Briefing Sessions for Annual Monitoring of Delivery of Taught Pathways in 2009/10 Autumn 2010 WELCOME www.anglia.ac.uk/qad.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quality and Standards Framework – Collaborative Provision December 2008 Janet Pearce, University Quality Officer.
Advertisements

Development of HEAR at Ulster Background to HEAR Content of HEAR Challenges in development Academic performance (4.3) Additional information (6.1) Roll.
Student Engagement: Indicators 5, 6 and 7 Dr Sarah Williamson Head of Learning and Teaching Support and Sarah Ingram Student Voice Officer
Learning from ELIR: piloting a new approach Thelma Barron, Assistant Director, QAA Scotland.
UK Quality Code Guide: Further Education & Colleges The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. Registered charity numbers and SC
EXTERNAL EXAMINERS’ INDUCTION 20 NOVEMBER 2013.
HEA STEM: Update of HEA activities in Physics Paul Yates, Discipline Lead for the Physical Sciences.
Sharing Good Practice in Quality
BA (Hons) Primary Education Year Three School Based Training Briefing
UWE Bristol External Examiner Annual Reporting Rebecca Smith, Curriculum Enhancement Manager
Quality Enhancement and Communications The development and delivery of a research active curriculum will be promoted as a core and high quality activity.
Student Induction Student Representation
School College Work Initiative: Phase May 11, 2006.
ACADEMIC INFRASTRUCTURE Framework for Higher Education Qualifications Subject Benchmark Statements Programme Specifications Code of Practice (for the assurance.
CRICOS Provider No 00025B Strategies for enhancing teaching and learning: Reflections from Australia Merrilyn Goos Director Teaching and Educational Development.
Review How we bring the Review systems together. Linking AHC and SAER Year 1Year 2Year 3Year 4Year 5 AHC SAER Year 6Year 7Year 8Year 9 Year10 AHC SAER.
Window-1: [ Self-Assessment Exercise
UEL Guidelines for External Examiners Philip Brimson Quality Manager (Validation & Review)
Personal Development Planning Margaret Harrison Associate Dean of Academic Frameworks.
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
A MEMBER OF THE RUSSELL GROUP PGR PERIODIC REVIEW Sara Crowley
Designing for inclusion and the role of the disability practitioner Caroline Davies and Tina Elliott IMPACT Associates Eileen Laycock, Disability Manager.
The Student Experience Project Overview for Kosovo Higher Education visit Mark Wilkinson October 2014.
Implementation & Evaluation Regional Seminar ‘04 School Development Planning Initiative “An initiative for schools by schools”
FOLLOW UP SITE VISIT Dr Robert Schofield Dr Arthur Brown Advisors to the Quality Assurance and Accreditation Project Republic of Egypt.
Partnership Forum 2014 Welcome. What’s New in the QA Office? Two Dedicated Collaborative Provision Staff Tina Hagger – New Collaborative Provision
Heads of Departments of Mathematical Sciences Conference The HEA and Future Development in Learning and Teaching Professor Craig Mahoney Chief Executive,
Prof. György BAZSA, former president Hungarian Accreditation Committee (HAC) CUBRIK Workshop IV Beograd, 13 March, 2012 European Standards and Guidelines.
Continuous Improvement Monitoring (CIM) Collaborative Partner Forum Awareness Session June 2015.
Student Education Service QUALITY ASSURANCE QAA Update HEFCE consultation on future of quality assessment arrangements QAA Quality Code Alignment - programme.
Validation, Annual Review and Periodic Subject Review at the University of Northampton Dr Anne Craven, Head of Quality and Academic Partnerships 25 April.
Welcome The changing face of quality assurance Hilary Placito (Director of Quality and Academic Support) January 2013.
Monitoring and Evaluation Harvey Hurree David /londonmetuni londonmet.ac.uk.
Foundation Degrees Foundation Degree Forward Lichfield Centre The Friary Lichfield Staffs WS13 6QG — Tel: Fax: —
Kevan MA Gartland Special Advisor & Professor of Biological Sciences Lesley McAleavy Development Officer (Engage) GCU Feedback Strategy.
Collaborative Programmes Annual and Periodic Quality Assurance Arrangements Rebecca Broome Quality Management Division November 2007.
Bologna – a top-down and bottom-up process at the University of Helsinki? Markku Kivinen Director Aleksanteri-insitute.
UEL Guidelines for External Examiners Philip Brimson Quality Manager (Validation & Review)
International Conference on Enhancement and Innovation in Higher Education Crowne Plaza Hotel, Glasgow 9-11 June 2015 Welcome.
On-line briefing for Program Directors and Staff 1.
Learning and Teaching Forum Higher Education Review - Update 31 May, 2016Gwendolen Bradshaw1.
NSS as a Quality Enhancement Tool University of Strathclyde A case study Rowena Kochanowska and Anna Highmore.
Quality Assurance Dr Christopher Stevens
Directorate of Academic Affairs and Registrar Quality and Qualifications Ireland (QQI) Annual Institutional Report (AIR) Reporting Period: 1 January –
Briefing Michael Mulvey PhD Director of Academic Affairs and Registrar
Review and Enhancement Process reports Ruth Carter.
SIF II Briefing Session 21 st September Briefing Session Content SIF Cycle I – overview Funding and arising issues SIF Cycle II – Process for evaluation.
ACADEMIC PROMOTIONS Promotions Criteria Please note, these slides only contain a summary of the promotions information – full details can be found.
Regional Hubs An exciting new development for the profession Bryony Simpson, Chair Kamini Gadhok, CEO.
European Social Fund Promoting improvement 15 th March 2016 Nigel Finch.
Welcome on behalf of the Higher Education Academy Jane Priestley Academic Lead Health Care.
Using the STEM learning impact evaluation process Also known as The Impact Toolkit (ITK)
QAA COLLABORATIVE PROVISION AUDIT DRAFT REPORT. QAA CPA Process Submission by the University of Self Evaluation Document (SED) (December 2005) Selection.
Denise Kirkpatrick Pro Vice-Chancellor The Open University, UK Quality Assurance in Distance Education.
Queen’s Teaching Awards QUB Teaching Awards Aims of the Briefing Session To raise awareness of the Queen’s Teaching Awards Scheme To encourage colleagues.
Teaching Enhancement Project Funding
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
UCL Annual Student Experience Review
Queen’s Teaching Awards 2017
Quality Assurance and Enhancement at The University of Edinburgh
SPHERE Study Visit: University of Edinburgh (October 2017)
Quality and Standards An introduction.
The view from the ‘regulator’
Governance and leadership roles for equality and diversity in Colleges
Roles and Responsibilities of an External Examiner
Internal Quality Assurance in Higher Education in Europe
Embedding equality and diversity in assessment and feedback policy and practice Helen Duncan, Equalities and Diversity Adviser Keith Smyth, Professor.
Periodic Developmental Reviews (PDR)
Quality Assurance and Enhancement
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
Presentation transcript:

