-focus wave front sensors for LTAO  Truth wave front sensor Minimize non-common path errors  Science instrument…  All with field derotation

PSWG March Full AO System + GMTIFS

PSWG March Summary  Demonstrated a feasible implementation of AO at the f/8 Gregorian focus  Optics are large and complex  Consequences of moving to an f/16 feed should be considered  More work is required to: Improve optical performance Develop concepts for science instruments (GMTIFS, MOAO, MCAO) Include WFSs at second focus Address field derotation on a stationary Instrument Platform Consider 10 arcmin(?) diameter phasing camera patrol field