Global Monitoring of Riparian Zones in Arid Lands Using Remote Sensing Methods in the Colorado River Delta Hugo Rodriquez, Doug Rautenkranz, Pamela Nagler

OVERVIEW Purpose and Background –Applications –The importance of measuring the extent and magnitude of riparian vegetation –Usefulness of remote sensing in monitoring riparian vegetation –Correlation of vegetation growth & water flows Data Collection –aircraft flight (May 1999) –satellite imagery Image processing & spectral analysis Scaling from aerial images to satellite images –field transects: validating imagery Results: Satellite data is useful in determining percent cover for habitat delineation. Future Work and Cooperation with Bureau of Reclamation –Helicopter Flight (January, 2000) –Future Aircraft Flight (May, 2000)

Applications Quantification of Riparian Vegetation in Arid Lands Protection of Biologically Diverse Natural Resources and Habitats for Endangered Species Warnings of Vegetation Stress and/or Habitat Reduction which help to facilitate bureaucratic decision-making. Provides Hydrologists, Modelers, Farmers, & Researchers with Image Products that aid in determining water availability.

Usefulness of Remote Sensing in Monitoring Riparian Vegetation Improved Methods: –Faster & Less tedious work –Larger area coverage & Inaccessible regions –More accurate (less human error) Spectral data (reflectances) are collected by sensors on different platforms: –satellite sensors: i.e., Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) or Terra MODIS –airborne sensors: i.e., DyCAM imaging camera, Exotech Radiometer –ground sensors: i.e., Exotech Radiometer Spectral data is divided into Red and NIR bands and ratioed to give a vegetation index (VI) showing the presence of vegetation: –VI = 0 Soil –VI = 1 Green Vegetation VI is important in determining the magnitude and extent (percent cover (%C)) of vegetation.

Spectral Data: Vegetation Indices (VI) A) NDVI = (NIR-Red) / (NIR+Red) B) SAVI = (1+L) x [(NIR - RED) / (NIR + Red + L)] C) EVI = 2(NIR-RED) / (NIR + 3.3Red - 4.5Blue + 0.6) B G R NIR

The importance of measuring the extent and magnitude of Riparian Vegetation Habitat Endangered species, Biodiversity Land Corridors (Continuity of habitat) Water Resources, Wetlands Hydrology Dependence of vegetation on water availability Removal of invasive plants by floods Global Hydrologic Cycle Earth’s Energy Balance Land Cover / Use, Vegetation Dynamics Surface Temperature and Energy Cycles Biology / Biogeochemistry of Ecosystems Global Carbon Cycle Climate Trends

Background After the construction of Glen Canyon Dam and the filling of Lake Powell, there was reduced flow and no water in the delta (“a dead delta”). There has been some regeneration of native vegetation in the absence of floods. Images were acquired before and after flooding to capture the state of vegetation and to bracket the flood periods. Bigger flows and their corresponding responses are shown in images before and after flooding. Large floods from produced trees which are now approximately 15 years old. Between there was no water, but trees which are in an age class ~10 years old germinated and grew although there were no floods. The flood period produced the greatest number of cottonwood and willow trees and which are 2-3 years old. Smallest peak (250,000 acre/ft) in 1997 still has enough water to stimulate/regenerate vegetation growth. In conclusion, the big peak flows exist, however even the smaller flows provide for a riparian growth.

Annual Flows Glen Canyon Dam Completed Lake Powell fills

Determining Vegetation Stress Vegetation Indices (VI) –Fraction of Absorbed Photosynthetically Active Radiation (fAPAR) –Leaf Area Index (LAI) EvapoTranspiration (ET) –Surface resistance –Latent heat of vaporization –Thermal Data: Canopy and Air Temperatures Peak Vegetation (VI & ET) data are correlated with these hydrologic variables: –Surface flows –Storage of water in the riparian aquifer –Depth to water and salinity of water –Precipitation, outflows, net radiation, potential evaporation, soil holding capacity Validation: –ground –aircraft –satellite, with different resolutions

