WHOIS Policy Review Team Consultation with the Community 16 March 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CcTLD Management, ICANN, and the Public Interest July 26, 2001.
Advertisements

Generic Names Supporting Organisation Bruce Tonkin Chair, GNSO Council.
Whois Task Force GNSO Public Forum Wellington March 28, 2006.
Internationalizing WHOIS Preliminary Approaches for Discussion Internationalized Registration Data Working Group ICANN Meeting, Brussels, Belgium Jeremy.
Update on Whois TF March 25, Objectives of the Task Force 1)Define the purpose of the Whois service. [complete] 2)Define the purpose of the Registered.
Update to NCPH on WHOIS GNSO NCPH Inter-Sessional Meeting 29 Jan 2013.
ICANN’s Whois Policy: Registry Obligations A “What is ICANN’s Whois Policy” Subteam Presentation By Kathy Kleiman.
19 January * Affirmation of Commitments (AoC) review * Mandate began in October 2010 * Cross-community composition, law enforcement (LE) representative.
At-Large Whois Briefing 05 March * Affirmation of Commitments (AoC) review * 2009 signed document between US DoC and ICANN * Commits ICANN to enforce.
© 2003 Public Interest Registry Whois Workshop Introduction to Registry/Registrar Issues Presented by Bruce W. Beckwith VP, Operations June 23, 2003 Serving.
Enhanced Cooperation Grace Githaiga Kenya ICT Action Network
A Next Generation Registration Directory Service (RDS) EWG Briefing for the IETF by Chris Disspain Monday Nov 4, 2013.
ICANN/ccTLD Agreements: Why and How Andrew McLaughlin Monday, January 21, 2002 TWNIC.
WHOIS Policy Review Team Draft Report Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC) 14 February 2012.
Introduction to ICANN’s new gTLD program. A practical example: the Dot Deloitte case. Jan Corstens, Partner, Deloitte WIPO Moscow, 9 Dec 2011.
Text #ICANN51. Text #ICANN51 15 October 2014 At-large policy round table Holly Raiche Panel 1: Privacy and Proxy 1000 – 1045 Hrs.
RAA Update and WHOIS Validation Workshop Moderated by: Volker Greimann, Gray Chynoweth, Kurt Pritz 12 March 2012.
Revised Draft Strategic Plan 4 December 2010.
2012 – 2015 ICANN Strategic Plan Development 6 October 2011.
A S I A P A C I F I C N E T W O R K I N F O R M A T I O N C E N T R E Database SIG APNIC Database Privacy Issues 1 March 2001 APRICOT, Malaysia Fabrina.
WHOIS Policy Review Team Interaction with the Community 16 March 2011.
1 Updated as of 1 July 2014 Issues of the day at ICANN WHOIS KISA-ICANN Language Localisation Project Module 2.3.
Update report on GNSO- requested Whois studies Liz Gasster Senior Policy Counselor 7–12 March 2010.
Final Report on Improvements to the RAA Steve Metalitz 5 December 2010.
Consumer Trust, Consumer Choice & Competition Presenter: Steve DelBianco Chair: Rosemary Sinclair.
ICANN LAC Regional Strategy Final Results URUGUAY February 7-8, 2013.
What is WHOIS?. 2  Internet Protocol you can use to search registry and registrar databases and discover who registered a domain name or IP address 
CcTLD/ICANN Contract for Services (Draft Agreements) A Comparison.
The Operational Point of Contact Proposal GNSO Whois Task Force.
CcNSO Update for APTLD New Delhi February 2012 Keith Davidson, ccNSO Councillor.
In Dec-2010 ICANN Board requested advice from ALAC, GAC, GNSO and ccNSO on definition, measures, and 3- year targets, for competition, consumer trust,
Michael Yakushev, cctld.ru Board Member.  WHOIS existed before ICANN (1982-)  Review of WHOIS Policy is prescribed by AoC (2009)  Review Team was formed.
RFP for the.aero registry operator DAC 7 April 19, 2005 Geneva.
ICANN Update: What Next for Trademark Owners? 22 nd Annual Fordham Int’l IP Law & Policy Conference 25 April 2014.
Update from ICANN staff on SSR Activities Greg Rattray Tuesday 21 st 2010.
1 ICANN update Save Vocea APSTAR retreat, Taipei, TW 24 February 2008.
WHOIS Policy Review Team Interaction with the Commercial Stakeholder Group (BC, ISPCP, IPC)
Multistakeholder Policy- & Decision-making
Global Name Registry Proposal to Modify Appendix O: WHOIS Data Access.
GNSO Public Forum Dr Bruce Tonkin Chair, GNSO Council Lisbon, 29 March 2007.
ccTLD IDN Report ccTLD Meeting, Montreol June 24, 2003 Young-Eum
IRTP Part D PDP WG Items for Review. Items for Review Policy Development Process WG Charter GNSO WG Guidelines.
HIPAA PRACTICAL APPLICATION WORKSHOP Orientation Module 1B Anderson Health Information Systems, Inc.
Policy Update. Agenda Locking of a Domain Name Subject to UDRP Proceedings PDP Thick Whois PDP IRTP Part D PDP Policy & Implementation Other efforts?
What is WHOIS?. 2  Internet Protocol you can use to search registry and registrar databases and discover who registered a domain name or IP address 
New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Steve Chan | APRALO-APAC Hub Webinar | 28 September 2015.
Proposals for Improvements to the RAA June 22, 2010.
The challenge of services for new registries Giovanni Seppia Cape Town, November 30, 2004.
1 1 The GNSO Role in Internet Governance Presented by: Chuck Gomes Date: 13 May 2010.
Security, Stability & Resiliency of the DNS Review Team Wednesday, 8 December 2010.
WHOIS Policy Review Team Interaction with the SSAC 15 March 2011.
Registrars Constituency Policy Update Denise Michel, VP Policy Liz Gasster, Senior Policy Counselor Margie Milam, Senior Policy Counselor October 2009.
Governmental Advisory Committee Public Safety Working Group 1.
Update on WHOIS- related policy activities in the GNSO Liz Gasster Senior Policy Counselor ICANN ICANN 5 March
Review of CCWG-Acct 3 rd Proposal and ALAC Issues Alan Greenberg 04 December 2015.
Law Enforcement Recommendations for RAA ammendment ICANN Brussels 2010 Protective Marking : Protect.
Update on Consumer Choice, Competition and Innovation (CCI) WG Rosemary Sinclair.
Update to ALAC on the RAA Negotiations Margie Milam 26 June 2012.
Margie Milam, Senior Director 27 March 2014 Privacy/Proxy Accreditation Survey Results.
GAC SESSION 9: Privacy and Proxy (P/P) Services Accreditation Issues.
GAC SESSION 7: PSWG Update. PUBLIC SAFETY WORKING GROUP (PSWG) – UPDATE TO THE GAC Agenda Item 7 | ICANN 56 | 28 June 2016.
Concerns of Noncommercial Users Constituency Privacy Conference November 29, 2005 Kathryn A. Kleiman, Esq. Internet Law and Policy Specialist, McLeod,
GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation)
Implementation Review Team Meeting
Data Protection/Privacy Activities
8th Capacity Building Webinar
Community Session - Next-Generation gTLD Registration Directory Service (RDS) Policy Requirements RDP PDP WG | ICANN59 | 26 June 2017.
ICANN’s Policy Development Activities
Next-Generation gTLD Registration Directory Service (RDS) to replace WHOIS PDP WG Handout for Working Group Call Wednesday 20 December 2017 at 06:00 UTC.
WHOIS Policy Review Team
Presentation transcript:

WHOIS Policy Review Team Consultation with the Community 16 March 2011

Background 2  Affirmation of Commitments  13 member, multi stakeholder team  Deadline: November 2011 For full reference, please refer to our WIKI: https: //community.icann.org/display/whoisreview

Our members 3 SO/AC CandidatesIndependent Experts Emily Taylor (UK) James Bladel (US) Kathy Kleiman (US) Kim von Arx (CA) Lutz Donnerhacke (DE) Olivier Iteanu (FR) Omar Kaminski (BR) Sarmad Hussain (PK) Susan Kawaguchi (US) Wilfried Woeber (AT) Bill Smith (US) Lynn Goodendorf (US) Law Enforcement Representatives Sharon Lemon (UK) Selectors or their Designated Nominees Michael Yakushev (RU) Peter Nettlefold (AU)

Mandate and Scope Whois began as a look-up service to enable Internet operators to find one another and communicate directly if abnor- malities in traffic occur between servers. (ICANN Annual Report ‘09) 4 ICANN commits to enforcing its existing policy relating to WHOIS, subject to applicable laws. Such existing policy requires that ICANN implement measures to maintain timely, unrestricted and public access to accurate and complete WHOIS information, including registrant, technical, billing, and administrative contact information. One year from the effective date of this document and then no less frequently than every three years thereafter, ICANN will organize a review of WHOIS policy and its implementation to assess the extent to which WHOIS policy is effective and its implementation meets the legitimate needs of law enforcement and promotes consumer trust. (AoC 9.3.1)

Whois Data – Domain Meta Data 5 ID: D LROR Name: ICANN.ORG Created On: 14-Sep : 00: 00 UTC Last Updated On: 20-Jan : 16: 41 UTC Expiration Date: 07-Dec : 04: 26 UTC Sponsoring Registrar: GoDaddy.com, Inc. (R91-LROR) Status: CLIENT DELETE PROHIBITED, …, UPDATE PROHIBITED Name Server: NS.ICANN.ORG, …, D.IANA-SERVERS.NET DNSSEC: Signed DS: db22e956a451eb5ae8d2ec39526ca6a87b9 DS: b8ab67d895e62087f0c…c622aefae30dd7b1ea199

