Results Showing the potential of the method for arbitrary networks The following diagram show the increase of networks’ lifetime in which SR I =CR I versus.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A 2 -MAC: An Adaptive, Anycast MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks Hwee-Xian TAN and Mun Choon CHAN Department of Computer Science, School of Computing.
Advertisements

Coverage by Directional Sensors Jing Ai and Alhussein A. Abouzeid Dept. of Electrical, Computer and Systems Engineering Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.
SELF-ORGANIZING MEDIA ACCESS MECHANISM OF A WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORK AHM QUAMRUZZAMAN.
Bidding Protocols for Deploying Mobile Sensors Reporter: Po-Chung Shih Computer Science and Information Engineering Department Fu-Jen Catholic University.
Maximum Battery Life Routing to Support Ubiquitous Mobile Computing in Wireless Ad Hoc Networks By C. K. Toh.
TDMA Scheduling in Wireless Sensor Networks
5/2/2015 Wireless Sensor Networks COE 499 Sleep-based Topology Control II Tarek Sheltami KFUPM CCSE COE
Improvement on LEACH Protocol of Wireless Sensor Network
Presented By- Sayandeep Mitra TH SEMESTER Sensor Networks(CS 704D) Assignment.
A Novel Cluster-based Routing Protocol with Extending Lifetime for Wireless Sensor Networks Slides by Alex Papadimitriou.
An Energy Efficient Hierarchical Heterogeneous Wireless Sensor Network
Wireless Sensor Network and Applicaions(WSNA2002) A Coverage-Preserving Node Scheduling Scheme for Large Wireless Sensor Networks Di Tian, Nicolas D. Georganas.
Fast Distributed Algorithm for Convergecast in Ad Hoc Geometric Radio Networks Alex Kesselman, Darek Kowalski MPI Informatik.
Differentiated Surveillance for Sensor Networks Ting Yan, Tian He, John A. Stankovic CS294-1 Jonathan Hui November 20, 2003.
1 Span. 2 Goals Minimize energy consumption Wireless interface is largest power drain* Maximize OFF time Minimize end-to-end delay No centralized controller.
Localized Techniques for Power Minimization and Information Gathering in Sensor Networks EE249 Final Presentation David Tong Nguyen Abhijit Davare Mentor:
1 Cross-Layer Scheduling for Power Efficiency in Wireless Sensor Networks Mihail L. Sichitiu Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering North Carolina.
A Survey of Energy-Efficient Scheduling Mechanisms in Sensor Networks Author : Lan Wang·Yang Xiao(2006) Presented by Yi Cheng Lin.
Zoë Abrams, Ashish Goel, Serge Plotkin Stanford University Set K-Cover Algorithms for Energy Efficient Monitoring in Wireless Sensor Networks.
1 TTS: A Two-Tiered Scheduling Algorithm for Effective Energy Conservation in Wireless Sensor Networks Nurcan Tezcan & Wenye Wang Department of Electrical.
Online Data Gathering for Maximizing Network Lifetime in Sensor Networks IEEE transactions on Mobile Computing Weifa Liang, YuZhen Liu.
The Chinese Univ. of Hong Kong Node Scheduling Schemes for Coverage Preservation and Fault Tolerance in Wireless Sensor Networks Chen Xinyu Group Meeting.
Adaptive Self-Configuring Sensor Network Topologies ns-2 simulation & performance analysis Zhenghua Fu Ben Greenstein Petros Zerfos.
Maximum Network lifetime in Wireless Sensor Networks with Adjustable Sensing Ranges Mihaela Cardei, Jie Wu, Mingming Lu, and Mohammad O. Pervaiz Department.
1 Sensor Placement and Lifetime of Wireless Sensor Networks: Theory and Performance Analysis Ekta Jain and Qilian Liang, Department of Electrical Engineering,
Power saving technique for multi-hop ad hoc wireless networks.