Data Collection Maps –Roads, urban areas, landmarks –Canals, drainage system, wetlands, soils –Vegetation/Landcover classes (GIS) –Species identification (ground-truthing) Field Instrumentation –Hydrological Gaging Stations: surface flows, salinity, aquifer storage –IRT (temperature), Ground Exotech (Refl. & VI) –LAI2000 (LAI), AccuPAR (f APAR ), Sap Flow (ET) –Manual Estimations: Height, Widths, Percent Cover, Vegetation Class/Species Meteorological Data (for 2000 flight) –net radiation, wind speed –vapor pressure deficit –field and air temperature Airborne Instrumentation –Digital VIS-NIR Camera –Exotech with simulated MODIS bands (VI) –Infrared Thermal (IRT) instrument (temperature) –Albedometers –Video Tape

Colorado River Delta Project Area Ciénega Altar Desert Water & Mud Flats S E A W i F S (1 km resolution)1998 Image

Data Collection: Aerial May 24, 1999

4 8 9 Digital Photos

10:47 10:53 10:55 10:56 Area = 67m x 100m Alt. = 150m Res. = 1.7m Length = 1.5 km with 10 km spacing Swath = 600m Alt. = 1000m Res. = 17.5m

Thematic Mapper (30m Resolution)1998 Image

Image histograms: 3 Bands and 3 VIs

MQUALS Flight

GIS Components Flight Line Coordinates of Dycam Images Solar Zenith Angle of Dycams TM image (July 1997) Video Time for Dycam image location Percent plant cover Visual assessments Spectral analysis Dycam Reflectances Dycam Average VI TM Average VI

DyCAM (fov: 100m) overlayed with Video Still (fov: 30m)

Vegetation Indices (VI) / Image A) NDVI = (NIR-Red) / (NIR+Red) B) SAVI = (1+L) x [(NIR - RED) / (NIR + Red + L)] C) EVI = 2(NIR-RED) / (NIR + 3.3Red - 4.5Blue + 0.6)

Determining Percent Cover

3-D (DEM) Representation of Vegetation Indices Digital Elevation Model Image of DyCAM VI DyCAM VI Classification of Ground Features

Percent Cover Comparison Computer Visual

DyCAM %C Results

Vegetation Indices (DyCAM) as a predictor of Percent Cover

Vegetation Indices (DyCAM) as a predictor of Leaf Area Index (LAI)

Data Collection: FIELD

Ground Cover (%) vs. Geographic Sampling of the Aerial Images

Tree Characteristics AB CD For three transect sites (Cinco de Mayo, Benito Juarez and Jesus Gonzales), 268 trees (cottonwood and willow only) were evaluated for Height (A), Diameter (B), No.Rings as a function of Diameter (C), and Age (D). Diameter (cm) Willows Cottonwoods

Cottonwood-Willow Zone: Cover Classes Estimates 3 Ways n = 9 n = 63 n = 9 Equal samples Accounts for different transect lengths

Percent Cover by Species in Understory, Midstory, Overstory, % of Total Land Cover & Area (ha)

Anderson-Ohmart Cover Classes

Cottonwood-Willow Structural Classes: A comparison of US and Mexico Riparian Area

TM Nº (Scaled NDVI) and NDVI from DyCAM to TM (1999) Scaled NDVI (Nº ): TM Nº = * DyCAM Nº r 2 = 0.82 TM NDVI: = * DyCAM Nº r 2 = 0.79

Percent Cover determined using TM NDVI

Conclusions Vegetation Indices (VI) were determined using aerial remote sensing equipment and were well correlated with percent cover (%C). Vegetation mapping methods derived from aerial images were scaled up to the satellite level to show changes in percent cover in the ecosystem. Field surveys validated inferences from aerial and satellite imagery: –Changes in total vegetation cover over time –Regeneration of native tree species –The volume of flow Satellite images can be used to assess habitat extent, water availability, and land use change. Peak vegetation can be correlated with surface flows to gauge water stress & water requirements to support the ecosystem. Annual qualitative assessments of variables such as Vegetation Indices (VI) and percent cover (%C) can be used to monitor the status of riparian vegetation in the Delta.

Future Work Land Cover Class Delineation based on VI Species Classification based on Spectral Discrimination Processing of TM Images ( ) Comparison of riparian areas: –Colorado River Mexico United States –Bill Williams River –Virgin River –Gila River

Helicopter Flight and Future Aerial Data Collection