1 Using Data to Plan Interventions: Determining Student Needs and Making Instructional Recommendations Kathryn Howe Trish Travers

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RtI Response to Intervention
Advertisements

MY SIDEWALKS Overview.
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Chapter 9: Fluency Assessment
1 Module 2 Using DIBELS Next Data: Identifying and Validating Need for Support.
Special Education Evaluations For Students With ELL Needs
Using the PMER &PMBR Overview of Progress Monitoring and the assessments available 1
WelcomeOPLC’s Reading Program and How it Works. OPLC Overview Balanced Reading Program – Reading Block – Whole Group Reading Assessments – Grouping Supports/Enrichment.
B-ELL Leadership Professional Development Oregon Reading First October 2 nd, 2008 University of Oregon © 2008 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center.
Digging Deeper Phonological Awareness Instructional Sort Our Focus The Wisconsin RtI Center/Wisconsin PBIS Network (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support.
What We’re Learning Building & Improving an RTI System Seven Key Foundations RISS 2009.
North Penn School District Phase III Update Introduction to Response to Instruction and Intervention (RTII): A Schoolwide Framework for Student Success.
Dr. Kelley. Share LiveText Assignment Discuss at table (rubric, typed AIP, student assessments):  The assessment tools you used.  What you learned.
Administering the DRA2 /EDL2
STAR Basics.
Using Data to Plan Instructional Support
Supplemental and Intervention Programs
Building Our 90 Minute Reading Block Westside Elementary Maria Randle, Reading Coach
1 Meeting the Needs of Some and High Risk Readers Oregon Reading First Outreach November 7, 2008 Jerry Silbert, Reading Consultant Elizabeth Jankowski,
Instruction GoalsAssessment For Each Student For All Students Overview of Advanced DIBELS Applications Institute on Beginning Reading II.
1 Project-wide Reading Results: Interpreting Student Performance Data and Designing Instructional Interventions Oregon Reading First February, 2004 Institute.
Beth Harn & Rachell Katz Oregon Reading First Center Oregon Reading First Review of Supplemental and Intervention Programs: Summary by Essential Component.
Reading First Assessment Faculty Presentation. Fundamental Discoveries About How Children Learn to Read 1.Children who enter first grade weak in phonemic.
Michael C. McKenna University of Virginia Sharon Walpole University of Delaware Differentiating Instruction: Planning with the 2/3 Team.
Aligning Interventions with Core How to meet student needs without creating curricular chaos.
Intervention Placement Process: Finding the Right Fit Cadre 8 Training Feb 5, 2012.
Grade-level Benchmark Data Meetings
Using a Comprehensive Assessment Plan to Meet All Students’ Instructional Needs Leadership Conference 2005 Orlando, Florida Pat Howard and Randee Winterbottom.
1 Preventing Reading Difficulties with DIBELS Assessment.
Work Sample Seminar1 Work Sample Seminar Screening Assessments, File Review, & Context Part 1 Portland State University.
Digging Deeper with Screening Data: Creating Intervention Groups Seaside School District March 17, 2010 Adapted from a presentation by.
100 % Data Meetings 100% Data Meetings turn data into ACTION FOR ALL students.
Wake County Public School System
What is Reading First This “program” focuses on putting proven methods of early reading instruction in classrooms. Through Reading First, states and districts.
1 RtII: Response to Instruction and Intervention Wissahickon School District.
Grade-level Data Team Meetings.
RDG 567 & RDG 568 (East Lyme Cohort) Session 3.
DIBELS: Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills 6 th Edition A guide for Parents.
Title I Parent Meeting Miami Elementary School
0 From TN Department of Education Presentation RTII: Response to Instruction and Intervention.
The Wisconsin RtI Center (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support of the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction in the development of this presentation.
Dynamic Measurement Group (DMG) Part 2.
School-wide Data Analysis Oregon RtI Spring Conference May 9 th 2012.
Aligning Interventions with Core How to meet student needs without creating curricular chaos.
Response to Intervention: Improving Achievement for ALL Students Understanding the Response to Intervention Process: A Parent’s Guide Presented by: Dori.
School-wide Data Team Meeting Winter NSIF Extended Cohort February 10, 2012.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
Chapter 5 Informal Assessment: Progress Monitoring.
Early Literacy Project Smart Goal Project Outcomes
Designing and using assessment systems to prevent reading difficulties in young children Dr. Joseph Torgesen Florida State University and Florida Center.
Special Education Referral and Evaluation Report Oregon RTI Project Sustaining Districts Trainings
MCLASS Reading 3D: Class Summary Reports. Desired Outcomes Understand how to access and analyze Class Summary Reports for whole class and individual students.
The Big Picture Teaching Reading Sourcebook 2nd edition
WORKING TOGETHER TO HELP CHILDREN SUCCEED. *providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to individual student needs *using a researched-based.
Digging Deeper with Screening Data: Creating Intervention Groups Gresham-Barlow School District September 8, 2011.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Initial Math RTI Training Nov 19 th, 2015 Math RTI:
DIBELS: Doing it Right –. Big Ideas of Today’s Presentation Reading success is built upon a foundation of skills DIBELS (Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early.
Assessment Discussion Student Achievement Committee Meeting January 9, 2014.
The Action Planning Process
Where Do You Stand? Using Data to Size Up Your School’s Progress Michael C. McKenna University of Virginia.
 Students in grades Kindergarten through twelfth  Classroom teacher, reading specialist, interventionist  Can be administered individually, some assessments.
UNIVERSAL SCREENING AND PROGRESS MONITORING IN READING Secondary Level.
WestEd.org Washington Private Schools RtI Conference Follow- up Webinar October 16, 2012 Silvia DeRuvo Pam McCabe WestEd Center for Prevention and Early.
3.0 Matching Instruction to Student Need Trainer Notes:
Data-Driven Decision Making
DIBELS.
Diagnosis and Remediation of Reading Difficulties
DIBELS Next Overview.
Using Strategies, Protocols, and Tools to Analyze Data A Presentation of the National Reading Technical Assistance Center (NRTAC) Speaker’s notes Additional.
DIBELS: An Overview Kelli Anderson Early Intervention Specialist - ECC
Presentation transcript:

1 Using Data to Plan Interventions: Determining Student Needs and Making Instructional Recommendations Kathryn Howe Trish Travers

2 Copyright l All materials are copy written and should not be reproduced or used without the expressed permission of Trish Travers, coordinator of the Oregon Reading First Center. Selected slides may have been reproduced from other sources and original references cited.

3 To assist schools in using student assessment information to: help plan instruction for all students throughout the year. identify students who are in need of additional reading instruction beyond the established reading block. determine instructional recommendations for students with different Instructional Profiles. Planning Interventions: Objectives

4 l a data review system to assess if instruction is having the desired effect - Grade Level Team a school-wide system to make instructional changes as necessary - School-wide Team. Critical Topics We Will Not Cover: We won’t have time to talk about these, but they must be in place:

5 l Data are used to determine each student’s Instructional Profile. l Framework provides guidance on the type of instruction that may best match each student’s literacy needs. l Teams work out the specifics of Standard Protocols for each group and change them as the data indicates. Instructional Profile Framework

6 Outcome Measures from Previous School Year Screening Data from Current School Year Grade LevelSome RiskHigh Risk Phonics Screener Profile #2 Grade Level or above on Screening Assessments & Passes In-Program Unit Tests Profile #3 Grade Level or above on Screening Assessments & Fails Some In-Program Unit Tests PassNo Pass In-Program Assessments Overview of K-6 Grouping Framework Overview of K-6 Grouping Framework Profile #4 Some Risk on Screening Assessments & Passes Phonics Screener Skills Profile #5 Some Risk on Screening Assessments & Fails Some Phonics Screener Skills ELL Profile Usually needs extra language support & can be in any profile Profile #6 High Risk on Screening Assessments Intensive Interventions along with Core Replacement Intervention Core Program Guided by Placement Test Results Advanced PassNo Pass Profile #1 Significantly Exceeds Grade Level Benchmarks on Screening Assessments & Passes In-Program Unit Tests Pass

