Day: Thursday 10 th November Session: 14.30am Coordinators: Ian Williamson & Stig Enemark Topic:Components of the vision- break out groups

Day 1 – Wednesday Nov 9 th Welcome & Research Vision Presentations - European Perspective of Paradigm European Group Coordinator: Ian Williamson Rapporteur: Paul van der Molen Report Back - Discussion European Lessons Learnt Australian Group Coordinator: Stig Enemark Rapporteur: Steve Jacoby Evaluate – Components of the vision

Presentations - Australian Perspective of Paradigm European Group Coordinator: Ian Williamson Rapporteur: Daniel Steudler Report Back - Discussion Australian Lessons Learnt Australian Group Coordinator: Stig Enemark Rapporteur: Grahame Searle Evaluate – Components of the vision Day 2 – Thursday Nov 10 th

Report Back - Discussion Group 1 (based on Australian & European Perspectives) Rapporteur: Warwick Watkins Evaluate – Issues in Designing a New Generation of LAS Day 3 – Friday Nov 11 th Presentation – Spatially Enabling Government Final Presentation Next Generation of LAS Ian Williamson, Stig Enemark, Jude Wallace Group 2 (based on Australian & European Perspectives) Rapporteur: Holger Magel

Key take home messages (1) -Sustainability is embedded within the culture – European owner has a different attitude towards land -Australia relies to much on regulation through Government to achieve sustainability -Current Australian LAS do not fully support sustainable development -Need much more disclosure and transparency of RRR and the current recording systems are not providing this – need to make a decision regarding recording these or not recording these in the register -Providing the correct information to policy and decision makers at all levels

Key take home messages (2) -Current LAS system of cadastre and land registry are focussed on the Land Market -Does not provide relevant and sufficient information for sustainable development as a parcel based paradigm can constrain thinking about sustainable development BUT -Spatially enabled cadastre is the key to meeting sustainable development as you must relate back to the owner -LAS need to cater and build in behaviour elements of people – LAS need to represent the values of the community – when designing changes to LAS, what is the behavioural change we are trying to implement -Unbundling of rights – need to make sure that this does not threaten sustainability

Lessons Learnt (1) -Has the approach been appropriate – straw man – paradigm -This approach was helpful -It created enough confusion to have a fruitful discussion -Overseas experience to the discussion was critical to success -Like to have seen more time for discussion and interaction after each presentation -Having papers developed before hand was good. -Want a CD of papers and presentations

Future (1) -Register of restrictions – topic is vital as it is critical to the sustainability aspect of LAS – work needs to feed in and impact on the way we build systems -Network of people who should be used as a reference group to provide advice to and receive advice from -More interdepartmental and inter-profession interaction is important -But how do we do this?? -Involve others – users, other professionals, -Land registrars in Australia embrace collaborative change in the broad sustainability debate, however in Europe there does not appear to be the same degree of interaction and understanding -To further Land Administration work will require similar strong interaction between academic, professional and governmental structures – especially in all stages of development activity

Future (2) -Local government engagement continues to be a problem that must be addressed -Original broad topic has enabled key issues to be identified – many of these need to be explored in a more defined process, rather than in a broad approach -Semantics and definitional issues need greater clarity if external stakeholders are to be engaged and to advance the process and application of our knowledge -Before this work is taken to government it needs to be road tested with the broad stakeholders -Government needs to understand the impact and scope of the effect of the RRR -Raise the importance of the debate at ministerial level through a ministerial council of land ministers