Inversion imaging of the Sun-Earth System Damien Allain, Cathryn Mitchell, Dimitriy Pokhotelov, Manuchehr Soleimani, Paul Spencer, Jenna Tong, Ping Yin,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Modelling complexity in the upper atmosphere using GPS data Chris Budd, Cathryn Mitchell, Paul Spencer Bath Institute for Complex Systems, University of.
Advertisements

University of Bath 4D ionisation dynamics during storms of the recent solar maximum Cathryn Mitchell, Ping Yin, Paul Spencer and Dmitriy Pokhotelov, University.
Introduction to data assimilation in meteorology Pierre Brousseau, Ludovic Auger ATMO 08,Alghero, september 2008.
ESWW 5 Some ionospheric effects on ground based radar Y. Béniguel, J.-P. Adam.
URSIGA, New Delhi, Oct 2005 Coordinated Observations of Ionospheric Scintillations, Density Profiles and Total Electron Content on a Common Magnetic.
Multi-Scale Probabilistic Modeling in Geospace Science Zach Thomas The Ohio State University Mentors: Tomoko Matsuo, Doug Nychka Ellen Cousins, Mike Wiltberger.
Ionosphere Climate Studied by F3 / COSMIC Constellation C. H. Liu Academia Sinica In Collaboration with Tulasi Ram, C.H. Lin and S.Y. Su.
David Prado Oct Antarctic Sea Ice: John N. Rayner and David A. Howarth 1979.
Observation of Equatorial Electrodynamics in Africa using AMBER Magnetometer Network Endawoke Yizengaw Institute for Scientific Research, Boston College,
Space Weather Effects on GPS Thomas J. Bogdan, Director Space Weather Prediction Center NCEP/NWS/NOAA 325 Broadway, DSRC Room 2C109 Boulder, CO 80305,
Modeling Generation and Nonlinear Evolution of VLF Waves for Space Applications W.A. Scales Center of Space Science and Engineering Research Virginia Tech.
Motion Tracking. Image Processing and Computer Vision: 82 Introduction Finding how objects have moved in an image sequence Movement in space Movement.
Atmospheric phase correction for ALMA Alison Stirling John Richer Richard Hills University of Cambridge Mark Holdaway NRAO Tucson.
Anomalous Ionospheric Profiles Association of Anomalous Profiles and Magnetic Fields The Effects of Solar Flares on Earth and Mars.
Mesoscale ionospheric tomography over Finland Juha-Pekka Luntama Finnish Meteorological Institute Cathryn Mitchell, Paul Spencer University of Bath 4th.
TEC and its Uncertainty Ludger Scherliess Center for Atmospheric and Space Sciences Utah State University GEM Mini-Workshop San Francisco December 2014.
Ice Sheet Motion Speckle tracking. Velocity measurement techniques Day 1 Day 24 Feature Retracking 100 m Day 1 Day m Day 1 Day m InSAR Speckle.
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 10 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 11 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
1 UNCLASSIFIED – FOUO – Not for Public Release Operational Space Environment Network Display (OpSEND) & the Scintillation Network Decision Aid Dr. Keith.
GPS / RO for atmospheric studies Dept. of Physics and Astronomy GPS / RO for atmospheric studies Panagiotis Vergados Dept. of Physics and Astronomy.
Review Doppler Radar (Fig. 3.1) A simplified block diagram 10/29-11/11/2013METR
Thomas Zurbuchen University of Michigan The Structure and Sources of the Solar Wind during the Solar Cycle.
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring MW 11:00-12:30 Room
Model & Satellite Data Dr Ian Brooks. ENVI 1400 : Meteorology and Forecasting2.
EISCAT Radar Summer School 15th-26th August 2005 Kiruna
COST 723 Training School - Cargese October 2005 OBS 2 Radiative transfer for thermal radiation. Observations Bruno Carli.
Page 1© Crown copyright Distribution of water vapour in the turbulent atmosphere Atmospheric phase correction for ALMA Alison Stirling John Richer & Richard.
Evolution of the 2012 July 12 CME from the Sun to the Earth: Data- Constrained Three-Dimensional MHD Simulations F. Shen 1, C. Shen 2, J. Zhang 3, P. Hess.
Ionospheric mitigation schemes and their consequences for BIOMASS product quality O. French & S. Quegan, University of Sheffield, UK J. Chen, Beihang University,
GPS derived TEC Measurements for Plasmaspheric Studies: A Tutorial and Recent Results Mark Moldwin LD Zhang, G. Hajj, I. Harris, T. Mannucci, X. PI.
EGU General Assembly 2013, 7 – 12 April 2013, Vienna, Austria This study: is pioneer in modeling the upper atmosphere, using space geodetic techniques,
UTSA Estimating Model Parameters from Ionospheric Reverse Engineering (EMPIRE) G. S. Bust and G. Crowley UTSA S. Datta-Barua ASTRA.
