Trace Metal Analysis of Sediments in the Park River Watershed, Hartford, CT Jonathan Gourley and Victoria Doñé Environmental Science Program Trinity College,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Trace metal dispersal in the south branch of the Park River watershed and its possible impact on Connecticut River sediments, Hartford, CT Victoria Doñé.
Advertisements

Heavy Metal Concentrations in Tyler Run Creek Water and Sediment Olivia Yaple and Sara Wing.
Fecal Colform Bacteria Contamination during Rain Events in Sayler’s Creek, Virginia Blake N. Robertson Senior Honors Research Under the Supervision of.
2009 Water Quality Monitoring Report – Fish Creek Vaughn Hauser, B.Sc. Naomi Parker, B.Sc., BIT, CEPIT.
Geological Society of America 2010, Denver Session No. 262-Booth #228 Abstract The Park River is an urban river that flows through greater Hartford, into.
Environmental Monitoring & Protection Unit
Groundwater Flow Model of the Southern Willamette Valley Groundwater Management Area Jeremy Craner and Roy Haggerty Department of Geosciences.
Stormwater Management For Developing Municipalities What Residents Can Do What Towns Can Do.
Rain Gardens at Vassar College: A Water Quality Assessment Emily Vail Collins Research Fellow Vassar College Environmental Research Institute Community.
Texas Stream Team …is a joint partnership with Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, U.S. EPA Region VI, Texas State University-San Marcos, and numerous.
Prairie View A&M University HBCU/MI Environmental Technology Consortium Hylton G. McWhinney, Ph.D. Principal Investigator John R. Williams, Ph.D. Steering.
Heavy Metal Concentrations in Urban Runoff Las Vegas, NM  By Bruceline Fru  & Dr. Edward Martinez.
Impact of Mine Drainage and Distribution of Heavy Metal Contamination in the James Creek Watershed Laura Harrington, Duke University Joe Ryan and Ned Turner,
Land Use and Water Quality in the Hudson River Amy Gao GIS in Water Resources November 16, 2010.
Abandoned Mines: Effects on stream water geochemistry Fall, 2003 Serena NW Hollmeyer.
Lecture ERS 482/682 (Fall 2002) Why watersheds? ERS 482/682 Small Watershed Hydrology.
Determination of Dominant Trace Metal Sequestration Processes in Two Vertical Flow Bioreactors Using Modified Tessier Extractions J.A. LaBar and R.W. Nairn.
Effects of copper on marine invertebrate larvae in surface water from San Diego Bay, CA Gunther Rosen 1, Ignacio Rivera-Duarte 1, Lora Kear-Padilla 2,
Nutrient and Sediment Concentrations, Yields and Loads in Impaired Streams and Rivers in the Taunton River Basin, Massachusetts, Jeffrey R. Barbaro.
Next The water that falls on the Chesapeake Bay watershed drains to local streams and rivers and then flows to the Chesapeake.
Item No. 13 Recommendation to the State Water Resources Control Board Regarding the Section 303(d) List Lahontan Water Board June 19, 2014 Carly Nilson.
Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometry (ICP-OES) Figure 1. The Varian Vista-PRO CCD Simultaneous ICP-OES in the Physical Geography laboratories.
No Baptisms In This Jordan Heavy Metal Concentrations In Jordan Creek Sediments by Mary Mantei.
Technical Track Work Group Report Out August xx, 2012.
IMPACTS OF LAND DEVELOPMENT ON OREGON’S WATERS 2001 This slide show was borrowed from the internet but we added our own research when we presented it.
Surface coal mining impacts on concentration-discharge relationships: Identifying spatial and temporal changes in the New River, TN Jenny Murphy Vanderbilt.
Water and sediment fluxes in transboundary Selenga river basin
Impacts of Land Development on Oregon’s Waters 2001.
Retention Ponds as a Filtering Mechanism for Runoff Water Kurt Lane Department of Biological Sciences, York College of Pennsylvania Introduction Retention.
New Stormwater Regulations “C.3” Provisions in effect Feb. 15, 2005.
1 Small Tributaries Loading Study #2: Zone 4 Line A, Cabot Blvd. Hayward Year 1 – Draft FINAL report Lester McKee and Alicia Gilbreath Sources Pathways.
Debra Harrington FDEP Groundwater Protection Watershed Monitoring Meeting August, 2004 INTEGRATING GROUND WATER INTO WATERSHED MANAGEMENT and BASIN ASSESSMENTS.
Significance Caffeine and ibuprofen may negatively affect plant growth.  Caffeine and ibuprofen generally exist at concentrations below 1 ppm in surface.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Leetown Science Center Research in the Shenandoah Valley Presented to the Shenandoah Valley Natural.
