SCUD Diagnostic Surface Currents SCUD and application to marine debris Hydrodynamics of Marine Debris workshop 5IMDC – 20 March 2011 Honolulu, Hawaii Jan.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Regional and Coastal Circulation Modeling: California Current System Art Miller Scripps Institution of Oceanography ECOFOR Workshop Friday Harbor, WA September.
Advertisements

Mid-depth Circulation of the World Ocean: A First Look at the Argo Array Josh K. Willis and Lee-Lueng Fu
Ocean circulation estimations using GOCE gravity field models M.H. Rio 1, S. Mulet 1, P. Knudsen 2, O.B. Andersen 2, S.L. Bruinsma 3, J.C. Marty 3, Ch.
IOVWST Annual Meeting, Annapolis, Maryland, May 9-11, 2011 Lagrangian Paths in OSCAR Surface Currents Kathleen Dohan Earth and Space Research Seattle,
Argo Products at the Asia-Pacific Data-Research Center Konstantin Lebedev, Sharon DeCarlo, Peter Hacker, Nikolai Maximenko, James Potemra, Yingshuo Shen.
NCAR GIS Program : Bridging Gaps
Hydrodynamics of Marine Debris” Sunday, March 20, 2011, Honolulu, HI Time Varying OSCAR Surface Currents in the Garbage Patch Regions Kathleen Dohan Earth.
Using High Quality SST Products to determine Physical Processes Contributing to SST Anomalies A First Step Suzanne Dickinson and Kathryn A. Kelly Applied.
Ocean Gyres - combine knowledge of global winds and Ekman flow - surface transport can be determined from wind direction/velocity - surface transport alters.
Observations of Mesoscale* Ocean Circulation: Present and Future Observations of Mesoscale* Ocean Circulation: Present and Future Bo Qiu Dept of Oceanography.
Aquarius optimum interpolation analysis for global and regional studies O. Melnichenko, P. Hacker, N. Maximenko, G. Lagerloef, and J. Potemra 2014 Aquarius/SAC-D.
1 Improved Sea Surface Temperature (SST) Analyses for Climate NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center Asheville, NC Thomas M. Smith Richard W. Reynolds Kenneth.
Wind-driven circulation II
Potential temperature ( o C, Levitus 1994) Surface Global zonal mean.
Define Current decreases exponentially with depth. At the same time, its direction changes clockwise with depth (The Ekman spiral). we have,. and At the.
N. Maximenko: Satellite ocean surface currents and winds Ocean Vector Wind Working Group meeting, October 7, 2013, Boulder 1,051 active drifters (approx.
Sustained Ocean Observations in Support of Sea Surface Salinity Process Studies Gustavo Jorge Goni National Oceanic and Atmospheric.
Linking sea surface temperature, surface flux, and heat content in the North Atlantic: what can we learn about predictability? LuAnne Thompson School of.
M-H Rio 1, F.Hernandez 2, J-M Lemoine 3, R. Schmidt 4, Ch. Reigber 4 AN IMPROVED MEAN DYNAMIC TOPOGRAPHY COMPUTED GLOBALLY COMBINING GRACE DATA, ALTIMETRY.
Evaporative heat flux (Q e ) 51% of the heat input into the ocean is used for evaporation. Evaporation starts when the air over the ocean is unsaturated.
“ New Ocean Circulation Patterns from Combined Drifter and Satellite Data ” Peter Niiler Scripps Institution of Oceanography with original material from.
PECC International Project Sustainable Management of Marine Resources Concluding Seminar The Management of Deep Sea Marine Resources and Oceans.
“ Combining Ocean Velocity Observations and Altimeter Data for OGCM Verification ” Peter Niiler Scripps Institution of Oceanography with original material.
Joaquim I. Goes and Helga Gomes Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences Increasing productivity in the Arabian Sea linked to shrinking snow caps – How satellites.
AN ENHANCED SST COMPOSITE FOR WEATHER FORECASTING AND REGIONAL CLIMATE STUDIES Gary Jedlovec 1, Jorge Vazquez 2, and Ed Armstrong 2 1NASA/MSFC Earth Science.
Upper ocean currents, Coriolis force, and Ekman Transport Gaspard-Gustave de Coriolis Walfrid Ekman.
2nd GODAE Observing System Evaluation Workshop - June Ocean state estimates from the observations Contributions and complementarities of Argo,