ARL Applied Research Laboratories The University of Texas at Austin ARL Applied Research Laboratories The University of Texas at Austin Ionospheric Tomography.
Estimating currents and electric fields in the high-latitude ionosphere using ground- and space-based observations Ellen Cousins 1, Tomoko Matsuo 2,3,
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring
Sub-ionospheric Point hmhm Ionosphere Earth Surface Ionospheric Piercing Point High Resolution GPS-TEC Gradients in the Northern Hemisphere Ionospheric.
Claudinei Rodrigues de Aguiar Federal University of Technology - Parana Paulo de Oliveira Camargo São Paulo State University.
University of Colorado Boulder ASEN 5070: Statistical Orbit Determination I Fall 2014 Professor Brandon A. Jones Lecture 18: Minimum Variance Estimator.
Joint International GRACE Science Team Meeting and DFG SPP 1257 Symposium, Oct. 2007, GFZ Potsdam Folie 1 Retrieval of electron density profiles.
ROSA – ROSSA Validation results R. Notarpietro, G. Perona, M. Cucca
Development of an EnKF to estimate CO 2 fluxes from realistic distributions of X CO2 Liang Feng, Paul Palmer
Data Assimilation for the Space Environment Ludger Scherliess Center for Atmospheric and Space Sciences Utah State University Logan, Utah GEM.
Ionospheric Research at USU R.W. Schunk, L. Scherliess, J.J. Sojka, D.C. Thompson & L. Zhu Center for Atmospheric & Space Sciences Utah State University.
VARIABILITY OF TOTAL ELECTRON CONTENT AT EUROPEAN LATITUDES A. Krankowski(1), L. W. Baran(1), W. Kosek (2), I. I. Shagimuratov(3), M. Kalarus (2) (1) Institute.
The Mesoscale Ionospheric Simulation Testbed (MIST) Regional Data Assimilation Model Joseph Comberiate Michael Kelly Ethan Miller June 24, 2013.
Global E-region Densities Derived from Radio Occultation Measurements M. J. Nicolls 1, F. S Rodrigues 2, and G. S. Bust 2 1. SRI International, Menlo Park,
Comparison of the electron density profiles measured with the Incoherent Scatter Radar, Digisonde DPS-4 and Chirp-Ionosonde Ratovsky K.G., Shpynev* B.G.,
Global Structure of the Inner Solar Wind and it's Dynamic in the Solar Activity Cycle from IPS Observations with Multi-Beam Radio Telescope BSA LPI Chashei.
Study on the Impact of Combined Magnetic and Electric Field Analysis and of Ocean Circulation Effects on Swarm Mission Performance by S. Vennerstrom, E.
Electron density profile retrieval from RO data Xin’an Yue, Bill Schreiner  Abel inversion error of Ne  Data Assimilation test.
Data Assimilation Retrieval of Electron Density Profiles from Radio Occultation Measurements Xin’an Yue, W. S. Schreiner, Jason Lin, C. Rocken, Y-H. Kuo.
Future China Geomagnetism Satellite Mission (CGS) Aimin Du Institute of Geology and Geophysics, CAS 2012/11/18 Taibei.
0 7th ESWW, Bruges, Ionospheric Scintillations Propagation Model Y. Béniguel, J-P Adam IEEA, Courbevoie, France.
COSMIC Ionospheric measurements Jiuhou Lei NCAR ASP/HAO Research review, Boulder, March 8, 2007.
© Copyright QinetiQ limited 2006 On the application of meteorological data assimilation techniques to radio occultation measurements of.
Ionospheric characteristics above martian crustal magnetic anomalies Paul Withers, M Mendillo, H Rishbeth, D Hinson, and J Arkani-Hamed Abstract #33.02.
URSI XXVI General Assembly, Toronto, Canada, August 1999 Improved Method for Measuring the Satellite-to-Satellite TEC in the Ionosphere by S. Syndergaard.
Bringing 93,000,000 Miles to 40,000 Feet: Space Weather & Aviation An introduction to Space Weather What is it? Where does it come from? What does it do?
Interminimum Changes in Global Total Electron Content and Neutral Mass Density John Emmert, Sarah McDonald Space Science Division, Naval Research Lab Anthony.
Global and Regional Total Electron Content Anthony Mannucci, Xing Meng, Panagiotis Vergados, Attila Komjathy JPL/Caltech Collaborators: Sarah E. McDonald,
S. Datta-Barua, Illinois Institute of Technology G. S. Bust, JHUAPL
Center for Atmospheric & Space Sciences
Ionosphere, Magnetosphere and Thermosphere Anthea Coster
ASEN 5070: Statistical Orbit Determination I Fall 2015
Use Inverse Matrices to Solve 2 Variable Linear Systems
Ionospheric impacts on LoFAR
Effects and magnitudes of some specific errors
Challenges of Radio Occultation Data Processing
Evaluation of IRI-2012 by comparison with JASON-1 TEC and incoherent scatter radar observations during the solar minimum period Eun-Young Ji,
Presentation transcript:

Inversion imaging of the Sun-Earth System Damien Allain, Cathryn Mitchell, Dimitriy Pokhotelov, Manuchehr Soleimani, Paul Spencer, Jenna Tong, Ping Yin, Bettina Zapfe Invert, Dept of E & E Engineering, University of Bath, UK BICS, September 2007

Tomography and the ionosphere Outline the basic problem GPS imaging of electron density large-scale slow moving (mid/low latitude) medium-scale fast moving (high latitude) high-resolution imaging small-scale structure System applications Next steps Plan

The ionosphere Tenuous atmosphere above 100 km – ionised by EUV

Along each continuous arc measurements of time- evolving, biased TEC Produce the time-evolving 3D distribution of electron density Tomography applied to imaging the ionosphere

Ground-receiver tomography Measure – integral of electron density Solve for spatial field of electron density Problems Incomplete data coverage Variability of the measurement biases Temporal changes in the ionosphere Tomography applied to imaging the ionosphere

? ? ? ? If each of the measurements (integrated quantities) are equal to 10, find the density in each pixel … 10 Problem 1 - incomplete data coverage

Four equations, four unknowns … but there are many possible answers because the equations are not all independent ? ? ? ? … etc but if vertical ratio is known to be 4:1 Problem 1 - incomplete data coverage … then the solution is unique If each of the measurements (integrated quantities) are equal to 10, find the density in each pixel … See for example Fremouw et al, 1992

Satellite-to-ground measurements are biased in the vertical direction … this means that the inversion is better determined in the horizontal distribution of electron density Problem 1 - incomplete data coverage

Low peak height small scale height High peak height large scale height Example of basis set constraints of MIDAS h EOF 1 EOF 2 EOF 3 Problem 1 - incomplete data coverage

