Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Migration Deconvolution of 3-D Seismic Data Jianxing Hu (University of Utah) Paul Valasek (Phillips Petroleum Company)

Published byGervase Flowers Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Migration Deconvolution of 3-D Seismic Data Jianxing Hu (University of Utah) Paul Valasek (Phillips Petroleum Company)"— Presentation transcript:

1 Migration Deconvolution of 3-D Seismic Data Jianxing Hu (University of Utah) Paul Valasek (Phillips Petroleum Company)

2 Outline ProblemProblem SolutionSolution Numerical testsNumerical tests ConclusionsConclusions

3 Problems Migration noiseMigration noise Recording footprintRecording footprint 15km10km5km0km 0km 4km Poor ResolutionPoor Resolution Amplitude DistortionAmplitude Distortion Kirchhoff Migration Image

4 Modeling and Migration Seismic data Reflectivity Green’s Function Model Space Migrated Image Data Space Seismic Data Forward Modeling: Migration: Wavelet

5 Model Space Where: Denote as the migration Green’s Function Relation of Migrated Image and Reflectivity Distribution Relation of Migrated Image and Reflectivity Distribution Data Space

6 Reflectivity Modulated by Migration Green’s Function Model Space

7 Outline ProblemProblem SolutionSolution Numerical testsNumerical tests ConclusionsConclusions

8 Solution Get rid of the influence of migration green’s function from the migrated image Get rid of the influence of migration green’s function from the migrated image Method: Migration Deconvolution Migration Deconvolution

9 Migration Deconvolution Model Space Migration Green’s function lateral shift invariant Assumption: --- reference position of migration Green’s function

10 Outline ProblemProblem SolutionSolution Numerical testsNumerical tests ConclusionsConclusions

11 Numerical Tests 2-D SEG/EAGE overthrust model2-D SEG/EAGE overthrust model 3-D poststack Kirchhoff migration3-D poststack Kirchhoff migration of French model data set of French model data set 3-D poststack reverse time migration3-D poststack reverse time migration of a gulf of Mexico data set of a gulf of Mexico data set 3-D prestack Kirchhoff migration of3-D prestack Kirchhoff migration of a North Sea data set a North Sea data set

12 Velocity Model 0km 0km15km10km5km0 150 0 4500 3000 Depth (m) 6000 250 0 Velocity (m/sec)

13 Comparison of KM and MD 15 km 0 km 0 km 15 km 15 km Poststack Migration Image Poststack Migration Image Deconvolved Migration Image Deconvolved Migration Image 0 km 4 km 0 km 4 km

14 15 km 0 km 4 km 0 km 0 km 15 km 15 km Poststack Migration Image of Half Sampled Data Poststack Migration Image of Half Sampled Data Deconvolved Migration Image Deconvolved Migration Image 0 km 4 km Comparison of KM and MD

15 Prestack Migration Image Prestack Migration Image Deconvolved Migration Image Deconvolved Migration Image 0 km 20 km 20 km 0 km 4 km 20 km 0 km 0 km 0 km 4 km

16 Numerical Tests 2-D SEG/EAGE overthrust model2-D SEG/EAGE overthrust model 3-D poststack Kirchhoff migration3-D poststack Kirchhoff migration of French model data set of French model data set 3-D poststack reverse time migration3-D poststack reverse time migration of a gulf of Mexico data set of a gulf of Mexico data set 3-D prestack Kirchhoff migration of3-D prestack Kirchhoff migration of a North Sea data set a North Sea data set

17 French Model 10,000 ft/sec 0 0 1 4 5 13,000 ft/sec 19,000 ft/sec 10,000 ft/sec 19,000 ft/sec Depth (km) 8 4 X (km) 2 Tested Area

18 Comparison of KM and MD Results Y (km) KM KM MD MD 3 5 3 5 Depth (km) Depth (km) 4 2 4 2 MD MD Depth (km) Depth (km) 4 2 4 2 X (km) 1 3 1 3 CrosslineSection InlineSection

