1. Discovery tools and research assessment solutions APRIL 2012 Shahrooz Sharifrazy Regional Sales Manager

2. Thomson Reuters: Supporting the entire academic enterprise

3. Over 50 Years Of Experience In Citation Indexing, Analysis, And Metrics In 1955, Dr. Eugene Garfield revolutionized research with his concept of citation indexing and searching, giving birth to the Science Citation Index ® Web of Science is the largest citation database with over 800 million cited references from 1900 to 2010 Thomson Reuters introduced the first ever research evaluation tool on the Web

4. Authority Diversity Depth & Consistency Quality Data Discovery Tools Web of Science – key benefits Evaluated authoritative content –Thomson Reuters specialists evaluate journals of 3300 publishers –Ongoing Independent and publisher-neutral evaluation of all types of journal Journals from commercial publishers Academic society journals Open Access journals Electronic only journals etc.

5. Truly Multidisciplinary –Journals are selected to provide coverage of all fields of scholarly research –11,800 journals in 249 subject categories –7,890 journals in the hard sciences –Social sciences – 2,690 journals –Arts & humanities –1,470 journals –More than 12,000 conferences annually. –30 000 Books in the Book Citation Index –> 57 million unique records (largest citation database) Web of Science – key benefits Authority Diversity Depth & Consistency Quality Data Discovery Tools For up to date info see: http://wokinfo.com/realfacts/http://wokinfo.com/realfacts/

6. Cover to cover indexing of all Journals All cited references, back to 1900 ( > 700 million searchable cited references) Indexing of 100% of available cited references ( enables to perform analyses on literature that is not indexed) The largest citation database available Web of Science – key benefits Authority Diversity Depth & Consistency Quality Data Discovery Tools Science Citation Index 7,890 Titles SSCI 2,690 Titles Century of Science 1900 1956 A&HCI 1,470 Titles 1975 1945 Century of Social Sciences 1900 CPCI 1990

7. Thomson Reuters captures all formal Cited References for all records All author names captured, including the full name when available Authors are linked to addresses making the affiliation clear All addresses are captured Funding Acknowledgements are captured for easy identification of grant based research and commercial interests Web of Science – key benefits Funding Acknowledgements are not available on the full archive. Authority Diversity Depth & Consistency Quality Data Discovery Tools

8. Web of Science – key benefits Searching and navigation via citations to discover unique research and evaluate the impact of research Visualization & reporting tools help identify trends and generate reports Analyze & Refine tools, Citation Report, Citation Map EndNote Web, ResearcherID Authority Diversity Depth & Consistency Quality Data Tool for Discovery & Analyzing

9. 2004 Cited References 1974 1998 2000 1993 2003 Times Cited Related Records 2008 1999 2002 2000 2009 The Citation index, a discovery tool Search Navigate Discover Assess Search Navigate Discover Assess

10. Search the Web of Science Citations links to discover publications

11. Funding information

12. Analyze results for detailed analysis such as collaborator identification Analysis Tools Instant Citation Reports to easily evaluate impcat and identify research trends Visualize citations using the Citation Map. Identify trends and track research pathways

13. ©2009 Thomson Reuters Save time, using Web of Knowledge personal profiles Combine and build complex searches. Save your searches and create unlimited number of alerts (RSS/email) for automated current awarness Combine and build complex searches. Save your searches and create unlimited number of alerts (RSS/email) for automated current awarness

14. Journals Web of Science Proceedings Bibliometric Tools Journal Citation Reports Incites Custom analytics

15. 15  How can we demonstrate return on investment for our research activities? What are our centers of excellence?  How does our research performance compare to our peer institutions? What are the trends?  How can we identify and promote outstanding or up-and- coming researchers?  How can we minimize burden on faculty for capturing data for promotion and review?  How can we promote our research accomplishments and encourage research collaborations?  How can we streamline regular reporting tasks? (e.g. CVs, annual review, accreditation, and grant biosketches) Key questions