CS 712 | Fall 2007 Using Mobile Relays to Prolong the Lifetime of Wireless Sensor Networks Wei Wang, Vikram Srinivasan, Kee-Chaing Chua. National University.
Vikramaditya. What is a Sensor Network?  Sensor networks mainly constitute of inexpensive sensors densely deployed for data collection from the field.
Lifetime and Coverage Guarantees Through Distributed Coordinate- Free Sensor Activation ACM MOBICOM 2009.
M-GEAR: Gateway-Based Energy-Aware Multi-Hop Routing Protocol
Dynamic Clustering for Acoustic Target Tracking in Wireless Sensor Network Wei-Peng Chen, Jennifer C. Hou, Lui Sha.
Mobile Ad hoc Networks Sleep-based Topology Control
WMNL Sensors Deployment Enhancement by a Mobile Robot in Wireless Sensor Networks Ridha Soua, Leila Saidane, Pascale Minet 2010 IEEE Ninth International.
SoftCOM 2005: 13 th International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks September 15-17, 2005, Marina Frapa - Split, Croatia.
Preserving Area Coverage in Wireless Sensor Networks by using Surface Coverage Relay Dominating Sets Jean Carle, Antoine Gallais and David Simplot-Ryl.
Patch Based Mobile Sink Movement By Salman Saeed Khan Omar Oreifej.
Maximum Network Lifetime in Wireless Sensor Networks with Adjustable Sensing Ranges Cardei, M.; Jie Wu; Mingming Lu; Pervaiz, M.O.; Wireless And Mobile.
1 A Bidding Protocol for Deploying Mobile Sensors GuilingWang, Guohong Cao, and Tom LaPorta Department of Computer Science & Engineering The Pennsylvania.
P-Percent Coverage Schedule in Wireless Sensor Networks Shan Gao, Xiaoming Wang, Yingshu Li Georgia State University and Shaanxi Normal University IEEE.
Selection and Navigation of Mobile sensor Nodes Using a Sensor Network Atul Verma, Hemjit Sawant and Jindong Tan Department of Electrical and Computer.
REECH ME: Regional Energy Efficient Cluster Heads based on Maximum Energy Routing Protocol Prepared by: Arslan Haider. 1.
SIMPLE: Stable Increased Throughput Multi-hop Link Efficient Protocol For WBANs Qaisar Nadeem Department of Electrical Engineering Comsats Institute of.
Probabilistic Coverage in Wireless Sensor Networks Authors : Nadeem Ahmed, Salil S. Kanhere, Sanjay Jha Presenter : Hyeon, Seung-Il.
By Naeem Amjad 1.  Challenges  Introduction  Motivation  First Order Radio Model  Proposed Scheme  Simulations And Results  Conclusion 2.
Decentralized Energy- Conserving and Coverage- Preserving Protocols for Wireless Sensor Networks
Evaluating Wireless Network Performance David P. Daugherty ITEC 650 Radford University March 23, 2006.
Cross-Layer Scheduling for Power Efficiency in Wireless Sensor Networks Mihail L. Sichitiu Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering North Carolina.
A Coverage-Preserving Node Scheduling Scheme for Large Wireless Sensor Networks Di Tian, and Nicolas D. Georanas ACM WSNA ‘ 02.
An Adaptive Zone-based Storage Architecture for Wireless Sensor Networks Thang Nam Le, Dong Xuan and *Wei Yu Department of Computer Science and Engineering,
Maximizing Angle Coverage in Visual Sensor Networks Kit-Yee Chow, King-Shan Lui and Edmund Y. Lam Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering The.
Cross-Layer Scheduling for Power Efficiency in Wireless Sensor Networks Mihail L. Sichitiu Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering North Carolina.
Decentralized Energy-Conserving and Coverage-Preserving Protocols for Wireless Sensor Networks Chi-Fu Huang, Li-Chu Lo, Yu-Chee Tseng, and Wen-Tsuen Chen.
