Linda R. Coney – 24th April 2009 Online Reconstruction & a little about Online Monitoring Linda R. Coney 18 August, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MAUS Update Adam Dobbs, MICE Project Board, 16 th April 2015.
Advertisements

MICE Beam Loss vs Particle Rate Adam Dobbs, ISIS Meeting, 18 th December 2009.
MICE Particle Rate and ISIS Beam Loss Adam Dobbs, Target – ISIS Meeting, 17 th September 2010.
Status of the MICE SciFi Simulation Edward McKigney Imperial College London.
30 March Global Mice Particle Identification Steve Kahn 30 March 2004 Mice Collaboration Meeting.
Linda R. Coney – 24th April 2009 MOM Update Linda R. Coney 21 September, 2009.
Data Quality Assurance Linda R. Coney UCR CM26 Mar 25, 2010.
Linda R. Coney – 24th September 2009 MOM Update End of Sept Run Linda R. Coney 05 October, 2009.
Sci Fi Simulation Status Malcolm Ellis MICE Meeting Osaka, 2 nd August 2004.
Online Reconstruction Update Linda R. Coney UCR Mar 25, 2010.
1 Online data quality and monitoring M. Ellis Daresbury DAQ Meeting 31 st August 2005.
Global Particle Identification Software Requirements Steve Kahn Mice Collaboration Meeting 31 March 2004.
Online Reconstruction Update Linda R. Coney UCR Dec 17, 2009.
1 G4MICE downstream distributions G4MICE plans Rikard Sandström Universite de Geneve MICE collaboration meeting 27/6-05.
Y. Karadzhov MICE MICO First EMR Plots 1.EMR detector has been successfully incorporated in the MICE DAQ system. 2.First 3 days of data taking in MICE.
March 31, Status of the TOF, Ckov and Virtual Detector Packages in G4Mice Steve Kahn Brookhaven National Laboratory Mice Collaboration Meeting March.
MICE: The International Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment Diagnostic Systems Tracker Cherenkov Detector Time of Flight Counters Calorimeter Terry Hart.
1 Analysis code for KEK Test-Beam M. Ellis Daresbury Tracker Meeting 30 th August 2005.
Linda R. Coney – 24th April 2009 Online Monitoring and Reconstruction Linda R. Coney 4 June, 2009.
Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 1 Absolute Time Calibration Method General description of the TOF DAQ setup For the TOF Data Acquisition.
1 G4MICE Analysis of KEK Test Beam Aron Fish Malcolm Ellis CM15 10th June 2006.
1 G4MICE Malcolm Ellis SciFi Tracker Meeting, KEK Thursday 31st March 2005.
MICE Online Linda R. Coney UCR MICE CM30 Oxford July 2011.
1 M. Bonesini - CM 25 RAL 5/11/09 PID status report M. Bonesini Sezione INFN Milano Bicocca.
Software and Computing towards Step IV David Colling With special thanks to Chris Rogers, Chris Tunnell, Linda Coney and Antony Wilson and the rest of.
MICE CM26 March '10Jean-Sebastien GraulichSlide 1 Detector DAQ Issues o Achievements Since CM25 o DAQ System Upgrade o Luminosity Monitors o Sequels of.
Software Summary 1M.Ellis - CM23 - Harbin - 16th January 2009  Four very good presentations that produced a lot of useful discussion: u Online Reconstruction.
Physics Program and Runs: Autumn 2011 & Step IV V. Blackmore MICE Project Board, 08/03/12.
Emittance measurement: ID muons with time-of-flight Measure x,y and t at TOF0, TOF1 Use momentum-dependent transfer matrices to map  path Assume straight.
Offline Software Summary 1M.Ellis - CM25 - 6th November 2009  Release Schedule  Simulation and Analysis Update  Detector software: u CKOV u EMR u KL.
MICE CM25 Nov 2009Jean-Sebastien GraulichSlide 1 Detector DAQ Issues o Achievements Since CM24 o Trigger o Event Building o Online Software o Front End.
TOF Meeting, 9 December 2009, CERN Chiara Zampolli for the ALICE-TOF.
Simulation & Reconstruction Durga Rajaram IIT, Chicago MICE Project Board 29 April 2014.
ICHEP 2012 Melbourne, 7 July 2012 Paul Soler on behalf of the MICE Collaboration The MICE Beam Line Instrumentation (Trackers and PID) for precise Emittance.