7 High RiskGrade LevelSome RiskAdvanced Another way of looking at it…

8 High RiskGrade LevelSome RiskAdvanced Our Overall Goal…

9 l A school’s Comprehensive Assessment Plan includes: Outcome Assessment Screening Assessment Diagnostic Assessment Classroom Based Assessment Key Assessments

10  Phonics Screeners Phonics screeners help pinpoint areas in which the student needs explicit phonics instruction.  In-program and informal specific skill tests Help determine if students are learning what is being taught Diagnostic and Classroom Information: Phonics

11 l K-1 Language Screener l Example Informal Tools: Retell Maze/Cloze In-Program Vocabulary and Comprehension Assessments Diagnostic and Classroom Information: Vocabulary and Comprehension

12 Outcome Measures from Previous School Year Screening Data from Current School Year Grade LevelSome RiskHigh Risk Phonics Screener Profile #2 Grade Level on Screening Assessments & Passes In-Program Unit Tests Profile #3 Grade Level on Screening Assessments & Fails Some In-Program Unit Tests PassNo Pass In-Program Assessments Overview of K-6 Profile Framework Overview of K-6 Profile Framework Profile #4 Some Risk on Screening Assessments & Passes Phonics Screener Skills Profile #5 Some Risk on Screening Assessments & Fails Some Phonics Screener Skills ELL / Low Language Profile Usually needs extra language support & can be in any profile Profile #6 High Risk on Screening Assessments Intensive Interventions along with Core Replacement Intervention Core Program Guided by Placement Test Results Advanced PassNo Pass Profile #1 Significantly Exceeds Grade Level Benchmarks on Screening Assessments & Passes In-Program Unit Tests Pass

13 Outcome Measures from Previous School Year Screening Data from Current School Year In-Program Assessments Advanced Profile #1 Significantly Exceeds Grade Level Benchmarks on Screening Assessments & Passes In-Program Unit Tests Pass Profile 1 Students Exceeding Grade Level Standards

14 Outcome Measures from Previous School Year Screening Data from Current School Year Grade Level Profile #2 Grade Level on Screening Assessments & Passes In-Program Unit Tests Pass In-Program Assessments Advanced Profile #1 Significantly Exceeds Grade Level Benchmarks on Screening Assessments & Passes In-Program Unit Tests Pass Profile 2 Grade Level Students Consistently Passing In- Program Tests

15 Outcome Measures from Previous School Year Screening Data from Current School Year Grade Level Profile #2 Grade Level on Screening Assessments & Passes In-Program Unit Tests Profile #3 Grade Level on Screening Assessments & Fails Some In-Program Unit Tests PassNo Pass In-Program Assessments Advanced Profile #1 Significantly Exceeds Grade Level Benchmarks on Screening Assessments & Passes In-Program Unit Tests Pass Profile 3 Grade Level Students NOT Consistently Passing In-Program Tests

16 Outcome Measures from Previous School Year Screening Data from Current School Year Grade LevelSome Risk Phonics Screener Profile #2 Grade Level on Screening Assessments & Passes In-Program Unit Tests Profile #3 Grade Level on Screening Assessments & Fails Some In-Program Unit Tests PassNo Pass In-Program Assessments Profile #4 Some Risk on Screening Assessments & Passes Phonics Screener Skills Advanced Pass Profile #1 Significantly Exceeds Grade Level Benchmarks on Screening Assessments & Passes In-Program Unit Tests Pass Profile 4 Some Risk Students Accurate But Not Fluent