SenSys 2003 Differentiated Surveillance for Sensor Networks Ting Yan Tian He John A. Stankovic Department of Computer Science, University of Virginia November.
Saran Jenjaturong, Chalermek Intanagonwiwat Department of Computer Engineering Chulalongkorn University Bangkok, Thailand IEEE CROWNCOM 2008 acceptance.
Mobility Increases the Connectivity of K-hop Clustered Wireless Networks Qingsi Wang, Xinbing Wang and Xiaojun Lin.
Toward Reliable and Efficient Reporting in Wireless Sensor Networks Authors: Fatma Bouabdallah Nizar Bouabdallah Raouf Boutaba.
Connected Point Coverage in Wireless Sensor Networks using Robust Spanning Trees IEEE ICDCSW, 2011 Pouya Ostovari Department of Computer and Information.
SERENA: SchEduling RoutEr Nodes Activity in wireless ad hoc and sensor networks Pascale Minet and Saoucene Mahfoudh INRIA, Rocquencourt Le Chesnay.
On Mobile Sink Node for Target Tracking in Wireless Sensor Networks Thanh Hai Trinh and Hee Yong Youn Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops(PerComW'07)
CSMA/CD Simulation Carrier Sense Multiple Access (CSMA), although more efficient than ALOHA or slotted ALOHA, still has one glaring inefficiency: When.
Deploying Sensors for Maximum Coverage in Sensor Network Ruay-Shiung Chang Shuo-Hung Wang National Dong Hwa University IEEE International Wireless Communications.
1 Power Efficient Monitoring Management in Sensor Networks A.Zelikovsky Georgia State joint work with P. BermanPennstate G. Calinescu Illinois IT C. Shah.
A Coverage-Preserving and Hole Tolerant Based Scheme for the Irregular Sensing Range in WSNs Azzedine Boukerche, Xin Fei PARADISE Research Lab Univeristy.
Scalable Coverage Maintenance for Dense Wireless Sensor Networks Jun Lu, Jinsu Wang, Tatsuya Suda University of California, Irvine Secon ‘ 06.
How to minimize energy consumption of Sensors in WSN Dileep Kumar HMCL 30 th Jan, 2015.
Students: Yossi Turgeman Avi Deri Self-Stabilizing and Efficient Robust Uncertainty Management Instructor: Prof Michel Segal.
SENSYS Presented by Cheolki Lee
Energy-Efficient Communication Protocol for Wireless Microsensor Networks by Wendi Rabiner Heinzelman, Anantha Chandrakasan, and Hari Balakrishnan Presented.
Net 435: Wireless sensor network (WSN)
Survey on Coverage Problems in Wireless Sensor Networks
Presentation transcript:

Results Showing the potential of the method for arbitrary networks The following diagram show the increase of networks’ lifetime in which SR I =CR I versus their density (the pattern is the same for the other types of networks). The increase rate is low given that even sleeping nodes consume energy at a high rate. Aim Provide a fully localized solution towards prolonging the lifetime of arbitrary sensor networks with autonomous nodes, whose objective is to monitor a geographic area and report data to a single station. Relax limitations that hold in other approaches such as the topology and nodes’ abilities. Ensure full area coverage, system’s connectivity and node’s autonomy. Contribution The paper contributes towards relaxing limitations, assumptions and constraints as far as the topology and nodes’ abilities are concerned, ensuring full area coverage, system’s connectivity and node’s autonomy. Introduction Aiming at deploying fully autonomous sensor nodes in hostile and inaccessible terrains so as to report data to a single server station, we deal with arbitrary sensor networks’ self- organization capabilities. Arbitrary Sensor Network : Arbitrary sensor networks have a random topology and comprise fully autonomous sensors with differing capabilities and capacities. Sensors capabilities : Each sensor has a sensing (SR) and a communication (CR) radii that may differ among themselves (i.e. CR I ≠SR I for the node I) as well as between different sensors (i.e. given two nodes I and J, in the general case it holds that CR I ≠CR j, SR I ≠SR j, SR I ≠CR j and CR I ≠SR j ). Sensors energy capacities : At any given time the energy capacity of each sensor may differ from the capacity of other nodes in the network. Problem Statement At every time point t during network’s lifetime a sensor is specified by. I : identification number of each sensor, unique for every node. Pr t I : the priority of each node, which is specified to be a function of node’s remaining battery. Cr t I : the