Sci-Fi Tracker: Progress Report Malcolm Ellis, MICE Video Conference Wednesday 6 th October 2004.
MICE CM June 2009Jean-Sebastien GraulichSlide 1 Online Summary o Achievements Since CM23 o Control Room o Controls o Detector DAQ o Open Issues o Summary.
Software Status  Last Software Workshop u Held at Fermilab just before Christmas. u Completed reconstruction testing: s MICE trackers and KEK tracker.
1M. Ellis - MICE VC - 1st November 2007 Cosmic Ray Test Preparations  The cosmic ray test was initially planned to be held in R12, but this proved to.
MICE FAC Alain Blondel 21 september   MICE The International Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment BRIEF STATUS OF MICE.
11 Nov 2008PC Analysis PC Schedule 2008 Tuesdays fortnightly 9 September  23 September  2 October  CM22  11 November  25 November 9 December.
January 31, MICE DAQ MICE and ISIS Introduction MICE Detector Front End Electronics Software and MICE DAQ Architecture MICE Triggers Status and Schedule.
Online Reconstruction 1M.Ellis - CM th October 2008.
1 KEK test-beam software progress Malcolm Ellis MICE Video Conference 4 th May 2005.
MICE CM January 2009Jean-Sébastien GraulichSlide 1 Detector DAQ Issues o Achievements Since CM23 o Detector DAQ o Trigger o Online Software o Front End.
1 A first look at the KEK tracker data with G4MICE Malcolm Ellis 2 nd December 2005.
Linda R. Coney – 5 November 2009 Online Reconstruction Linda R. Coney 5 November 2009.
M. Ellis - MICE Collaboration Meeting - Thursday 28th October Sci-Fi Tracker Performance Software Status –RF background simulation –Beam simulation.
MICE CMPB Alain Blondel 1 Highlights on MICE.
MICE CM28 Oct 2010Jean-Sebastien GraulichSlide 1 Detector DAQ o Achievements Since CM27 o DAQ Upgrade o CAM/DAQ integration o Online Software o Trigger.
Progress in the construction of the MICE cooling channel and first measurements Adam Dobbs, EPS-HEP, 23 rd July 2011.
26 Oct 2010PC Physics Requirements of Software from Chris R ~19 Oct. My.
FPD STATUS Carlos Avila Uniandes/UTA 1. FPD overview 2. Roman pot and detector status 3. FPD readout integration status 4. Software status 5. Stand-alone.
MICE CM39 St Catherine’s, Oxford, 26 June 2014 Paul Soler Instrumentation Global Commissioning Plan.
Tracker Cosmic Ray Test 2011 Linda R. Coney UC Riverside CM 29 - February 16, 2011.
1 Light Yield results from the KEK tracker test using G4MICE M. Ellis Tracker Phone Meeting 25 th January 2006.
Software Overview 1M. Ellis - CM21 - 7th June 2008  Simulation Status  Reconstruction Status  Unpacking Library  Tracker Data Format  Real Data (DATE)
1 Tracker Software Status M. Ellis MICE Collaboration Meeting 27 th June 2005.
ch/~bdl/lepc/lepc.ppt 1 MICE Status and Plans Rikard Sandström Université de Geneve International Scoping Study CERN,
PHOS offline status report Yuri Kharlov ALICE offline week 7 July 2008.
MICE CM February 08Jean-Sébastien GraulichSlide 1 Report on DAQ & CAM o Detector DAQ Status Hardware Trigger Software o Controls and Monitoring (CAM) o.
1M. Ellis - MICE Tracker PC - 1st October 2007 Station QA Analysis (G4MICE)  Looking at the same data as Hideyuki, but using G4MICE.  Have not yet had.
MICE Tracker Software A. Dobbs CM32 9 th Feb 2012.
MICE, Uni-Geneva and the transnational access to MICE (MICE-TNA)
Mark Rayner – Analysis SessionCM25, 4 November The TOF detectors: Beyond particle identification Mark Rayner The University of Oxford MICE CM25.
MAUS Status A. Dobbs CM43 29 th October Contents MAUS Overview Infrastructure Geometry and CDB Detector Updates CKOV EMR KL TOF Tracker Global Tracking.
Linda Coney MICO June 6, 2011 MICE Online Report.
TOF Software and Analysis Tools
Offline Software A. Dobbs CM43 30th October 2015.
MICE Collaboration Meeting Saturday 22nd October 2005 Malcolm Ellis
Tracker Software Status
Presentation transcript:

Linda R. Coney – 24th April 2009 Online Reconstruction & a little about Online Monitoring Linda R. Coney 18 August, 2009

Linda R. Coney – 18 August 2009 MICE Online  So far: u DAQ front end u Trigger u Event Building u Controls and Monitoring  Given that we are successfully running the experiment and creating data u How do we know the equipment is working well? u How do we check the data quality?  Two levels of real-time data quality checks u Online Monitoring s Look at raw data for each board in the DAQ s No translation into physical quantities u Online Reconstruction s Initial look at analysis variables and detector information with geometry  Next: see Data Flow MICE notes 252 & 255

Linda R. Coney – 18 August 2009 Online Monitoring

Linda R. Coney – 18 August 2009 Online Monitoring  Run unpacker on DATE data u Fill plots for each type of board s No geography information s No reconstruction s Boards have ID# but no information on what channel it is u Fill online monitoring histograms in real time while taking data u Use to debug operations u Provides data quality check u Provide graphical interface to display plots  There are 3 overall types of plots because there are 3 types of board u FADCs u Scalar u TDCs

Linda R. Coney – 18 August 2009 Online Monitoring Histograms  Example of monitoring plots from data run in November08  Preset histograms  TOF position info, Scalars

Linda R. Coney – 18 August 2009 Online Monitoring Actions  DAQ DATE Readout is finished   Create framework for decoding data   Implement unpacking for TOF, CKOV, KL   Test data readout, unpacking, and monitoring with real-time data   Include unpacking with G4MICE   Create online monitoring plots for TOF, CKOV   Upgrade FADC firmware (7/09)  u Will decrease size of data  Modify FADC monitoring plots (7/09)  Implement unpacking for Tracker (08/09)  Create online monitoring plots for KL,Tracker, EMR (9/09, 2010)  Implement unpacking for EMR (2009)

Linda R. Coney – 18 August 2009 Online Reconstruction

Linda R. Coney – 18 August 2009 Online Reconstruction  G4MICE uses the unpacker to look at data from DATE  It then converts the raw data into information with physical meaning  Goal: u Provide a fixed set of histograms to be filled during data taking u These histograms will contain quantities that can give information about the physics happening – a first look at analysis quantities u Provides another data quality check s Are we taking the data we think we are? s Are the detectors & beam behaving as planned? u Provide graphical interface to display plots u Provide comparison plots for shifters  Not meant to be final results  Collaboration chooses list of useful histograms u Preliminary list follows