17 Outcome Measures from Previous School Year Screening Data from Current School Year Grade LevelSome Risk Phonics Screener Profile #2 Grade Level on Screening Assessments & Passes In-Program Unit Tests Profile #3 Grade Level on Screening Assessments & Fails Some In-Program Unit Tests PassNo Pass In-Program Assessments Profile #4 Some Risk on Screening Assessments & Passes Phonics Screener Skills Profile #5 Some Risk on Screening Assessments & Fails Some Phonics Screener Skills Advanced PassNo Pass Profile #1 Significantly Exceeds Grade Level Benchmarks on Screening Assessments & Passes In-Program Unit Tests Pass Profile 5 Some Risk Students Not Accurate and Not Fluent

18 Outcome Measures from Previous School Year Screening Data from Current School Year Grade LevelSome RiskHigh Risk Phonics Screener Profile #2 Grade Level on Screening Assessments & Passes In-Program Unit Tests Profile #3 Grade Level on Screening Assessments & Fails Some In-Program Unit Tests PassNo Pass In-Program Assessments Profile #4 Some Risk on Screening Assessments & Passes Phonics Screener Skills Profile #5 Some Risk on Screening Assessments & Fails Some Phonics Screener Skills ELL/Low Language Profile Usually needs extra language support & can be in any profile Profile #6 High Risk on Screening Assessments Intensive Interventions along with Core Replacement Intervention Core Program Guided by Placement Test Results Advanced PassNo Pass Profile #1 Significantly Exceeds Grade Level Benchmarks on Screening Assessments & Passes In-Program Unit Tests Pass Profile 6 High Risk Students

19 Outcome Measures from Previous School Year Screening Data from Current School Year Grade LevelSome RiskHigh Risk Phonics Screener Profile #2 Grade Level on Screening Assessments & Passes In-Program Unit Tests Profile #3 Grade Level on Screening Assessments & Fails Some In-Program Unit Tests PassNo Pass In-Program Assessments Profile #4 Some Risk on Screening Assessments & Passes Phonics Screener Skills Profile #5 Some Risk on Screening Assessments & Fails Some Phonics Screener Skills ELL/Low Language Profile Usually needs extra language support & can be in any profile Profile #6 High Risk on Screening Assessments Intensive Interventions along with Core Replacement Intervention Core Program Guided by Placement Test Results Advanced PassNo Pass Profile #1 Significantly Exceeds Grade Level Benchmarks on Screening Assessments & Passes In-Program Unit Tests Pass

20 l Michael is a third grade student. His second grade outcome data indicated an overall reading score at the 22nd percentile which placed him in the Some Risk category l Michael’s recent screening information on reading fluency placed him at Some Risk, reading 68 wpm with 88% accuracy. l Michael was administered a phonics screener which indicated significant difficulty with mastery of vowel combinations and two-syllable words. l Using the assessment information, determine Michael’s instructional profile. Application Activity Michael 33

21 l Brianna is a first grade student at a new school. There are no previous records from Kindergarten. l Recent screening information indicates that Brianna falls into the “High Risk” category of instructional need. l Diagnostic information indicates that Brianna has not acquired phonemic awareness skills, she lacks beginning alphabetic skills (few letter-sound relationships), and recognizes few sight words. l Using the assessment information, determine Brianna's instructional profile. l Pair and Share. Application Activity Brianna

22 l Daniel is a second grade student who has received ELL services in the past. Outcomes measures from first grade place him in the Some Risk category. l Recent screening data indicates Daniel is at grade level on reading fluency measures. l Although the school year has just started, Daniel has had some difficulty passing in-program assessments. l Using the assessment information, determine Daniel’s instructional profile. l Pair and Share. Application Activity Daniel 35

23 Sample K-1 Oral Lang. Screener Handout 2 Generic Phonics Screener Handouts 3A & 3B Instructional Profiles and Recommendations and Grade-level Goals Handouts 4A and 4B Phonics Screener Data Summaries Handouts 5A and 5B Standard Protocol Templates Handouts 6A through 6B Additional Handouts