communication range of each node. SR t I : the sensing range of each node. ST t I : the state of the node and can be either “active” or “sleeping”. BL t I : the remaining battery level of the node at time t in mA. CM I : the consumption matrix that specifies the consumption rate of each sensor component in active and in static states Let G be an arbitrary sensor network and L(G) its lifetime. The addressed problem is to maximize L(G) subject to preserving the connectivity of the network at every time point t, 0≤t≤L(G). In other words, since L(G) depends on consumption, our goal is to minimize system's consumption. Taken that sleeping nodes consume much less energy, lifetime extension can be achieved by maximizing the number of sleeping nodes at every time point t. Method Lifetime Division System's lifetime is divided into rounds the duration of which is predefined. Each round is further divided into 3 phases: Neighbours Detection, during which each node transmits a hello message, within its CR, advertising its location and its capabilities. Scheduling phase, during which each node decides whether to sleep or not. Task phase, during which active nodes carry out their task. The neighbouring sensors N(I) of a sensor I at time t are those whose distance from I is less that CR t I. N(I) may change between different time points due to the changing CR I. Scheduling A node can enter in sleep mode when: Its sensing area is fully covered It is not needed for preserving system's connectivity Sensing Area Coverage Anode is fully covered when its sensing area is fully covered by the sensing areas of its neighbours. Following Tian and Georganas approach, this is calculated by joining the central angles of the sector drawn by the touching points of the two areas and the node itself. If the final angle is ≥360° the node is fully covered. As it is known, if nodes decide simultaneously whether to enter in sleep mode or not, blind points may appear and loss of connectivity may occur. Every node whose sensing area is fully covered, it waits for a random time period and then transmits a status message to its neighbours, announcing them its intention to enter in sleep mode. It then waits for another random time period before proceeding. If a status message from another node arrives during these periods, the node checks if it's still fully covered without taking in count the node that sent the message. Otherwise, it proceeds to connectivity checking. If a node is not fully covered, it remains active, raising his priority by a large number and entering in task phase. Connectivity Necessity Although we avoided the appearance of blind points, we still haven't ensure connectivity. For that purpose, before entering in sleep mode, a node wait for a time period, which is inversely proportional to its priority, and then checks if its active neighbours are connected. If that's true, this node safely enter in sleep mode. Otherwise, it means that the node is necessary to system's connectivity, and has to remain active. The calculation a neighbours connectivity, can be easily done by simple mathematics, taken that node's sensing and communication radii are known to their neighbours. Energy efficient area coverage in arbitrary sensor networks Sigalas Markos, Vouros George Information and Communication Systems Engineering Department, University of the Aegean, Samos, Greece (contact: Round Division into 3 phases Random deployment of 1000 nodes in a 500x500 area. Dialog box of our simulation software where one may specify CM. Assumptions The system is synchronized. Nodes are static. Radii reduction is calculated by a linear formula Neighbours Detection Scheduling Task Phase (a) Sector drawn by sensing areas of two neighbouring nodes, (b) central angle of sector, (c) fully covered node by its neighbours SR i =CR I Conclusions We have shown the potential of a method for prolonging the lifetime of an arbitrary sensor network subject to keeping it connected so as nodes to report to a single server. Future work concerns the enhancement of the method towards asynchronous networks and the study for further reduction of the number of messages by using enhancements of the Tian & Georganas method [1]. SR t = CR t =10 The following diagram shows the percentage of active nodes versus network’ density