FY 2000 System Studies Activities Farrokh Najmabadi VLT/FWP Meeting April 6-9, 1999 OFES Headquarters, Germantown Electronic copy:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project Cycle Management
Advertisements

Advancing Alternative Energy Technologies Glenn MacDonell Director, Energy Industry Canada Workshop on Alternatives to Conventional Generation Technologies.
Comments on Progress Toward and Opportunities for Attractive Magnetic Fusion Power Plants Farrokh Najmabadi FPA workshop Jan 23-25, 1999 Marina Del Rey,
Nuclear Energy University Programs NGNP Systems Analysis August 10, 2011 Hans Gougar.
Energy Grand Challenge - Wind Energy R&D Wind Energy Seminar Gallagher Estate 28 September 2010.
VLT Report the fusion trend line Stan Milora (ORNL) and Richard Nygren (SNL) FNST/PFC/MASCO Meeting Aug 2-6, UCLA.
Who will save the tokamak – Harry Potter, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Shaquille O’Neal or Donald Trump? J. P. Freidberg, F. Mangiarotti, J. Minervini MIT Plasma.
Continuous Value Enhancement Process
Plans for Socioeconomic Studies for FY01 Farrokh Najmabadi VLT PAC Meeting June 28-29, 2000 Oak Ridge National Laboratory Electronic copy:
Nuclear Energy University Programs MS-RC1 - Reactor Concepts RD&D August 10, 2011 Christopher Grandy Argonne National Laboratory.
EFDA Fusion Roadmap Status of implementation Francesco Romanelli EFDA Leader.
Environmental Sustainability in the Extractive Industry: The Case for Climate Change Mitigation Dr Uwem E. Ite.
Plans For ARIES-IFE Study Farrokh Najmabadi ARIES Conference Call May 17, 2000 Electronic copy: ARIES Web Site:
Overview of NSO and Advanced Design Studies Farrokh Najmabadi OFES Budget Meeting April 4-6, 2000 OFES Headquarters, Germantown Electronic copy:
Summary and Closing Remarks Farrokh Najmabadi University of California San Diego Presentation to: ARIES Program Peer Review August 18, 2000 UC San Diego.
System Studies Activities (FY 1999 & Beyond) Farrokh Najmabadi VLT PAC Meeting June 8 & 9, 1999 UC San Diego Electronic copy:
Potential Impacts of an Advanced Energy Portfolio Standard in Pennsylvania Ryan Pletka, P.E. Black & Veatch April 12, 2004 Supported by: Heinz Endowments.
Impact of Liquid Wall on Fusion Systems Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego NRC Fusion Science Assessment Committee November 17, 1999.
Status of Advanced Design Studies and Overview of ARIES-AT Study Farrokh Najmabadi US/Japan Workshop on Fusion Power Plant Studies & Advanced Technologies.
September 6-7, 2007/ARR 1 Power Management Technical Working Group: Status and Documentation A. René Raffray Mark Tillack University of California, San.
Overview of Advanced Design White Paper Farrokh Najmabadi Virtual Laboratory for Technology Meeting June 23, 1998 OFES Headquarters, Germantown.
ARIES Town Meeting On Physics of Compact Stellarators as Power Plants Farrokh Najmabadi and the ARIES Team September 15-16, 2005 Princeton Plasma Physics.
Study Project TRANS-CSP Trans-Mediterranean Interconnection for Concentrating Solar Power (WP03 Policies and Finance) Project for the Research & Development.
Summary Report of the Energy Issues Working Group Organizer: Farrokh Najmabadi Covenors:Jeffrey Freidberg, Wayne Meier, Gerald Navaratil, Bill Nevins,
Proposed Research for the ARIES Team for Farrokh Najmabadi, Mark Tillack for the ARIES Team Virtual Laboratory for Technology Meeting June 23,
US Fusion Power Plant Studies: Current Projects & Planned Activities Farrokh Najmabadi IEA ESE Executive Committee Meeting November 14, 2001 Tsukuba, Japan.
Highlights of ARIES-IFE Study Farrokh Najmabadi VLT Conference Call April 18, 2001 Electronic copy: ARIES Web Site:
Advanced Design Activities Farrokh Najmabadi Virtual Laboratory for Technology Meeting Dec. 10, 1998 VLT PAC Meeting, UCSD.
Thoughts on Fusion Nuclear Technology Development and the Role of ITER TBM Farrokh Najmabadi Prof. of Electrical Engineering Director of Center for Energy.
ARIES Project Meeting, L. M. Waganer, 3-4 April 2007 Page 1 Groundrules, Bases, and Definitions to Scope “The Next Step” L. Waganer The Boeing Company.
Role of ITER in Fusion Development Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA FPA Annual Meeting September 27-28, 2006 Washington,
Advanced Design Studies Plans Farrokh Najmabadi VLT PAC Meeting December 15 & 16, 1999 Sandia National Laboratory Albuquerque Electronic copy:
Copenhagen 29 June Energy and climate outlook: Renewables in a world and European perspective Peter Russ.
