Executive Summary 2009 Findings November 16, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OCCC AtD Meeting, September 16, 2009 Mr. Stuart Harvey 1.
Advertisements

DATA UPDATES FACULTY PRESENTATION September 2009.
Engagement By Design: Focus on Developmental Education Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2004 Findings.
The Faculty Said… (pt.3) Community College Faculty Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Findings Presenter: LaSylvia Pugh – September 14, 2006.
Data for FCDC Dec ACCJC New Standards Mission Fulfillment through institutionally defined standards Bakersfield College is committed to providing.
GGC and Student Engagement.  NSSE  Overall: 32%  First Year: 30%  Seniors: 33%  GGC  Overall: 28%  First Year: 26% (381)  Seniors: 38% (120)
Presentation to Student Affairs Directors November, 2010 Marcia Belcheir, Ph.D. Institutional Analysis, Assessment, & Reporting.
Benchmarking Effective Educational Practice Community Colleges of the State University of New York April, 2005.
BENCHMARKING EFFECTIVE EDUCATIONAL PRACTICE IN COMMUNITY COLLEGES What We’re Learning. What Lies Ahead.
Faculty Said/Students Said Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Findings Presenters: LaSylvia Pugh & Pamela G. Senegal – February 17, 2006.
National Survey of Student Engagement, 2008 Results for UBC-Okanagan.
CCSSE Houston Community College System Presented by Margaret Drain June 19, 2007.
1 This CCSSE Drop-In Overview Presentation Template can be customized using your college’s CCSSE results. Please review the “Notes” section accompanying.
San Luis Obispo Community College District SENSE 2012 Findings for Cuesta College.
St. Petersburg College CCSSE 2011 Findings Board of Trustees Meeting.
SENSE 2013 Findings for College of Southern Idaho.
Community College Survey of Student Engagement CCSSE 2014.
The Students Said… (pt.2) Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Findings Presenter: LaSylvia Pugh – August 29, 2006.
Faculty Said/Student Said 2008 Update (First Look) Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings LaSylvia Pugh – February 16, 2009.
Mountain View College Spring 2008 CCSSE Results Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings.
MARTIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE ACHIEVING THE DREAM COMMUNITY COLLEGES COUNT IIPS Conference Charlotte, North Carolina July 24-26, 2006 Session: AtD – Use of.
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services.
Corning CC and CCSSE: What We Experienced and How We Handled It Maren N. Hess Director of Institutional Research AIRPO Winter Conference Syracuse – January.
CCSSE 2013 Findings for Cuesta College San Luis Obispo County Community College District.
Note: CCSSE survey items included in benchmarks are listed at the end of this presentation 1. Active and Collaborative Learning Students learn more when.
In this session, participants will learn what assessment of student engagement has shown St. Louis Community College (STLCC) about transfer success and.
National Survey of Student Engagement, 2008 Results for UBC-Vancouver.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: National Survey of Student Engagement Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty.
APSU 2009 National Survey of Student Engagement Patricia Mulkeen Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness.
Maryland Consortium Findings from the 2006 CCSSE Survey.
Community College Survey of Student Engagement JIM Meeting Presentation January 20, 2009 Jerome Ward Director, Institutional Research Cochise College.
Strategic Conversation: A Commitment to Student Engagement.
ENHANCING STUDENT ENGAGEMENT AT IWU DR. MARY ANN SEARLE VICE PRESIDENT FOR ENROLLMENT & STUDENT AFFAIRS.
Topic #1 – COMPLETERS (Graduation and Transfer) Key AC Evidence Provided by Amarillo College Offices of Institutional Research and Outcomes Assessments.
Data You Can Bank On What can OIR do for you?. Fall 2007 Student Demographics 13,217 students 69% Female 52% Minority Average age is 27 18% are First-time.
ESU’s NSSE 2013 Overview Joann Stryker Office of Institutional Research and Assessment University Senate, March 2014.
CCSSE 2010: SVC Benchmark Data Note: Benchmark survey items are listed in the Appendix (slides 9-14)
NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT AT IU KOKOMO Administrative Council 26 September 2007.
1 This CCFSSE Drop-In Overview Presentation Template can be customized using your college’s CCFSSE/CCSSE results. Please review the “Notes” section accompanying.
2009 Pitt Community College CCSSE Results September 21, 2009 Report to the Campus College CCSSE Results Pitt Community College Dr. Brian Miller, Assistant.
Committing to Student Engagement AVC 2008 Findings.
Making Connections Dimensions of Student Engagement 2010 Findings.
Topic #2 – FIRST-GENERATION Students Key AC Evidence Provided by Amarillo College Offices of Institutional Research and Outcomes Assessments.
Student Engagement as Policy Direction: Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Skagit Valley College Board of Trustees Policy GP-4 – Education.
De Anza College 2009 Community College Survey of Student Engagement Presented to the Academic Senate February 28, 2011 Prepared by Mallory Newell Institutional.
NISOD 2011 Student Success – From the Starting Gate to the Finish Line.
Student Engagement and Academic Performance: Identifying Effective Practices to Improve Student Success Shuqi Wu Leeward Community College Hawaii Strategy.
NSSE Working Student Study Assessment Day Presentation Office of Assessment Fitchburg State College.
Achieving the Dream Board of Trustees Institute 2010 Students Speak – We Listen!
De Anza College 2009 Community College Survey of Student Engagement Presented to the Academic Senate January 10, 2011 Prepared by Mallory Newell Institutional.
1 NSSE Results Fort Lewis College (2010) Richard A. Miller Exec. Dir – OIRPA.
UNDERSTANDING 2012 NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) RESULTS Nicholls State University October 17, 2012.
RESULTS OF THE 2009 ADMINISTRATION OF THE COMMUNITYCOLLEGE SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT Office of Institutional Effectiveness, April 2010.
CCSSE 2015 Findings for OSU Institute of Technology.
CCSSE 2015 Findings for Merced College Spring 2016 Flex Thursday, 14 January 2016 Presented by the Office of Student Services, Office of Student Equity.
Today’s Topic Student Satisfaction and Engagement Hosted by IEPR.
CCSSE 2014 Findings Southern Crescent Technical College.
CCSSE 2012 Findings for Southern Crescent Technical College.
© 2011 Center for Community College Student Engagement Wyoming Community Colleges Statewide Workshop October 29, 2013.
RESULTS OF THE 2009 ADMINISTRATION OF THE COMMUNITYCOLLEGE SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT Office of Institutional Effectiveness, September 2009.
This SENSE Drop-In Overview Presentation Template can be customized using your college’s SENSE results. Please review the “Notes” section accompanying.
Del Mar College Utilizing the Results of the 2007 Community College Survey of Student Engagement CCSSE Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness.
2009 C OMMUNITY C OLLEGE S URVEY OF S TUDENT E NGAGEMENT & F ACULTY S URVEY OF S TUDENT E NGAGEMENT RESULTS FOR IVCC (CCSSE AND CCFSSE) Cathy Bangert &
Jackson College CCSSE & CCFSSE Findings Community College Survey of Student Engagement Community College Faculty Survey of Student Engagement Administered:
North Seattle College All College Meeting
Closing the Loop on Student Feedback
Director, Institutional Research
The Heart of Student Success
Faculty In-Service Week
CCSSE 2015 Findings for OSU Institute of Technology
Presentation transcript:

Executive Summary 2009 Findings November 16, 2009

CCSSE is a national study designed to provide information about effective educational practices in community and technical colleges and assists institutions in using that information to provide improvements in student learning and persistence. A Tool for Improvement – CCSSE helps us: Assess our educational quality. Identify and learn from good educational practices. Indentify areas in which improvement can be made. A Tool for Accountability – CCSSE: Provides reliable data on issues that matter. Reports data publicly. Is committed to using data for improvement.

CCSSE was first conducted in 2002 and WITC was one of 257 colleges to launch the study. The study has grown in popularity and credibility and now includes over 600 participating colleges with approximately 400,000 students participating. WITC participated in CCSSE in 2002, 2003, 2005, and In 2007, WITC was ranked 7 th best 2-year college in the nation based on results from the 2005 CCSSE study.

CCSSE 2009 Consisted of 663 participating colleges. WITC is one of 331 colleges grouped into a ‘small college’ cohort. Classroom survey administration consisted of 70 classes selected with a total of 667 students participating. Student participation represented nearly 20% of the total program students enrolled at WITC during the FY 09 spring term.

84% of WITC students participating in CCSSE are enrolled full-time. The majority (71%) of CCSSE respondents are between the age of 18 and % of respondents are male.

Education Level and College Experience A high school diploma/GED is the highest level of education attained by 68% of CCSSE respondents. 72% of respondents are starting their college career at WITC.