19 Comparison of KM and MD Results 2.3 3.3 1.3 0.3 Sharper Sharper X (km) Sharper 0.3 534 X (km) 2.3 3.3 1.3 Y (km) 534 KM KM MD MD 10,000 ft/sec 13,000 ft/sec 19,000 ft/sec Test Area Test Area X (km) 0 8 0 5 Depth (km) 1 2570 m

20 Numerical Tests 2-D SEG/EAGE overthrust model2-D SEG/EAGE overthrust model 3-D poststack Kirchhoff migration3-D poststack Kirchhoff migration of French model data set of French model data set 3-D poststack reverse time migration3-D poststack reverse time migration of a gulf of Mexico data set of a gulf of Mexico data set 3-D prestack Kirchhoff migration of3-D prestack Kirchhoff migration of a North Sea data set a North Sea data set

21 Poststack RTM Image of a Gulf of Mexico Data Set 0 3 6 9 12 12 X(km) X(km) 1 2 3 4 Depth(km) Depth(km)

22 Velocity Model 120 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Depth (km) X (km) 6 1.6km/s 4.45km/s 3km/s

23 Comparison of RTM and MD Images 6 X(km) X(km) 5 1 2 3 Depth (km) Depth (km) 1 6 X(km) X(km) 5 2 3 Depth (km) Depth (km) RTMMD

24 Comparison of RTM and MD Images 3 Depth (km) Depth (km) 7.4 7.4 Y(km) Y(km) 7.0 7.0 1 2 2 3 Depth (km) Depth (km) 7.4 7.4 Y(km) Y(km) 7.0 7.0 1 RTM MD

25 Comparison of Depth Slices 7.0 7.0 7.5 7.5 Y (km) Y (km) X (km) X (km)5.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.5 7.5 Y (km) Y (km) X (km) X (km)5.0 6.0 6.0 RTM Image RTM Image MD Image MD Image 7.0 7.0 7.5 7.5 Y (km) Y (km) X (km) X (km)5.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.5 7.5 Y (km) Y (km) X (km) X (km)5.0 6.0 6.0

26 Comparison of Depth Slices RTM Image RTM Image MD Image MD Image 7.0 7.0 7.5 7.5 Y (km) Y (km) X (km) X (km)5.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.5 7.5 Y (km) Y (km) X (km) X (km)5.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.5 7.5 Y (km) Y (km) X (km) X (km)5.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.5 7.5 Y (km) Y (km) X (km) X (km)5.0 6.0 6.0

27 Numerical Tests 2-D SEG/EAGE overthrust model2-D SEG/EAGE overthrust model 3-D poststack Kirchhoff migration3-D poststack Kirchhoff migration of French model data set of French model data set 3-D poststack reverse time migration3-D poststack reverse time migration of a gulf of Mexico data set of a gulf of Mexico data set 3-D prestack Kirchhoff migration of3-D prestack Kirchhoff migration of a North Sea data set a North Sea data set

28 Comparison of PSKM and MD Images X (km) X (km) 4 6 8 10 10 1 4 Depth (km) Depth (km) X (km) X (km) 4 6 8 10 10 1 4 Depth (km) Depth (km) Prestack Kirchhoff Migration Image of Prestack Kirchhoff Migration Image of a North Sea Data Set a North Sea Data Set MD Image

29 KM Y(km) Y(km) 8 6 1 4 Depth (km) Depth (km) Y (km) Y (km) Depth (km) Depth (km) 6 1 4 8 MD Comparison of PSKM and MD Images

30 Comparison of Depth Slices 6 8 Y (km) Y (km) X (km) X (km)4 8 6 10 10 6 8 Y (km) Y (km) X (km) X (km)4 8 6 10 10 6 8 Y (km) Y (km) X (km) X (km)4 8 6 10 10 Kirchhoff Image Kirchhoff Image MD Image MD Image 6 8 Y (km) Y (km) X (km) X (km)4 8 6 10 10

