Noise Mapping For The Environmental Noise Directive WHAT IT MEANS FOR SCOTLAND Dr Bernadette McKell, October 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
COSO I COSO II. Meycor COSO, a Comprehensive Solution for Enterprise Risk Management (ERM)
Advertisements

Open Days European Week of Regions and Cities Blue Book - Guide to cost benefit analysis in transport sector JASPERS: Bringing Major Projects to Maturity.
Map matching algorithm for data conflation – an open source approach
Executive Summary Introduction In 1988, by virtue of State Statute , the Nebraska State Legislature first assigned the Nebraska Department.
NOISE MAPPING PROCESS Dr Bernadette McKell Hamilton & McGregor.
Roads Input Data Dr David Connolly. Transport Model for Scotland (TMfS) Multi-modal transport model covering most of mainland Scotland 2005 Base Year.
European approaches to transport data collection and analysis for strategic policy and impact evaluation TRB 92 nd Annual Meeting Session 824: Transport.
Towards Action Planning Linda Story Air Noise and Nuisance Team.
From portions of Chapter 8, 9, 10, &11. Real world is complex. GIS is used model reality. The GIS models then enable us to ask questions of the data by.
The SoCoMMS Model Paul Read Dan Jones. The Presentation Outline of the Study The Modelling Framework Accessibility Model.
MAG New Generation Freight Model SHRP2 C20 IAP Project Vladimir Livshits, Ph.D AMPO Annual Conference, Atlanta, GA October 23, 2014 Freight Session.
Air Quality and Land Use Planning Land Use Consultants 11 th March 2008 Susanne Underwood.
Spring INTRODUCTION There exists a lot of methods used for identifying high risk locations or sites that experience more crashes than one would.
Measure 26 Strategic Traffic Management Katerina Oktabcova Usti nad Labem Municipality.
Application of the Histocity Method to Mobility analysis and scenario definition in the city of Florence, Italy M.A. Esposito Università degli Studi di.
REGIONAL FORUM FOR BEVERLY, DANVERS AND SALEM DECEMBER 8, 2010 North Shore Regional Strategic Planning Project.
Validate - A Nationwide Dynamic Travel Demand Model for Germany Peter Vortisch, Volker Waßmuth, PTV AG, Germany.
TRACECA PROJECT EVALUATION
The use of census data as an input in forecasting population, employment and land use change 5 th October 2010 Andy Dobson David Simmonds Consultancy.
Simpson County Travel Demand Model Mobility Analysis November 7, 2003.
 Scotland’s National Transport Strategy A Consultation.
” Particulates „ Characterisation of Exhaust Particulate Emissions from Road Vehicles Key Action KA2:Sustainable Mobility and Intermodality Task 2.2:Infrastructures.
Connectivity & Mobility
Vvisual comparision of data Measuring the quality of Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) datasets such as OpenStreetMap is often attempted without.
Transportation Planning, Transportation Demand Analysis Land Use-Transportation Interaction Transportation Planning Framework Transportation Demand Analysis.
Getting to Know Cube.
Ergonomics Regulatory Requirements Bawan Saravanabawan, Labour Program, HRSDC February 4, 2008.
Patrick Revell Ordnance Survey Research
1 Cohesion Policy Adam Abdulwahab Evaluation network meeting Brussels, 21 September 2009 Ex post evaluation of cohesion policy programmes
MATRIX ADJUSTMENT MACRO (DEMADJ.MAC AND DEMADJT.MAC) APPLICATIONS: SEATTLE EXPERIENCE Murli K. Adury Youssef Dehghani Sujay Davuluri Parsons Brinckerhoff.
Exploring Cube Base and Cube Voyager. Exploring Cube Base and Cube Voyager Use Cube Base and Cube Voyager to develop data, run scenarios, and examine.
Transport The new TEN-T guidelines Results of the legislative procedure Philippe Chantraine (MOVE B1), 24 June 2013.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe UNECE Transport Division 1 TRANS-EUROPEAN RAILWAY (TER) PROJECT 2 nd Expert Group Meeting (Budapest, 23 September.