First-Generation Status Fifty-five percent (55%) of students are first-generation college students. 39% of mothers’ and 40% of fathers’ highest education is a high school diploma/GED. Support Systems Three-fourths of WITC students indicate that their family is extremely supportive of their attendance at WITC.

WITC Students Contend With Multiple Priorities Work Caring for Dependents Nearly three-fourths of students work for pay. Half work 20 or more hours per week. 58% have family that is dependent on their care. Commuting Over one-third of students spend 6 or more hours a week driving to and from WITC. 10% spend 11 or more hours in their weekly commute.

Students’ Educational Goals

Factors Causing Students to Leave

Paying for college. The majority of WITC students are utilizing student loans, grants, and scholarships to pay for their WITC tuition.

Relationships are Strong at WITC WITC students say ….. Other Students are: Friendly, supportive, and help create a sense of belonging. Instructors are: Available, helpful, sympathetic. Staff are: Helpful, considerate, flexible.

WITC Students are Very Satisfied 98% of survey respondents would recommend WITC to a friend or family member. 93% of students rated their educational experience at WITC as good or excellent.

Future Plans Over two-thirds of CCSSE respondents will either return to WITC within the year or have accomplished their goals at WITC. 17% 9%

Service Item Frequency of UseSatisfactionImportance (Often/sometimes)(Very/Somewhat)(Very) Computer lab85%97%73% Financial aid advising67%89%69% Academic advising/planning61%93%55% Skill labs (writing, math, etc.)60%94%51% Career counseling42%86%50% Transfer credit assistance42%82%48% Student organizations38%88%25% Job placement assistance37%78%58% Peer or other tutoring30%85%38% Services to students with disabilities21%82%47% Child Care12%56%27% Student Services

A regular feature of CCSSE allows colleges to dig deeper into areas of student experience and institutional performance that are basic to student success. This year’s Special-Focus questions elicited information from students on their use of social networking tools such as Instant messaging, text messaging, MySpace, Facebook and Twitter for communication with other students, faculty or college staff.

Survey results show that most students use social networking tools on a daily to weekly basis; however, their use of these tools for educational purposes is less frequent.

85% of students surveyed use WITC’s Course Management system, Blackboard, at some time during their educational experience at WITC.

Q. How connected do you feel to WITC when using social networking tools? Almost one-third of WITC students feel more connected to WITC because of social networking tools.

 Active & Collaborative Learning  Student Effort  Academic Challenge  Student-Faculty Interaction  Support for Learners CCSSE uses a set of five benchmarks of effective educational practice in colleges. Benchmarks allow colleges to monitor their performance in areas that are focused on teaching, learning and student success. The five benchmarks encompass 38 engagement items on the survey that reflect a variety of aspects of our students’ learning experiences.

WITC benchmark scores were higher in all five areas compared to the WTCS Consortium and the CCSSE Small School Cohort!

Active & Collaborative Learning Asked questions/contributed to class discussions. Made a class presentation. Worked with other students on projects during and outside of class. Tutored or taught other students. Participated in a community- based projects as part of a regular course. Discussed ideas from readings or classes with others outside of class.

Student Effort Prepared two or more drafts of a paper/assignment before turning it in. Worked on a paper/project that required integrating ideas or information from various sources. Came to class unprepared. Time spent preparing for class. Reading books for personal enjoyed or enrichment. Frequency of use of peer tutoring, skills lab, and computer lab.

Academic Challenge Worked harder than they thought they could to meet instructor's standards/expectations. Applied theories/concepts to practical problems or in new situations. Used information read or heard to perform a new skill. Made judgments about the value or soundness of information, arguments, or methods. Completed exams that challenged them to do their best work.

Student-Faculty Interaction Used to communicate with an instructor. Discussed grade/assignment with an instructor. Talked about career plans with an instructor/advisor. Discussed ideas from readings or classes with instructors outside of class. Received prompt feedback from instructors on performance. Worked with instructors on activities other than coursework.

Support for Learners Providing support necessary to succeed, thrive socially, and cope with non-academic responsibilities. Providing financial support to afford education. Use of academic advising/ planning and career counseling. Encouraging contact with students from different economic, social, racial, or ethnic backgrounds.

WITC benchmark scores were higher in all five areas compared to the WTCS Consortium and the CCSSE Small School Cohort!

Marketing HLC Accreditation Student Services QRP Strategic Planning