Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Kinship care for the safety, permanency, and well-being of children removed from the home for maltreatment: A Summary of a Systematic Review Erin Geary.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Kinship care for the safety, permanency, and well-being of children removed from the home for maltreatment: A Summary of a Systematic Review Erin Geary."— Presentation transcript:

1 Kinship care for the safety, permanency, and well-being of children removed from the home for maltreatment: A Summary of a Systematic Review Erin Geary

2 Background: Kinship Care
What is kinship care? “the full-time nurturing and protection of children who must be separated from their parents, by relatives, members of their tribes or clans, godparents, step- parents, or other adults who have a kinship bond with a child” (CWLA 1994, p. 2) Formal, informal, and private kinship placements Known by other names internationally Family and friends care – UK Kith and kin care – Australia Considered Formal or informal placements depending on whether kinship care provider has or is seeking custody

3 Background: Kinship Care
What is kinship care? Goals of kinship care: Family preservation– reunification with birth parents Substitute care– care for the child when reunification is not an option “New” priority in child welfare Seen as least intrusive option for kids in care Number of kinship placements are on the rise internationally

4 Review Objective “To evaluate the effect of kinship care placement compared to foster care placement on the safety, permanency, and well-being of children removed from the home for maltreatment.”

5 Review Protocol: Inclusion Criteria
Randomized control trials or quasi-experimental studies Children in kinship care are compared to children in foster care Must have spent more than 50% of time in out of home care in kinship setting Excluded more restrictive out of home placement settings (residential care) Studies that only examine informal or private kinship care were excluded Participants: Children under 18 who were removed and placed in kinship care

6 Review Protocol: Inclusion Criteria
Outcome Measurement Behavioral Development Case records, caregiver, teacher and self reports, and standardized instruments Mental Health Case records, caregiver and self reports, and standardized instruments Placement Stability Child Welfare administrative databases Permanency Educational Attainment School records and child welfare administrative databases Family Relations Caregiver and self-reports and standardized instruments Service Utilization Medical records, caregiver and self-reports, and child welfare administrative databases Re-abuse Child welfare administrative databases

7 Review Protocol: Search
Database Years searched Cochrane Library 2007 MEDLINE Campbell Collaboration’s Social, Psychological, Educational, and Criminological Trials Registrar Sociological Abstracts Social Work Abstracts Social Sciences Citation Index Family and Society Studies Worldwide ERIC PsycINFO ISI Proceedings CINAHL Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts UMI Dissertation Abstracts International Late 1960s-2007

8 Review Protocol: Search
Other Strategies Most recent volumes of: Child Abuse & Neglect Children and Youth Services Review Child Welfare Research on Social Work Practice Families in Society Contacted several authors included in the review Published literature reviews

9 Review Protocol: Search
Keywords (sample) Database Search examples Cochrane Library (relative near foster*) (relative near substitute*) (family near foster*) (family near substitute*) (kin near care*) (kinship near care*) MEDLINE (relative$ adj3 foster$) (relative$ adj3 substitute) (family adj3 foster$) (families adj3 foster$) (kin adj3 care$) (kinship adj3 care$) Social Work Abstracts (relative$ near3 foster$) (kinship near3 care$)

10 Study Inclusion Flow Chart

11 Quality Assessment Quality Assessment
Selection Bias Performance Bias Detection Bias Report Bias Attrition Bias Table 1 (p. 7) is a breakdown of quality assessment for 63 Studies Low, Moderate, High

12 Results: Evidence Base
“Weak standing of quantitative research on kinship care.” Most studies had moderate to high risk of bias Implementation fidelity issues

13 Results: Data Analysis

14 Results: Data Analysis

15 Study Conclusions Children in kinship care experience better outcomes related to: Behavior problems Adaptive behaviors Psychiatric disorders Well-being Placement stability Guardianship

16 Study Conclusions No difference between groups on:
Reunification Length of stay Family relations Educational Attainment Children in kinship care are less likely to: Be adopted Utilize mental health services Children in kinship care are more likely to still be in placement

17 Implications Practice and Policy: Research
Kinship should be sought and supported if goals are: Behavioral Development Mental Health functioning Placement Stability Findings do not support implementing kinship placements if goal is solely to: Increase permanency Increase service utilization Research Need for more studies that have: Generalizable sample Equivalent groups Repeated measures Longitudinal focus Studies that breakdown data further Impact on specific populations Impact on caregivers Breakdown by age, gender, ethnicity

18 Questions What does this look like with further aggregation of the data? Demographic differences Severe behavior problems How is it impacted (or is it) by involvement of birth parents? What about respite care or family foster care? What are the implications of the study in terms of payment differences between kinship and non-kinship foster care What does the cost-benefit research say?


Download ppt "Kinship care for the safety, permanency, and well-being of children removed from the home for maltreatment: A Summary of a Systematic Review Erin Geary."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google