NJ iMap 2.0 and NJ BASINS Paul Morton Water Monitoring & Standards Marzooq Al-Ebus Division of Watershed Management.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Enhancing Data Sharing and Access: STORET and WQX.
Advertisements

ICIS-NPDES Plugin Design Preview Webinar ICIS-NPDES Full Batch OpenNode2 Plugin Project Presented by Bill Rensmith Windsor Solutions, Inc. 3/15/2012.
NetDMR Electronic DMR Reporting
Materials Data Curation System
WSUS Presented by: Nada Abdullah Ahmed.
Pacific Northwest Water Quality Data Exchange Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Washington Department of Ecology Idaho Department of Environmental.
From STORET to WQX New Jersey’s Solution for Integrating Ambient Water Quality, Facility and GIS Information from Federal, State, County & Volunteer Organizations.
TRI State Data Exchange …The Best Thing Since ….!.
Watershed Characterization System (WCS) and its Modeling Extensions
Presented by the EPA AQS Team. Agenda Introductions Housekeeping/Overview of GoToWebinar Presentation Q& A session – use Question box to submit your questions.
Time Series Analyst An Internet Based Application for Viewing and Analyzing Environmental Time Series Jeffery S. Horsburgh Utah State University David.
Agenda Overview Why TransCAD Challenges/tips Initiatives Applications.
Integrating Historical and Realtime Monitoring Data into an Internet Based Watershed Information System for the Bear River Basin Jeff Horsburgh David Stevens,
Maintaining and Updating Windows Server 2008
EGEMS A Dedicated Web Based System for Ground Water Data Processing Analysis and Storage.
California Integrated Water Quality System (CIWQS) and Electronic Self Monitoring Reports (eSMR) Presentation to California Dischargers.
WHY THE NEED FOR DATABASE MANAGEMENT? Seven major rivers cross the reservation –24 Established sampling sites –12+ years accumulated water quality.
Watershed Watch Network NJ Department of Environmental Protection Danielle Donkersloot Volunteer Monitoring Coordinator.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey NWIS Web Services Snapshot for ArcGIS Sally Holl and David Maltby Based on work by David McCulloch.
Utah Department of Environmental Quality Division of Water Quality Modern STORET Implementation Why Move From a Working Database To STORET: Originally.
Professional Informatics & Quality Assurance Software Lifecycle Manager „Tools that are more a help than a hindrance”
Data for Water Resource Management Module 14, part A – Data types and sources.
Region 1 & 2 IR Workshop October 28,  The Water Quality Framework is a new way of thinking about how EPA’s data and information systems can be.
Roger Miller, Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality Barry Jackson, USGS Arkansas Water Science Center ARKANSAS EXCHANGE NETWORK FOR GROUNDWATER-QUALITY.
What is CCAMP OpenWater? A Prototype Internet based Open Source Software Toolkit Focused on water quality and quantity assessment and visualization. CCAMP.
Managing Monitoring Data from Many Sources A New Hampshire Experience Deb Soule Watershed Management Bureau New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services.
WQX Web and FIFRA Data Larry Theller, ABE, Purdue University Leighanne Hahn, OISC March 22, 2012.
TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATIONPARTNERS DOWNLOAD DATA Download water quality data in MS Excel, CSV, TSV, and KML formats. Learn how to use the portal and data.
SB 1070 Overview California Water Quality Monitoring Council –MOU CalEPA and Resources (Dec 2007) –Monitoring Inventory (April 2008) –Monitoring Recommendations.
Introduction to the Exchange Network January 9 th, 2012.
EPA Region 10 STORET Web Services & Superfund WQX Data Flow Region 10: STORET 2007 User’s Conference Sue McCarthy Matt Gubitosa
Support of the Framework for Monitoring Office of Management and Budget March 26, 2003.
National Environmental Information Exchange Network Potential for Regional LAEs By: Dave Tetta and Andrew Battin US EPA.
November 15, National STORET Users Conference 1 Progress Report 2004 National STORET Users Conference November 15-17, 2004 Lee Manning.
Water Quality Exchange and Web Tools Utah Monitoring Council February 25 th, 2010 Presented by James Harris Division of Water Quality.
