Identifying Critical Areas for BMP Applications. Critical Areas Those areas or sources where the greatest water quality improvement can be accomplished.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Phosphorus Index for Oregon and Washington Steve Campbell USDA - Natural Resources Conservation Service Portland, Oregon Dan Sullivan Oregon State University.
Advertisements

Phosphorus Index Based Management Douglas Beegle Dept. of Crop and Soil Sciences Penn State University
Project collaborators: Laura Ward Good, Katie Songer, Matt Diebel, John Panuska, Jeff Maxted, Pete Nowak, John Norman, K.G. Karthikeyan, Tom Cox, Water.
Evaluation of Overland Flow Paths Generated from Multiresolution DEMs J.M. Shawn Hutchinson 1, Stacy L. Hutchinson 2, and I.J. Kim 2 1 Department of Geography.
Developing Modeling Tools in Support of Nutrient Reduction Policies Randy Mentz Adam Freihoefer, Trip Hook, & Theresa Nelson Water Quality Modeling Technical.
Project Ranking Results Presented at the 8 th Stakeholder Meeting Hal Bryson, EEP Western Watershed Planner January 12th, 2010.
The Wisconsin River TMDL: Linking Monitoring and Modeling Ann Hirekatur, Pat Oldenburg, & Adam Freihoefer March 7, 2013 Wisconsin River TMDL Project Team.
Agricultural BMPs An Educator’s Guide. What are Agricultural BMPs? Best Management Practices An approach to help farmers reduce or eliminate agricultural.
IDEM TMDL 101 Everything you wanted to know about Total Maximum Daily Loads.
Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP) Measuring the Environmental Benefits of Conservation Managing the Agricultural Landscape for Environmental.
General Ag. Compliance & Chesapeake Bay Update. PA Clean Streams Law & General AG Compliance Prevent discharge of pollutants & water quality impairment.
DESIGNING MONITORING PROGRAMS TO EVALUATE BMP EFFECTIVENESS Funded by grants from USDA- CSREES, EPA 319, NSF Nancy Mesner - Utah State University, Dept.
On-Farm Conservation and Nutrient Management in Maryland: A 2010 Snapshot Erik Lichtenberg Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics University.
Indiana Confined Feeding Operations Permit Program Indiana Department of Environmental Management.
Interpreting and Using Existing Data to Identify Pollution Causes and Sources.
P Index Development and Implementation The Iowa Experience Antonio Mallarino Iowa State University.
Getting the Big Picture How to Look at Your Watershed Indiana Watershed Planning Guide,
Load Estimation Models. Existing loads come from: Point-source discharges (NPDES facilities) Info is available on the discharges (DMRs, etc.) Some are.
Logo Certified Nutrient Management Planning7-1 Module 7: Manure Utilization By Hailin Zhang.
A Water Quality Loading Model for Tillamook Bay Patrice A. Melancon Thanks to: Dr. David Maidment Dr. Michael Barrett Dr. Francisco Olivera Dr. Maidment’s.
Economic and Biophysical Models to Support Conservation Policy: Hypoxia and Water Quality in the Upper Mississippi River Basin CARD Resources and Environmental.
Measuring Carbon Co-Benefits of Agricultural Conservation Policies: In-stream vs. Edge-of-Field Assessments of Water Quality. Measuring Carbon Co-Benefits.
Chesapeake Bay Program Incorporation of Lag Times into the Decision Process Gary Shenk 10/16/12 1.
Bill Carter Nonpoint Source Program Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Trade Fair and Conference, May 2015.
URBAN STORMWATER QUALITY AND LOAD ESTIMATION FROM URBAN RESIDENTIAL AREA IN SKUDAI, JOHOR, MALAYSIA Siti Nazahiyah Bte Rahmat Faculty of Civil and Environmental.
Northwest hydraulic consultants 2NDNATURE Geosyntec Consultants September 11, 2007 Urban Upland / Groundwater Source Category Group (UGSCG) Overview Presentation.
Options for Identifying & Quantifying Pollutant Loads
Water Quality Associated with Urban Runoff: Sources, Emerging Issues and Management Approaches Martha Sutula and Eric Stein Biogeochemistry and Biology.
Land Uses & Water Pollution Sources Christopher Gale Bill Taft.
Steve Harrison, Environmental Manager Bureau of Entomology and Pest Control -Mosquito Control Section.
WEPP: A Process-Based Watershed Runoff and Erosion Model for Watershed Assessment William Conroy, Joan Wu, Shuhui Dun Dept. Biological Systems Engineering.
Sediment Retention model
