Raising the Profile of Indonesian Universities through Research Andy Teo, Account Manager Elsevier Science & Technology

2

3 The Research Landscape  Crossing of national boundaries  Highly mobile researchers, ideas & technologies  Need for prestige » Quality assessment & ranking systems drives global engagement / competition » Stem brain drain in public universities & attract full fee paying students in private universities  Public & private pressures on research investment

4 What drives research?  Competition  Who leads, who follows?  Scramble for scarce resources e.g. first to publish, funding, PhD students, successful patents, spin-off enterprises  Collaboration  Research networks & clusters in multidisciplinary areas to solve complex problems  Aided by instant global communications, data transfer, rapid exchange & critique, & highly interactive

5 What drives research?  Regulation  Governments, quality agencies, funding councils  Need for accountability, ethics  Innovation  Moving research ideas into Innovation  Technology transfer – new products or improve on existing  To tackle big questions – climate change, environmental sustainability, poverty. Or else why invest public money?  Outcomes to focus on economic & cultural development, social betterment

6 We have a problem…  Common issue faced by governments, policy makers & senior administrators: There are too many similar universities, employing similar people with similar backgrounds, coming up with similar ideas, producing similar things & similar quality.

7 Raising profile of Indonesian University Research  How?  Medium of Communication = Primarily Scientific Journals  To increase prominence:  Internationalize local Indonesian Journals  Publish more in International Journals

Internationalization of Indonesian Journals For a local Journal to be successful, it cannot be too local.

9 Internationalize Local Indonesian Journals  Improve Quality of Local Journals  Partner Regional or International journals  Invite Scientists as Contributing Authors or Editorial Board members **  Raise Author’s ability to publish  Incentives, Awards & Workshops  Tools for Research Excellence & Productivity **  Electronic platforms  Visibility to Global Audience e.g. Google, Open Source platforms, Scopus etc **

10 Partner Regional or International journals

11 NO STRANGER TO ACADEMIC RESEARCH ** Solicit and manage submissions Manage peer review Production Publish and disseminate Edit and prepare Archive and promote Hundreds of new editors per year new journals per year Article submissions ： 500, ,000 referees 1 million referee reports per year 7,000 editors 70,000 editorial board members 6.5 million author/publisher communications per year 300,000 new articles produced per year 180 years of back issues scanned, processed and data-tagged 20 million researchers 6,000+ institutions 180+ countries 240 million+ downloads per year 2.5 million print pages per year 2,000+ journals 9 million articles 40-90% of articles rejected Organize editorial boards Launch new specialist journals

12 Raise Author’s ability to publish: Incentives, Awards & Workshops

13 26% Others Share of Journal Articles Published Over one million English language research articles published globally each year Our Scientific Disciplines 300,000 English language research articles published with Elsevier today Largest Collection of electronic Scientific information ** Elsevier Springer Wiley-Blackwell ACS Taylor & Francis Wolters Kluwer AIP IEEE APS IOP Others Life sciences Materials Science & Engineering Chemistry & Chemical Engineering Physics Maths & computer science Social Sciences Earth Sciences Environmental Sciences Health sciences 26% Research Support Tools

14 Electronic platforms

15 Focusedwebinformation Academiclibrarysources 16,700+ titles Repositories STM & Social Social sciences sciences SCOPUS What is Scopus? Largest Citations and Abstract database – 16,700+ sources from 4,000 publishers Comprehensive Scientific, Technical, Medical and Social Sciences coverage. Arts & Humanities Quality Web Sources – Institutional Repositories Patent searching from 5 major patent offices Citations Analysis of your researchers, institution, journal, research area

16 Physical Sc. Chemistry Physics Engineering … Health Sc. (100% Medline) Nursing Dentistry … Life Sciences Neurosc. Pharmacol. Biology … Social Sc. Psychology Economics Business … 16,70016,700 Breadth of coverage - Across subject areas Scopus balanced in terms of subject areas De Moya (Scientometrics 2007): “The coverage provided by Scopus is balanced in terms of subject areas when compared with Ulrich’s core” 32%32%20%20%31%31%17%17%