Using STORET Data to Characterize Your Watershed 1 Webcast on June 21, 2007 Randy E. Hill IT Project Manager, EPA Monitoring Branch Dwane Young IT Specialist,
Crystal And Elliott Edward M. Kwang President. Objective A brief demo of Crystal Report to entice you –People spend thousand of dollars to attend Crystal.
WQX Web and OISC FIFRA Data, and follow-on work in 2015 Larry Theller, ABE, Purdue University April 16, 2015.
Larry Theller, Bernie Engel, Youn Shik Park for Purdue University ABE and Office of Indiana State Chemist September 27-28, 2012 “Empowering Water Quality.
Water Quality Exchange (WQX) Pilot and its Potential Role in NWIS/STORET Coordination October 18, 2005.
Electronic Exchange of Drinking Water Lab Data Presented by: Mike Matsko NJDEP Exchange Network Users Meeting April 18, 2006.
Regional STORET Perspective Why it is good practice to share data with STORET Data collection can be expensive, no single organization can collect all.
EPA’s Water Quality Exchange (WQX) National Water Quality Monitoring Conference San Jose, California Kristen Gunthardt, US EPA Curtis Cude, OR DEQ.
RCRAInfo May 6, RCRAInfo: What is it? The national (mission critical) information system that supports the RCRA Subtitle C program. A national.
Surface Water Quality Monitoring Information System (SWQMIS) Cindi Atwood Tetra Tech, Inc. (703) Nancy Ragland TCEQ.
WQX Web and FIFRA Data EPA Region 5 pre-SFIREG meeting WQX demonstration Larry Theller, ABE, Purdue University Leighanne Hahn, OISC Conference Call April.
September 2012 Developed by Agricultural and Biological Engineering Department at Purdue University and Department of Regional Infrastructures Engineering.
Purdue Status Report Summer Meeting 2012 Midwest Spatial Decision Support Interest Group EPA Region 5 July 9, 2012 Bernie Engel, Larry Theller, Youn Shik.
Distributed Data Analysis & Dissemination System (D-DADS ) Special Interest Group on Data Integration June 2000.
Monitoring Directory Tutorial.
1 Batch Indexing, Enviromapper, Web Services, and GIS Tools Randy Hill, Kevin Christian US EPA OWOW/AWPD/MB November 28, 2007.
Using the Exchange Network A User’s Perspective Deb Soule Watershed Management Bureau New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services.
Larry Theller, Bernie Engel, Youn Shik Park for Purdue University ABE and Office of Indiana State Chemist September 27-28, 2012 “Purdue Load Duration Curve.
Flowing Data from Texas to EPA: The WQX Experience Nancy Ragland Texas Commission on Environmental Quality STORET Conference November 28, 2007.
BASINS Better Assessment Science Integrating point and Non-point Sources Use of NHD in BASINS Presented at the NHD Application Symposium Ed Partington.
1 Electronic DMRs: Key to Burden Reduction and Improved NPDES Program Management David Hindin, Director, Enforcement Targeting and Data Division Office.
Water Quality Monitoring in Michigan, : A Decade of Program Evolution By: Gerald Saalfeld, MI Department of Environmental Quality.
1 Web Services USGS/EPA Collaboration February 21, 2008 Dwane Young, U.S. EPA; Jon Scott, USGS; Dorinda Gellenbeck, USGS; Nate Booth, USGS.
Can you do this in SmarTeam?
Maintaining and Updating Windows Server 2008 Lesson 8.
Considerations for Regional Data Collection, Sharing and Exchange Bruce Schmidt StreamNet Program Manager Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission Presentation.
Larry Theller, Bernie Engel, Youn Shik Park for Purdue University ABE and Office of Indiana State Chemist September 27-28, 2012 “Purdue Load Duration Curve.
C Copyright © 2009, Oracle. All rights reserved. Using SQL Developer.
ONYX 12.2.
Integration of Mobile GIS Technologies in the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection Bond Forfeiture Program Sarah Clapham and Yueming.
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection
Underground Injection Control
MICHIGAN’S Electronic Discharge Monitoring Reporting System (e-DMR)
Automating and Validating Edits
Health & Consumers DG SANCO Unit A.4 Information systems
Presentation transcript:

NJ iMap 2.0 and NJ BASINS Paul Morton Water Monitoring & Standards Marzooq Al-Ebus Division of Watershed Management

