3-D Migration Deconvolution Jianxing Hu, GXT Bob Estill, Unocal Jianhua Yu, University of Utah Gerard T. Schuster, University of Utah.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Geological Model Depth(km) X(km) 2001 Year.
Advertisements

Selecting Robust Parameters for Migration Deconvolution University of Utah Jianhua Yu.
Closure Phase Statics Correction Closure Phase Statics Correction University of Utah Jianhua Yu.
Prestack Migration Deconvolution Jianxing Hu and Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
Imaging Multiple Reflections with Reverse- Time Migration Yue Wang University of Utah.
SURFACE WAVE ELIMINATION BY INTERFEROMETRY AND ADAPTIVE SUBTRACTION YANWEI XUE University of Utah.
Depth (m) Time (s) Raw Seismograms Four-Layer Sand Channel Model Midpoint (m)
Specular-Ray Parameter Extraction and Stationary Phase Migration Jing Chen University of Utah.
Wavepath Migration versus Kirchhoff Migration: 3-D Prestack Examples H. Sun and G. T. Schuster University of Utah.
Reduced-Time Migration of Converted Waves David Sheley and Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
Wave-Equation Interferometric Migration of VSP Data Ruiqing He Dept. of Geology & Geophysics University of Utah.
Wave-Equation Interferometric Migration of VSP Data Ruiqing He Dept. of Geology & Geophysics University of Utah.
Primary-Only Imaging Condition Yue Wang. Outline Objective Objective POIC Methodology POIC Methodology Synthetic Data Tests Synthetic Data Tests 5-layer.
Reverse-Time Migration By A Variable Grid-Size And Time-Step Method Yue Wang University of Utah.
Solving Illumination Problems Solving Illumination Problems in Imaging:Efficient RTM & in Imaging:Efficient RTM & Migration Deconvolution Migration Deconvolution.
TARGET-ORIENTED LEAST SQUARES MIGRATION Zhiyong Jiang Geology and Geophysics Department University of Utah.
CROSSWELL IMAGING BY 2-D PRESTACK WAVEPATH MIGRATION
MULTIPLE PREDICTION & ATTENUATION Ruiqing He University of Utah Feb Feb
Improve Migration Image Quality by 3-D Migration Deconvolution Jianhua Yu, Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
Joint Migration of Primary and Multiple Reflections in RVSP Data Jianhua Yu, Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
Arbitrary Parameter Extraction, Stationary Phase Migration, and Tomographic Velocity Analysis Jing Chen University of Utah.
Overview of Utah Tomography and Modeling/Migration (UTAM) Chaiwoot B., T. Crosby, G. Jiang, R. He, G. Schuster, Chaiwoot B., T. Crosby, G. Jiang, R. He,
Migration and Attenuation of Surface-Related and Interbed Multiple Reflections Zhiyong Jiang University of Utah April 21, 2006.
Salt Flank Delineation by Interferometric Imaging of Transmitted P-to-S Waves Xiang Xiao Advisor: Gerard T. Schuster Committee: Michael Zhdanov Bob Smith.
Kirchhoff vs Crosscorrelation
Autocorrelogram Migration of Drill-Bit Data Jianhua Yu, Lew Katz, Fred Followill, and Gerard T. Schuster.
FAST VELOCITY ANALYSIS BY PRESTACK WAVEPATH MIGRATION H. Sun Geology and Geophysics Department University of Utah.
Stabilization of Migration Deconvolution Jianxing Hu University of Utah.
Local Migration with Extrapolated VSP Green’s Functions Xiang Xiao and Gerard Schuster Univ. of Utah.
Midyear Overview of Year 2001 UTAM Results T. Crosby, Y. Liu, G. Schuster, D. Sheley, J. Sheng, H. Sun, J. Yu and M. Zhou J. Yu and M. Zhou.
3-D PRESTACK WAVEPATH MIGRATION H. Sun Geology and Geophysics Department University of Utah.
