Modeling TKR Readout Effects Part 2 Leon R. Analysis Group 12 September 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GAME:IT Junior Learning Game Maker: The Score Tab.
Advertisements

STAR Status of J/  Trigger Simulations for d+Au Running Trigger Board Meeting Dec5, 2002 MC & TU.
Dec/02/04 Su DongCaltech Trigger/DAQ/Online workshop1 Level 1 Trigger: Introduction L1 trigger objects and strategy Implementation features L1 composition.
Giovanni Petri University of Pisa/INFN Pisa/SLAC 29 August 2005 Study of TEM errors.
Bill Atwood, Dec GLAST 1 GLAST Energy or Humpty-Dumpty’s Revenge A Statement of the Problem Divide and Conquer strategy Easiest: Leakage (Depth)
1 Study of the Tail Catcher Muon Tracker (TCMT) Scintillator Strips and Leakage with Simulated Coil Rick Salcido Northern Illinois University For CALICE.
Bad Strips for DC2 Leon R. Calibration and Analysis Mtg July 11, 2005.
Surplus Hits Ratio Leon R. C&A Meeting Oct. 31, 2001.
GLAST LAT ProjectIA Workshop 6 – Feb28,2006 Preliminary Studies on the dependence of Arrival Time distributions in the LAT using CAL Low Energy Trigger.
GLAST LAT Project Apr 1, 2005 E. do Couto e Silva 1/31 Overview of End to End Runs Eduardo do Couto e Silva April 1, 2005 ( not it is not a joke, we finally.
High-Multiplicity Events Analysis Group March 28, 2005 Leon R.
GLAST LAT Project Instrument Analysis Meeting– May 27, 2005 Hiro Tajima, TKR Bad Strips 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: TKR Bad strips analysis update Hiro.
S. Ritz1 Checking Out What is Checked In  Need to optimize balance of checking between users and developers. –infuse more of a culture of detailed checking.
1 GEOMETRY FOR TRACKER Eduardo do Couto e Silva - 2/11/00 (drawings are NOT to scale) 1 - List of Figures 2 - Top view of tray with 5 x 5 detectors 3 -
TkrRecon Status Perugia Software Workshop May, 2003.
TkrRecon Reorganization Update Analysis Group Meeting Nov 22, 2004 Introduction Overview of the new TkrRecon TDS Classes Overview of changes in the TkrRecon.
GLAST LAT Project July 19, 2005 E. do Couto e Silva 1/17 Science Verification Analysis and Calibration GLAST Large Area Telescope Eduardo do Couto e Silva.
Loops Repeat after me …. Loops A loop is a control structure in which a statement or set of statements execute repeatedly How many times the statements.
GLAST LAT Readout Electronics Marcus ZieglerIEEE SCIPP The Silicon Tracker Readout Electronics of the Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope Marcus.
1 Initial Tracking Tests of DHC Tower Update - 09/24/2003 Kurt Francis, Donna Kubik - Northern Illinois University.
GLAST LAT Project Analysis Meeting March 22, 2004 E. do Couto e Silva 1/8 LAT Instrument Test Analysis Eduardo do Couto e Silva March 23, 2004.
Modeling TKR Readout Effects Leon R. Analysis Group 14 March 2005.
Surplus Hits Ratio, etc. Leon R. C&A Meeting &
GLAST LAT ProjectIA Workshop 6 – Feb27,2006 E. do Couto e Silva 1 Introduction to Instrument Workshop 6 Eduardo do Couto e Silva Feb 27, 2006.
TriggerLatchingEffLAT_ ppt1 Status report of overall Trigger and Latching Efficiencies study Instrument Analysis meeting, May 13, 2005 Tsunefumi.
CC ANALYSIS STUDIES Andy Blake Cambridge University Fermilab, September 2006.
Conservation of Energy November The conservation of energy.  In a closed system, energy is neither created nor destroyed. Energy simply changes.
Approved Plots from CMS First Beam Runs 2-October-2008.
Effect of the Shape of the Beampipe on the Luminosity Measurement September 2008 Iftach Sadeh Tel Aviv University DESY.
Monte Carlo Comparison of RPCs and Liquid Scintillator R. Ray 5/14/04  RPCs with 1-dimensional readout (generated by RR) and liquid scintillator with.
Insert using Linear Hashing h H level (n) = level+1 bits of nLevel = 0, next = 7 Insert 2, h 0 (2) = 0 initial 4 = 100, so h 0 (4) = 0 7 = 111,
11 Sep 2009Paul Dauncey1 TPAC test beam analysis tasks Paul Dauncey.
BesMUC Reconstruction Current Status You zhengyun, Mao yajun School of Physics, PKU
Update on Material Studies - Progress on Linearity using calib-hits (very brief) - Revisiting the material problem: - a number of alternative scenarios.
AND/OR - Are MC and Data (in)consistent? - further analysis and new measurements to do - Effects on inefficiency evaluation 1 G. Martellotti 21/05/2015.
 Next  Back  Exit  Explanation/Hint  Practice Game Hint.
Pixel Offline Study Jianchun Wang Syracuse University 11/05/04, Pixel testbeam meeting.
© Imperial College LondonPage 1 Tracking & Ecal Positional/Angular Resolution Hakan Yilmaz.
1 BFEM Trigger Diagnostics Mar 12, 2002 Tsunefumi Mizuno Note: For reference, this document includes some works already reported (pages 2-5 and 7). The.
Hycal Energy Resolution, Timing, &Trigger Efficiency, A cumulative study. Chris Mauney.
The High Performance Simulation Project Status and short term plans 17 th April 2013 Federico Carminati.
CALOR April Algorithms for the DØ Calorimeter Sophie Trincaz-Duvoid LPNHE – PARIS VI for the DØ collaboration  Calorimeter short description.
D. Jason Koskinen FNAL Collaboration mtg. 10/ Near Detector Efficiency.
GLAST LAT Project CU Beam Test Workshop 3/20/2006 C. Sgro’, L. Baldini, J. Bregeon1 Glast LAT Calibration Unit Beam Test Status Report on Online Monitor.
EMR detector lying beam-face up in Geneva workshop.
1. Last measurement of the distances between schools gave following results: G.Ferraris – A.Volta 1.41 km A.Volta – M.D’Azeglio 1.15 km G.Ferraris – M.D’Azeglio.
22 January 2009 David1 Look at dead material and fake MET in Jx samples mc08 10 TeV simulations, release J0 to J6 are tag s479_r586, ‘ideal geometry’
HBD Status Report from Run 9 Craig Woody BNL DC Meeting July 8, 2009.
Scan Rules Introduction –Overview –Justification –Approach Neutrino Event Type Assignment –Strategy –Muon-Flavor Reaction (mu) Type –Electron-Flavor Reaction.
Search for active neutrino disappearance using neutral-current interactions in the MINOS long-baseline experiment 2008/07/31 Tomonori Kusano Tohoku University.
General Tracker Meeting: Greg Iles4 December Status of the APV Emulator (APVE) First what whyhow –Reminder of what the APVE is, why we need it and.
Mark Dorman Separation Of Charged Current And Neutral Current Events In The MINOS Far Detector Using The Hough Transform Mark Dorman 16/12/04.
Problem of the Day Problem of the Day Geometry Squares next.
A Simple Monte Carlo to understand Cerenkov photons propagation and light collection in a single crystal equipped with two PMs Alessandro Cardini / INFN.
20 April 2007MICE Tracker Phone Meeting1 Analysis of cosmic/self-triggerd data of station 5 Hideyuki Sakamoto MICE Tracker Phone Meeting 20 th April 2007.
First Look at Housekeeping Data
Instrument Analysis Workshop 2
Start on the corner of your picture *(Not the corner of the paper)
Insert using Linear Hashing
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
Overview of Instrument Analysis Effort
Monitoring SCT Efficiency and Noise
Rick Salcido Northern Illinois University For CALICE Collaboration
Imaging crystals with TKR
Aim: How do we explain conservation of energy?
The TOTEM T2 Telescope based on triple-GEM chambers
Studies of the Time over Threshold
BesMUC Reconstruction Algorithm
Rick Salcido Northern Illinois University For CALICE Collaboration
Presentation transcript:

Modeling TKR Readout Effects Part 2 Leon R. Analysis Group 12 September 2005

Truncation in each plane <= n1hits<=n2 hits <= m1 hits<= m2 hits Only the first m1,2 or n1,2 hits are kept, where m, n <= 64 The limit is adjustable by plane and end Now also adjustable in Simulation

On each cable Buffer There are 8 cables on each tower. Each cable reads out one-half of one face of every other tray. No more than 128 hits can be stored in each cable buffer. The hits are read into the buffer from the bottom up, and from low to high strip number on each side (Now in MC) Buffer

Topology of Truncation CC Truncation RC Truncation

An Air Shower (real data) In x view, hits at top and bottom of shower are mostly on different cables. In y view, they are on the same cables, and the top hits are lost.. Pink squares mark truncated ends.

Another real event! Another real event! Diagnostic info says every plane is truncated to 64 at both ends… Not much to go on!

Recon Strategy (New) For each event, we deduce which planes have potentially overflowed by counting the remaining hits. (Note: No separate indication exists in the data to flag events which overflow the buffers.) This information is stored in the TDS. PatRec looks at this information when it encounters a plane with no hit. –If the missing hit is “excused,” patrec continues to the next plane. Other reasons are also checked. (See next slide) –If the hit is unexcused, gap counters are incremented, and when a certain number is reached, the track is declared found as is.

Reasons for excused absences The missing hit is excused if the extrapolated track passes –through a failed plane –outside active area of tower –through a gap in a plane –through a region made insensitive by truncation –near one or more dead strips. The tests are performed in the order shown (in approximate order of decreasing probability).

FRED displays truncated regions In order to generate this picture, I set the RC buffer size to 2, and the CC buffer size to 7 Truncated regions But no good way to look at really big events …

Rough test of Effect of Truncation Source is 1000 all_gammas between 100 and 300 GeV, in 3 configurations: No truncation Standard truncation Simple tailoring: All RC buffers set to 14 (14*9 = 126 < 128)

Result: 292 Triggers nTracks>0DirErr<0.1DirErr<0.005mean No truncation Standard Tailored No obvious problem caused by truncation!