Overall Use of STORET in NJ  Began using STORET in 1970s  Currently storing ambient chemical, benthic macroinvertebrate, fish and data logger results  Since 1998, over 3,300 stations, 600,000 results  Used for required Integrated Water Quality Report (303 (d) & 305(b)) to USEPA and for TMDL development

NJDEP/USGS-NJ NWIS Data  Entered 3 years of cooperative network results in NJ STORET (only a part of NJDEP’s monitoring program)  Eliminated practice w/Region 2’s approval  Duplicate entry = skewed results for users retrieving data from both databases  No proofreading and USGS staff limitations  Shifted resources to getting data not in a public database into STORET so publicly available for Integrated Assessment Report

Window to My Environment  Advantages:  “One stop shop” for NWIS & STORET data  Access to data not in NJ-STORET (DRBC, EPA, IEC)  Map based and available to the public  Disadvantages:  Different data formats: must reformat to merge  Only one station of data per retrieval  No Legacy STORET data

 Will be applying for FY06 NEIEN Grant funding for multiple data flows to NJ-STORET NJ State Lab NJ-STORET (expanding eDWR)NJ State Lab NJ-STORET (expanding eDWR) NJ-STORET EPA-STORET?NJ-STORET EPA-STORET? May create a Web site/Web service for receiving 319(h) grant & volunteer data from groups not running STORET per Region 2 guidanceMay create a Web site/Web service for receiving 319(h) grant & volunteer data from groups not running STORET per Region 2 guidance  Learn from Pacific Northwest and USGS XML- based data sharing efforts so don’t reinvent the wheel Plans for NJ-STORET and CDX

Business Objects Web Intelligence NJEMS Facility Data (DMRs, Permits, Violations) GIS Spatial Data i-MapNJ BRIDGE NJ STORET Ambient Water Quality & Bio Data i-MapNJ ArcIntelligence 2.0 “Integrating GIS with NJDEP Databases”

Basic Function of i-MapNJ (Intranet) Builds a Bridge between Tabular Data and Spatial Data Improves Environmental Decision-Making Puts GIS & Data Viewer on Every NJDEP Desktop Introduces a “User Profile” concept Integrates additional environmental data Deploys additional GIS tools; Improves performance Employs State-of-the-Art Intranet Mapping Software Answers spatial questions that were previously unanswerable (not having a discoverable answer)

iMap NJ Interface

f You Can Manage the Layers in Your Profile

Pre-Defined WEBI Query for Water Monitoring and Standards

Results of the Query - Now Run the WEBI Report

WEBI Report

Set Filters on WEBI Report to find Results Exceeding the Standard

Result Set - Now Show These Stations in iMap

New Set of Stations Selected

Download a Comma Delimited File to your PC

Open with Excel or Access

NJ Perspective on Needed National STORET & Related Enhancements  Common format for data exchange (XML schema for STORET) to eliminate current wasteful practice of manually reformatting data  Automate 2-way data exchange (CDX client node] between Federal agencies (STORET and NWIS] and states/tribes to eliminate wasteful manual process  NEIEN Grant funds for states to implement STORET CDX nodes or we won’t be able to implement efficiencies offered by NEIEN initiatives  STORET GIS Web Service to make monitoring stations available via common format and eliminate manual creation of GIS data layers. Multiple agencies create GIS data clearinghouses that point to Web Services = broadest possible exposure for STORET data  Web links for reports currently disappear after 30 days. Make Web links for Data Logger files permanent so we can link to them from our Web sites rather than having to store the data on our Web sites

NJ Perspective on Needed National STORET/WME Enhancements  STORET/Window to My Environment Add ability to download multiple station results rather than the exhausting “one at a time” processAdd ability to download multiple station results rather than the exhausting “one at a time” process Normalize output formats for STORET and NWIS (ex: units of measure, how “Non-detects” are treated, etc.) so end user can spend less time reformatting data and more time assessing results and developing TMDLSNormalize output formats for STORET and NWIS (ex: units of measure, how “Non-detects” are treated, etc.) so end user can spend less time reformatting data and more time assessing results and developing TMDLS Add link to Legacy STORET data for users needing to do long term trend analysis and indicator/surrogate studies rather than forcing them to go to 2 Web sites and reformat data.Add link to Legacy STORET data for users needing to do long term trend analysis and indicator/surrogate studies rather than forcing them to go to 2 Web sites and reformat data.