? ? ? ? Problem 2 – variable measurement biases Each set of satellite to receiver paths is assumed to have a ‘constant’ measurement bias, c … In terms of a mathematical solution, this just results in a slightly more underdetermined problem, because need to solve for c for each satellite-receiver pair 5+c15+c See for example Kunitsyn et al., 1994

NmF2 from ground based data? 20 TECu Height (km) TECu Large differences in the profile still result in small TEC changes … … so we need to use the differential phase not the calibrated code observations Problem 2 – variable measurement biases

? ? ? ? Problem 3 – temporal changes Now, we had a static solution, but what if the ionosphere changes during the time we collect the measurements? time1 TEC =5 ; time2 TEC=

? ? ? ? Now, we had a static solution, but what if the ionosphere changes during the time we collect the measurements? time1 TEC =5 ; time2 TEC= This gives a time-evolving solution of electron density, where (applying for example a linear time evolution) the solution is Time 1 Time 2 Problem 3 – temporal changes

Problem 4 – uneven data coverage Some form of regularisation e.g. spherical harmonics

A relatively short period is chosen for the time-dependent inversion, for example one hour, and data collected at typically 30 second intervals are considered. The change in the ray path geometry, defined in the D matrix, multiplied by the unknown change in electron concentration (y) is equal to the change in TEC, Tc. The mapping matrix, X, is used to transform the problem to one for which the unknowns are the linear (or other) changes in coefficients (G) MIDAS – time-dependent inversion Spherical harmonics and EOFs (X)

The time-dependent solution to the inverse problem is then given by The matrices can be re-written such that the ray path geometry is multiplied directly by the mapping matrix to create the basis set and the change in the unknown contributions of each of these line integrations of electron concentration is solved for. MIDAS – time-dependent inversion [electron density change] = [model electron density] [coefficients] Solve for G

MIDAS – high latitude Problems Grid geometry Limited ground-based data Severe gradients, localized features Fast moving structures Solutions Rotated grid Convected background ionosphere

State transition to project prior into the future Convected ionosphere formulated in Kalman filter New density is formed from projected previous state and new measurements H is the path-pixel geometry defined by the satellite orbits and receivers measurements Variance in observations (IFB)

MIDAS – high latitude E-field from Weimer

MIDAS – high latitude Magnetic field from IGRF

MIDAS – high latitude Velocity used to convect ‘background’ ionosphere

MIDAS – high latitude

MIDAS – comparison to EISCAT Acknowledgement: EISCAT Scientific Association, in particular Ian McCrea at CCLRC, UK Electron density as a function of height and universal time 30 th October 2003 EISCAT radar MIDAS tomography

Conjugate plasma controlled by electric field ArcticAntarctic GPS data-sharing collaboration through International Polar Year Extension of imaging to Antarctica

High-resolution imaging In collaboration with J-P Luntama, FMI

High-resolution imaging

Equatorial imaging and GPS Scintillation – South America and Europe In collaboration with Cornell University, USA

GPS Ionosphere multi-scale problems – system effects Credit: ESA Perturbs the signal propagation speed proportional to total electron content – tens of metres error at solar maximum

Space-based P-band radar (SAR) forest biomass estimation ice sheet thickness determination Ionosphere multi-scale problems – system effects Ionospheric impacts Faraday rotations from several degrees to several cycles in high sun-spot periods defocusing by ionospheric irregularities

Tomography and the ionosphere GPS imaging of electron density System applications Next steps … Summary and Further Work

NASA movie - CME Sun-Earth connections

Goal – to nowcast and forecast the Sun-Earth System Models – Do we know all of the physics of the Sun-Earth System? Can we simplify it into a useful Sun-Earth model? Computational – how can we minimise the computational costs? Multi-scale data assimilation (temporal and spatial) will be essential Next steps Credit to ESA