Scrutiny Presentation Local Transport Plan and Active Travel Strategy 24 th October 2013 Andy Summers and David Burt.
The Scottish Ferries Review Consultation Document 2010 Arran - 12 July 2010 Graham Laidlaw.
The Regional Transport Strategy Transport for Regional Growth Conference Edinburgh 5 November 2015 John Saunders SEStran.
 European Urban Roadmaps to 2030  Dr Guy Hitchcock  Knowledge Leader  ETC, 28 th September 2015.
Multimodal Analysis Using Network Analyst. Outline Summarizing accessibility Summarizing accessibility Adding transportation modes to a network Adding.
Putting the LBRS and other GIS data to Work for Traffic Flow Modeling in Erie County Sam Granato, Ohio DOT Carrie Whitaker, Erie County 2015 Ohio GIS Conference.
Exploiting census workplace data to build a daytime grid map of England and Wales. David Martin, Samantha Cockings, Alan Smith European Forum for Geostatistics,
Bicycle Advisory Board September 2, 2015 Freight Master Plan.
Tools for Expedited Regional Transportation Noise Modeling Jim Cowan and Ken Kaliski Resource Systems Group, Inc. White River Junction, VT.
Transport Model for Scotland SHS-based inputs and forecast trends SHS User Day David Connolly and Lucy Barker| November 2007.
Road Information System / Road Data Bank 10 April 2013 Lars Bergman M. Sc. In Civil Engineering Long Term Planning Swedish Transport Administration.
1 Assessing Travel Demand for Exclusive Truck Facilities Matthew Roorda, University of Toronto Michael Hain, University of Toronto Glareh Amirjamshidi,
2015 ABNMS Conference Application of Bayesian Networks in Urban Growth Models © 2015, Sizztech Pty Ltd.
Transport Integration of cross-border transport infrastructure TEN-T strategy on large cross- border cooperation projects Gudrun Schulze, Team leader,
European Strategic Traffic Forecasts and possible contribution for the TEM Master Plan Bratislava 9 February 2004 Benno Bultink DG Public Works, the Netherlands.
Waikato Regional Transportation Model A Strategic Tool for Land Use and Transport Investigations SPN Meeting, November 2015.
POLK RAIL QUIET ZONE ANALYSIS Conditions Assessment CSX “S” Line March 24, 2016.
Toward a New ATM Software Safety Assessment Methodology dott. Francesca Matarese.
TD MANAGEMENT PG PLANNING THE NETWORK Future Needs for Performance Indicators & Road Data.
Transportation Modeling – Opening the Black Box. Agenda 6:00 - 6:05Welcome by Brant Liebmann 6:05 - 6:10 Introductory Context by Mayor Will Toor and Tracy.
Road Investment Decision Framework
Urban Mobility Management and Emissions Measurement System Boile Maria 1,2 Afroditi Anagnostopoulou 1 Evangelia Papargyri 1 1 Centre for Research and Technology.
NGTA Halton Planning and Public Works Committee
Noise Maps and House Building – potential future influence on planning and design Peter Hepworth Tuesday 31st October 2006 Sustainable New Homes and.
INSPIRE Maintenance and Implementation expert Group
Network Screening & Diagnosis
for Multi-Modal Transport
COSO I COSO II. Meycor COSO, a Comprehensive Solution for Enterprise Risk Management (ERM)
Eurostat Working Group Regional Statistics
AERODROME CERTIFICATION COURSE
Spatial Methodology Introduction Outline of draft Chapter Highlights
Update on forthcoming assessments by ETC/ACM
Land Use Modelling Group, Sustainability Assessment Unit (DG JRC)
Regional accessibility indicators: developments and perspectives
3 November 2017 Fraserburgh and Peterhead to Aberdeen Strategic Transport Study: STAG Part 1 Plus Bob Nicol: Project Director David Murtagh: Project Manager.
WebTRAGIS: Status Update and Development Overview
Geospatial data for cities and FUAs: state of play and opportunities
Presentation transcript:

Noise Mapping For The Environmental Noise Directive WHAT IT MEANS FOR SCOTLAND Dr Bernadette McKell, October 2006

EU Directive 2002/49/EC The Environmental Noise (Scotland) Regulations 2006 Intended to “inform the public about environmental noise and its effects”

Produce strategic and strategic consolidated noise maps for large urban areas (agglomerations) major roads (6 million vehicle threshold) major railways (more than 60,000 train passages per year ) major airports (more than 50,000 movements per year) Produce action plans to manage and reduce environmental noise where necessary preserving environmental noise quality where it is good

POTENTAIL ABUSE OF STRATEGIC MAPS PAN 56?

Noise Mapping For The Environmental Noise Directive An Automated Methodology For the Identification of Industrial Noise Sources

DATA SOURCES Airports CAA will provide grids Rail At this time Network Rail Position not known Industrial Inferred + WG-AEN, GPG V2 Road TMfS

Noise Mapping For The Environmental Noise Directive An Automated Methodology For the Identification of Industrial Noise Sources

Overview END Requirements onerous No comprehensive data source available Automated method essential for first round of mapping Making use of publicly available data Resultant data can be refined

Building Footprints – Source OS MasterMap General best quality data for UK. All data polygonised and richer attribute set than previous data (landline) © Crown Copyright. All rights reserved Scottish Executive 100020540 2005.

Building Footprints – Base Data OS MasterMap – building footprints extracted Every building in area extracted, including huts, garages etc. This is the base for all of the inferred and detailed building type assignments. © Crown Copyright. All rights reserved Scottish Executive 100020540 2005.

Inferred Use – Level 1 OS AddressPoint Data – Inferred Building Use AddressPoint data – inferred classification. If an address has does not have an organisation associated with it is assumed to be RESIDENTIAL, otherwise a word search is carried out through the organisation name field to interpret the type of use. Default is COMIND (others are AMENITY/RECREATION, EDUCATION, FARM, HEALTH,RELIGIOUS). © Crown Copyright. All rights reserved Scottish Executive 100020540 2005.

Building Footprints – Level 1 Building Footprints with AddressPoint Inferred uses Building fooprints updated with the values from the inferred uses from AddressPoint – any buildings without an AddressPoint are recorded as ‘Not classified’. It is recognised that this method is not comprehensive and will have an inbuilt error – but it is a good starting point and can be used where more detailed information is currently not available. © Crown Copyright. All rights reserved Scottish Executive 100020540 2005.

Inferred Use – Level 2 Standardised (national) land use classes from Local Plans Standardised land use classes for the whole of UK captured by Landmark Information Group. These include all classes from each Local Authority Local Plan. This is intended to allow us to sweep up those buildings which do not have an address but nevertheless have an industrial use – e.g. large works where only the office is addressable. © Landmark and/or its Data Suppliers 2005 (Data kindly supplied by Landmark for evaluation purposes).

Inferred Use – Level 2 Land use constraints polygons which indicate uses likely to produce industrial noise We went through the 79 classes and assigned the to Airport, commercial, heavy, ports (with ports having precedence). Classes correspond to the default values for Sound Power Levels Unknown - Tool 5 – in the 'Good Practice Guide for Strategic Noise Mapping and the Production of Associated Data on Noise Exposure': © Landmark and/or its Data Suppliers 2005 (Data kindly supplied by Landmark for evaluation purposes).

Building Footprints – Level 2 Building footprints assigned to land use constraints polygons which indicate uses likely to produce industrial noise. Class values applied to the building footprints. © Landmark and/or its Data Suppliers 2005 (Data kindly supplied by Landmark for evaluation purposes).