Co-Benefits from Conservation Policies that Promote Carbon Sequestration in Agriculture: The Corn Belt CARD, Iowa State University Presented at the Forestry.
BACKRIVER TMDL PROJECT Technical Outreach Prepared by MDE/TARSA Prepared for the Baltimore Harbor Stakeholder Advisory Group September 10, 2002.
Assessing Alternative Policies for the Control of Nutrients in the Upper Mississippi River Basin Catherine L. Kling, Silvia Secchi, Hongli Feng, Philip.
Watershed Management Assessment Through Modeling: SALT and CEAP Dr. Claire Baffaut Water Quality Short Course Boone County Extension Office April 12, 2007.
BMP CHALLENGE Experience: Cannon River Watershed Partnership Information provided by: Dave Legvold Executive Director Cannon River Watershed Partnership.
La Moine River Ecosystem Partnership: Organizing for Success Dan Moorehouse & Jeff Boeckler.
1 Evaluating and Estimating the Effect of Land use Changed on Water Quality at Selorejo Reservoir, Indonesia Mohammad Sholichin Faridah Othman Shatira.
Lessons Learned from BMP evaluation studies in the nontidal streams and river in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Katie Foreman University of Maryland Center.
Patapsco/Back River SWMM Model Part I - Hydrology Maryland Department of the Environment.
Status of the CEAP National Assessment Robert Kellogg Jerry Lemunyon Natural Resources Conservation Service, USDA.
How Breakthroughs in Information Systems Can Impact Local Decisions Bruce Babcock Center for Agricultural and Rural Development Iowa State University.
Patapsco/Back River SWMM Model Part II – SWMM Water Quality Calibration Maryland Department of the Environment.
Redwood River TMDL Critique David De Paz, Alana Bartolai, Lydia Karlheim.
Timeline Impaired for turbidity on Minnesota’s list of impaired waters (2004) MPCA must complete a study to determine the total maximum daily load (TMDL)
Price Creek Watershed Project A joint project of the Iowa & Benton County Soil and Water Conservation Districts IOWATER Meeting – November 13, 2007.
Big Raccoon Creek Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting June 26, 2013.
Water Quality Monitoring in the Upper Illinois River Watershed and Upper White River Basin Project Brian E. Haggard University of Arkansas.
 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)  All dischargers over 1-acre must develop a SWPPP  6 major portions of every SWPPP Site Evaluation and.
Poplar River Sediment Source Assessment John L. Nieber Bruce N. Wilson Department of Bioproducts and Biosystems Engineering University of Minnesota July.
The Effect of Compost Application and Plowing on Phosphorus Runoff Charles S. Wortmann Department of Agronomy and Horticulture Nutrient Management for.
1 State Parks  Soil and Water Conservation  Natural Heritage Outdoor Recreation Planning  Land Conservation Dam Safety and Floodplain Management Chesapeake.
Edge of Field Monitoring in the Lake Champlain Basin of Vermont
National Assessment for Cropland. Analytical Approach Sampling and modeling approach based on a subset of NRI sample points. Farmer survey conducted to.
Precision Management beyond Fertilizer Application Hailin Zhang.
Nutrient Management Summary CNMP Core Curriculum Section 5 – Nutrient Management.
Prevention not Intervention Developing a Sound Response to Erosion and Sediment Control Problems through the Planning Process.
Lesson 2: Gimme a BMP!. Best Management Practices (BMPs) BMPs are ways to reduce the amount of water pollution caused by storm water runoff. -Rules put.
Farm Practices and Environmental Impacts Water Quality Area of Expertise Team.
Impacts of Livestock Waste on Surface Water Quality By the North Dakota Department of Health Division of Water Quality For the Livestock Manure Nutrient.
Human Impacts Part 2- Watersheds. What’s a Watershed? An area of land that drains into a common body of water.
Precipitation, Streamflow and a Look at Little Bear River Contaminants
Dave Clark and Michael Kasch
Brian Haggard Arkansas Water Resources Center University of Arkansas
Paper by: Bloniarz D. , M. Matteo, T
Total Maximum Daily Loads of Fecal Coliform for the Restricted Shellfish Harvesting/Growing Areas of the Pocomoke River in the Lower Pocomoke River Basin.
A Public Friendly Approach to Sharing Water Quality Data
Overview of US EPA & State Manure Management Regulations
Best Management Practices (BMPs)
Presentation transcript:

Identifying Critical Areas for BMP Applications

Critical Areas Those areas or sources where the greatest water quality improvement can be accomplished per dollar spent (Maas, et al., 1985). NOT just the source of the greatest loads!

Critical Area Selection Criteria N,P, Sediment, Pathogens Type and Severity of Water Resource Impairment Sedimentation or turbidity? Erosion Rate Useful to some degree for P Not so useful for N or pathogens Fertilizer Rates and Timing Timing of N more important than timing of P Soil test P Animal waste application areas Pathogen Source Magnitude Feedlots, cropland with manure, urban sources In-stream sources (AZ NMP)

Distance to Nearest Watercourse Delivery ratio varies with pollutant and path characteristics Distance to Impaired Water Resource Delivery ratio varies with pollutant and path characteristics Present Conservation Status How much improvement is possible? Critical Area Selection Criteria N,P, Sediment, Pathogens

How Can Monitoring Help? Type and Severity of Water Resource Impairment Discussed earlier Erosion Rate USLE and sediment delivery estimates Fertilizer Rates and Timing Survey of farmers and homeowners Soil sampling on farms and homes Pathogen Source Magnitude Windshield survey Check WWTP discharge records In an ideal project where there is plenty of time, the land inventory would be conducted first, and that information would help in selecting water quality monitoring sites, sample parameters, and sample timing (IDEM, 2003).

How Can Monitoring Help? Distance to Nearest Watercourse Edge-of-field grab samples at suspected major sources can yield concentration data Baseflow and runoff conditions Estimate flow? Distance to Impaired Water Resource Tributary grab samples Baseflow and runoff conditions Estimate flow for instantaneous load comparisons

How Can Monitoring Help? Present Conservation Status Farm survey SWCD and NRCS On-site evaluation Farm*A*Syst self-audits Inspections

How Can Modeling Help? Simple Models Limited to waterbodies where loadings can be aggregated over longer averaging periods Limited to gross loadings Need to create subwatersheds and model them to allow critical area delineation

How Can Modeling Help? Mid-Range Models Limited to waterbodies where loadings can be aggregated over longer averaging periods Daily/monthly load summaries Need to create subwatersheds and model them to allow critical area delineation Loads for different source categories

How Can Modeling Help? Comprehensive Watershed Models Include both landscape and receiving water simulation, BUT Calibration is required…AND Time-consuming…AND Requires greater experience

STEPL Estimates Pre-BMP and Post-BMP loads for N, P, BOD, and sediment By land use Doesn’t identify specific sources Lack of detail re: current BMP status and potential for change due to new/modified BMPs BE CAREFUL

References IDEM Indiana Watershed Planning Guide, Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Indianapolis, IN. Maas, R.P., M.D. Smolen, and S.A. Dressing Selecting critical areas for nonpoint-source pollution control, Journal of Soil & Water Conservation, 40(1):68-71.