1 CFSR STATEWIDE ASSESSMENT LESSONS LEARNED (State) CFSR Kick Off (Date)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
To Eliminate Poverty and Family Violence in El Paso County.
Advertisements

Enhancing the Service Array in Child Welfare: (1) Assessing the Capacity of a Jurisdiction/State to Meet the Individualized Needs of Children and Families.
Improving The Lives of Maryland’s Dually Involved Girls June 11, 2014 A project generously funded by the Abell Foundation & the Jewish Women’s Giving.
Community Based Care in Florida and the IV-E Waiver.
The Child and Family Services Review: An Agenda for Change Kathy Yurchisin Krista Hudson Kentucky CFSR Stakeholders Advisory Group.
Continuous Quality Improvement Enter YOUR Service Area along with Lead and Facilitator Name!
1 North Dakota Children and Family Services Review Paul Ronningen, Division Director Don Snyder, Permanency Unit Manager.
Child and Family Services Reviews (CFSRs). 2 Child Welfare Final Rule (excerpt from Executive Summary) The child and family services reviews … [focus]
California Department of Social Services Program Improvement Plan
CW/MH Learning Collaborative First Statewide Leadership Convening Lessons Learned from the Readiness Assessment Tools Lisa Conradi, PsyD Project Co-Investigator.
AN OUTLINE OF IT’S ROLES AND STRUCTURE IN MATTERS OF CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES RI’s Family Court System.
Child Welfare and Education Two Systems Working Together for Foster Youth.
Educational Access Project for DCFS An Overview of a Partnership Between Northern Illinois University and the Illinois Department of Children and Family.
One Chance at Childhood Every Child Deserves the Best Start.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley CFSR2 Data Indicators: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly Center for Social Services.
1 Child and Family Services Review Program Improvement Plan Kick-Off Division/Staff Name Date (7/30/07)
Strategic Thinking to Align Initiatives and Integrate Management, Supervision, and Practice Heidi D. McIntosh, MSW Deputy Commissioner Fernando J. Muñiz,
1 Agency/Court Collaboration in the CFSR: ENGAGING COURTS AND THE LEGAL SYSTEM The National Child Welfare Resource Center For Organizational Improvement.
1 Lessons Learned about the Service Array from the First Round of Child and Family Services Reviews (CFSRs) The Service Array Process National Child Welfare.
1 THE CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES REVIEW (CFSR) PRACTICE PRINCIPLES: Critical Principles for Assessing and Enhancing the Service Array The Service Array.
Engaging Community Stakeholders and Building Community Partnerships
Seeing the Forest and the Trees National Title IV-E Roundtable June 2-4, 2015, MN Collaboration with Private Partners Andrea Hightower Strategic Partnerships.
Permanency Enhancement Project Peoria, Illinois Jennifer La Fever Elizabeth Morgan Amy Roman
Inspiration  Ideas  Improvement Practice Improvement Unit District Practice Improvement Specialists District Automation Liaisons Inspiration An agent.
1 Court-Agency Collaboration in Child and Family Service Reviews (CFSRs): Steps for Each Stage of the Process Hon. Stephen W. Rideout & Hon. William Jones.
1 Strengthening Child Welfare Supervision as a Key Practice Change Strategy Unit I: Helping Child Welfare Leaders Re-conceptualize Supervision.
Program Staff Presentation 1 Program Staff Presentation.
Georgia: Improving Outcomes for Children through Data Sharing Presenter: Sharon L. Hill, PhD Director, Georgia Division of Family & Children Services Presentation.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley The Child and Family Services Review Composite Scores: A “Great Start” Barbara.
 By Amie Little  EDU 644 Discussion 1 week 2. The mission of DCFS is to protect children who are reported to be abused or neglected and to increase.
May 18, MiTEAM Is Michigan’s guide to how staff, children, families, stakeholders and community partners work together to achieve outcomes that.
Mental Health is a Public Health Issue: What I Learned from Early Childhood.   Presented by  Charlie Biss 
Common Core 3.0 Content Overview Stakeholder Feedback Seeking Your Input to Improve Child Welfare Training! For audio: call enter access.
Systems Change to Achieve Permanency Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Arlington, Texas April 15, 2009.
Prepared by American Humane Association and the California Administrative Office of the Courts.
Indicating Success in Public Child Welfare Child Outcomes, System Performance and the CFSR Process Susan Smith and Lisa Tuttle Casey Family Programs July.
Training Agenda Continuous Quality Improvement Section Federal CFSR Oklahoma CFSR Oklahoma Program Improvement Plan (PIP) CFSR/Case Review Instrument.
Maine DHHS: Putting Children First
Connecticut Department of Children and Families Agency Overview.
Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Quarterly Meeting – October 21, 2011 Bryan Samuels, Commissioner Administration on.
SSIS as a Case Management Tool Nan Beman Anne Broskoff.
Department of Human Services
1 Bureau of Milwaukee Child Welfare Report to the Community January 13, 2006 Jan. – Dec Progress summary of 2005  Safety  Permanence  Well-Being.
DIAKON Lutheran Social Ministries/Family Design Resources Tools That Work Conference 11/03 Implementing Best Practice Standards in Permanency Planning.
1 Quality Counts: Helping Improve Outcomes for Pennsylvania’s Children & Families September 22, 2008.
Lori Clarke Convergent Horizons February 6, 2015.
CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES PLAN and REVIEW. CFSP Child and Family Service Plan.
Child and Family Service Review CFSR 101. Child and Family Service Review CFSR stands for the Child and Family Service Review. It is the federal government’s.
Utah’s Quality Improvement Committees Utah’s Quality Improvement Committees (QIC) were first outlined in the Performance Milestone Plan in May 1999 when.
Administration for Children and Families Children’s Bureau Fostering Connections Implementation Support & Resources CAPTA 2010 – Highlights.
An Overview of the California Foster Care System Navigating the System.
Race and Child Welfare: Exits from the Child Welfare System Brenda Jones Harden, Ph.D. University of Maryland College Park Research Synthesis on Child.
IOWA PARTNERSHIPS Kara Hudson,CFSR State Coordinator (515) Michelle Muir, Executive Officer (515)
White House Conference on Children and Youth What’s It All About? Child Welfare League of America.
1 CHILDREN SAFE AND THRIVING WITH FOREVER FAMILIES, SOONER DIVISION OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES Isabel Blanco, Deputy Director of Field Operations September.
© CDHS College Relations Group Buffalo State College/SUNY at Buffalo Research Foundation Guiding Framework for Interventions Recommendation 1.
Common Goals: Child Safety, Permanency and Well-Being Citizen Review Panel National Conference May 21-23, 2008 St. Paul, Minnesota Christeen Borsheim,
The Child and Family Services Review (CFSR) February 2008 Update.
In FY10, there were 66,897 confirmed cases of child abuse and neglect. 26,074 cases (39%) were children three years and younger. In Fort Bend County,
1 1 Child Welfare Policy and Practice for Supervisors.
1 Department of Human Services (DHS)/Child Welfare Services (CWS) Branch Child & Family Services Review (CFSR) & Program Improvement Plan (PIP)
Kinship care for the safety, permanency, and well-being of children removed from the home for maltreatment: A Summary of a Systematic Review Erin Geary.
No Place Like HOME Texas Kick Off Meeting
Office of Children's Services
Tuolumne County Adult Child and Family Services
Pre-service Orientation
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services January 23, 2015
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services December 19, 2014
Insert Meeting Date and Presenters
Children Services Committee Meeting
Presentation transcript:

1 CFSR STATEWIDE ASSESSMENT LESSONS LEARNED (State) CFSR Kick Off (Date)

2 Two Phases of CFSR Statewide Assessment On-Site Review  Final Report  Program Improvement Plan (PIP)

3 3 Statewide Assessment Emphases on a)meaningful stakeholder involvement (particularly with courts, tribes and youth) b)descriptive and evaluative language c)use of data

4 Why Stakeholder Involvement? “The safety, permanency, and well-being of children is a shared responsibility … Child welfare agencies do not serve children and families in isolation; they … work in partnership with policymakers, community leaders, and other public and private agencies to improve outcomes for children and families in their States.” Children’s Bureau, “Collaborating During the CFSRs”

5 Why Stakeholder Involvement? Different contributors to the child welfare system bring to the assessment process: Different perspectives Additional information (including data) Assistance in exploring possibilities to the improvement process: Collaboration = increased probability for achievement of outcomes (Safety, Permanency & Well-Being)

6 Who are Stakeholders? CFSR review includes entire child welfare system in which stakeholders include: Birth parents, family caregivers (resource, foster, kinship care, and adoptive families), and youth, who have experience with the child welfare system. Court, legal, and law enforcement officials, including staff of the Administrative Office of the Court (AOC) and the Court Improvement Program (CIP), and CASA volunteers. Tribal representatives.

7 Who are Stakeholders? (continued) Public and private sector providers of child welfare services. Citizen review panels / foster care review board members. Mental health, substance abuse, and domestic violence services providers. Educators, health care providers, home visiting program staff. Child abuse prevention advocates and staff.

8 Who are Stakeholders? (continued) Other key providers (e.g., housing, food resources, transportation, recreation). Elected officials and administrators, including legislators and legislative staff. Representatives of the business, faith, labor, and media communities. Other public sector employees, community- based organizations, and representatives of entities such as the United Way and local foundations.

9 What is the Role of Stakeholders? in the Statewide Assessment Gathering and/or providing information (including data) Examining data Assisting in analyzing and evaluating Providing perspective and insight Reviewing drafts of the self-assessment Identifying possible early steps for improvement

10 What is the Role of Stakeholders? in the CFSR On-Site Review Serving as a reviewer Participating in stakeholder interviews Attending exit event in the Program Improvement Plan Assisting in preparing the plan Contributing to improving outcomes for children and families (Safety, Permanency and Well-Being)

11 Statewide Assessment Emphases on a)meaningful stakeholder involvement (particularly with courts, tribes and youth) b)descriptive and evaluative language c)use of data

12 Use of Data Data Profile Child Safety, e.g. Disposition of CA/N Reports National Data Indicators (with standards) Absence of Maltreatment Recurrence Absence of Child Abuse and/or Neglect in Foster Care

13 Use of Data Data Profile Permanency, e.g. Foster Care Population Flow Placement Types Permanency Goals National Data Indicators (with standards) Timeliness and Permanency of Reunification Timeliness of Adoption Permanency for Children and Youth in Foster Care for Long Periods of Time Placement Stability

14 Descriptive and Evaluative Language Example 1 – Item 1 (Timeliness of initiating investigations of report of child maltreatment) Page 2 – Measures of Effectiveness Second paragraph (rates by risk) Third paragraph & chart (rates by district) Page 3 – Factors Affecting Performance