Inferred Use – Level 3 Building footprints assigned to PointX classification (as assessed by SEPA for likelihood to produce industrial noise). This is the most detailed level of classification. PointX data with 323 classes assigned the default values for Sound Power Levels Unknown - Tool 5 – in the 'Good Practice Guide for Strategic Noise Mapping and the Production of Associated Data on Noise Exposure‘ by SEPA. These were then applied to PointX data, and the PointX data to the building footprints. Only data with one of the noise classes were applied to the buildings – and only some buildings have an association. This is not a comprehensive dataset and is constantly being updated. Anomalies will include an arbitrary shop being applied to a shopping centre etc. © Crown Copyright. All rights reserved Scottish Executive 100020540 2005. © Landmark and/or its Data Suppliers 2005 (Data kindly supplied by Landmark for evaluation purposes).

Inferred Use – Final Use Sources: Building Footprints (AddressPoint inferred classification) - inferred value Building Footprints (Land Use classification) – update inferred uses where building not addressable Building Footprints (PointX and SEPA Noise Level Classes) – accurate, but limited, individual building classes Detailed Assignment: PointX is assumed to be the most accurate information, and if a building contains a point then this is taken as the building type (based on the SEPA assigned classification of the data). Where no building type is available from PointX, the value assigned using the land use polygons is then used. Where neither are available, the inferred use is used. Any occurrence in inferred use of Commercial/Industrial, not previously assigned using the other datasets, has been assigned to Light.

Building footprints – Final Use Building footprints assigned to finalised building classification using methodology described. Combination of all classifications based on the methodology © Crown Copyright. All rights reserved Scottish Executive 100020540 2005. © Landmark and/or its Data Suppliers 2005 (Data kindly supplied by Landmark for evaluation purposes).

Inferred Use – Final Use Classes Industrial Uses based on Sound Power Levels Unknown, 'Good Practice Guide for Strategic Noise Mapping and the Production of Associated Data on Noise Exposure': Airport - to be dealt with by the Airport Authority Commercial - corresponds to Area with commercial uses Heavy- corresponds to Area with heavy industries Light- corresponds to Area with light industries Ports - corresponds to Ports Other Uses: Amenity/Recreation Education Farm Health Religious Residential Not classified - garden huts, garages etc.

Industrial Noise - Methodology © Hamilton & McGregor

Scottish European Noise Directive Traffic Flow Estimates for Noise Mapping Dr David Connolly | 6 October 2006

Transport Model for Scotland (TMfS) TMfS is a transport and Land Use modelling tool and database that enables the Scottish Executive and Local Authorities to assess major inter-urban road and public transport schemes and major transport policy options. TMfS currently covers 95% of Scotland’s population Scottish END|6 October 2006

Traffic Data for Noise Mapping TMfS provides: Week-day AM Peak, Inter-Peak & PM Peak traffic estimates for most of the relevant roads in the required areas Average speeds and %HGVs (by time period) for every link Ability to forecast future traffic conditions and the impacts of any traffic-related interventions Data easily transferred on to GIS packages Annualisation factors will be used to convert AM Peak, Inter-Peak & PM Peak traffic estimates to 18-hr flows. Scottish END|6 October 2006

TMfS Network Detail and Flow Estimates

Geo-rectification of TMfS We are developing a method to match the model network “stick” links to OS Master Map ITN features. This will ensure that the traffic information is positioned consistently with other noise mapping data TMfS ITN Scottish END|6 October 2006

Geo-rectification of TMfS The geo-rectification method combines manual adjustments and automated processes to ensure a good quality correspondence. The key processes are: Node Matching Link Matching Dual Carriageway processing Roundabout processing Complex junction processing Scottish END|6 October 2006

END Major Road Sections “red” sections show flows > 16000 AAWDT based on traffic counts Included in first round of END mapping Being reviewed against TMfS data Some short “outlier” sections may be included in second round of mapping

Other Road Attributes In addition to integrating the traffic model data, the END network has to manage other attributes, eg: pavement type road gradient location of bridges and culverts These attributes lie along a partial edge or may cross several edges without changing characteristic. In these cases we will employ “dynamic segmentation”, which is a GIS technique to reference attributes to lengths of road. This method is already used within the SERIS database. Scottish END|6 October 2006