Migration Deconvolution vs Least Squares Migration Jianhua Yu, Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
1 Fast 3D Target-Oriented Reverse Time Datuming Shuqian Dong University of Utah 2 Oct
MD + AVO Inversion Jianhua Yu, University of Utah Jianxing Hu GXT.
3-D Migration Deconvolution: Real Examples Jianhua Yu University of Utah Bob Estill Unocal.
Interferometric Multiple Migration of UPRC Data
Reverse-Time Migration For 3D SEG/EAGE Salt Model
Autocorrelogram Migration for Field Data Generated by A Horizontal Drill-bit Source Jianhua Yu, Lew Katz Fred Followill and Gerard T. Schuster.
4C Mahogony Data Processing and Imaging by LSMF Method Jianhua Yu and Yue Wang.
Demonstration of Super-Resolution and Super-Stacking Properties of Time Reversal Mirrors in Locating Seismic Sources Weiping Cao, Gerard T. Schuster, Ge.
Prestack Migration Deconvolution in Common Offset Domain Jianxing Hu University of Utah.
Multisource Least-squares Reverse Time Migration Wei Dai.
3D Wave-equation Interferometric Migration of VSP Free-surface Multiples Ruiqing He University of Utah Feb., 2006.
V.2 Wavepath Migration Overview Overview Kirchhoff migration smears a reflection along a fat ellipsoid, so that most of the reflection energy is placed.
Attribute- Assisted Seismic Processing and Interpretation 3D CONSTRAINED LEAST-SQUARES KIRCHHOFF PRESTACK TIME MIGRATION Alejandro.
Mitigation of RTM Artifacts with Migration Kernel Decomposition Ge Zhan* and Gerard T. Schuster King Abdullah University of Science and Technology June.
Coherence-weighted Wavepath Migration for Teleseismic Data Coherence-weighted Wavepath Migration for Teleseismic Data J. Sheng, G. T. Schuster, K. L. Pankow,
Migration Deconvolution of 3-D Seismic Data Jianxing Hu (University of Utah) Paul Valasek (Phillips Petroleum Company)
Impact of MD on AVO Inversion
New Migration Deconvolution Filters Jianhua Yu University of Utah.
Multisource Least-squares Migration of Marine Data Xin Wang & Gerard Schuster Nov 7, 2012.
Interferometric Interpolation of 3D SSP Data Sherif M. Hanafy Weiping Cao Gerard T. Schuster October 2009.
Fast Least Squares Migration with a Deblurring Filter Naoshi Aoki Feb. 5,
Wave-Equation Migration in Anisotropic Media Jianhua Yu University of Utah.
Super-virtual Interferometric Diffractions as Guide Stars Wei Dai 1, Tong Fei 2, Yi Luo 2 and Gerard T. Schuster 1 1 KAUST 2 Saudi Aramco Feb 9, 2012.
Wave-Equation Waveform Inversion for Crosswell Data M. Zhou and Yue Wang Geology and Geophysics Department University of Utah.
3-D Prestack Migration Deconvolution Bob Estill ( Unocal) Jianhua Yu (University of Utah)
Fast Least Squares Migration with a Deblurring Filter 30 October 2008 Naoshi Aoki 1.
The Earth’s Near Surface as a Vibroseis Signal Generator Zhiyong Jiang University of Utah.
Jianhua Yu University of Utah Robust Imaging for RVSP Data with Static Errors.
Enhancing Migration Image Quality by 3-D Prestack Migration Deconvolution Gerard Schuster Jianhua Yu, Jianxing Hu University of Utah andGXT
MD+AVO Inversion: Real Examples University of Utah Jianhua Yu.
Interpolating and Extrapolating Marine Data with Interferometry
Zero-Offset Data d = L o ò r ) ( g = d dr r ) ( g = d
Primary-Only Imaging Condition And Interferometric Migration
4C Mahogony Data Processing and Imaging by LSMF Method
Summary: Lateral Resolution
Han Yu, Bowen Guo*, Sherif Hanafy, Fan-Chi Lin**, Gerard T. Schuster
LSMF for Suppressing Multiples
Least Squares Migration
Presentation transcript:

