ABET The Complete Report on Your Course. ABET OUTCOME CHECKLIST.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Assessment Report Computer Science School of Science and Mathematics Kad Lakshmanan Chair Sandeep R. Mitra Assessment Coordinator.
Advertisements

Keys to Success in Engineering Study
National Academic Reference Standards
For AS 229 (Environmental Technology). 1. A competent environmental technologist with strong understanding of fundamental scientific and technological.
Curriculum Maps Margaret Kasimatis, PhD VP for Academic Planning & Effectiveness.
Assessment of Undergraduate Programs Neeraj Mittal Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas.
CE 3372 Water Systems Design Lecture 001. Course Location Meet: 9:30-10:50AM, T-Th, CE Room 205 Instructor: T.G. Cleveland TA: P. Monaco Course Materials:
Graduate Expectations. Critical Thinking & Life Management. IBT graduates are expected to: identify and demonstrate the essential employability skills.
1 A pupil from whom nothing is ever demanded which he cannot do, never does all he can. John Stuart Mill.
1 UCSC Computer Engineering Objectives, Outcomes, & Feedback Tracy Larrabee Joel Ferguson Richard Hughey.
Computer Science Department Program Improvement Plan December 3, 2004.
1. An ability to:  Understand the academic requirements you need to obtain your degree  Calculate your GPA  Prepare a draft schedule 2.
Mohammad Alshayeb 19 May Agenda Update on Computer Science Program Assessment/Accreditation Work Update on Software Engineering Program Assessment/Accreditation.
ABET Engineering Criteria 2000 To maintain ABET accreditation, Engineering Departments must demonstrate that all of their graduates have the following.
DIPOL Quality Practice in Training at İstanbul Technical University Maritime Faculty Dr.Banu Tansel.
ABET Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
Capstone Design Project (CDP) Civil Engineering Department First Semester 1431/1432 H 10/14/20091 King Saud University, Civil Engineering Department.
Groundwater Hydraulics
Best Practices In Design Outcomes Of A Survey P. H. King, PhD, PE Joan Walker, PhD Vanderbilt University.
CHEN Program Assessment Advisory Board Meeting June 3 rd, 2012.
JIC ABET WORKSHOP No.4 Guidelines on: II Faculty Survey Questionnaire.
Educator Effectiveness Academy Day 1, Session 2. Participants will: review STEM Standards of Practice student proficiencies. analyze the STEM Standards.
GE105: Introduction to Engineering Design Course Information College of Engineering King Saud University Feb 1, 2012.
Department of Computing and Technology School of Science and Technology A.A.S. in Computer Aided Design Drafting (CADD) CIP Code Program Quality.
NMSU Pathways Workshop September 18-20, 2014 Design Thinking, Low Res Prototyping, Assessment and ABET Mashup.
ABET’s coming to Rose! Your involvement Monday, Nov 5, 2012.
Overview of the Department’s ABET Criterion 3 Assessment Process.
ABET Student Forum September 20, Review of the criterion Criterion 2: Objectives Criterion 3: Outcomes Criterion 5: Curriculum.
Industrial Engineering
CIRCUIT AND SYSTEMS SKEE /2014, Sem II Nik Din Muhamad Section 01 Bilik: P (MEK)
MANUFACTURING PROCESSES I IE 351 Lecture 1 Introduction to: »Class Operation, »Course Coverage, »Skill Expectations.
1 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering MDR (18 th -27 th November 2013) -MDR Deliverables clearly defined? -Individual team member MDR deliverables.
 Introduction Introduction  Contents of the report Contents of the report  Assessment : Objectives OutcomesObjectivesOutcomes  The data :
The Balance Between Theoretical and Practical Work Within Electrical and Computer Engineering Courses Dr. Bahawodin Baha March Development Partnerships.
EE Program Student Advising Prof. Michael Green These slides can be found at:
ABET 2000 Preparation: the Final Stretch Carnegie Institute of Technology Department Heads Retreat July 29, 1999.
EENG 4910/4990 Engineering Design Murali Varanasi September 02, 2009.
1 A pupil from whom nothing is ever demanded which he cannot do, never does all he can. John Stuart Mill.
Design of a Typical Course s c h o o l s o f e n g I n e e r I n g S. D. Rajan Professor of Civil Engineering Professor of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering.
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering MDR Report.
Copyright © 2011 by ABET, Inc. and TMS 1 December 2, 2008 ABET Update UMC Meeting April 6, 2015 San Francisco, CA Chester J. Van Tyne
Copyright © 2014 by ABET Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5 Charles Hickman Managing Director, Society, Volunteer and Industry Relations AIAA Conference.
HU113_Assignment31 HU113: Technical Report Writing Prof. Abdelsamie Moet Teaching Assistant: Mrs. Rana El-Gohary Fall 2012/13 Pharos University in Alexandria.
CISE IAB MeetingOctober 15, ABET Accreditation Brief history. –1980’s: faculty qualifications sufficed. –1990s: quality of courses, materials, and.
Preparing for ABET visit Prof. Dr. Lerzan Özkale Management Engineering Head of Department November 2010.
ENGINEERING ANALYSIS. WHAT IS ENGINEERING ANALYSIS? ABET Required Program Outcomes: (a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering.
1 Assessment of Undergraduate Programs Neeraj Mittal Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas (UTD) January 22, 2016.
Wilmer Arellano  Getting started  Syllabus  Objectives and Evaluation  Teams and Mentors  Topics Covered  Learning Outcomes  Exams Regulations.
EXPERT SYSTEM WEEK 1. C ATALOG D ESCRIPTION Knowledge Acquisition techniques, Knowledge representation, Analysis and Design of an ES, Reasoning strategies,
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING POLICIES THE WHAT, HOW AND WHY.
University of Utah Program Goals and Objectives Program Goals and Objectives Constituents U of U, COE, ASCE, IAB Constituents U of U, COE, ASCE, IAB Strategic.
Assessment of Industrial Internships Karyn Biasca.
Advanced Database Course Syllabus 1 Advanced Database System Lecturer : H.Ben Othmen.
Computer Security Course Syllabus 1 Computer Security Lecturer : H.Ben Othmen.
Engineering programs must demonstrate that their graduates have the following: Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) ETP 2005.
ABET ACREDITATION By: Elizabeth Rivera Oficina de Acreditación.
Funded by a grant from the National Science Foundation. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed are those of the authors and do.
By: Wilmer Arellano.  1. Form a team  2. Find a Team Leader  3. Find Three Potential Topics  4. Find a Mentor  5. Select a Topic.
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering ABET Outcomes - Definition Skills students have graduation.
Continuous Program Improvement
Lecture 1. Course Introduction
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
Class Agenda Capstone Design Project Process 10 min
Lecture 1. Course Introduction
Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5
Lecture 1. Course Introduction
Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas
Welcome W 1.2 Introduction to Engineering Design II
Development of ABET Syllabus
CE 220 Professionalism A pupil from whom nothing is ever demanded which he cannot do, never does all he can. John Stuart Mill.
Presentation transcript:

ABET The Complete Report on Your Course

ABET OUTCOME CHECKLIST

(ABET Outcome 3a: Ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering to solve problems). Students Apply mathematics, calculus and science knowledge to tool design, force, cutting power calculations and economics of metal cutting. Apply engineering material properties and stress- strain relationship to analyze stress/deformation in designing metal cutting tools. Work on a design project in which students show ability to apply principles of analysis and design across manufacturing area.

(ABET Outcome 3c: Ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs). Students Design a device (a metal cutting tool : for example broaching tool design), to perform a specific task. Deal with open-ended problems that require identification of the design goals and constraints, generation and exploration of alternative solutions. Use analytical tools to aid in the design process, select preferred concept and support final design.

(ABET Outcome 3d: Ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams). Students Work in 3-to 5-member teams to perform a semester-long design project. Participate in making decisions, elect a leader, discuss with team members, distribute the design tasks, and compromise on team project direction. Design and build a prototype to demonstrate its functionality and performance. Perform a group presentation at the end of the semester and write a group project report.

ABET Outcome 3g: Ability to communicate effectively) Students Make a brief presentation to class at the end of the term. Write a final report for their design project. Submittal organization, format, and technical writing were addressed in class. Class and studio discussions

( Outcome 3i: A recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning).  Students had to learn technical material on their own through library and internet research

(ABET Outcome 3g: Ability to communicate effectively) Make a brief presentation to class at the end of the term. Write a final report for their design project. Submittal organization, format, and technical writing were addressed in class. Class and studio discussions

Outcome 3k: Can use techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for practice Acquire skills in web-based research. Use word processing software for final project report. Use spreadsheet software for analytical and data analysis and for presentation of results. Use AutoCAD for drawing. Use power point to prepare oral presentation.

OUTCOME ANALYSIS Outcome 3a: Ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering to solve problems. Students demonstrated their ability to apply math, science, and engineering principles in 9 homework assignments, 2 midterms, and the final exam. Their performance in these assignments and exams was as follows: Homework – 70% of the students earned 70% or higher in homework scores. Midterm I – 60% of the students scored 70% or better in the first midterm. Midterm II – 75% of the students scored 70% or better in the second midterm. Final Exam – 70% of the students scored 70% or better in the final examination. Student Survey Results ( 20 responses)

Outcome 3g: Ability to communicate effectively. Student grades on specifically the written aspects of the project are not up to expectation due to their poor English language. The written submittals, while on average of good quality in terms of contents, were not at the high level of presentations.