Briefing Sessions for Annual Monitoring of Delivery of Taught Pathways in 2009/10 Autumn 2010 WELCOME

The Key Focal Points maintenance of Anglia Ruskin’s academic standards the extent of student achievement of the intended learning outcomes the student experience and quality of educational support to students action taken to enhance and improve curriculum delivery, and future actions identified the identification of good practice in learning, teaching and assessment Para 7.1, Senate Code of Practice on the Approval, Annual Monitoring & Periodic Review of Taught Pathways Writing the Report: Enhancement and Information Gathering

deliberate steps at institutional level to improve the quality of learning opportunities developmental opportunities in a systematic and strategic manner – not accidental ‘planned approaches’ and ‘a process rather than an outcome’ Therefore it is a deliberate and strategic process but features of good practice do not necessarily evidence an enhancement strategy Enhancement is…

“a method, strategy, system, procedure or process, which has, over an appropriate period of time, resulted in improved academic standards, an enhanced quality of education and/or an improved level of service to stakeholders (eg: students, staff, external examiners, collaborative partners, employers etc.) and which can, when appropriately adapted, be implemented in other areas of the institution.” Anglia Ruskin’s Definition of Good Practice

Examples highlighted from delivery in 2008/09 included: Provision of a Dissertation Support group for students (ALSS; Languages & Intercultural Communication) Introduction of a mentoring scheme for Year 1 MA students by Year 2 students (ALSS; Music Therapy) Wider adoption of explicit marking schemes and an improving speed of return of marked work (AIBS; Postgraduate pathways) Development of an online virtual Freshers’ Week (FHSC; Radiography) Identification of areas within placements where support and adjustments can be made for students with learning disabilities (FHSC; Acute Care Pre-Registration) Introduction of weekly feedback to students which identifies recurring themes and addresses them before the next lecture (FST; Forensic Science & Chemistry)

External examiners reports and other feedback External panel members for approval events PSRBs and related agendas Employers (or employability) and related agendas including placement/work-based learning National Student Survey (NSS) National developments in discipline; HEA Subject Centre and related agendas Information Gathering External Reference Points

Student Module Evaluation Questionnaires Student involvement in Programme Subcommittees Curriculum Management Committee at partner institutions Student views at Faculty Learning & Teaching Subcommittee Anglia Ruskin Student Barometer Student Achievement – standard and exceptional (success stories) Graduates (First Destinations, Success Stories) Internal Reference Points: Students

Discipline Network Groups Faculty Learning, Teaching and Assessment Strategy Faculty/Department priorities (especially those linked to the Corporate Plan) Staff Development policies Research (discipline-based and pedagogic) Staff Reward policies (sabbaticals, Learning & Teaching Fellowships, promotions, readerships, professorships) (Inter)national standing of staff (external examinerships, (inter)national committees/ journals etc); staff success stories Sharing / Dissemination of Good Practice Internal Reference Points: Staff

The Annual Monitoring Template

The Action Plan it can include actions relevant to individual pathways as well as actions required at Programme level or higher it must respond to external examiners’ reports, even if action already completed it should include any outstanding actions from previous year

S pecific M easurable A greed R ealistic T imebound S.M.A.R.T.

What has been achieved since last year? What issues are still outstanding and why? What are the main issues from 2009/10 which require action in 2010/11? Who is responsible for addressing these issues? Set realistic timescales – can be beyond 2010/11 Who will monitor progress? Drawing Up the Action Plan

Academic Office Annual Monitoring web pages Extract of web page: Annual Monitoring of Pathways Delivered in 2009/10 The process for monitoring of taught pathways delivered in the 2009/10 is now underway. Templates for the main Annual Monitoring Report are available below together with other supporting information and guidance: Annual Monitoring Report Template Guidelines to completing the Annual Monitoring Report Aide Memoire Cover Memo for Annual Monitoring Process - June 2010 Key Deadlines for the Annual Monitoring Process