CRESST / U C L A Slide 1, 7-23-03 Implementing No Child Left Behind: Assessment Issues Joan L. Herman UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Delaware Alternate Portfolio Assessment II (DAPA)
Advertisements

Events that led to NCLB Allows all children to receive a quality education Gives higher standards and greater accountability Teachers teach things that.
ALIGNING STATE SYSTEMS TO IMPROVE TEACHER QUALITY FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
Helping State Leaders Shape Education Policy Presentation Prepared for Panel Discussion Colorado Association for Teacher Educators Spring 2004 Conference.
Educational Policies Present Zachary Schrage.
1/27 CRESST/UCLA A Sample of CRESST Research Ronald Dietel Arizona Educational Research Organization Phoenix, AZ - October 19-20, 2006 UCLA Graduate School.
Hickory Ridge Elementary School Annual Title One Parent Meeting
Beyond Peer Review: Developing and Validating 21st-Century Assessment Systems Is it time for an audit? Thanos Patelis Center for Assessment Presentation.
LAKE COUNTY SCHOOLS System Accreditation Overview of Standards March 3-6, 2013 Susan Moxley, Ed.D. Superintendent Hugh Hattabaugh Chief Academic Officer.
Chapter Fifteen Understanding and Using Standardized Tests.
C R E S S T / U C L A Improving the Validity of Measures by Focusing on Learning Eva L. Baker CRESST National Conference: Research Goes to School Los Angeles,
Keystone Instructional Specialist. Keystone Exams Offered three times each year – winter, spring and summer. Offered in Algebra I, Biology and Literature.
Accreditation: An Opportunity to Promote Information Technology Fluency NLII Annual Meeting San Diego, CA January 26, 2004 Joan K. Lippincott CNI.
CESA 10 February,  Overview of the the legal requirements  Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) formerly known as No Child Left Behind.
Pennsylvania Department of Education Initiatives Updates May 24, 2012.
No Child Left Behind and School Improvement Ivana Beeman Southern Utah University.
High Stakes Testing EDU 330: Educational Psychology Daniel Moos.
Education in Delaware: ESEA Flexibility Renewal Community Town Hall Ryan Reyna, Office of Accountability.
1 No Child Left Behind Critical Research Findings For School Boards Ronald Dietel UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies National Center.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Assessment in Early Childhood Legislation. Legislation for Young Children The need for measurement strategies and tests to evaluate federal programs led.
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together.
UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing Online Assessment within.
Assessment of an Arts-Based Education Program: Strategies and Considerations Noelle C. Griffin Loyola Marymount University and CRESST CRESST Annual Conference.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
IDEA and NCLB Standards-Based Accountability Sue Rigney, U.S. Department of Education OSEP 2006 Project Directors’ Conference.
Washington State Assessment Conference 2008 Improving Student Learning: Moving Forward with Integrity Dr. Terry Bergeson Superintendent of Public Instruction.
CIcu Conference June 18, 2014 Joan Thompson Mid- Hudson Region.
Marjorie Hall Haley, PhD - GMU1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
The Why (Waiver & Strategic Plan) Aligned to research: MET Study Components: Framework/Multiple Measures Pilot Requirements Timeline.
Iowa Support System for Schools in Need of Assistance (SINA) Overview and Audit Iowa Department of Education and AEA 267 August 2011.
The Do’s and Don’ts of High-Stakes Student Achievement Testing Andrew Porter Vanderbilt University August 2006.
Further Research Baker, E., Goldschmidt, P., Martinez, F., & Swigert, S. (February, 2002). In search of school quality and accountability: Moving beyond.
NCLBNCLB No Child Left Behind (take notes, please)
Teaching to the “Big Ideas”: Moving beyond the standards Terry P. Vendlinski UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies National Center for.
Teaching Students with Mild and Moderate Disabilities: Research-Based Practices Second Edition © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights.
No Child Left Behind Application NCLB Application – Common Elements Virginia Department of Education.
State Practices for Ensuring Meaningful ELL Participation in State Content Assessments Charlene Rivera and Lynn Shafer Willner GW-CEEE National Conference.
Slide 1, Moving From Challenge To Action: Accountability Supporting Student Learning Joan L. Herman UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information.
School Monitoring and OEPA Greg Miller MEL – 540 School Resource Management Spring 2015.
Ed Reform in Washington State 4.5, 4.6. Purpose of Understanding  If you don’t know where you are going, how will you know when you get there?  How.
C R E S S T / U C L A Validity Issues for Accountability Systems Eva L. Baker AERA April 2002 UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies.
Oregon Department of Education March 10, 2005 Video Conference Title ID Subpart 2 Formal Agreements with Facilities to Provide Academic Programs.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
On the horizon: State Accountability Systems U.S. Department of Education Office of Elementary and Secondary Education October 2002 Archived Information.
No Child Left Behind Impact on Gwinnett County Public Schools’ Students and Schools.
1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
C R E S S T / CU University of Colorado at Boulder National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing Measuring Adequate Yearly.
Continuous Improvement Priority Schools CIPS. Passage of No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Passage All Students Meet Standards Adequate Yearly Progress.
1 Restructuring Webinar Dr. Zollie Stevenson, Jr., Ph.D. Director Student Achievement and School Accountability Programs Office of Elementary and Secondary.
NH Department of Education Developing the School Improvement Plan Required by NH RSA 193-H and Federal Public Law for Schools in Need of Improvement.
STATEWIDE ASSESSMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY: PROMOTION AND GRADUATION TESTS BY ISABELLA BROWN Emory University Summer 2006.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). What is Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? As a condition of receiving federal funds under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), all.
Exploring Data Use & School Performance in an Urban School District Kyo Yamashiro, Joan L. Herman, & Kilchan Choi UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information.
Assessment, Accountability & Ultimate Learning Goals Joan L. Herman NEA Symposia Series Education Goals: Vision and Reality November 15, 2007 National.
Module 4: Overview of the EQuIP Rubric
Proficiency Assessments for Wyoming Students
Standardized Test Overview
Parent and Family Engagement Input Meeting
كتاب مهارات تدريس.
State Board of Education Progress Update
Understanding and Using Standardized Tests
REPORTING.
How to Prepare for State Assessments
Education and Accountability
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together
Presentation transcript:

CRESST / U C L A Slide 1, Implementing No Child Left Behind: Assessment Issues Joan L. Herman UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST) National Conference of State Legislatures San Francisco, CA July 23, 2003

CRESST / U C L A Slide 2, Overview è Overview of symbolic and technical uses of assessment in NCLB è Research evidence on how accountability is working è Advice on how accountability can work better?

CRESST / U C L A Slide 3,

CRESST / U C L A Slide 4,

CRESST / U C L A Slide 5, Effects of Testing on Teaching and Learning è Tests focus on instruction è Teachers model what is assessed è Test scores show initial increases è BUT… è Teachers focus on test, not standards è What is not tested becomes invisible

CRESST / U C L A Slide 6, Selected Technical Issues è Alignment of tests with standards is uneven è Questions about whether test score increases represent real learning è Issues reliability of AYP scores è Feasibility of AYP goals

CRESST / U C L A Slide 7, Suggestions è Assure alignment è Encourage multiple measures è Encourage regular monitoring of student progress è Assure teacher capacity è Promote reform in ways that support social capital, not just intellectual capital

Feedback: Privacy Policy Feedback
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
About project: SlidePlayer Terms of Service

© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.