The current overall EU policy framework: Europe 2020 strategy, Innovation Union and Energy 2020 Strategy On March 2010, the Commission presented a Communication.
Ashley Finan, 2006 Page 1 Nuclear Energy and Oil Sands? Ashley Finan Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Nuclear Science & Engineering.
© OECD/IEA – 2011 Key Insights from IEA Indicator Analysis ENERGY INDICATORS Efficient Power Generation 2011 Roundtable 4: Efficient use of energy in the.
US Fusion Power Plant Studies: Current Projects & Planned Activities Farrokh Najmabadi IEA ESE Executive Committee Meeting March 14, 2001 Gaithersburg.
The Fission-Fusion Hybrid At last! A solution that has found a problem Jeff Freidberg MIT.
Opting for “Long Term Operations” Technical, economic and regulatory considerations MARC Conference June 8, 2010 Sean Bushart, EPRI Sr. Program Manager.
FUSION ENERGY A Compelling Opportunity for Alberta Allan Offenberger/Finance Committee Alberta/Canada Fusion Energy Program Presentation to Standing Committee.
Overview of the ARIES “Pathways” Program Farrokh Najmabadi UC San Diego US-Japan Workshop on Power Plants Study and Related Advanced Technologies with.
© OECD/IEA 2010 Energy Policies of the Czech Republic 2010 In-depth Review Energy Policies of the Czech Republic 2010 In-depth Review Prague, 7 October.
Sustainability at NMSU A part of the integrated planning process.
D29 - Roadmap for LFR development Davide Mattioli ENEA UTFISSM-PRONOC LEADER (Lead-cooled European Advanced DEmonstration Reactor) WP 1 - Task 1.1 Amsterdam.
Technologies of Climate Change Mitigation Climate Parliament Forum, May 26, 2011 Prof. Dr. Thomas Bruckner Institute for Infrastructure and Resources Management.
AES, ANL, Boeing, Columbia U., CTD, GA, GIT, LLNL, INEEL, MIT, ORNL, PPPL, SNL, SRS, UCLA, UCSD, UIIC, UWisc FIRE Collaboration FIRE.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Stan Milora, ORNL Director Virtual Laboratory for Technology 20 th ANS Topical Meeting on the Technology.
KEC MGA Committee, 2/21/2008 Midwestern Governor’s Association (MGA) Energy Security and Climate Stewardship Platform and Midwestern GHG Accord.
AES, ANL, Boeing, Columbia U., CTD, GA, GIT, LLNL, INEEL, MIT, ORNL, PPPL, SNL, SRS, UCLA, UCSD, UIIC, UWisc FIRE Collaboration FIRE.
Generation Portfolio Options Study Philip O’Donnell Manager, Generation Analysis 14 October 2009.
Identification of national S&T priority areas with respect to the promotion of innovation and economic growth: the case of Russia Alexander Sokolov State.
Atoms for Peace +50 Andy White – President & CEO, GE Nuclear Energy.
Senate Select Committee on Climate Change and AB 32 Implementation December 3, 2013.
Supply chains for the UK to 2050 A. Bauen (*), R. Slade, S. Jablonski and C. Panoutsou The context The aim of this work is to explore the potential for.
1 EPA’s Climate Change Strategy Robert J. Meyers Principal Deputy Assistant Administrator U.S. EPA, Office of Air and Radiation December 3, 2007.
Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Community Energy Strategic Planning Sarah Zaleski March 30, 2012 INSERT SEVERAL PROGRAM-RELATED PICTURES.
Weathering the Change Action Plan 2 ACT Climate Change Council 8 November 2011.
U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science 20 th Meeting of the IEA Large Tokamak ExCo, May th Meeting of the IEA Poloidal Divertor ExCo, May.
Summary and Closing Remarks Farrokh Najmabadi UC San Diego Presentation to ARIES Program Peer Review August 29, 2013, Washington, DC.
Briefing on the Pebble Bed Modular Reactor Portfolio Committee on Public Enterprises 18 February Top Secret - 1.
Advanced Design Activities in US Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego Japan/US Workshop on Fusion Power Plants & Related Technologies.
Comments on Fusion Development Strategy for the US S. Prager Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory FPA Symposium.
California Energy Commission Global Climate Change: Trends and Policy Issues Susan J. Brown California Energy Commission March 3, 2005.
Heat Network Demonstration SBRI: policy context & objectives for the competition Natalie Miles Heat Strategy and Policy (Heat Networks)
Environmental Management Division 1 NASA Headquarters Environmental Management System (EMS) Michael J. Green, PE NASA EMS Lead NASA Headquarters Washington,
US Participation in the
Integrated Distribution Planning Process
Advanced Design Activities in US
The Fuel Cycle Analysis Toolbox
TWG goals, approach and outputs
Presentation transcript:

FY 2000 System Studies Activities Farrokh Najmabadi VLT/FWP Meeting April 6-9, 1999 OFES Headquarters, Germantown Electronic copy: ARIES Web Site:

Program Elements Strategic planning and forecasting -- role of fusion energy in a sustainable global energy strategy. A new initiative in FY99 ($555k in FY99); FY00 proposal: $500k Power Plant Studies: National power plant studies team (ARIES). New projects started in 1/99 ($1,655k in FY99). FY00 proposal: $1,800k Pre-conceptual designs (analysis of critical issues) of advanced fusion concepts (no new studies in FY99). FY00 proposal: $100k * VLT director budget of $2,400k

Role of Fusion in a Sustainable Global Energy Strategy Objective: Assess the role of fusion energy in a long-term, sustainable global energy strategy, taking into account the portfolio of energy options available. Most of the socioeconomic studies were launched in FY 99:  Study of options to deploy large fusion power plant including hydrogen production and co-generation. (ORNL & Partners).  Establish the merits and address issues associated with fusion implementation (PPPL).  Macro-economics modeling of global energy market and role of fusion (PNL) (Continuation of previous work).  Comparison of various sources of energy based on equivalent CO 2 emission (U. Wisc.).

Socioeconomic Studies of Fusion Power (ORNL & Partners) Objective: An assessment of the projected competitiveness of future fusion-based electrical power generation with fission, fossil, and renewable electricity sources. –Principal Jerry Delene. –To be completed: 9/99. Objective: Study of options to deploy large fusion power plant including hydrogen production and co-generation. –Principals: Boeing, Center for Energy and Environment at Princeton University, Duke E&ES, TVA, and ORNL). –Completion date nominally 9/99, realistically 12/99.

Socioeconomic Studies of Fusion Power (PPPL) Objective: To establish the merits and address issues associated with fusion implementation. Focus: With potential implementation scenarios establish the: –Environmental impact of reduced CO2 emission, waste disposal, and waste recycling; –Resource needs of special materials and tritium; –Economics; –Potential role of fusion/fission combinations. To be completed: 9/99.

Socioeconomic Studies of Fusion Power (PNL) Objective: Establish economic benefit of fusion research and fusion energy using macroeconomic models. Focus: Economic impact on GNP and balance of trade using parametric variations of –Busbar cost of fusion electricity; –Time of introduction and growth of fusion electricity. Timeframe: on-going for several years.

Socioeconomic Studies of Fusion Power (U. of Wisconsin) Objective: To calculate the energy payback ratio and CO 2 gas emission rates from fusion and natural gas electrical power generating stations. Plans for FY 99: To calculate the energy payback ratio and CO 2 emission rates for DT fusion and comparison to coal, LWR, and wind electrical generating facilities. –To be completed: 9/99 Plan for FY 00: To apply the same analysis techniques to natural gas power plants and compare them to fusion, fission, coal, and wind power plants.

Socioeconomic Studies of Fusion Power VLT PAC Review (12/98) “At present, studies of the role of fusion energy are limited to a handful of disparate tasks performed by fusion researchers. The VLT can perform the much needed function of formulating a coherent plan to integrate fusion energy into the planning and vision of the larger energy research community. For impact beyond our own community, we recommend that a substantial amount of the research be contracted to researchers from outside the fusion program. Naturally, a measured involvement of fusion researchers is necessary as a liaison between outside researchers and the fusion program.”