31 Comparison of Depth Slices 6 8 Y (km) Y (km) X (km) X (km)4 8 6 10 10 6 8 Y (km) Y (km) X (km) X (km)4 8 6 10 10 6 8 Y (km) Y (km) X (km) X (km)4 8 6 10 10 6 8 Y (km) Y (km) X (km) X (km)4 8 6 10 10 Kirchhoff Image Kirchhoff Image MD Image MD Image

32 Comparison of Decon and MD Images 4 6 8 10 10 1 4 Depth (km) Depth (km) 4 6 8 10 10 1 4 Depth (km) Depth (km) X (km) X (km) MD Image MD Image AGC + Harmonize + FXY decon image of the raw migration data

33 Comparison of Decon and MD Images 8 Y(km) Y(km) 6 1 4 Depth (km) Depth (km) Y (km) Y (km) 6 1 4 Depth (km) Depth (km) 8 MD AGC + Harmonize + FXY decon

34 Comparison of Depth Slices 6 8 Y (km) Y (km) X (km) X (km)4 8 6 10 10 6 8 Y (km) Y (km) X (km) X (km)4 8 6 10 10 Harmon + FXY Decon Image Harmon + FXY Decon Image MD Image MD Image 6 8 Y (km) Y (km) X (km) X (km)4 8 6 10 10 6 8 Y (km) Y (km) X (km) X (km)4 8 6 10 10

35 Comparison of Depth Slices 6 8 Y (km) Y (km) X (km) X (km)4 8 6 10 10 6 8 Y (km) Y (km) X (km) X (km)4 8 6 10 10 6 8 Y (km) Y (km) X (km) X (km)4 8 6 10 10 6 8 Y (km) Y (km) X (km) X (km)4 8 6 10 10 Harmon + FXY Decon Image Harmon + FXY Decon Image MD Image MD Image

36 Results Comparison Model Deconvolved Migration Image ConventionalDeconvolution Migration MD Decon 0 1 1 1 Kirchhoff Migration Image Kirchhoff Migration Image MD Image MD Image 0 X(km) X(km) Y(km) Y(km) 0 0 X(km) X(km) Y(km) Y(km) 1 1 MigrationImage

37 Outline MotivationMotivation SolutionSolution Numerical testsNumerical tests ConclusionsConclusions

38 Conclusions Works on 2D and 3D migrated data, improves resolution, mitigates migration artifactsWorks on 2D and 3D migrated data, improves resolution, mitigates migration artifacts Suitable for Kirchhoff and RTM migration imagesSuitable for Kirchhoff and RTM migration images Post-migration processingPost-migration processing

39 Acknowledgement Thank Phillips petroleum company and other UTAM sponsorsThank Phillips petroleum company and other UTAM sponsors Thank Phillips petroleum company, Veritas marine surveys, Agip (UK) ltd., BG EP ltd., Centrica plc., Conoco UK ltd., Fina exploration ltd., and Phillips (UK) ltd., for granting permission to present the application of MD to gulf of Mexico and North Sea data setThank Phillips petroleum company, Veritas marine surveys, Agip (UK) ltd., BG EP ltd., Centrica plc., Conoco UK ltd., Fina exploration ltd., and Phillips (UK) ltd., for granting permission to present the application of MD to gulf of Mexico and North Sea data set

Download ppt "Migration Deconvolution of 3-D Seismic Data Jianxing Hu (University of Utah) Paul Valasek (Phillips Petroleum Company)"

Similar presentations

Warping for Trim Statics

Warping for Trim Statics
Geological Model 0 4 0 3 Depth(km) X(km) 2001 Year.

Geological Model Depth(km) X(km) 2001 Year.
Adaptive Grid Reverse-Time Migration Yue Wang. Outline Motivation and ObjectiveMotivation and Objective Reverse Time MethodologyReverse Time Methodology.

Adaptive Grid Reverse-Time Migration Yue Wang. Outline Motivation and ObjectiveMotivation and Objective Reverse Time MethodologyReverse Time Methodology.
Selecting Robust Parameters for Migration Deconvolution University of Utah Jianhua Yu.

