CSC Online and Offline DQA Status Ken Johns, Venkat Kaushik, Xiaowen Lei (U. Arizona)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RPC & LVL1 Mu Barrel Online Monitoring during LS1 M. Della Pietra.
Advertisements

GNAM and OHP: Monitoring Tools for the ATLAS Experiment at LHC GNAM and OHP: Monitoring Tools for the ATLAS Experiment at LHC M. Della Pietra, P. Adragna,
Jet and MET HLT Monitoring for HI Running Ken Johns, Sam Silva, Venkat Kaushik, (U. Arizona)
CSC DQA Status Ken Johns, Venkat Kaushik, Caleb Lampen, Xiaowen Lei (U. Arizona)
11 CSC DQA Status Ken Johns, Venkat Kaushik, Caleb Lampen, Xiaowen Lei (U. Arizona)
CSC Offline DQA History Plots Josh Smith, Fionnbarr O’Grady (U. Arizona)
CSC DQA and Commissioning Summary  We are responsible for the online and offline DQA for the CSC system, a US ATLAS responsibility  We are ready for.
1 Online Jet Slice DQA Ken Johns, Venkat Kaushik, Xiaowen Lei University of Arizona.
Update on Pileup Ken Johns, Venkat Kaushik, Xiaowen Lei, Mario Aletti (U. Arizona)
1 Jet and MET Slice DQA Ken Johns, Venkat Kaushik University of Arizona Lucian Ancu University of Bern.
Update from UAZ Xiaowen Lei, Ken Johns, Venkat Kaushik, Mario Aletti (U. Arizona)
CSC DQA for Last Week Ken Johns, Venkat Kaushik, Xiaowen Lei University of Arizona.
CSC Online and Offline DQA Status Ken Johns, Venkat Kaushik, Xiaowen Lei (U. Arizona)
First year experience with the ATLAS online monitoring framework Alina Corso-Radu University of California Irvine on behalf of ATLAS TDAQ Collaboration.
O FFLINE T RIGGER M ONITORING TDAQ Training 30 July 2010 On behalf of the Trigger Offline Monitoring Experts team.
Data Quality Monitoring of the CMS Tracker
Offline Tracker DQM Shift Tutorial. 29/19/20152 Tracker Shifts Overview Online Shifts at P5 (3/day for 24 hours coverage) – One Pixel shifter and one.
Greg Sullivan University of Maryland Data Filtering and Software IceCube Collaboration Meeting Monday, March 21, 2005.
2nd September Richard Hawkings / Paul Laycock Conditions data handling in FDR2c  Tag hierarchies set up (largely by Paul) and communicated in advance.
Databases E. Leonardi, P. Valente. Conditions DB Conditions=Dynamic parameters non-event time-varying Conditions database (CondDB) General definition:
CAF shifts and procedures Marcello, Raffaello, Alberto, Pigi, Sungeun, David, Silvia, Anna & all the 2009 shifters.
Release Management Configuration management. Release Management Goal Coordinate the processes through the project development life cycle Ensure the.
Gnam Monitoring Overview M. Della Pietra, D. della Volpe (Napoli), A. Di Girolamo (Roma1), R. Ferrari, G. Gaudio, W. Vandelli (Pavia) D. Salvatore, P.
TAU entered in various places. Manpower – Yan Benhammou++ (N. Guttman, N. Hod, E. Reinherz, A. Kreizel). Working on online Monitoring of TGC. Looking at.
DQM status report Y. Foka (GSI) Offline week from pp to PbPb.
Part I – Shifter Duties Part II – ACR environment Part III – Run Control & DAQ Part IV – Beam Part V – DCS Part VI – Data Quality Monitoring Part VII.
September 2007CHEP 07 Conference 1 A software framework for Data Quality Monitoring in ATLAS S.Kolos, A.Corso-Radu University of California, Irvine, M.Hauschild.
Latest News & Other Issues Ricardo Goncalo (LIP), David Miller (Chicago) Jet Trigger Signature Group Meeting 9/2/2015.
February 07, 2002 Online Monitoring Meeting Detector Examines Should aid in: 1.Diagnosing problems early and getting it fixed 2.Making decisions on the.
Online System Status LHCb Week Beat Jost / Cern 9 June 2015.
N. Hod, Y. Benhammou, O. Ben-Ami, Y. Silver, L. Levinson D. Lellouch O. Silbert TGC ONLINE Monitoring.
Online (GNAM) and offline (Express Stream and Tier0) monitoring produced results during cosmic/collision runs (Oct-Dec 2009) Shifter and expert level monitoring.
1 Checks on SDD Data Piergiorgio Cerello, Francesco Prino, Melinda Siciliano.
Pixel DQM Status R.Casagrande, P.Merkel, J.Zablocki (Purdue University) D.Duggan, D.Hidas, K.Rose (Rutgers University) L.Wehrli (ETH Zuerich) A.York (University.
IceCube Offline Database Overview Georges Kohnen Université de Mons-Hainaut
Prompt Calibration Loop 11 February Overview Prompt calibration loop in SCT –Provides ATLAS with conditions data used for the bulk reconstruction.
Zhen YAN, Muon Offline DQ meeting, 05/10/2015 Signed off runs(express stream) since last Friday meeting Default defects:  MS_RPC_BA_ROD_PROBLEM_1  MS_RPC_BC_ROD_PROBLEM_1.
1 CTP offline software status (Offline week,8/4/08) R.Lietava for CTP group.
Physics selection: online changes & QA M Floris, JF Grosse-Oetringhaus Weekly offline meeting 30/01/
Online Consumers produce histograms (from a limited sample of events) which provide information about the status of the different sub-detectors. The DQM.
Online DQ Segments and Triggers John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech.
14 th IEEE-NPSS Real Time Stockholm - June 9 th 2005 P. F. Zema The GNAM monitoring system and the OHP histogram presenter for ATLAS 14 th IEEE-NPSS Real.
ID Week 13 th of October 2014 Per Johansson Sheffield University.
TGC On-Line Monitoring Status for 1 beam Before LHC Startup on TomBox: A single machine (pc-tgc-mon-rod-01) receives all TGC events.
ATLAS The ConditionDB is accessed by the offline reconstruction framework (ATHENA). COOLCOnditions Objects for LHC The interface is provided by COOL (COnditions.
Muon Detectors Tile Calorimeter Liquid Argon Calorimeter Solenoid Magnet Toroid Magnets 46m 22m SemiConductor Tracker(SCT) Pixel Detector Transition Radiation.
M. Caprini IFIN-HH Bucharest DAQ Control and Monitoring - A Software Component Model.
MET Slice Monitoring Xiaowen Lei, Venkat Kaushik Ken Johns.
TRTViewer: the ATLAS TRT detector monitoring and diagnostics tool 4 th Workshop on Advanced Transition Radiation Detectors for Accelerator and Space Applications.
LIGO-G E S2/S3 Data Quality Flagging John G. Zweizig LIGO/Caltech.
TDAQ status and plans for 2008 Carlos Solans TileCal Valencia meeting 17th December 2007.
L1Calo Databases ● Overview ● Trigger Configuration DB ● L1Calo OKS Database ● L1Calo COOL Database ● ACE Murrough Landon 16 June 2008.
Online Software Status ● Overview ● Recent Changes ● Required Changes ● Desirable Changes ● Upgrade ● Summary Murrough Landon 1 July 2009.
L1Calo Databases ● Overview ● Recent Activitity ● To Do List ● Run types Murrough Landon 4 June 2007.
TGC online DQ GNAM + RODSampler status 11/09/2009 GNAMs + ROD sampler: 6/6 GNAM segments running. 1 RODSampler application running. 1/6 GNAM segment (efficiencies.
ATLAS Tile Calorimeter Data Quality Assessment and Performance
TGC L1 Trigger On-Line Monitoring Tel Aviv University:
RPC DQA 2012 Status and prospective
Risultati del run di integrazione M4
Pixel DQM Status & Plans
Online Software Status
Online Software Status
Online Software Status
Remaining Online SW Tasks
Data Quality Monitoring of the CMS Silicon Strip Tracker Detector
HLT Jet and MET DQA Summary
CMS Pixel Data Quality Monitoring
Searches for Exotic Physics using Top Quarks
ورود اطلاعات بصورت غيربرخط
Weekend Summary Friday Saturday Sunday C. Gemme, INFN Genova,
Presentation transcript:

CSC Online and Offline DQA Status Ken Johns, Venkat Kaushik, Xiaowen Lei (U. Arizona)

CSC ROD Status  New version of ROD firmware/software is presently being tested on ROD test stand  CSC is running parasitically with ATLAS using CTP triggers Gnam histograms are produced Express stream histograms and DQM must be produced by hand 2

CSC Online DQA  Issues Some online (GNAM) histogram changes did not get propagated to current version In theory, OHP, DQMF, DQ flag storage are in good shape but still lack daily exercise with ATLAS partition before signoff Documentation for shifters exists Calibration Stream GNAM monitoring in progress though probably not implemented until late January  Results from beam-beam collisions 3

CSC Offline DQA  Issues Splitting of the MuonDetector configuration resulted in the CSC folder disappearing in DQ Web Browser  It was there previously  Still trying to get experts to respond In theory, HAN, DQMF, DQ flag storage are in good shape but still lack daily exercise with ATLAS partition before signoff  Results from beam-gas collisions 4

CSC Offline DQM  CSC overview 5

CSC Offline DQM  CSC timing Beam moving from A side to C side 6

CSC Offline DQM  CSC cluster monitoring 7

CSC Offline DQM  CSC RDO monitoring 8

CSC Offline DQM  CSC RDO monitoring 9

CSC Offline DQM  CSC RDO monitoring 10

Conclusions 11