Good & Bad Websites

From WEB 1. Submit one bad or ugly web site or web interface. This is ugly website because there are too many colors on this page that is alike. I’m color blind, so the background and the text look very similar. So I had a hard time trying to read and navigate the page.

From AU/AU community 1. Submit one bad or ugly web site or web interface. This website is an ugly because there is too must stuff on this page. There is a lot of texts and too many pictures that is trying to show all at once. It would be a good site if Auburn try and stop showing all of that texts and pictures.

Bad Websites This website is bad because it didn’t fit correctly in my browser window. Also it uses more then two font styles and some text is placed against non-contrasting images.

The website has a funny intro page. The actual content in it looks horrible and they use way to many images to make up their logo.

A very poor designed website would be the tiger transit website. The first thing I noticed was that the front page of the site contained to much text that was unrelated. This gives the webpage a cluttered look. A good percentage of the text that was on the front page was recent new articles. I think they should remove those articles and put them on the news page.I would also remove the transit schedule from the front page they should have that on separate page with a link pointing to it on the side menu this would also add free space. Another problem that I noticed was the body text and the link text having similar font color.

This website was another poorly designed website. It contained two navigation menus one at the top and one at the bottom. The two menus also contain some of the same links so you have repetitive information and the bottom menu is not that noticeable. On the front page there is a picture in the middle that changes into another picture if you rollover it with your mouse this gives the user the idea that this picture might be a picture link. Another design flaw was the pictures on the site did not contain alternate text for people with disabilities.