Selecting Robust Parameters for Migration Deconvolution University of Utah Jianhua Yu.
Reverse Time Migration of Multiples for OBS Data Dongliang Zhang KAUST.

Reverse Time Migration of Multiples for OBS Data Dongliang Zhang KAUST.
Reverse Time Migration Reverse Time Migration. Outline Outline Finding a Rock Splash at Liberty Park Finding a Rock Splash at Liberty Park ZO Reverse.

Reverse Time Migration Reverse Time Migration. Outline Outline Finding a Rock Splash at Liberty Park Finding a Rock Splash at Liberty Park ZO Reverse.
Interferometric Interpolation of 3D OBS Data Weiping Cao, University of Utah Oct. 29 2009.

Interferometric Interpolation of 3D OBS Data Weiping Cao, University of Utah Oct
Prestack Migration Deconvolution Jianxing Hu and Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.

Prestack Migration Deconvolution Jianxing Hu and Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
Imaging Multiple Reflections with Reverse- Time Migration Yue Wang University of Utah.

Imaging Multiple Reflections with Reverse- Time Migration Yue Wang University of Utah.
1.5 -1.5 6.0-6.0 2100 Depth (m) Time (s) Raw Seismograms 0 2100 Four-Layer Sand Channel Model 0 0 0.8 Midpoint (m)

Depth (m) Time (s) Raw Seismograms Four-Layer Sand Channel Model Midpoint (m)
Specular-Ray Parameter Extraction and Stationary Phase Migration Jing Chen University of Utah.

Specular-Ray Parameter Extraction and Stationary Phase Migration Jing Chen University of Utah.
Wavepath Migration versus Kirchhoff Migration: 3-D Prestack Examples H. Sun and G. T. Schuster University of Utah.

Wavepath Migration versus Kirchhoff Migration: 3-D Prestack Examples H. Sun and G. T. Schuster University of Utah.
Reverse-Time Migration By A Variable Grid-Size And Time-Step Method Yue Wang University of Utah.

Reverse-Time Migration By A Variable Grid-Size And Time-Step Method Yue Wang University of Utah.
Solving Illumination Problems Solving Illumination Problems in Imaging:Efficient RTM & in Imaging:Efficient RTM & Migration Deconvolution Migration Deconvolution.

Solving Illumination Problems Solving Illumination Problems in Imaging:Efficient RTM & in Imaging:Efficient RTM & Migration Deconvolution Migration Deconvolution.
TARGET-ORIENTED LEAST SQUARES MIGRATION Zhiyong Jiang Geology and Geophysics Department University of Utah.

TARGET-ORIENTED LEAST SQUARES MIGRATION Zhiyong Jiang Geology and Geophysics Department University of Utah.
CROSSWELL IMAGING BY 2-D PRESTACK WAVEPATH MIGRATION

CROSSWELL IMAGING BY 2-D PRESTACK WAVEPATH MIGRATION
3-D Migration Deconvolution Jianxing Hu, GXT Bob Estill, Unocal Jianhua Yu, University of Utah Gerard T. Schuster, University of Utah.

3-D Migration Deconvolution Jianxing Hu, GXT Bob Estill, Unocal Jianhua Yu, University of Utah Gerard T. Schuster, University of Utah.
Improve Migration Image Quality by 3-D Migration Deconvolution Jianhua Yu, Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.

Improve Migration Image Quality by 3-D Migration Deconvolution Jianhua Yu, Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
Joint Migration of Primary and Multiple Reflections in RVSP Data Jianhua Yu, Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.

Joint Migration of Primary and Multiple Reflections in RVSP Data Jianhua Yu, Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
Overview of Utah Tomography and Modeling/Migration (UTAM) Chaiwoot B., T. Crosby, G. Jiang, R. He, G. Schuster, Chaiwoot B., T. Crosby, G. Jiang, R. He,

Overview of Utah Tomography and Modeling/Migration (UTAM) Chaiwoot B., T. Crosby, G. Jiang, R. He, G. Schuster, Chaiwoot B., T. Crosby, G. Jiang, R. He,

Similar presentations

Ads by Google