AutoCal Proposal, Take Two James Wnorowski 6.UAT Proposal Revision

Objectives of the Proposal Describe the current state of PIM software Describe the current state of PIM software Show the need for a program like AutoCal Show the need for a program like AutoCal Convince the reader that AutoCal is the right tool to use Convince the reader that AutoCal is the right tool to use

AutoCal Proposal Pros Describes the project well Describes the project well Conveys the relevant information Conveys the relevant information Makes an argument for why the program is useful / important Makes an argument for why the program is useful / important

AutoCal Proposal Cons Poor Organization Poor Organization Unprofessional Writing Style Unprofessional Writing Style Excessive Verbiage Excessive Verbiage

Prior Work Brief background on previous software programs Brief background on previous software programs Talk about current PIMs Talk about current PIMs Update on Garfinkel’s Work Update on Garfinkel’s Work

The Rest of AutoCal Revised Background split between Intro and Prior Work Background split between Intro and Prior Work Intro sets motivation Intro sets motivation Prior Work tells the history Prior Work tells the history