16. Custom Data, Reports, Analysis & Interpretation Analytic & Benchmarking Tools Enterprise Information Management Systems You set the parameters and we deliver raw data or a finished report tailored to your requirements Regularly monitor activities and trends in a web-based environment you can access from anywhere A hosted system that integrates data with an analytic interface for reporting activities Populate an internal system with high quality, reliable data Get expert analysis and interpretation to answer a specific question or set of questions Pinpoint influential and emerging researchers and monitor collaboration Benchmark your institution against others worldwide Examine measures on more than 30 indicators including reputation, funding, publications, staff and students Supports annual review, faculty expertise search, administrative and strategic reporting. Provide faculty with a one- stop resource for collecting and reporting on scholarly activities THOMSON REUTERS RESEARCH ANALYTICS SOLUTIONS 16 Providing a continuum of products, tools, and services for performance evaluation, research management and decision support across your entire organization. Custom solutions Incites Research In View

17. ©2009 Thomson Reuters  US National Science Foundation Science & Engineering Indicators  European Commission : European Union Science & Technology Indicators  Also used by government entities in France, Australia, Italy, Japan, UK, Portugal, Norway, Spain, Belgium, South Korea, Canada, and more, to shape higher education policy.  Times Higher Education World University Rankings ”powered by Thomson Reuters”  Agence d’évaluation de la recherche et de l’enseignement Research Analytics The Thomson Reuters Data Foundation Thomson Reuters’ publication and citation metrics are an important piece of many published research assessments throughout the world.

18. 18 1. 31 InCites is a web-based research evaluation tool designed to track trends on the field, country, and institution level, to enable detailed bibliometric analysis and reporting on the publications important to you.

19. All metrics and analyses can be performed on any subset of the data An entire institution One researcher Group of researchers (e.g. a department) Field of research within your institution Topic of research within your institution A collaboration partnership within your institution Funding 19

20. Contextualization of citation counts, benchmarking Small number of Publications/Citations, but strong impact Discover influential, emerging researchers & trends Small number of Publications/Citations, but strong impact Discover influential, emerging researchers & trends Identify areas for growth and investment Research Performance Profiles 1

21. Multiple indicators = Multiple angles Multiple answers to multiple very specific Key questions Our indicators are transparent, simple, reproducible, powerful. Research Performance Profiles 1

22. Who are our most productive and influential researchers? You can generate a summary of all metrics related to one researcher papers, or any other group of publications. Metrics such as the self citation levels and the collaborations give us a very granular insight into someone’s publications Research Performance Profiles 1

23. 23 Which collaboration is leading to research with the greatest impact? Research Performance Profiles 1

24. In which field are we publishing the most? In which field do we have the strongest average impact? In which field(s) are we better than our peers? In which field are we publishing the most? In which field do we have the strongest average impact? In which field(s) are we better than our peers? How can we identify our strengths and weaknesses in different disciplines? « Peers » = researchers/institutions/countries publishing the same type of documents, at the same time, and in the same field

25. Where is our research funding coming from? Are these funding generating good impact?

26. The big picture. International comparisons Countries and Institutions can be compared across multiple sets of subject categories Global Comparisons 2

27. Compare any country/region in any subject category across the past 30 years 2

28. Global Comparisons Compare particular research areas for different international universities Multiple indicators and graphical representations Multiple angles 2

29. Institutional Profiles A dynamic web-based resource presenting portraits of over 560 world’s leading academic institutions Robust, quality data about all aspects of Higher Education for evidence based decisions making 3

30. Create research footprints to profile, compare and trend institutions across multiple indicators Institutional Profiles 3 Faculty size, reputation, funding, citation measures and more

31. More than just publication/citation information Combinations of bibliometric and institutional data can create new and unique indicators. More Indicators. More Comparisons. More Comprehension. Combinations of bibliometric and institutional data can create new and unique indicators. More Indicators. More Comparisons. More Comprehension. Institutional Profiles 3

32. Thank you