Seifu A Tilahun School of Civil & Water Resources Engineering,BDU Storm Runoff and soil erosion processes on the Ethiopian highland.
COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING OF CONTAMINATED SOILS Metodi Mladenov, Daria Ilieva University of Chemical Technology.
BIONAD 18 Month Meeting July 7th, 2015, Inescop Premises, Elda (E) LIFE12 ENV/IT/352 Determination of trace elements in traditional dyes, naturalized dyes.
COUNTRY REPORT : RISK ASSESSMENT AND MONITORING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICALS PRESENTER : TRAN THI THU DUNG ENVIRONMENTAL DEPARTMENT OF HYDROMETEOROLOGICAL.
Technical Track Work Group Report Out August 22, 2012.
Assessment of Runoff, Sediment Yield and Nutrient Load on Watershed Using Watershed Modeling Mohammad Sholichin Mohammad Sholichin 1) Faridah Othman 2)
Timeline Impaired for turbidity on Minnesota’s list of impaired waters (2004) MPCA must complete a study to determine the total maximum daily load (TMDL)
Watershed Monitoring and Modeling in Switzer, Chollas, and Paleta Creek Watersheds Kenneth Schiff Southern California Coastal Water Research Project
Warm-Up  What is it called when water enters the ground?  What do you think affects the rate at which water soaks into the soil? What type of soil do.
Poplar River Sediment Source Assessment John L. Nieber Bruce N. Wilson Department of Bioproducts and Biosystems Engineering University of Minnesota July.
Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for low gradient streams) for species richness, composition and pollution tolerance, as well as a composite benthic macroinvertebrate.
Beach Contamination Source Identification Techniques: Physical Characteristics of the Beach and Surrounding Watershed Door County Soil and Water Conservation.
Seasonal variation in surface- groundwater exchanges in an urban floodplain with active gravel-bar formation Dorothea Lundberg Karen Prestegaard University.
Metal Sorption Properties The binding behavior of Zn, Cu, and Pb relates to the surface complexation constant, K int. Dzombak and Morel, 1990 Assessment.
Water Pollution.
Stormflow Nutrient Concentrations in Coastal Streams Tributary to the Santa Barbara Channel, California: A Common Urban Response Al Leydecker, Tim Robinson.
Findings Is the City of Oberlin a source or a sink for pollutants? Water quality in Plum Creek as a function of urban land cover Jonathan Cummings, Tami.
Methylmercury Production in Groundwater Watershed Hg Research Program at SERC Deposition Transport Watershed retention Methylation MDN site MD00 Stream.
Stormwater Management William Taylor New Hampshire Wastewater Control Association June 13, 2013.
Water quality sensors provide insight into the suspended solids dynamics during high flow events in the Lamprey River, NH Nicholas K. Shonka and William.
Sources of Bacteria and their Variability in Urban Watersheds Robert Pitt Cudworth Professor Urban Water Systems Department of Civil, Construction, and.
North Creek Water Quality Prepared by Jon Rogers and Carie McCoy.
How much water will be available in the upper Colorado River Basin under projected climatic changes? Abstract The upper Colorado River Basin (UCRB), is.
Water Quality Indicators and Monitoring Design to Support the Albemarle-Pamlico National Estuary Program: A Progress Report Dean E. Carpenter and William.
Abstract Man-made dams influence more than just the flow of water in a river. The build up of sediments and organic matter, increased residence times,
Johnathan Bolton, Anpeng He, Ning Zhang (Ph.D.) Department of Engineering McNeese State University ULS Academic Summit April 12-13, 2013 DISCHARGE SOURCE.
Effects of Stream Restoration: A Comparative Study of Pine Run in Felton, Pennsylvania Luke Mummert, Department of Biological Sciences, York College of.
Acid Mine Drainage : Metals in Water and Sediment Upper Lefthand Creek, Northwestern Boulder County 2003 REU Program – August 7, 2003 Roshan Cholas, University.
Integrated Watershed Management
Kacey Myers Senior undergraduate student Department of Animal Science
Distribution of Heavy Metals in Sediment and Water from Coast Batam, Riau Islands, Indonesia 1, 2Ismarti & 3Suheryanto 1International Institute of.
Olga Ogburn Background
No Baptisms In This Jordan
Estimation of Loadings for Nonpoint Sources and Stormwater
Airborne Contaminants from Mining Operations In Arizona
Presentation transcript:

Trace Metal Analysis of Sediments in the Park River Watershed, Hartford, CT Jonathan Gourley and Victoria Doñé Environmental Science Program Trinity College, Hartford CT

Acknowledgements Trinity College’s Faculty Research Grant program Trinity College undergraduate research students and faculty Mary Rickel Pelletier – Park River Watershed Revitalization Initiative Photos by Kelsey Semrod

Regional basins with EPA designated impaired reaches Park River Watershed Hartford

24 of the 69 causes of impairment in the Lower Connecticut are listed as “CAUSE UNKOWN” 35% 27.5% Of the approved TMDL studies for watershed- 76% are for E. Coli Data from US EPA Section 303(d) List Fact Sheet for Lower Connecticut Watershed

What role do toxic trace metals play in the impairment of the Park River Watershed?

Engage undergraduate students in long term research projects

T

1) Determine concentration of toxic trace metals in the Park River sediment Watershed wide survey Use Inductively Couple Plasma – Optical Emission Spectroscopy (ICP-OES) to analyze sediment samples using weak-acid digestion following method of Giddings et al. (2000)

2) Identify local problem point sources Photo by Nathan Sell

3) Compare sediment data to macroinvertebrate data

4) Model downstream transport of toxic metals Channelization and impervious runoff creates “flashy” storm events What is the sediment’s “memory” of toxic trace metals? What is the impact of contaminated Park River sediments on the Lower Connecticut watershed? Photo by Nathan Sell

Hartford, CT 1864

North Branch South Branch

Photo by Nathan Sell

19 % 28% Park River Watershed Impervious Surfaces

Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection Leachate point source discharges

Which toxic trace metals are found in high concentration in the Park River sediments? Impervious runoff, point source discharges from metal finishing industry Use Right To Know Network (RTK) to identify toxic metal discharges directly in to the River Pb, Zn, Cu, Cd Established baseline concentrations in North Branch sediments

Sediment sample locations for trace metal analysis

upstreamdownstream SQG Range = 270 – 820 ppm PEC = 459 ppm

PEC = 149 ppm upstreamdownstream

Range 3-10 ppm PEC = 4.9 ppm upstream SQG Range = 3-10 ppm

Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection Leachate point source discharges

Good Poor

Moving forward Determine availability of metals to biota – conduct acid-volatile sulfide (AVS) study Understand temporal variations in concentration; sediment memory Determine toxic metal contribution of Park River to Lower CT watershed Determine concentration of metals in water samples

FLOW

Contoured concentrations of Pb in sediments (ppm)

Conclusions Significant difference in trace metal concentrations between north and south branch of the Park River Significant difference in macroinvertebrate population of north and south branch Indentified sampling locations with high trace metal concentrations that are good candidates for detailed contaminant plume analysis

Thank You! Photo by Nathan Sell