Linda R. Coney – 18 August 2009 MICE Schedule 

Linda R. Coney – 18 August 2009 Online Reconstruction Histograms  Step I  TOF u # planes hit/event u # slabs hit/event u Pulse heights u Distribution in x, y across TOF0, TOF1, TOF2  2D x vs y  gives shape of beam u Reconstructed time-of-flight  Momentum if assume  etc u dt (plane 1 vs plane2) in TOF0, TOF1, TOF2  2D x vs y  gives shape of beam u RF phase calculated vs absolute time in spill  CKOV u Light yield in CKOVA and in CKOVB u Construct some CKOV measure using the two CKOVs  KL ???  PID determination u CKOV A B light yield vs TOF u TOF vs PTracker u Check x,y in TOF1 vs x,y in the tracker at input and similarly at the other end of the channel for TOF2 and tracker2

Linda R. Coney – 18 August 2009 Online Reconstruction Histograms  Step II & Beyond  Tracker(s) u # planes hit/event u # stations hit u Pulse heights u # points used in online reconstruction u Muon p x, p y, p z, p T, p at the 2 tracker reference planes u x,x’, y,y’ u 1D, 2D plots of position at 2 tracker reference planes u Light yield distributions for each station  PID determination u CKOV A B light yield vs TOF u TOF vs PTracker u Check x,y in TOF1 vs x,y in Tracker1 at input and same for TOF2 and exit of Tracker2  Beam emittance, amplitude u MICE Step III and IV – energy in Tracker1 vs energy in Tracker2 and DE u MICE Step V and VI s DE vs RF phase s DE vs absolute time  EMR ???

Linda R. Coney – 18 August 2009 Online Reconstruction Histograms  Step II & Beyond  Input welcome on desired plots….

Linda R. Coney – 18 August 2009 Online Reconstruction Histograms  What is needed to produce these plots?  Online Reconstruction farm  G4MICE installed on farm  TOF reconstruction  CKOV reconstruction  Tracker reconstruction  KL reconstruction  EMR reconstruction  Calibration for all detectors  Unpacking code for each detector  Check that G4MICE uses unpacker in a same way that Online Monitoring uses unpacker

Linda R. Coney – 18 August 2009 Current Status of Reconstruction  TOF Reconstruction and calibration well underway  CKOV reco same  Tracker reconstruction works

Linda R. Coney – 18 August 2009 Online Reconstruction Farm  Installed two farm computers in MICE control room March 09  Total of three quad-core processors  G4MICE installed on both  Tests run u Reconstructed tracker cosmic ray test data s 114 events/second u Ran simulation, digitization, and reconstruction of Step VI s Simulation: ~262 events/second s Simulation + Digi: ~236 events/second s Reconstruction: ~1920 events/second

Linda R. Coney – 18 August 2009 Online Reconstruction Histograms  What is needed to produce these plots?  Online Reconstruction farm   G4MICE installed on farm   TOF reconstruction   CKOV reco   Tracker reco   KL reco ??  EMR reco  Unpacking code for each detector u TOF, CKOV, GVA, KL  u Trackers, EMR (08/09, late 2009)  Check that G4MICE uses unpacker in same way that Online Monitoring uses unpacker u Can produce online monitoring plots with G4MICE  u Testing under way to compare to standard Online Monitoring plots (08/09)

Linda R. Coney – 18 August 2009 Online Reconstruction Histograms  What is needed to produce these plots for Step I?  TOF reconstruction  CKOV reco  Tracker reco   KL reco  Questions: u Which reconstruction to use? u What is current status of reco for each detector? u Only code in official tested release used in Online Reco s If you have personal reconstruction code – needs to go through software group to be included/used. u Which calibration to use? Who does the calibration?

Linda R. Coney – 18 August 2009 Conclusions  Now: u Read out and decode DATE DAQ from MICE beam data u Monitor Step I raw data quality and detector performance with Online Monitoring u Reconstruct TOF, CKOV, Tracker data  Next: u Implement online reconstruction for Step I u Goal to see first plots w/in 2 weeks time s Can practice with old data s Start with TOFs and CKOV u Gather requests for Online Reco plots  Eventually: u Include necessary information for further steps u Routinely have shifters monitoring detectors and MICE physics in MLCR