Breadth of Coverage across geographical regions

18

19

20

21 Content & Selection Advisory Board (CSAB)  Board comprises about 30 scientists & subject specialists around the world  External & Independent to work with Scopus Team for:  Product enhancements  Recommendations influencing overall direction of Scopus  Content growth strategy to ensure Scopus stays international, current & relevant

22

Future Directions and Next Steps Productivity Tools for Growth and Development

24 A Complete Picture Of An Institution’s Research Strengths Size of the bubble reflects the size of the output in each cluster Position within the circle indicates the interdisciplinary mix Each bubble represents a group of clusters wherein your institution has a distinctive competency

25 Showing Discipline Growth And Your Relative Position Relative article share reflects your institution's position vis-à-vis the biggest competitor Market growth indicates if distinctive competency has higher or lower than average market growth In these research disciplines, which are growing faster than the other disciplines, your institutions holds the number 1 position. Relative Article Share Relative Growth Rate

26 Identifying Top Researchers In Growing Disciplines Top researchers within this discipline who can strengthen your relative position DC 85

27 Next Steps… Navigation of global scientific information Covers > 16,700 journals, including APAC sources > 4,000 publishers Primary Source full text articles Over 9 million full-text articles More than 2,000 journals

28 Research Output Comparison

29 Malaysia Research Output Source: Malaysia ScienceDirect Consortium formed in 2002

30 Thailand ScienceDirect Consortium formed in 2002 Thailand Research Output

Contact Details: Andy Teo Account Manager Elsevier Science & Technology tel: Terima Kasih!

32  Countries ranked by published output in 2007 THE NEW WEALTH OF NATIONS?  US  China  UK  Ger- many  Japan  France  Cana- da  Italy  Spain  India  Aus- tralia  Korea  Nether- lands  Russia  Brazil  Taiwan  Swit- zerland  Swe- den  Poland  Bel- gium  1997 Published Output  2007 Published Output UK: 109,000 Docs Output growth: 35% USA: 344,000 Docs Output growth:10% Australia: 39,000 Docs Output growth: 76%

33  UK  Ger- many  Nether- lands  Sweden  Swit- zerland  France  Canada  US  Italy  China  Korea  Brazil  Taiwan  India  Spain  Austra- lia  Poland  Belgium  Russia  Japan THE NEW WEALTH OF NATIONS?  Countries ranked by output growth (by %)

34 So how are we doing?

35  42 Age that researchers get their first grant from National Institute of Health  15% Approval rate for National Science Foundation research grants to new researchers  30% Time researchers spend working on grant applications 4215%30%

36 The Solution: Funding Intelligence Tool (FIT)  FIT provides three key benefits: 1. Comprehensive funding content : Stop worrying you’re missing out on opportunities 2. Targeted Recommendations : Find guidance on where to apply to 3. Funding Intelligence : Enabling performance measurement, benchmarking and strategic planning FIT enables universities to better compete and increase grant income

37 WHERE IS THE MONEY? Automated recommendations matched on pre-populated profiles (Scopus) “Pre-population of publication history [would be] a big winner with researchers – they hate doing it manually.” – Director Office of Sponsored Research Recommendations preview

38 IDENTIFYING NATIONAL STRENGTHS  Strengths – Top 40 Nations  Strengths – USA Source:Klavans & Boyack, “US vulnerabilities in science and engineering,” 10th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, Vienna, Austria, Sept , 2008

39 ANOTHER VIEW – ALL STRENGTHS Source:Klavans & Boyack, “US vulnerabilities in science and engineering,” 10th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, Vienna, Austria, Sept , 2008 US strengths (transparent) are overlaid here on the strengths (dark) from another 40 nations. The areas of strength from 40 nations that are visible, and are not underneath US strengths represent areas in which the US is vulnerable in science and engineering.

40 A&I / Paten ts Engineering Search Knowledge Discovery Suite Grant / A&I Multi- Discipline Multi- Discipline Map Performance Planning Suite Books / A&I Multi- Discipline Multi- Discipline Col- lab Tools Suite EVOLVING WITH OUR CUSTOMERS’ NEEDS  Third Party Assets  Elsevier’s Base Assets Books Biology Funding Journals Chemistry Collaboration A&I Physics Maps Grant Humanities Ontology  Format  Discipline  Tool