Socioeconomic Studies of Fusion Power Plans for FY 2000 There is a need to make a case for fusion energy in the context of a sustainable global energy future. In FY99, $555k is allocated to this research. Some of these projects will be completed in 9/99. Per PAC’s recommendation, a planning group will be formed to draft “a coherent plan to integrate fusion energy into the planning and vision of the larger energy research community.” This plan will be submitted to the VLT PAC for the June meeting. Target funding for this research in FY00 is set at $500k. Additional resources may be needed if outside researchers are contracted for this work.

National Power Plant Studies Program Initiated New Projects in 1/99 Proposed topics were developed under the VLT framework and discussion with physics and technology program leaders* Advanced ARIES-RS (45% of effort) Fusion Neutron Source(45% of effort) Support for on-going examination of fusion systems as producers of hydrogen(5% of effort) Impact of ferromagnetic material on plasma performance(5% of effort) Support for proof-of-principle concepts

Advanced ARIES-RS Study ARIES-RS is the vision for the advanced tokamak program and is used to plan R&D directions. Advanced ARIES-RS study assesses “how good” advanced tokamaks can be using higher performance physics (more optimized profiles, reduced current drive power, etc.) and higher performance technologies (high- temperature superconductors, SiC blankets with liquid metal breeder/coolant, etc.) This is an important study as the fusion program debates the future of tokamak research and its balance against other elements of the program.

Advanced ARIES-RS Study -- Tasks Systems StudiesUCSD Physics: –MHD and leadPPPL –Current driveUCSD –Transport, DivertorGA Engineering –Magnets (high T c )MIT, PPPL, ORNL –BlanketUCSD, ANL –Neutronics and shieldingU. Wisc. –SafetyINEEL –Configuration & maintenanceUCSD

Scoping studies have indicated that fusion neutron sources may lead to attractive, near term products for the fusion program leading to new clients and to additional resources for fusion:  Typical applications (~ n/s ) : Transmutation of fission waste; Hybrids for fuel and/or energy production; Fusion materials and engineering testing.  Post-cold-war additions: Tritium production; Burning of plutonium from dismantled weapons.  Recent application (~ n/s ) Radioisotope production; Medical radiotherapy; Detection of explosives. Fusion Neutron Source Study

Metrics to evaluate the potential of a fusion neutron source:  Cost (capital cost, neutron cost in $/mole)  Total number of moles of neutrons produced per year;  Value of the product;  Magnitude of the extrapolation from the current physics and technology databases;  Complexity of the system;  Environmental, safety and health effects;  Timeframe and cost of the development plan;  Political issues associated with certain applications (e.g., association with nuclear weapons, etc.) Study will be performed in two phases. Concept definition phase would be completed by 9/99 with a preliminary report for the snowmass meeting. A detailed design will be launched assuming favorable results.

Fusion Neutron Source Study has focused on high-strength (~ n/s) applications -- Tasks Continued assessments to identify the most useful application and product (Boeing); Continued interactions with the fission and accelerator communities to understand the potential of reactors and accelerators for neutron source applications (RPI, INEEL, U.Wisc., ANL, UCSD); System studies to assess the performance/metrics of fusion- based neutron sources for both the D-T and D-D-T fuel cycles (UCSD, Team input);

Fusion Neutron Source Study has focused on high-strength (~ n/s) applications -- Tasks A compilation and assessment of the engineering and nuclear performance of the various concepts proposed for neutron- source applications including fusion, fission and accelerator systems (UCSD, U.Wisc., ANL, TSI); An assessment of the environmental, safety and licensing implications of fusion neutron-source applications such as plutonium disposition and radioactive waste transmutation (INEEL, Team input); Assessment of the political issues associated with certain applications (e.g., association with nuclear weapons, attacks from environmental and/or fission communities, etc.)

National Power Plant Studies Program VLT PAC Review (12/98) “The ARIES program has performed a series of key tokamak system studies, and is a valuable resource for continued evaluation of power plants based on various fusion concepts. As new studies are initiated, we recommend that they be planned and executed as a partnership between Aries team members and advocates from the fusion concept under study.” VLT PAC has agreed to help define new studies.

National Power Plant Studies Program Plans for FY 2000 The original planning for the 2-year study was based on $2,000k per. In FY99, $1,655k is allocated to this research resulting in the stretching of the first year schedule and reduction in scope. Proposed funding of $1,800k in FY00 allows completion in the two-year period (at reduced scope). The stellarator and MTF proof-of-principle program planning committees have asked the ARIES Team for help in their program. Additional resources can be used in this area and will be highly leveraged.