Application of Radial and Elliptical Surface Current Measurements to Better Resolve Coastal Features  Robert K. Forney, Hugh Roarty, Scott Glenn 
“Very high resolution global ocean and Arctic ocean-ice models being developed for climate study” by Albert Semtner Extremely high resolution is required.
The Inferred 3D velocity field Nelson Hogg (WHOI) The Inferred 3D velocity field Nelson Hogg (WHOI) Nelson Hogg: Missing PN Ranks with altimetry in terms.
The New Geophysical Model Function for QuikSCAT: Implementation and Validation Outline: GMF methodology GMF methodology New QSCAT wind speed and direction.
General Description of coastal hydrodynamic model.
An example of vertical profiles of temperature, salinity and density.
This presentation illustrates the need for Aquarius/SAC-D Mission and numerical modeling as well as other satellite and in situ data in order to close.
“Why Ocean Circulation Observations are Important for Climate Studies” Peter Niiler Scripps Institution of Oceanography.
Question: Why 45 o, physics or math? andare perpendicular to each other 45 o relation holds for boundary layer solution Physics: Coriolis force is balanced.
Ocean Surface Current Observations in PWS Carter Ohlmann Institute for Computational Earth System Science, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA.
IOVWST Meeting May 2011 Maryland Calibration and Validation of Multi-Satellite scatterometer winds Topics  Estimation of homogeneous long time.
Geopotential and isobaric surfaces
Contributions to SST Anomalies in the Atlantic Ocean [Ocean Control of Air-Sea Heat Fluxes] Kathie Kelly Suzanne Dickinson and LuAnne Thompson University.
Permanent Meanders in the California Current System and Comparison of Near- Surface Observations with OGCM Solutions Luca Centurioni (SIO-PORD) Collaborators:
A high-resolution Aquarius OI SSS L4 analysis: 3-year, near-global, weekly, 0.5 degree grid Oleg Melnichenko, Peter Hacker, Nikolai Maximenko, and James.
Yi Chao Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology
GOOS/GCOS measurements of near-surface currents Rick Lumpkin National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Atlantic Oceanographic.
Wind-driven circulation II ●Wind pattern and oceanic gyres ●Sverdrup Relation ●Vorticity Equation.
Forecasting smoke and dust using HYSPLIT. Experimental testing phase began March 28, 2006 Run daily at NCEP using the 6Z cycle to produce a 24- hr analysis.
The OC in GOCE: A review The Gravity field and Steady-state Ocean Circulation Experiment Marie-Hélène RIO.
An oceanographic assessment of the GOCE geoid models accuracy S. Mulet 1, M-H. Rio 1, P. Knudsen 2, F. Siegesmund 3, R. Bingham 4, O. Andersen 2, D. Stammer.
Altimeter and scatterometer seminar SMHI, March 2012 Altimetry data products Julia Figa Saldaña.
Wind-driven circulation
Satellite Data for CLIMODE
Ekman layer at the bottom of the sea
Operational Oceanography Science and Services for Europe and Mediterranean Srdjan Dobricic, CMCC, Bologna, Italy on behalf of National Group of Operational.
A PECC International Project
Using Profiling Float Trajectories to Estimate Ocean Circulation
AOMIP and FAMOS are supported by the National Science Foundation
Per Knudsen & Ole Andersen, DTU Space, Jerome Benveniste, ESA/ESRIN,
Observations of the North Atlantic Subtropical Mode Water
Frictionless Motion In addition assume no horizontal pressure gradients (no surface slopes) and homogeneous fluid.
Nikolai Maximenko and Jan Hafner
‘Aquarius’ Maps Ocean Salinity Fine-scale Structure
Nikolai Maximenko and Jan Hafner
Week 5: Thermal wind, dynamic height and Ekman flow
Ocean circulation: key questions
Characteristics of mesoscale eddies in the Southwest Pacific
Wind Stress and Ekman Mass Transport along CalCOFI lines: 67,70 and 77 by Lora Egley
NOAA Objective Sea Surface Salinity Analysis P. Xie, Y. Xue, and A
Lesson 8: Currents Physical Oceanography
Ocean Currents.
Presentation transcript:

SCUD Diagnostic Surface Currents SCUD and application to marine debris Hydrodynamics of Marine Debris workshop 5IMDC – 20 March 2011 Honolulu, Hawaii Jan Hafner and Nikolai Maximenko IPRC/SOEST University of Hawaii

Outline Motivation Methodology Data Model formulation Application to Marine Debris Future

Motivation Ocean Surface Currents – important factor in marine debris problem Direct measurements difficult – few in situ observations Utilize satellite data to arrive with surface ocean currents supported by the following agencies: NASA Physical Oceanography Program (Ocean Surface Topography Science Team) US National Fish and Wildlife Foundation JAMSTEC NOAA sponsoring IPRC Our direct motivation is from applications on marine debris

Methodology Task: to develop a simple diagnostic model of surface ocean currents to fit drifters' trajectories Input parameters: AVISO sea level anomaly (geostrophic current component)‏ Ocean surface wind data: daily QSCAT – wind driven current component ( Ekman)‏

DATA Drifter data: AOML - Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory drifters, drogued at 15m from 1979 till 2008, interpolated on 6 hourly intervals

DATA AVISO mean sea level anomaly maps: 1/3 degree maps, merged product (up 4 satellites), weekly time frequency, starting Oct ( MDOT - Mean Dynamic Ocean Topography, developed by Maximenko et al. (2009), ½ degree map produced using combined drifters, sea altimetry, GRACE and surface wind data, QSCAT 3-day moving averages of surface winds (10 m), ¼ degree daily maps July 1999 – November 2009, (

Formulation of the diagnostic model U SCUD (x,y,t) = U 0 + u hx ⋅∇ x h(x,y,t) + u hy ⋅ ∇ y h(x,y,t) + u wx ⋅ wx(x,y,t) + u wy ⋅ wy(x,y,t)‏ And similarly V SCUD (x,y,t) = V 0 + v hx ⋅∇ x h(x,y,t) + v hy ⋅ ∇ y h(x,y,t) + v wx ⋅ wx(x,y,t) + v wy ⋅ wy(x,y,t)‏ Where : U SCUD, V SCUD - modeled ocean current components U 0, V 0 - constant coefficient (mean)‏ h - sea level anomaly wx, wy U and V component of surface wind (QSCAT) u hx, u hy, u wx, u wy - U component coefficients corresponding to sea level gradient and surface wind (function of x and y only)‏ v hx, v hy, v wx, v wy - similarly corresponding V component coefficients

Formulation of the diagnostic model The coefficients are solved by minimizing the cost function: F cost =Σ[(U drifter ‐ U SCUD ) 2 + (V drifter ‐ V SCUD ) 2 ] where the summation is over all drifters' data in a given lat/lon box ( total 5,700,000 6-hourly data points).

RESULTS

Local Scale

Numerical Experiment: SCUD currents applied on ocean tracers released daily from coast and weighted by coastal population count Where the marine debris goes? How it gets there ? SCUD application on marine debris transport and convergence

Animation of tracer transport by SCUD currents

Structure of SCUD tracers “patches”

SCUD model application on marine debris What model cannot do: prediction vertical structure of marine debris coastal processes – emission and deposition of marine debris What model can do: zones of convergence structure of the patches trajectories = pathways

Future – what is needed Thank you 1. operational SCUD product requires QSCAT to be replaced with ASCAT winds 2. global inventory of marine debris sources and sinks in the ocean and onshore is needed 3. effect of vertical mixing on floating debris needs to be included in the model 4. coastal dynamical processes, esp. high frequency and debris deposition processes, need to be considered in the model 5. validation of SCUD model results by in situ data needed

Data preprocessing AVISO, MDOT and QSCAT wind data were interpolated on times and locations of 6-hourly drifters' data Filtering out high frequency signal by Hanning cosine filter with halfwidth = inertial frequency, minimum frq. ~ 3 days (9°37' lat.)‏

Fit to the data Absolute misfit to drifters' data R.M.S. of cost function (m/s)‏ Global average misfit : m/s (0.118 m/s for U SCUD and m/s for V SCUD )‏ Relative misfit to the drifters' data Ratio of cost function and drifters' R.M.Ss. Global average : (0.541 and 0.653, for U and V components respectively)‏

Data and Access ¼ degree surface currents maps: daily from 01Aug1999 till 19Nov2009 (span of QSCAT data)‏ SCUD dataset is open for free unrestricted use and distribution Disseminated by APDRC servers : LAS, LAS7, OpeNDAP, DChart SCUD manual : df SCUD users listserver:

From S.Pacific ST gyre To S.Pacific ST gyre From N.Pacific ST gyreTo N.Pacific ST gyre From Hawaii To Hawaii Trajectories of real drifter starting from (left column) and ending in (right column) the South Pacific (top row), North Pacific (middle row), and Hawaii (bottom row).

Statistics R.M.S. of modeled velocities related to sea level (m/s) R.M.S. of modeled velocities related to surface winds (m/s)