Whois Data – Registrant 6 ID: CR Name: Domain Administrator Organization: ICANN Street1: 4676 Admiralty Way #330 City: Marina del Rey State/Province: California Postal Code: Country: US Phone: FAX:

Whois Data – Admin 7 ID: CR Name: Domain Administrator Organization: ICANN Street1: 4676 Admiralty Way #330 City: Marina del Rey State/Province: California Postal Code: Country: US Phone: FAX: That’s not a natural person! It’s also used for Tech, …

Whois Data Flow 8  Resource owners register with their data  Registrars collect data and maintain accuracy  How about resellers (chains), (Sub-)LIRs?  Registries collect and publish to Whois services  Thick Whois approach  required by registry agreement and by RAA 1.13  Everybody can access Whois services  Bulk and wildcard access is limited

Local Law vs. Inter Net 9  Easy and wrong: Define Internet as a state  Correct: Find policies based on the needs of the Internet community with respect national and international law  Data privacy laws and law enforcement work geographically  Internet is defined and operated logically

Current review work 10  Defining basic phrases (first review)  law enforcement, applicable law, producers and maintainers, consumer  Describing use cases  Requirement analysis for Whois services  Detecting alternatives  LE can follow the delegation chain  Understanding usability  Communication in native languages

Law Enforcement 11  Law Enforcement shall be considered to be an entity authorized by a government and whose responsibilities include the maintenance, co-ordination, or enforcement of laws, multi-national treaty or government-imposed legal obligations.

Applicable Law 12  Includes any and all local and national laws that regulate and/or control the collection, use, access, and disclosure of personally identifiable information. It may also include other relevant legal obligations, including U.N. Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the U.N. Guidelines for the Regulation of Computerized Personal Data Files.

Producers and Maintainers 13  Producers are individuals or organizations supplying contact data for inclusion into WHOIS data.  Data Controllers are Individuals or organizations that define the data to be collected, require its release, and govern its use.  Data Processors are Individuals or organizations engaged in the collection, storage, and release of data, according to the terms defined by the Data Controller.

Consumer 14  All Internet users including natural persons, commercial and non-commercial entities, government and academic entities.  Any consumer that acts as a Producer of WHOIS data, Maintainer of WHOIS data and provider of WHOIS Service, or User of WHOIS data.

Other ICANN Work 15  Study on Misuse of public Whois (GNSO)  Whois service requirements project (Staff)  Whois accuracy, proxy services, escrow progress reports (GNSO)  Proxy-privacy study (NOR)  Whois misuse for harmful purposes (Staff)  Registrant representation in Whois (Staff)

Other ICANN Work 16  RAA Amendments Work Team report (GNSO)  significant changes to WHOIS requirement  Contribution from Intellectual Property Constituency and Law Enforcement  Whois records in more languages and scripts  SSAC/GNSO on IDN TLDs implications to Whois  Whois Data Problem Reporting Service  Relicensing InterNic™ from DoC  WDPRS improvement iterations

Real world reality 17  “Fake” data in Whois  Privacy and proxy services to restrict access  Rough ISPs register to themselves  Compliance with dispute resolutions?  Registry points to registrar points to …  Thin Whois: Multiple queries, but no copied data  Local law of the registrar defines data handled  Required by RAA for accredited registrars  No access to Whois data  Web access with captchas, offline communication

ICANN power on Whois 18  AoC … policy requires that ICANN implement measures to maintain … access to WHOIS …  ICANN policy (influenced by the review)  Could propose a new approach to Whois  Could promote technical changes to Whois  Will influence other policy making groups  RIRs, ccTLDs

Outreach activities 19  Fulfill transparency requirements  http: //community.icann.org/dispay/whoisreview http: //community.icann.org/dispay/whoisreview  Archived mailing list:  Meetings/confcalls with remote participation  Deliverables & calendar  Call for comments till April, 17 th 2011  Direct consultation at ICANN Meetings  Sessions with each AC, SO, UC (at ICANN40)  Web based questionnaire (work in progress)  http: //whois-rt4-survey.iks-jena.de/ http: //whois-rt4-survey.iks-jena.de/

Community input 20  Tell us your needs and problems  Highlight issues which are important  Identify any key documents to consider  Tell us best practices in your community

21 Request for Input Direct Public forum, Wednesday 11 am-12 noon ELIZABETHAN A-C Tell us your needs and concerns We are listening right now Formal http: // announcement-04mar11-en.htm http: // announcement-04mar11-en.htm March, 4 th - April, 17 th 2011