Needed STORET Enhancements  Make STORET a fully functional database by eliminating wasteful practices and enhancing processing of batches of information freeing resources to enter additional data: Add the ability to change a group of results (batch processing) from “Preliminary” results that are not visible on the Web to “Final” results that are, without having to manually change each result or delete/reenter results. Add the ability to change a group of results (batch processing) from “Preliminary” results that are not visible on the Web to “Final” results that are, without having to manually change each result or delete/reenter results. Ability to add add, change or delete results for a group of existing samples (batch processing) rather than doing it “one at a time”Ability to add add, change or delete results for a group of existing samples (batch processing) rather than doing it “one at a time” Ability to share custom set-ups that increase the efficiency of data entry (share Preference & Defaults) between agenciesAbility to share custom set-ups that increase the efficiency of data entry (share Preference & Defaults) between agencies

Needed STORET Tools  Web based application (SIM Web?) for accepting/reformatting data for groups (contractors, grantees, academia, volunteers] not using STORET so they can make their data publicly available and therefore valid for inclusion in Water Quality Assessments.  Application to include all necessary information for STORET including Organization information, and preference/default codes that must be entered manually into a local copy of STORET (problem for those who don’t have STORET  Update SIM (the STORET Interface Module) so it can accept this additional information saving time and effort from manual steps and freeing resource to enter other data that doesn’t exist in a public database.

BASINS-NJ  Customized version of EPA BASINS 2.0 for WQ data analysis, TMDL modeling and implementation  Additional GIS data (Land Use, Impervious Cover, etc.)  Additional models (Mercury and Sediment)  Additional assessment tools  Low flow analysis tool  Watershed characterization report  Improved target and assess tool  Download and/or compile water quality data from multiple sources (USGS-NWIS, NJ-STORET, third-party data source  Basins-NJ version 1 was delivered on June, 2004 and is currently undergoing testing

BASINS-NJ Issues  ArcGIS  NJDEP switching from ArcView 3.x environment to ArcGIS 8.x, 9.x and establishing ArcGIS as the only GIS approved platform for the agency.  An option is to create a version of BASINS-NJ that runs on ArcGIS - this will involve a significant rewrite of the BASINS-NJ ArcView 3x Avenue scripts to VBA and ArcObjects or migrating to BASINS 4.0 when released by EPA.

BASINS-NJ Issues During Testing Phase   System errors   Error Codes- No user-interpretable information   BASINS Extensions may lock the system when multiple extensions are loaded   Some extensions use common dialogs and same name   Low Flow Analysis   Single day low flow is greater than an average 7 day low flow- 1Q10> 7Q10

BASINS Avenue Error

BASINS-NJ Issues  Data Duplication  NWIS and Legacy STORET data Data entered into both data systems Data entered into both data systems BASINS-NJ was not designed to handle this automatically. BASINS-NJ was not designed to handle this automatically.  User has to review combined data manually to remove data duplicates.

Potential BASINS-NJ Enhancements  Update data and provide tools to automatically update data  Population  Water quality and flow stations  Meteorological data (new WDM files)  Automatically refresh stations list from USGS- NWIS and EPA-STORET

Potential BASINS-NJ Enhancements  Include new models  STEPL  GWLF  AQUATOX  Enhance current download tools to include:  Refresh/update NWIS stations  Connect and download EPA-STORET data and stations  Provide tools to identify potential data duplicates from multiple data sources  Tools to archive and restore BASINS projects (available in BASINS 3.1)

NJ’s Perspective on STORET & BASINS Now, and its promise for future.  NJ has used STORET for multiple water quality networks and types of monitoring (chemical & biological) for over 4 decades,  NJ enthusiastically supports STORET as a National Water Quality Data Base useful for meeting EPA requirements, especially Integrated Assessments, trends and TMDLs.  Urgent need to develop automated data exchange between EPA/STORET, USGS/NWIS and states, tribes, academia and volunteers to eliminate extremely wasteful current practice of reformatting data and manual data sharing.  Key enhancements are needed in the areas of importing data, editing and deleting results so that STORET is a fully functional national DB and BASINS is a comprehensive assessment tool for states, tribes, academia, volunteers and public.

Thank you!