3-D Migration Deconvolution Jianxing Hu, GXT Bob Estill, Unocal Jianhua Yu, University of Utah Gerard T. Schuster, University of Utah

Why Do Migration Deconvolution (MD) ? Outline Migration Deconvolution Examples Conclusions Implementation of MD

Why Do Migration Deconvolution (MD) ? Outline Migration Deconvolution Examples Conclusions Implementation of MD

Migration noise and artifacts Migration Noise Problems Depth (km) Weak illumination Footprint

Purpose of MD Processing: Improving spatial resolution Enhancing illumination Suppressing migration noise and artifacts

Why Do Migration Deconvolution (MD) ? Outline Migration Deconvolution Examples Conclusions Implementation of MD

M = L T Migration: Migrated image L R L is modeling operator Reflectivity

T R = (L L ) M 3-D PRESTACK MD Reflectivity Design an improved MD filter Migrated Section MD is to eliminate the blurring influence in migration image by designing MD operator Goal:

Why Do Migration Deconvolution (MD) ? Outline Migration Deconvolution Examples Conclusions Implementation of MD

MD Implementation Steps: Step 1: Prepare traveltime table Velocity cube Acquisition geometry information or Use migration timetable

Calculate the migration Green’s function MD Implementation Steps: Step 2: Y (km) Depth (km) Depth Level i N L

Step 4: Invert MD image at the depth Z i by solving linear equations MD Implementation Steps: Step 5: Repeat Steps 2-4 until the maximum depth is finished

Why Do Migration Deconvolution (MD) ? Outline Migration Deconvolution Examples : Synthetic data Conclusions Implementation of MD

0 3 km 0 3-D Point Scatterer Model 3 km 11 X 11 Receivers 11 X 11 Receivers dxg=dyg=0.3 km Imaging: dx=dy=50 m dz=100 m 3X3 Sources; dxshot=dyshot=1.5 km 10 km

0 3 X (km) 0 3 Y (km) 0 3 X (km) 0 3 Y (km) 0 3 X (km) 0 3 Y (km) 0 3 X (km) 0 3 Y (km) 0 3 X (km) 0 3 Y (km) 0 3 X (km) 0 3 Y (km) MIG MD Z=1 km Z=3 km Z=5 km Depth Slices

0 3 X (km) 0 3 Y (km) 0 3 X (km) 0 3 Y (km) 0 3 X (km) 0 3 Y (km) 0 3 X (km) 0 3 Y (km) 0 3 X (km) 0 3 Y (km) 0 3 X (km) 0 3 Y (km) MIG MD Z=7 km Z=9 km Z=10 km Depth Slices

0 2.5 km 0 Meandering Stream Model 2.5 km 5 X 1 Sources; 11 X 7 Receivers 3.5 km

Mig MD Model 0 Y (km) X (km) Z=3.5 KM

km 0 3-D SEG/EAGE Salt Model 12.2 km 9 X5 Sources; dxshot=dyshot=1 km 201 X 201 Receivers Imaging: dx=dy=20 m

3-D SEG/EAGE Salt Model X (km)Y (km) Y=7.12 km

Mig and MD ( z=1.4 km, negative polarity) X (km) 3 10 Y (km) X (km) MDMig

MD (z=1.2 km)Mig (z=1.2 km) X (km) 3 10 Y (km) X (km)

MD (z=1.2 km)Mig (z=1.2 km)

Why Do Migration Deconvolution (MD) ? Outline Migration Deconvolution Examples: 2-D field data Conclusions Implementation of MD

PS PSTM Image ( by Unocal) 0 6 X (km) 0 8 Time (s)

0 6 X (km) 0 8 Time (s) MD PSTM(courtesy of Unocal) PSTMD

0 6 X (km) 3 8 Time (s) MD PSTM(courtesy of Unocal) PSTMD

Why Do Migration Deconvolution (MD) ? Outline Migration Deconvolution Examples: 3-D field data Conclusions Implementation of MD

3-D Land Field Data : Receivers : Sources

1.6 s Inline Crossline 3D PSTM (courtesy of Unocal) MD

2.0 s Crossline 3D PSTM (courtesy of Unocal) MD

3 Mig in Inline (Courtesy of Unocal) MD

Mig MD Mig MD

Mig (Courtesy of Unocal) MD Inline Number Crossline Number Inline Number (2 kft)

Fault

(3.6 kft) Inline Number Crossline Number Inline Number Mig (Courtesy of Unocal) MD

Inline Number Depth (kft) 90Inline Number1 Mig (courtesy of Unocal)MD (Crossline=50)

(crossline 200) Depth (kft) Mig (courtesy of Unocal)MD

Depth (kft) Crossline Number (Inline =50) Mig ( Unocal ) MD

Why Do Migration Deconvolution (MD) ? Outline Migration Deconvolution Examples Conclusions Implementation of MD

Conclusions Aperture width and filter length in designing MD filter are two key parameters Improve resolution and suppress migration artifacts MD cost is related with acquisition geometry

Acknowledgments Thank Amramco, Unocal, and Chevron- Texaco for providing the data setsThank Amramco, Unocal, and Chevron- Texaco for providing the data sets Thank 2002 UTAM sponsors for their financial supportThank 2002 UTAM sponsors for their financial support The help and comments from Alan Leeds and George Yao are very appreciatedThe help and comments from Alan Leeds and George Yao are very appreciated